13 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jason A Clark's avatar

Diamond and Silk might have a point. Even though a lot of us are still unvaccinated how long will it take for many of those people to become "infected" from blood transfusions and such?

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I put a clause in my advance directive (which is usually for end of life stuff) that if I were temporarily disabled that I did not want any vaxes or vaxxed blood.

At least if I state it, someone has to read it, and I could sue if they do it anyway. Perhaps 🤔

Expand full comment
Jason A Clark's avatar

It would be an interesting case. But I don't think they even know if the blood is vaxxed so they'd probably not give you any. I'm just guessing.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Refusing blood might be a nail in the coffin, but vaxxed blood might be too. Gee, they might have to work on my behalf to find some clean blood.

Expand full comment
Truthseeker's avatar

i think she was referring to/implying a ‘self spreading vaccine’, … ‘self disseminating vaccine’… which they absolutely already have in the pipeline.

There’s a question of if shedding from the vaxxed was a form of vaccinating the non vaxxed… there’s a lot we still don’t know

sounds like science fiction -but it’s all in the pipeline.

The controversial quest to make a 'contagious' vaccine

A new technology aims to stop wildlife from spreading Ebola, rabies, and other viruses. It could prevent the next pandemic by stopping pathogens from jumping from animals to people.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732410/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-1254-y

Expand full comment
Truthseeker's avatar

It’s like Bill gates genetically modified mosquitoes he’s released…

What could possibly go wrong with altering a whole ecosystem? 🤯

And these people claim to care about the environment- it’s laughable. They’re all hypocrites.

Expand full comment
L1's avatar

I am concerned that it truly is a spreading vaxx already. We need a way to test for mRNA in the unvaxed.

Expand full comment
Amy Wright's avatar

My sis-in-law had to have one and they didn't think of it (emergency situation) until later. Praying for her.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I’ll pray too! Hoping the spike is all used up on the donor. I really hope someone reliable does some research on donated blood.

Expand full comment
Amy Wright's avatar

Thank you! I hurt for the baby and the family in either Australia or New Zealand (can't recall which) that they had unvaccinated donors lined up for the baby's surgery, but the government took the baby away and gave the baby vaxxed blood. I think the baby passed away from after the baby had a successful surgery and the doctor later ordered an unnecessary transfusion... so sad.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

You're getting the 2 stories mixed up.

The Washington state baby, Baby Alex, was born with a 95% repairable heart defect. After a successful surgery, he was given vaxxed blood, despite the parents having unvaxxed blood donor ready. Baby Alex died from a blood clot that went from his knee to his heart. Now, there are 'no records found" for Baby Alex at the hospital that treated him.

The other baby, known as Baby W in NZ, was "kidnapped" and custody granted to the docs because the parents wanted unvaxxed blood used in a urgent lifesaving surgery. The parents tweeted that docs ended up giving "clean" blood to that baby and he survived. The NZ hospital was smart. That was very high profile, they could not take the chance of a repeat performance of the US case.

Expand full comment
Amy Wright's avatar

Ah. Thank you for clarifying. I didn't trust just googling would give me anything credible and I've been inundated with stories now for two plus years that I guess they start to blend together.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

There was a recent case in Spokane Wa I think. The parents didn’t want blood for their month old baby, doctors did it anyway and the baby died.

Expand full comment