Maybe. It's a good hypothesis that can't be disproven at this point. But I've been at this game for more than two decades. I'll reserve my enthusiastic support and continue to consider alternatives until I get some corroborating evidence. And I'll continue to consider alternatives and revise conclusions until I'm "pushing daisies" (thanks to the poster for that). The facts that reveal the truth don't often surface quickly, and some missing ones can completely overturn the apple cart.
Oh sure it *must* be some 5D chess, a genius do genius 🙃
If it is not "5D chess", it is indeed a good tactic. Go back and re-read Jeff's reasoning; it is spot-on.
Maybe. It's a good hypothesis that can't be disproven at this point. But I've been at this game for more than two decades. I'll reserve my enthusiastic support and continue to consider alternatives until I get some corroborating evidence. And I'll continue to consider alternatives and revise conclusions until I'm "pushing daisies" (thanks to the poster for that). The facts that reveal the truth don't often surface quickly, and some missing ones can completely overturn the apple cart.
*gospel 😝
ETA to clarify: Ever heard of circumstantial gain? 😇
Considering everything, it's not impossible that Trump is getting paid for that nonsense. Anyhow, it's not going to get him a lot of support.