Not ad hominem at all. I am pointing out that allowing ones point of reference to be so solidly based on one other person can make you have tunnel vision. The ONLY time I would not argue that point is in reference to the Bible.
Thank you for this clarification. I am not basing my views on one other person's views but on 3 years of personal research and observation of Trump's words and deeds since he was fraudulently removed from office.
I would encourage you to read the books (or even just the first part of the first one). They are not easy to read because they are written like an encyclopedia. 🤦♀️ They are literally DENSE with historical, factual recitation. She doesn't take any liberties with innuendo or supposition. What I've gleaned so far (I'm not done yet) is exactly how and why I think politicians who are "successful" have so many skeletons by the time they ascend to power that they become heavily compromised (in the sense that they cannot, potentially under threat of death for their family members if not themselves) to the point that they cannot/will not fulfill their campaign promises. There is a "bigger" agenda pushing their success and they know their true masters will pull the plug on them the moment they step too far astray.
I voted for Trump, twice. I was pleased with the campaign promises he actually kept. I was disgusted with his personnel choices and his tendency to be a "nasty" man (despite rightfully calling out Hillary for the same nastiness)... that was beneath him and he lowered himself by going there.
That said, his actions are confounding to his supporters. Unless you know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't think it's 12D chess... it's the FBI/CIA/DOD/MIC power brokers pulling all the strings they can where he's concerned.
Which of her thousands of footnotes of objectively observable history do you take issue with, exactly?
Ad hominem attacks aren't persuasive rebuttals.
Not ad hominem at all. I am pointing out that allowing ones point of reference to be so solidly based on one other person can make you have tunnel vision. The ONLY time I would not argue that point is in reference to the Bible.
Thank you for this clarification. I am not basing my views on one other person's views but on 3 years of personal research and observation of Trump's words and deeds since he was fraudulently removed from office.
I would encourage you to read the books (or even just the first part of the first one). They are not easy to read because they are written like an encyclopedia. 🤦♀️ They are literally DENSE with historical, factual recitation. She doesn't take any liberties with innuendo or supposition. What I've gleaned so far (I'm not done yet) is exactly how and why I think politicians who are "successful" have so many skeletons by the time they ascend to power that they become heavily compromised (in the sense that they cannot, potentially under threat of death for their family members if not themselves) to the point that they cannot/will not fulfill their campaign promises. There is a "bigger" agenda pushing their success and they know their true masters will pull the plug on them the moment they step too far astray.
I voted for Trump, twice. I was pleased with the campaign promises he actually kept. I was disgusted with his personnel choices and his tendency to be a "nasty" man (despite rightfully calling out Hillary for the same nastiness)... that was beneath him and he lowered himself by going there.
That said, his actions are confounding to his supporters. Unless you know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't think it's 12D chess... it's the FBI/CIA/DOD/MIC power brokers pulling all the strings they can where he's concerned.
I will take a look at the Whitney Webb writings.