I'd be a little cautious on assuming that. Yes, *technically* they aren't enjoined from doing it now, but multiple courts have judged them "likely to lose" (part of the requirement for the injunction existing in the first place) so at this point, continuing to censor would be creating further evidence against themselves of deliberate unconstitutional action, for when the courts eventually rule against them.
So ok, maybe some of them don't really care about the courts and constitutionality and just want to "get away with it", but balancing that out is a tendency of public servants to be risk-averse, and this is a bunch of individuals not one collective hive-mind. If a court has shown signs of ruling against you, the reaction from most is likely to be "pull your head in", lest they risk getting personally exposed over it and lose their career and pension and so forth. And those who genuinely think they are "doing the right thing" by "protecting people from misinformation" are likely to be rethinking their position after the court rulings.
Count on the censorship to escalate as long as the ban on the injunction is in place.
Yeah glen beck has come out and said he’s cutting back on advertising bc that’s censorship.
How convenient. they will get to censor probably through the next election
I'd be a little cautious on assuming that. Yes, *technically* they aren't enjoined from doing it now, but multiple courts have judged them "likely to lose" (part of the requirement for the injunction existing in the first place) so at this point, continuing to censor would be creating further evidence against themselves of deliberate unconstitutional action, for when the courts eventually rule against them.
So ok, maybe some of them don't really care about the courts and constitutionality and just want to "get away with it", but balancing that out is a tendency of public servants to be risk-averse, and this is a bunch of individuals not one collective hive-mind. If a court has shown signs of ruling against you, the reaction from most is likely to be "pull your head in", lest they risk getting personally exposed over it and lose their career and pension and so forth. And those who genuinely think they are "doing the right thing" by "protecting people from misinformation" are likely to be rethinking their position after the court rulings.