SB 252 is either the best and strongest medical freedom bill in the country, or it's a demonic, pharma-backed RINO Trojan Horse. Let's figure out whether it's great news or something else.
By weaponizing woke ideology, a powerful group is destroying the modern world by poisoning the wells we all share of comradery, fellowship, and family – they are doing everything they can to decimate the ties that bind us together and to destroy every trace of common ground and brotherhood between us.
Values we all once shared that were intended to do the most good for the most people are being maliciously torched in the name of discord and disunity by utilizing a reality denying, mentally ill, family destroying, child warping, depraved ideology.
The globablists’ have successfully utilized the Red vs Blue, East vs West, Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed, Boy vs Girl dichotomies to exploit our innate tribal nature, and in doing so are dividing and conquering us. This ‘us-vs-them’ separation makes us easy to control and direct with simple angry thoughts about “the enemy” who isn’t really our enemy – while blinding us to the actual enemy behind the curtain pulling the puppet strings. If we could collectively recognize this for what it is the NWO wouldn’t stand a chance.
Most people will not act to secure their future, so long as they feel they have an advocate fighting for them in the public or political arenas. This is why Republican vs Democrat equals divide and conquer. The human mind is binary. Our thought process can often be boiled down into terms (often ultimatums) of – this or that – and our adversaries understand - very well - the art of this war.
They know that politicization is so effective at manipulating us because most emotionally connect their personal belief system to the belief system of their political party, and so then any attack on their party – legitimate or otherwise – is interpreted by their brain as an attack on themselves. Reason and logic then jump out the nearest window as raw emotion takes the helm, thus making them even more susceptible to the predatory controlling influences.
United we will stand, divided we will fall, our adversaries know this which is why we are being mercilessly divided.
Had a “tranny” experience last weekend when visiting family in OKC. Walked into an upscale restaurant to be greeted by a black man, with facial hair and no makeup, adorned in a sleeveless, wrap-style floral dress. (All I could think was “please don’t raise your arms” 🙈) Not a word spoken about it until we got back in the car with son and DIL, who were completely fine with it. It’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” I know Truth is Love, so how is it love to deny the objective truth of this mental disorder? I have compassion for people suffering with this issue, but the forced celebration of it borders on demonic, IMO. Not sure where I read it, but isn’t this the equivalent of black face? Men appropriating all the facets of womanhood, so “woman face?” And the younger generation acts as if all is normal, lest they be accused of being *-phobic and cancelled (oh, the horror!) Lord, have mercy on us! 🙏🏻
Anyone else notice they never get the jewelry right? They put on a dress, thinking this makes them a woman. But, the accessories are always “off”. To quote the great Clairee, “The only thing that separates us from the animals is our ability to accessorize.”
Because it is a parody and ultimately it is a troll on women. It is offensive. People saw Rachel Dolezal as offensive to Black people. Now, women need to stand and say, “NO!”
Where are the feminists? Why are they not supporting female athletes who are being pushed out of their sports? Why are they not speaking out against using Dylan Mulvaney as a model for women's sports bras? What the heck? This is insanity. They are canceling women! Plain and simple. Because women are child bearers! We can't be having babies else the depopulation movement stalls. So let's make all women lesbians and trans men so they don't procreate. This the evil agenda.
I probably don't get the jewelry or other accessories right, either, when I wear dresses, as I've been a lifelong tomboy who prefers jeans, t-shirts, and boots, but I'm nonetheless a woman and have never been anything but. I realize your comment wasn't meant to be provocative or rude, and my feelings aren't hurt (read my first sentence in an unoffended, normal tone). However, I think it borders on defining womanhood by externals, which would seem to be the same position taken by the trans types (and I consider a manufactured vagina or hormone-induced man-boobs to be 'externals').
It seems to me that motives are an important aspect of this.
There are different positive ways to highlight femininity and this is true of masculinity, too. Wanting to dress like the opposite sex because it turns them on is an example of a very different motive these cross-dressing people often have.
But a woman can be beautiful in herself whether tomboy-like or ultra elegant just as some men can wear pink in a way that highlights their masculinity perfectly somehow while others go with with a more rugged look that suits them equally well. It's hard to define, but we know the difference somehow.
I totally understand what you’re saying. It’s more of a subtle thing...whether you’re a girly-girl or a tomboy. A tomboy woman would not wear a frilly dress and then put the wrong earrings or shoes on, because she would wear what she is comfortable wearing. A fashionista would know what accessories go with the outfit. That’s what I notice, it’s like bad plastic surgery, you notice it when it’s out of the norm. Like drywall. You only notice it when it’s installed incorrectly.
Very interesting! But I would not know because 'I am only a husband'!
However, when you all 'get it right', we do notice because you all are rendered quite stunning. We might not know why, or the particular sartorial engineering selections in play, or how that all happens, but by impacts and evidences seen ...we know that we are bedazzled.
When my daughter was little, she didn't like what she called "palm trees" --hairs between her eyebrows-- and wanted them gone. So I did some plucking for her while she went "ouch! ouch! ow!" When I was done, I told her "Now you are a woman! You have suffered for beauty!"
This truly is demonic. I recommend reading Johnathan Cahn’s book, ‘The Return Of The Gods’. This book explains that one of the ‘gods’ had upper body of woman, lower body of man. These ‘gods’ were invited back into our nation by things that we allowed.
My PCP chose to close his private practice and go to work in a Federal prison, as he was being limited about what he could give his patients during the planned takedown of our freedoms.
He said that the prisons are rife with men claiming to be trans....either because they are ‘gay’ or because they want to be transferred to a women’s prison. He also said that once he read the book, his eyes opened and he could see it exactly as demonic.
He couldn’t get out of that hell fast enough. He’s a very popular doctor, he came back to a full docket of patients in his private practice and is now able to give patients advice about alternative treatments for this planned attack on our medical decisions.
I cannot recommend Jonathan Cahn’s books highly enough. They are all phenomenal.
Jonathan Cahn really explains the roots of this perfectly -- we are back in the pre-Christian era of child sacrifice I'm horrified to say. And we have been for over 50 years.
I thought this was a great recap of what Cahn's book is about - you probably saw this already but in case you didn't https://youtu.be/IMHPjsQN8qs also last night I saw the movie "Nefarious" - Cannot recommend it highly enough but it's going to be a tough slog to keep it in the theaters.
"They" understand that language is important. And then they get us using their language. I find it is even problematic to use the phrase "gender affirming care". Even those fighting against that are using the term. They need another, more a descriptive term.
I think the left was knocked off their perch when they realized we were starting to call them groomers. Very accurate. They're still fighting against it and trying to use it against the side of sanity (that's not working).
Adopt one of the rules from the left-wing playbook: words matter..
Gender is not biology. It is imagined. Language does matter. Use “sex” very time they demand that you use “gender.” Note, there is no such thing as sex affirming surgeries.
Oh we definitely should never call it “gender affirming care.” That’s such a lie. It’s really mutilation. Also it’s not care and it isn’t gender affirming.
Good thought...black face and men dressing as women...not cultural appropriation, but gender appropriation. As a woman, I find it insulting and demeaning. Ever wonder why the social justice war is so unjust?
When I see or hear "something" justice, I've taken to replacing justice with revenge (or vengeance or domination). It puts the motivation in a clearer light.
Right? I feel uncomfortable around that, likely because I feel like it's an attempt to make fun of women, in general. And we're supposed to just accept it and laud it.
Had a similar experience a few months ago in OKC at an art exhibit for Van Gogh. The ticket checker was obviously a man wearing a yellow dress. I was shocked, but couldn't think of what else to do but show him our tickets and move on.
On the plus side, we were exploring OKC just last weekend, looking for a temporary short-term rental for my RN wife. Unfamiliar with the city, we stumbled across a small artsy-fartsy bar district called The Plaza, and went into one of the bars for drink on the patio. (We're lifelong Tulsans, so we're not officially allowed to "like" OKC. So our lips naturally curl whenever we reach the end of the turnpike, as if we just smelled something nasty. LOL)
Took our drinks onto the patio so we could watch the local wildlife. I struck up a convo with an African American dude out there, who'd grown up in the Plaza before it gentrified. (He told us the neighborhood had once been drug-infested and dangerous.)
We sat there and reminisced about how much America and Oklahoma had changed over the last 50 years - some of it in a very good way (e.g., how racial segregation had gone by the wayside.) It was a great conversation - one well-meaning American to another.
Our daughter - our youngest child - is graduating from college in OKC May 6th. She loves OKC too.
I'll deny I said this, but the truth is that OKC has really been putting on the ritz for about 20 years now. It has a ton of great neighborhoods and things to do and see.
Years ago, someone once famously described the difference between the two cities thus: "OKC is a Cadillac with a Bible under the seat, where Tulsa is a Mercedes with tickets to the ballet in the console."
I'm a native Okie. Grew up on Lawton and lived in OKC for a few years. Sprawling big cowtown back then, but I left long before it got all hoity-toity. Okie's are generally lovely people, with many great southern qualities. I've had lunch a few times at the Brickyard, and enjoyed the atmosphere. The Cowboy Hall of Fame is a wonderful museum.
The problem with young people (besides being naive) is that they haven't learned to have an independent thought. This has been trained out of them by 16 years of state public schooling. That and the fact that they don't come to school already with a definitive ethical worldview instilled in them by their parents.
I totally don’t get dressing like a woman, but sporting facial hair. It’s just so confusing to me. That Prime commercial makes me cringe. The little boy dressing like a girl, but showing off his unibrow and mustache.
It tells you that they want you to think, or pretend, that reality is invented by each individual, moment by moment. It's the ultimate relativism. "The desires of their own hearts," and where that sadly leads.
My husband thinks it’s a girl, I think its a boy because of the mustache. We argue about it, lol. Maybe its a girl taking testosterone? Yes, I guess the point is about confusion and following your bliss… even if it’s delusional.
Wait. That's a boy in that commercial? I thought it was a girl who was getting comfortable with her unfortunate mustache rather than waxing or bleaching it. That was my Italian interpretation.
Truth is not Love. Truth is Truth. And if not Truth, then a lie, a falsification, a dissembling ... some sort of twisting of reality.
Would we follow Biblical Law, the foundation of the Old Republic, we would not have this abomination of 'gender confusion' as the Bible prohibits men dressing as women and vice versa. And we may recall that the Bible clearly prohibits acts of sodomy, and so did the Old American Republic until Lawrence came along.
The younger generation, most of them, are schooled in 'everything goes.' And yet, nobody teaches the younger generation that if 'everything goes' then eventually one reaches the point where there is no order of law, no restraints.
All functioning societies are intolerant of certain things. The Old American Republic with it's assemblage of the several states was intolerant of immorality based upon a Biblical understanding of what is moral and what is not. That is why there was all that talk of 'morality being essential to a well ordered Republic'. Why! So that our affairs of state, families, conduct of business be orderly. Hence, the phrase, 'to maintain public order'.
Toleration of everything is just the just the 'old intolerance' moving to a new 'intolerance'. Old American did not tolerated the wickedness of sin. The New America does not tolerate the Christian and Christian moral ordering. But the dissonance is that if everything is tolerated except the Christian and God's Law, then chaos and insanity ensue. And here we are!
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. On the road to tyranny, we've gone so far that polite political action is about as useless as a miniskirt in a convent. ... Something's eventually going to happen. Government will bloat until it chokes us to death, or one more tyrannical power grab will turn out to be one too many. ... Maybe it'll be one more round of "reasonable gun control" or one more episode of burning children to death to save them from "child abuse." Whatever, something will snap."
Interesting quote ... and perhaps something has already snapped and we are now seeing the unravelling. Those maps showing the 'red colored' countries now flocking to the BRICS Plus consortium of common interest are stunning.
This time we are living in is sort of like we are waiting for the next Big Shoe to drop, although it could equally as well be a prolonged withering on the vine. No matter what, it's all highly uncomfortable and disconcerting. But it is nigh impossible the argue against the proposition that our plight is long overdue and well-deserved.
An outright collapse might be the horrific best solution in that it, à la the Soviet example, washes out a host of sins and discredits the ideological presuppositions of the previous dysfunctional system. Walking things back is problematic in that the body politic is so in a dither confused that it is likely to ever get a moral solution, but more a mere mitigation. And that's how Rome unwound. Periods of 'hell on wheels' followed by spats of mitigation, but all on a downward slope. In the American case, it's change or die. Things just move faster in the Age of Tech and instant communications. It's now years and decades, not centuries by measure. Interesting times to say the least.
Wars can be won with logistics, wars are certainly lost without logistics.
If we recognize this is war, if we then Stockpile for kith & kin in our home areas.
These areas are better if Rural, even in Blue States, much less in Cities, even in Red States.
We cannot say what form it's going to be as you said, we can only be as ready as possible to ensure some continued life to the cause of liberty. One day at a time, like Lexington & Concord.
ncrenegade.com has southern prepper videos from a Vet fyi.
I think we need to bring the Scottish kilt back. Now that's a man's "dress". Wear it everywhere. The trannies will hate us for it cuz it will disempower their arrogance and rob them of their stage.
I'll pass on the kilt. I went to the Renaissance Festival in Michigan once where my wife and her friend insisted on dressing for the occasion which included her friend's husband and I wearing kilts and a pseudo-Scottish get-up. I dug the natural A/C but missed the support. To quote Kramer from Seinfeld: "My boys need a house".
That's cheating. My first year of college I went to a toga party and was somewhat shy so I donned some tighty-whities. When I confessed, I was attacked by three semi-intoxicated women who tried to pull them off. I ran out of there. I was young and dumb and, in retrospect, I wish I wouldn't have fought them off. :)
I think I had my first encounter today at my local library. I’m in a very small rural town so it’s hard to tell. Behind the counter was a larger, young person, with rainbow hair and a rainbow shirt with a beard and breasts. At least they could have been breasts or fatty deposits on the chest. One other person was definitely a male with bright green hair in a bun. I kept very quiet and finished my business and left. I’m happy I only need the library once every few years. I am still kind of traumatized. I’m an old grandma. 😳
Last summer we took the grandkids to the zoo. There was a 6’3” man dressed as a woman with a woman. My hubby asked me “so, are we ok with a man dressed as a woman dating a woman?” 🤣 It gets confusing!
The person you described used to be referred to as a cross-dresser—a hetero-man with a fetish for wearing women’s clothing. It used to be done in private… not any more. 😳
I agree. I believe God gives you the freedom to personally choose your path. As the saying goes "Choose wisely ". God doesn't tolerate the unfaithful and unholy behavior for long. People will reap what they sow. Get right with The Lord.
Very true. Gods kindness is allowing those who choose to not follow His rules time to change their ways and choose Him over human leaders. Eventually time will run out and the choices will end. The pivotal point in time is now. CHOOSE WISELY indeed
Missoula, Bozeman and Whitefish. The first two are college towns and all 3 are home to former west coasters bringing their political views with them. We’ve owned a home in NW MT for 23 years and the cultural climate is sadly changing
I live in Helena and sadly, it is very liberal as well. Our governor is the first Republican is 17 years? Yes, everyone is wanting to move to those 3 towns and throwing off the balance of what the rest of the state wants. Kind of like Western Oregon population overriding what the other 2/3 of the state want.
This is why states should adopt the federal electoral college model. That way big blue cities within these red states can't control the entire vote. That is if you still believe that elections are fair.
I’m sorry they all left the Willamette Valley and ruined beautiful Montana. The devil is on the move big time and he won’t quit until God stops him dead. It’s coming.
It's a tiny urban district, something like two square miles in the heart of Missoula. It's dominated by non-residential business and student rental housing for those attending the University of Montana. A district like that is always going to elect a left-wing nut case so there's a good argument for breaking it up among other districts when drawing district lines. On the other hand if you put all the loonies in one district it limits their numbers in the legislature.
Have to hand it to the Montana legislature though as so far they have handled this about as well as possible.
Interesting that there was a trans candidate in every single state last year. With their numbers, how likely is that unless there has been some kind of outside push for it? 🤔
I often wonder if these people have any other qualification. Cross dresser? sure you’re elected! I think it would be better for their propaganda if any of them were competent and able to do their job of representing the people. But maybe that isn’t possible….
I think all of them should have to take a mental competency test before they run for any type of public office. Most aren't even qualified to be dog catcher.
Regarding your last topic on transgender:
By weaponizing woke ideology, a powerful group is destroying the modern world by poisoning the wells we all share of comradery, fellowship, and family – they are doing everything they can to decimate the ties that bind us together and to destroy every trace of common ground and brotherhood between us.
Values we all once shared that were intended to do the most good for the most people are being maliciously torched in the name of discord and disunity by utilizing a reality denying, mentally ill, family destroying, child warping, depraved ideology.
The globablists’ have successfully utilized the Red vs Blue, East vs West, Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed, Boy vs Girl dichotomies to exploit our innate tribal nature, and in doing so are dividing and conquering us. This ‘us-vs-them’ separation makes us easy to control and direct with simple angry thoughts about “the enemy” who isn’t really our enemy – while blinding us to the actual enemy behind the curtain pulling the puppet strings. If we could collectively recognize this for what it is the NWO wouldn’t stand a chance.
Most people will not act to secure their future, so long as they feel they have an advocate fighting for them in the public or political arenas. This is why Republican vs Democrat equals divide and conquer. The human mind is binary. Our thought process can often be boiled down into terms (often ultimatums) of – this or that – and our adversaries understand - very well - the art of this war.
They know that politicization is so effective at manipulating us because most emotionally connect their personal belief system to the belief system of their political party, and so then any attack on their party – legitimate or otherwise – is interpreted by their brain as an attack on themselves. Reason and logic then jump out the nearest window as raw emotion takes the helm, thus making them even more susceptible to the predatory controlling influences.
United we will stand, divided we will fall, our adversaries know this which is why we are being mercilessly divided.
https://tritorch.com/united
Had a “tranny” experience last weekend when visiting family in OKC. Walked into an upscale restaurant to be greeted by a black man, with facial hair and no makeup, adorned in a sleeveless, wrap-style floral dress. (All I could think was “please don’t raise your arms” 🙈) Not a word spoken about it until we got back in the car with son and DIL, who were completely fine with it. It’s “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” I know Truth is Love, so how is it love to deny the objective truth of this mental disorder? I have compassion for people suffering with this issue, but the forced celebration of it borders on demonic, IMO. Not sure where I read it, but isn’t this the equivalent of black face? Men appropriating all the facets of womanhood, so “woman face?” And the younger generation acts as if all is normal, lest they be accused of being *-phobic and cancelled (oh, the horror!) Lord, have mercy on us! 🙏🏻
We need to start referring to this as “woman face” from now on.
Anyone else notice they never get the jewelry right? They put on a dress, thinking this makes them a woman. But, the accessories are always “off”. To quote the great Clairee, “The only thing that separates us from the animals is our ability to accessorize.”
Because they’re like little girls playing dress-up. I believe they think the more in-your-face with the outrageousness, the better.
Because it is a parody and ultimately it is a troll on women. It is offensive. People saw Rachel Dolezal as offensive to Black people. Now, women need to stand and say, “NO!”
Where are the feminists? Why are they not supporting female athletes who are being pushed out of their sports? Why are they not speaking out against using Dylan Mulvaney as a model for women's sports bras? What the heck? This is insanity. They are canceling women! Plain and simple. Because women are child bearers! We can't be having babies else the depopulation movement stalls. So let's make all women lesbians and trans men so they don't procreate. This the evil agenda.
I probably don't get the jewelry or other accessories right, either, when I wear dresses, as I've been a lifelong tomboy who prefers jeans, t-shirts, and boots, but I'm nonetheless a woman and have never been anything but. I realize your comment wasn't meant to be provocative or rude, and my feelings aren't hurt (read my first sentence in an unoffended, normal tone). However, I think it borders on defining womanhood by externals, which would seem to be the same position taken by the trans types (and I consider a manufactured vagina or hormone-induced man-boobs to be 'externals').
It seems to me that motives are an important aspect of this.
There are different positive ways to highlight femininity and this is true of masculinity, too. Wanting to dress like the opposite sex because it turns them on is an example of a very different motive these cross-dressing people often have.
But a woman can be beautiful in herself whether tomboy-like or ultra elegant just as some men can wear pink in a way that highlights their masculinity perfectly somehow while others go with with a more rugged look that suits them equally well. It's hard to define, but we know the difference somehow.
I totally understand what you’re saying. It’s more of a subtle thing...whether you’re a girly-girl or a tomboy. A tomboy woman would not wear a frilly dress and then put the wrong earrings or shoes on, because she would wear what she is comfortable wearing. A fashionista would know what accessories go with the outfit. That’s what I notice, it’s like bad plastic surgery, you notice it when it’s out of the norm. Like drywall. You only notice it when it’s installed incorrectly.
Same! Sometimes I go outside and realize that everything I'm wearing could be worn by a normal man. But no one ever takes me for a man.
Very interesting! But I would not know because 'I am only a husband'!
However, when you all 'get it right', we do notice because you all are rendered quite stunning. We might not know why, or the particular sartorial engineering selections in play, or how that all happens, but by impacts and evidences seen ...we know that we are bedazzled.
Even Scarlett knew the value of a good corset. “Beauty must suffer.”
When my daughter was little, she didn't like what she called "palm trees" --hairs between her eyebrows-- and wanted them gone. So I did some plucking for her while she went "ouch! ouch! ow!" When I was done, I told her "Now you are a woman! You have suffered for beauty!"
Good point 😁😆
This truly is demonic. I recommend reading Johnathan Cahn’s book, ‘The Return Of The Gods’. This book explains that one of the ‘gods’ had upper body of woman, lower body of man. These ‘gods’ were invited back into our nation by things that we allowed.
My PCP chose to close his private practice and go to work in a Federal prison, as he was being limited about what he could give his patients during the planned takedown of our freedoms.
He said that the prisons are rife with men claiming to be trans....either because they are ‘gay’ or because they want to be transferred to a women’s prison. He also said that once he read the book, his eyes opened and he could see it exactly as demonic.
He couldn’t get out of that hell fast enough. He’s a very popular doctor, he came back to a full docket of patients in his private practice and is now able to give patients advice about alternative treatments for this planned attack on our medical decisions.
I cannot recommend Jonathan Cahn’s books highly enough. They are all phenomenal.
Lo & behold 🤪: a statue of breastfeeding man at KØN—Gender Museum Denmark—formerly Women's Museum --> pbs.twimg.com/media/FuOci_faMAA7BDU?format=jpg
Mental illness on full display.
Jonathan Cahn really explains the roots of this perfectly -- we are back in the pre-Christian era of child sacrifice I'm horrified to say. And we have been for over 50 years.
https://youtu.be/IMHPjsQN8qs
I thought this was a great recap of what Cahn's book is about - you probably saw this already but in case you didn't https://youtu.be/IMHPjsQN8qs also last night I saw the movie "Nefarious" - Cannot recommend it highly enough but it's going to be a tough slog to keep it in the theaters.
I'm 75% of the way through Cahn's book right now.
here's a great recap:
https://youtu.be/IMHPjsQN8qs
Absolutely.
"They" understand that language is important. And then they get us using their language. I find it is even problematic to use the phrase "gender affirming care". Even those fighting against that are using the term. They need another, more a descriptive term.
I think the left was knocked off their perch when they realized we were starting to call them groomers. Very accurate. They're still fighting against it and trying to use it against the side of sanity (that's not working).
Adopt one of the rules from the left-wing playbook: words matter..
Gender is not biology. It is imagined. Language does matter. Use “sex” very time they demand that you use “gender.” Note, there is no such thing as sex affirming surgeries.
Oh we definitely should never call it “gender affirming care.” That’s such a lie. It’s really mutilation. Also it’s not care and it isn’t gender affirming.
Podcaster and radio host Todd Herman understands this, BTW.
He refers to the medications used as "wrong sex hormones."
😂
I had a thought last night that we should call it reproductive prevention care 😑
... Though 'care' sounds like a good thing. That's why the left incorporates that word.
So maybe call it 'reproductive destruction care'
Or maybe reproductive elimination
I started calling it "woman face" right after the Anheuser-Busch, Bud light stunt.
A minstral show.
At first I read menstrual show. 🫣
'Fem face' just graced my mind 😁 Sounds catchy & memeifiable—but prolly somewhat lacks in clarity 🤔
True 😆
Mine happens a heart #66 ('liked' count)—hence of double the strength at the very least! 🤸
Good thought...black face and men dressing as women...not cultural appropriation, but gender appropriation. As a woman, I find it insulting and demeaning. Ever wonder why the social justice war is so unjust?
When I see or hear "something" justice, I've taken to replacing justice with revenge (or vengeance or domination). It puts the motivation in a clearer light.
Right? I feel uncomfortable around that, likely because I feel like it's an attempt to make fun of women, in general. And we're supposed to just accept it and laud it.
It is! Drag is a demeaning parody of womanhood, end of story (hour).
Had a similar experience a few months ago in OKC at an art exhibit for Van Gogh. The ticket checker was obviously a man wearing a yellow dress. I was shocked, but couldn't think of what else to do but show him our tickets and move on.
On the plus side, we were exploring OKC just last weekend, looking for a temporary short-term rental for my RN wife. Unfamiliar with the city, we stumbled across a small artsy-fartsy bar district called The Plaza, and went into one of the bars for drink on the patio. (We're lifelong Tulsans, so we're not officially allowed to "like" OKC. So our lips naturally curl whenever we reach the end of the turnpike, as if we just smelled something nasty. LOL)
Took our drinks onto the patio so we could watch the local wildlife. I struck up a convo with an African American dude out there, who'd grown up in the Plaza before it gentrified. (He told us the neighborhood had once been drug-infested and dangerous.)
We sat there and reminisced about how much America and Oklahoma had changed over the last 50 years - some of it in a very good way (e.g., how racial segregation had gone by the wayside.) It was a great conversation - one well-meaning American to another.
Lol at the Tulsa comments! DIL is a Tulsan, but she really likes OKC. Probably didn’t get the memo 😉
Our daughter - our youngest child - is graduating from college in OKC May 6th. She loves OKC too.
I'll deny I said this, but the truth is that OKC has really been putting on the ritz for about 20 years now. It has a ton of great neighborhoods and things to do and see.
Years ago, someone once famously described the difference between the two cities thus: "OKC is a Cadillac with a Bible under the seat, where Tulsa is a Mercedes with tickets to the ballet in the console."
I'm a native Okie. Grew up on Lawton and lived in OKC for a few years. Sprawling big cowtown back then, but I left long before it got all hoity-toity. Okie's are generally lovely people, with many great southern qualities. I've had lunch a few times at the Brickyard, and enjoyed the atmosphere. The Cowboy Hall of Fame is a wonderful museum.
😂
My wife has family in Claremore so she gets it... Lol.
The problem with young people (besides being naive) is that they haven't learned to have an independent thought. This has been trained out of them by 16 years of state public schooling. That and the fact that they don't come to school already with a definitive ethical worldview instilled in them by their parents.
"the fact that they don't come to school already with a definitive ethical worldview instilled in them by their parents."
Yeah, maybe if at least one parent were at home and ready to engage a kid when he or she came home from school, this wouldn't be a problem.
I totally don’t get dressing like a woman, but sporting facial hair. It’s just so confusing to me. That Prime commercial makes me cringe. The little boy dressing like a girl, but showing off his unibrow and mustache.
It tells you that they want you to think, or pretend, that reality is invented by each individual, moment by moment. It's the ultimate relativism. "The desires of their own hearts," and where that sadly leads.
"Their Truth."
Or that repulsive Walgreens ad with a chubby, bearded "dad" all dressed up in spangles and tulle, having "tea" with, presumably, his daughter?
It reeks of pedophilism and de-masculization. Horrible.
Five years ago that ad was cute. But today its gross. They have done that to us.
I feel like my innocence has been taken away 🤪
Are you sure it’s a boy? I thought it was a girl? But I’m still not sure - which is probably the point of that commercial
My husband thinks it’s a girl, I think its a boy because of the mustache. We argue about it, lol. Maybe its a girl taking testosterone? Yes, I guess the point is about confusion and following your bliss… even if it’s delusional.
Wait. That's a boy in that commercial? I thought it was a girl who was getting comfortable with her unfortunate mustache rather than waxing or bleaching it. That was my Italian interpretation.
🤣🤪😁
That's a boy??!!!
I thought so since two of his idols were men, one is Freida, one is Freddy Mercury, one is Eddie Murphy, but I'm so confused now, 🤣🤣🤣
It's "in your face." Like, I dare you to call me out!
Yes, I agree.
Truth is not Love. Truth is Truth. And if not Truth, then a lie, a falsification, a dissembling ... some sort of twisting of reality.
Would we follow Biblical Law, the foundation of the Old Republic, we would not have this abomination of 'gender confusion' as the Bible prohibits men dressing as women and vice versa. And we may recall that the Bible clearly prohibits acts of sodomy, and so did the Old American Republic until Lawrence came along.
The younger generation, most of them, are schooled in 'everything goes.' And yet, nobody teaches the younger generation that if 'everything goes' then eventually one reaches the point where there is no order of law, no restraints.
All functioning societies are intolerant of certain things. The Old American Republic with it's assemblage of the several states was intolerant of immorality based upon a Biblical understanding of what is moral and what is not. That is why there was all that talk of 'morality being essential to a well ordered Republic'. Why! So that our affairs of state, families, conduct of business be orderly. Hence, the phrase, 'to maintain public order'.
Toleration of everything is just the just the 'old intolerance' moving to a new 'intolerance'. Old American did not tolerated the wickedness of sin. The New America does not tolerate the Christian and Christian moral ordering. But the dissonance is that if everything is tolerated except the Christian and God's Law, then chaos and insanity ensue. And here we are!
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards. On the road to tyranny, we've gone so far that polite political action is about as useless as a miniskirt in a convent. ... Something's eventually going to happen. Government will bloat until it chokes us to death, or one more tyrannical power grab will turn out to be one too many. ... Maybe it'll be one more round of "reasonable gun control" or one more episode of burning children to death to save them from "child abuse." Whatever, something will snap."
Claire Wolfe
Interesting quote ... and perhaps something has already snapped and we are now seeing the unravelling. Those maps showing the 'red colored' countries now flocking to the BRICS Plus consortium of common interest are stunning.
This time we are living in is sort of like we are waiting for the next Big Shoe to drop, although it could equally as well be a prolonged withering on the vine. No matter what, it's all highly uncomfortable and disconcerting. But it is nigh impossible the argue against the proposition that our plight is long overdue and well-deserved.
An outright collapse might be the horrific best solution in that it, à la the Soviet example, washes out a host of sins and discredits the ideological presuppositions of the previous dysfunctional system. Walking things back is problematic in that the body politic is so in a dither confused that it is likely to ever get a moral solution, but more a mere mitigation. And that's how Rome unwound. Periods of 'hell on wheels' followed by spats of mitigation, but all on a downward slope. In the American case, it's change or die. Things just move faster in the Age of Tech and instant communications. It's now years and decades, not centuries by measure. Interesting times to say the least.
Wars can be won with logistics, wars are certainly lost without logistics.
If we recognize this is war, if we then Stockpile for kith & kin in our home areas.
These areas are better if Rural, even in Blue States, much less in Cities, even in Red States.
We cannot say what form it's going to be as you said, we can only be as ready as possible to ensure some continued life to the cause of liberty. One day at a time, like Lexington & Concord.
ncrenegade.com has southern prepper videos from a Vet fyi.
A man wearing a dress doesn’t bother me so long as he doesn’t call himself a woman. Or worse, making me accept that he is a woman.
A male is not a female. Simple as that.
But wear whatever you want.
I think we need to bring the Scottish kilt back. Now that's a man's "dress". Wear it everywhere. The trannies will hate us for it cuz it will disempower their arrogance and rob them of their stage.
I'll pass on the kilt. I went to the Renaissance Festival in Michigan once where my wife and her friend insisted on dressing for the occasion which included her friend's husband and I wearing kilts and a pseudo-Scottish get-up. I dug the natural A/C but missed the support. To quote Kramer from Seinfeld: "My boys need a house".
😂😆
Get some jockeys.lol
That's cheating. My first year of college I went to a toga party and was somewhat shy so I donned some tighty-whities. When I confessed, I was attacked by three semi-intoxicated women who tried to pull them off. I ran out of there. I was young and dumb and, in retrospect, I wish I wouldn't have fought them off. :)
I LOVE KILTS!!!
DOOO EEEET!!!!
I think I had my first encounter today at my local library. I’m in a very small rural town so it’s hard to tell. Behind the counter was a larger, young person, with rainbow hair and a rainbow shirt with a beard and breasts. At least they could have been breasts or fatty deposits on the chest. One other person was definitely a male with bright green hair in a bun. I kept very quiet and finished my business and left. I’m happy I only need the library once every few years. I am still kind of traumatized. I’m an old grandma. 😳
Last summer we took the grandkids to the zoo. There was a 6’3” man dressed as a woman with a woman. My hubby asked me “so, are we ok with a man dressed as a woman dating a woman?” 🤣 It gets confusing!
The person you described used to be referred to as a cross-dresser—a hetero-man with a fetish for wearing women’s clothing. It used to be done in private… not any more. 😳
https://youtu.be/IMHPjsQN8qs
Thank you for that link. Love U.S. Grace Force! I will definitely give it a listen.
I agree. I believe God gives you the freedom to personally choose your path. As the saying goes "Choose wisely ". God doesn't tolerate the unfaithful and unholy behavior for long. People will reap what they sow. Get right with The Lord.
Decide this day whom you will serve....
Such a great way to put it. Amen.
AMEN 🙏🏻
Annie....Always.
Very true. Gods kindness is allowing those who choose to not follow His rules time to change their ways and choose Him over human leaders. Eventually time will run out and the choices will end. The pivotal point in time is now. CHOOSE WISELY indeed
Just another way to say, “Fuck Around and Find Out.” A lot of that going around.
How did a tranny get elected in Montana anyway?
Missoula, Bozeman and Whitefish. The first two are college towns and all 3 are home to former west coasters bringing their political views with them. We’ve owned a home in NW MT for 23 years and the cultural climate is sadly changing
Sounds like the conservative citizens of those three communities need to get moving and rally the troops. Maybe this is Zoey was a wake up call
One can only hope
I live in Helena and sadly, it is very liberal as well. Our governor is the first Republican is 17 years? Yes, everyone is wanting to move to those 3 towns and throwing off the balance of what the rest of the state wants. Kind of like Western Oregon population overriding what the other 2/3 of the state want.
Just saying, this is true for CA too actually. Many many conservative areas over run by big pop blue cities.
This is why states should adopt the federal electoral college model. That way big blue cities within these red states can't control the entire vote. That is if you still believe that elections are fair.
Oregon has not had fair elections for close to 30 years. All mail-in since 1998. 😢
Initially misread your comment as "big POOP blue cities."
Same difference.
LOL. Thanks for the laugh!!
In every 'blue' state.
Sounds exactly like Oregon. 🥲
It’s the Willamette Valley. The rest of the state is still sane.
Came from WA, OR, and CA. To escape, but brought their politics with them.
Exactly right
I’m sorry they all left the Willamette Valley and ruined beautiful Montana. The devil is on the move big time and he won’t quit until God stops him dead. It’s coming.
You’re so right and I can’t wait. Come quickly Lord Jesus!
It's a tiny urban district, something like two square miles in the heart of Missoula. It's dominated by non-residential business and student rental housing for those attending the University of Montana. A district like that is always going to elect a left-wing nut case so there's a good argument for breaking it up among other districts when drawing district lines. On the other hand if you put all the loonies in one district it limits their numbers in the legislature.
Have to hand it to the Montana legislature though as so far they have handled this about as well as possible.
Taking a guess.... Soros backed candidates?
Interesting that there was a trans candidate in every single state last year. With their numbers, how likely is that unless there has been some kind of outside push for it? 🤔
Think of BigMike as a catalyst...?
Missoula maybe? College town and becoming very “woke”
Missoula is very woke
I often wonder if these people have any other qualification. Cross dresser? sure you’re elected! I think it would be better for their propaganda if any of them were competent and able to do their job of representing the people. But maybe that isn’t possible….
I think all of them should have to take a mental competency test before they run for any type of public office. Most aren't even qualified to be dog catcher.