745 Comments

Regarding your last topic on transgender:

By weaponizing woke ideology, a powerful group is destroying the modern world by poisoning the wells we all share of comradery, fellowship, and family – they are doing everything they can to decimate the ties that bind us together and to destroy every trace of common ground and brotherhood between us.

Values we all once shared that were intended to do the most good for the most people are being maliciously torched in the name of discord and disunity by utilizing a reality denying, mentally ill, family destroying, child warping, depraved ideology.

The globablists’ have successfully utilized the Red vs Blue, East vs West, Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed, Boy vs Girl dichotomies to exploit our innate tribal nature, and in doing so are dividing and conquering us. This ‘us-vs-them’ separation makes us easy to control and direct with simple angry thoughts about “the enemy” who isn’t really our enemy – while blinding us to the actual enemy behind the curtain pulling the puppet strings. If we could collectively recognize this for what it is the NWO wouldn’t stand a chance.

Most people will not act to secure their future, so long as they feel they have an advocate fighting for them in the public or political arenas. This is why Republican vs Democrat equals divide and conquer. The human mind is binary. Our thought process can often be boiled down into terms (often ultimatums) of – this or that – and our adversaries understand - very well - the art of this war.

They know that politicization is so effective at manipulating us because most emotionally connect their personal belief system to the belief system of their political party, and so then any attack on their party – legitimate or otherwise – is interpreted by their brain as an attack on themselves. Reason and logic then jump out the nearest window as raw emotion takes the helm, thus making them even more susceptible to the predatory controlling influences.

United we will stand, divided we will fall, our adversaries know this which is why we are being mercilessly divided.

https://tritorch.com/united

Expand full comment
Apr 28Liked by Jeff Childers

Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave Himself for our sins so that He might rescue us from this present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father, to whom be the glory forevermore. Amen.

— Galatians 1:3-5 NASB1995

Expand full comment

As someone who back in the day worked in retail banking, when I would be in a bank branch office, I would look around and thin to myself "If I was a robber, what action would I do to be successful here?" Later positions in life had me asking "How can I test this? Can I break that?" So, when I look at this bill's points detailed above, a few obvious things popped up.

First is this from above "— It stops ALL vaccines passports and discrimination for any of three types of vaccines. Businesses, governmental entities, or schools may not require proof of covid, mRNA, or EUA vaccines for entry or services, or discriminate against people, including hiring and firing decisions. (The mRNA ban sunsets in two years unless extended. But we’ll know even more in two years.)" In the age of re-defining words, this one is easy to skirt by having some thumb-sucker at the CDC re-define what a future shot is away from "vaccine" to some other term. Then they fascistically require it.

Second from above "— It bans mandates on all masks, face shields, or any other device covering the old breathing apparatus except in medical, industrial and educational settings." Focusing on the 'educational settings'. That should be changed to certified teaching colleges for medical degrees. After all, isn't our concern for the kids stuck in woke school districts (k-12) whose idiotic school boards kept "following the science" keeping kids masked for years? This would stop it in Florida at least. Having the "educational" exception in this bill is like the phony "health of the mother" part of abortion laws that pro-aborts used to drive huge exception trucks through by claiming "mental" health. So any woman could make the claim without any proof. It neutered those bills.

Finally, on this one, "— It preserves freedom of choice for covid treatment. Hospitals may not interfere with a patient’s right to choose covid treatment alternatives, if recommended by a doctor with hospital privileges." This one is mostly useless in this age where the majority of doctors are now corporate doctors, not the old independent doctors carrying their little black bags. As a term of employment, it would be easy for the employer to have in its contract for doctors the clause that the doctor will be required to only offer patients advise and treatment as approved by the hospital's oversight board. So doctors signing it would just again be pushing the pills and jabs from their corporate masters. And we've already seen that there are plenty of doctors who lost their hospital privileges because they tried recommending ivermectin, HCQ, etc. So a doctor may be protected for the first person they treat with a frowned upon treatment, but once it is known (since hospitals track all meds given a patient on its premises, they would just remove official privileges there after. So a doctor is confronted again with "Do I help this one person but lose my privilege ability for my other patients here?" This needs to be changed or it is just toothless.

Expand full comment

The fact that we have to have bills passed to protect common sense freedoms, already guaranteed us in our Constitution shows how far down the rabbit hole we have sunk. The House just passed a bill to protect women and girl’s rights to competition in sports from men pretending to be women, by the margin of Republicans over Democrats, totally partisan. What world are we in where this should even need discussion, let alone a National bill?

Expand full comment
Apr 28Liked by Jeff Childers

My now deceased father in law was a bonafide Conservative Republican Supreme Court Justice.

He remarked so many times after a national election, with a vigorous understanding he cared not about the Office of the President. As long as diligent Congress/Senate/House of Reps would read and understand the Bills introduced to vote on. The Constitution remained intact! Well that was yesterday....and yesterdays gone....They don't read it. It's a party time, party line vote. Corrupted.

Expand full comment

Jeff, I've been hoping to see you talk about the WHO and how the Biden admin is planning to give full sovereignty to them for any emergency or "pandemic"... This is an international treaty which would certainly be the most serious step toward one world government. There is a WHO Withdrawal Act HR79 which would require the president to withdrawal immediately, but no one is talking about it other than people like Michelle Bachmann. We are being distracted with so many other things, but this is what could change the country overnight. In fact, this May is the month that this is supposed to occur. They could decide on everything from jabs to gun ownership... in other words, whatever they declare as an emergency, and our own govt. could not stop it. Can you give us any more information on this? Jan Markell has a very informative podcast on April 21, 2023 on Understanding the Times. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Apr 28Liked by Jeff Childers

Perhaps SB 252 / HB 1013 could add a private cause of action and 1-way attorney's fees for successful plaintiffs.

We have a great Governor and State Surgeon General - but what happens in the future if we don't? A private cause of action might be helpful as an alternative remedy

Expand full comment
Apr 28Liked by Jeff Childers

Excellent news about that guy from Montana. If you go read something like the free press, it's horrible. Lol. No it isn't. And during her rant on that page she refers to him as a she. So predictable.

The next point I'd like to make is that although this is a good bill, think about this. The job of the federal government is to protect its citizens first and foremost. It's why we have a bill of rights. Then there is the Hippocratic oath taken by all medical caregivers before licensing. Does it piss anyone else off that we have to put in to law here in Florida a device to protect we the people from our own federal government? I'm glad it's happening, but it should not be necessary!

Expand full comment

I don't care what state you reside in or what bills they may pass. I simply say "Do Not Comply".

Expand full comment

“Apparently, there’s no middle ground.”

Don’t you know only extremists believe in middle ground, Jeff?

Expand full comment

"Unfortunately, I discovered in 2021 that a lot of lawmakers aren’t willing — not yet — to compare vaccine status with race, sex, age, religious beliefs, and other historically-protected classes."

But under SB 269 they're willing to make being an ethnic Jew not only a protected class, as is the status quo, but a SUPER protected class with felony hate crime criminal penalties attached for SPEECH. Establishment clause? First Amendment anyone?

"So here is the first important take-away: calling or lobbying a bill’s sponsor might not make any difference at all, especially if it’s a priority bill. They don’t care. Second, it’s not good enough to just find a friendly lawmaker to file a bill for you. If you REALLY want to pass a bill, you’d better start with the Governor, Senate President or the House Speaker."

So much for our "representative" form of government, we're actually ruled by a Star Chamber of 3 UNIPARTY loyalists.

Expand full comment

It seems like the problem is that the Medical Freedom groups want to win the war on the first day. It takes time to win a war. Win this first battle and then it sets the stage for winning the war by getting the full freedom we want in future legislative sessions.

Expand full comment
Apr 28·edited Apr 28

On banning mask mandates "except in medical, industrial and educational settings."

I really don't like the exception for educational settings. Some of the biggest damage masks have done is to kids. And as far as medical goes, if that means you can be forced to wear one to enter a hospital or doctors office, I have a feeling many folks would rather chose to avoid going altogether.

**Edit**

After scanning the bill, it looks like the exception for educational settings is only related to "required safety equipment in a course of study consistent with occupational or laboratory safety requirements, in accordance with standards adopted by the Department of Health." - Page 12

Expand full comment

Send the trannies to mental health facilities. At least a year without any gender based conversations etc. They will be much better for it.

Expand full comment
Apr 28Liked by Jeff Childers

They can't deny this anymore.

mRNA is an Operating System - Technology Platform per Moderna Website

The Moderna site clearly defines mRNA as a software program that makes ‘proteins’. The mRNA injections do not contain biological RNA, but contain programmable technologies/electronic devices.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/mrna-is-an-operating-system-technology?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment

"(at some future post Biden point)"

I am generally an upbeat, optimistic individual. I just have ZERO faith in our election process. "Dominion" is a very appropriate name for dominating elections.

Expand full comment