"Specifically, the researchers have grown concerned about something called the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer. It’s a theory that cancer develops not by a single event but in a gradual process caused by multiple accumulating genetic changes — called ‘hits’ — in cells. It's kind of like stacking differently-shaped blocks until they make…
"Specifically, the researchers have grown concerned about something called the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer. It’s a theory that cancer develops not by a single event but in a gradual process caused by multiple accumulating genetic changes — called ‘hits’ — in cells. It's kind of like stacking differently-shaped blocks until they make a wobbly tower about to topple over. Each "hit" is a new mutation or a different disruption, adding up and increasing entropy until the cell goes wonky and then … cancer."
If I'm understanding that properly, I think I've read about that theory years and years ago, in connection with reading about interferon.
The idea is that we develop cancer as we live and age, and our bodies' immune systems fight it and defeat it. Then it starts to develop again, somewhere, and our bodies fight it and defeat it. That we beat cancer over and over during our lives, until some of us don't.
That's an ignorant layman's attempt to explain something that I read years ago, maybe 30 or more years ago, about this cancer hypothesis.
You are correct sir and in fact it’s well known that our bodies routinely make bad cells or proteins that are recognized as such by our immune system and destroyed. It’s one of the reasons the shots are so diabolical bc it impairs the part of your immune system that sentinels this process (among other things as stated in the article).
My understanding is also that your immune system is constantly fighting off cancer. Getting cancer is essentially a failure of the immune system. That doesn't necessarily contradict what they described in the paper. The immune system could fail because there were finally too many combined hits to fight it off. The immune system could fight off the first few "hits" but become overloaded or worn out or confused over time. There are many factors attacking the immune system: diet, exercise, environment and age also play a factor.
this is correct. In simple terms, (pre jab. all bets are off now) there are 4 elements to cancer formation, and you need at least 3 of them (excepting a Chernobyl type exposure)."
1) Failed Immune system
2) Poorly nutrified body (which typically leads to an acidic , not basic body)
3)Exposure to (excessive) low level ionizing radiation
Also, my understanding is that vaccines create a distraction from the normal immune function (ie ridding the body off cancer cells) making the body more susceptible to other things while it is figuring out how to deal with the injected substance.
"Specifically, the researchers have grown concerned about something called the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer. It’s a theory that cancer develops not by a single event but in a gradual process caused by multiple accumulating genetic changes — called ‘hits’ — in cells. It's kind of like stacking differently-shaped blocks until they make a wobbly tower about to topple over. Each "hit" is a new mutation or a different disruption, adding up and increasing entropy until the cell goes wonky and then … cancer."
If I'm understanding that properly, I think I've read about that theory years and years ago, in connection with reading about interferon.
The idea is that we develop cancer as we live and age, and our bodies' immune systems fight it and defeat it. Then it starts to develop again, somewhere, and our bodies fight it and defeat it. That we beat cancer over and over during our lives, until some of us don't.
That's an ignorant layman's attempt to explain something that I read years ago, maybe 30 or more years ago, about this cancer hypothesis.
You are correct sir and in fact it’s well known that our bodies routinely make bad cells or proteins that are recognized as such by our immune system and destroyed. It’s one of the reasons the shots are so diabolical bc it impairs the part of your immune system that sentinels this process (among other things as stated in the article).
My understanding is also that your immune system is constantly fighting off cancer. Getting cancer is essentially a failure of the immune system. That doesn't necessarily contradict what they described in the paper. The immune system could fail because there were finally too many combined hits to fight it off. The immune system could fight off the first few "hits" but become overloaded or worn out or confused over time. There are many factors attacking the immune system: diet, exercise, environment and age also play a factor.
this is correct. In simple terms, (pre jab. all bets are off now) there are 4 elements to cancer formation, and you need at least 3 of them (excepting a Chernobyl type exposure)."
1) Failed Immune system
2) Poorly nutrified body (which typically leads to an acidic , not basic body)
3)Exposure to (excessive) low level ionizing radiation
4)Emotional stress or trauma
Also, my understanding is that vaccines create a distraction from the normal immune function (ie ridding the body off cancer cells) making the body more susceptible to other things while it is figuring out how to deal with the injected substance.