This is exactly it. I still believe in following the evidence, but the trick was in having pHarma-supported and -written protocols turn out to be what's called 'evidence.' I went to medical school before the evidence-based trend, and it wasn't ideal, either, though. We were giving all peri- and post-menopausal women hormones "to prevent …
This is exactly it. I still believe in following the evidence, but the trick was in having pHarma-supported and -written protocols turn out to be what's called 'evidence.' I went to medical school before the evidence-based trend, and it wasn't ideal, either, though. We were giving all peri- and post-menopausal women hormones "to prevent heart attacks," e.g., when later evidence showed they *caused* more heart attacks. They are training automatons, now, though, instead of telling them to study physiology and pathophysiology enough to understand the natural way to stay healthy and the non-drug interventions regaining health.
Well I first read about 'evidence based medicine' when studying CMS guidelines as part of a trends report for a client and was instantly suspicious. One of those things that SOUNDS good in principle, but made me wonder 'whose evidence'? I had already figured out that science was corrupted before covid (although I didn't realize how much so) and so when the 800 pound gorilla is picking the evidence, just seemed like a bad plan. But the spin doctors were working hard.
This is exactly it. I still believe in following the evidence, but the trick was in having pHarma-supported and -written protocols turn out to be what's called 'evidence.' I went to medical school before the evidence-based trend, and it wasn't ideal, either, though. We were giving all peri- and post-menopausal women hormones "to prevent heart attacks," e.g., when later evidence showed they *caused* more heart attacks. They are training automatons, now, though, instead of telling them to study physiology and pathophysiology enough to understand the natural way to stay healthy and the non-drug interventions regaining health.
Well I first read about 'evidence based medicine' when studying CMS guidelines as part of a trends report for a client and was instantly suspicious. One of those things that SOUNDS good in principle, but made me wonder 'whose evidence'? I had already figured out that science was corrupted before covid (although I didn't realize how much so) and so when the 800 pound gorilla is picking the evidence, just seemed like a bad plan. But the spin doctors were working hard.