11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
J Boss's avatar

Ed Dowd recently gave an interview and said excess deaths are spiking up again. He's a former investment guru so he said the chart looked like a breakout stock. For deaths to "break out" to the upside, well that's the opposite of good.

My life insurance paid through large company policy went up 125% this year... my cost portion. CEOs know why it went up...

Expand full comment
Raptor's avatar

That insurance rate change is incredible. At some point there shold be a break for the unjabbed. Why should the folks less likely to die unexpectedly while being healthy and young bear the brunt?

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

I heard (but can't confirm), the more jabs you've had, the less the life insurance companies will insure you for. If you've gotten all the jabs and all the latest boosters, you are not eligible for coverage. 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

This is interesting as it says they won't ask your status and they below it says most won't require you to have it to get life insurance.

https://www.guardianlife.com/life-insurance/covid-vaccine

I'm guessing it is a problem as the fact they felt the need means people must be sharing their personal experiences.

Another site I looked at says ask your provider and mentioned states that issued laws against not accepting it. I lost the link, sorry.

These people are total weasels... If you think about it if 70% of the population is not eligible to buy insurance it would all collapse. Therefore they have to say they are and then when shtf and they die by the millions they probably have a clause that says they are not liable to pay

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Interesting that they seem to ask if you've had or have Covid, but not about the vaccine? Weird. Just add "vaccine" after Covid in the following paragraph. Obviously, the injections do not keep you from getting covid, or spreading covid and do nothing to keep one out of the hospital or protect you from DYING. In fact, the numbers are proving the exact opposite - get vaxed->> get covid, get crazy ADRs, some permanently disabling, go to hospital, or get DEAD right off the bat.

"However, getting COVID-19 could hurt your ability to get a new policy in the future, especially if you develop more severe long-haul symptoms from this illness. So if a vaccine helps you stay healthier – either by preventing you from getting COVID or limiting the severity of the infection and its long-term consequences – it could indirectly help you qualify for life insurance with better terms."

Same paragraph - my edits

However, getting COVID-19 [vaccinations] could hurt your ability to get a new policy in the future, especially if you develop more severe long-haul symptoms from this illness [VAIDS]. So if a vaccine helps you stay healthier (it doesn't)– either by preventing you from getting COVID (it doesn't) or limiting the severity of the infection (it doesn’t) and its long-term consequences (it doesn’t)– it could indirectly help you qualify for life insurance with better terms."

*My (it doesn't) comments are backed up by the big pharm's own admissions. They never tested for prevention, only (supposedly) the "lessening of symptoms", which data says was a complete failure.

The insurance companies HAVE to see what's happening!

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

And yes they do. But you have to remember that they oversold these policies and they are looking for a way out.

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

I know they were never tested. This looks like a fear tactic. It's endless! Yet they said people will get it willingly. These people need a lesson in informed consent!

Expand full comment
Raptor's avatar

A shock and awe miracle if true Grammy.

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

I heard that there is a clause in the policy that says if you are take part in experimental drug trials you invalidate your insurance. This was at the very start when people were trying to help people make the choice.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

That clause has been standard in life insurance policies for a long time. It has kept people from being able to use alternative treatments to diseases, especially cancer. That's one reason why there was the such a push to falsely claim the jabs were FDA approved. They did a bait and switch - approving Comirnaty (not available) but using BioNTech instead, saying they were interchangeable. My question was -IF they are indeed "interchangeable", why not get the FDA approval for BioNTech, too??

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

I wish this is true. Any confirmation out there?

Expand full comment