I thought the story on the ants was leading to a new WHO-approved food supply for us pleebs.
Fortunately it's about cancer detection, which is a novel approach. I recall Joe Biden saying he was going to get cancer solved. Haven't heard much about that. Press doesn't seem curious.
I thought the story on the ants was leading to a new WHO-approved food supply for us pleebs.
Fortunately it's about cancer detection, which is a novel approach. I recall Joe Biden saying he was going to get cancer solved. Haven't heard much about that. Press doesn't seem curious.
This is something to keep our eyes on. I've noticed some recent deaths, turbo cancers and well ... I may just be married to someone who took 2 modernas despite my pleas...
Cancer is the perfect unifier - everyone agrees that cancer sucks. But then, we are not all going to agree on why it has gotten worse. Heck I remember reading back in the 90's or so that COFFEE caused cancer. And bacon. (Maybe they make these proclamations to get more lobbyist money) And given the new eyes with which many of us are viewing the medical establishment these days, even the treatment options are becoming politicized. And turns out all the billions poured into research is largely applied in a lemming-like groupthink model. Kudos to the ant people who are thinking outside the box.
There is a very old saying "There is more money to be made LOOKING for cancer cure than for FINDING one." This observation can be generalized to many fields, particularly those that involve suckling at the government teat. Three years of reading about the massive corruption surrounding Covid-19 "vaccines" and drugs, and learning the rot goes back way earlier, has convinced me that the entire system is corrupt, largely due to the flow of funding and who controls it. I suppose that a new breakthrough is possible, but from what I've read, it sounds as though the entire system is biased to protect the (profitable) status quo and entrenched interests. A good example would be off-label (generic) drugs -- any research into these would be discouraged, their uses restricted (e.g. IVM & HCQ) because it might threaten on-patent expensive products.
There is a lot of research on nutrition, supplements and off label medications that can treat and cure cancer, but no Big Pharma $$$ to be made, so they sweep them under the rug and do not get funded for the 'necessary' clinical trials to allow them to be included in my now most hated term - 'Standard of Care'. Almost all practitioners we have encountered in batlting my husband's cancer hide behind theses kind of statements!!
There was a recent study done in Europe where they discovered a metabolic pathway(called SCOT) that can be blocked through supplements, fasting and off label meds. The study was crowd source funded as no pharmas would touch it.
Same with 'climate change'. I had a lot of 'green' projects for clients in the early Obama years as there were grant money programs for companies to explore green options - feasibility studies. So yeah, studying the issue but no money to actually DO anything. ROI of most of them was sketchy. And in the course of all this digging around, discovered that peer review is just another name for groupthink. I remember reading about brave scientists whose work did not adhere to the 'chicken little sky is falling' narrative who lost grants, jobs and reputations. Sound familiar? So I came into 2020 with a jaded eye from the start.
A relative by marriage did PhD research on a cure for ovarian cancer. The research was ‘confiscated’ by the university and never saw the light of day. So much anger…
I’m old enough to remember when cancer ‘burst’ upon the scene. (Just when the major chemical companies began mass producing all the household and farm products we couldn’t live without.). When alarmed folk questioned, ‘why is this happening?’ The answer was, ‘It’s always been happening. We just didn’t know what to call it.’ As a small child, I thought that was odd.
So, I got curious and did a little digging. In 1880, US life expectancy was 39.4 years. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy So indeed possible that cancer never got around to inflicting people, and medicine was pretty primitive, likely deaths caused by cancer were not properly diagnosed.
Cancer incidence rates were 400.9 per 100K in 1975, and rose steadily through the 80's, peaking at 499.99 overall (men and women) in 1992, but declining after that to 451.16 per 100K in 2019, so still higher rate vs 1975. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/diagnosis/incidence Five year cancer survival rates have grown since 1970 for all cancers except uterine and cervical, which have declined. https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2018/03/Five-year-cancer-survival-rates-USA-v2-01.png Cancer disproportionally affects older adults, so the longer you live, it stands to reason that you have a better chance of getting a cancer dx. Of course, the causes of cancer have always been a hot topic, and something that changes with the wind for some things.
This history of cancer I found fascinating: Cancer has been found in mummies, dinosaurs and preserved remains of people thousands of years old.
"The long-held hypothesis of a link between microorganisms and cancer is of historic significance as it exemplifies how generations of scientists, researchers, and scholars, misguided by flawed hypotheses, often commit their talents and energy, as well as considerable human and financial resources to the unproductive pursuit of a dubious lead. While a resolute pursuit of a worthy goal by many is often necessary, overly enthusiastic adherence to a single hypothesis by many is self-reinforcing and often obfuscates good judgment while dismissing the unwelcome views of few dissenters." (This was published in 2014, but sounds JUST LIKE today)
Sucked down the rabbit hole, LOL. It seems like I am hearing about a lot more people with cancer these days, but then I am also over 50. My parents came from big families , and I have 35 cousins, and know only one aunt, my dad, and my FIL are the only ones who had cancer. All 3 survived it, although my dad survived prostate cancer for 8 years but died from heart failure while fighting throat cancer at age 79 (in 2014) Have to wonder a little about a genetic link. A friend, her sister and her mom are all breast cancer survivors. Did not try to find more recent incidence data, as I suspect the CDC is probably hiding it anyway and their site is a huge PITA to navigate.
I can imagine. There must be so much information out there to sift through and not all of it accessible or easy to understand. I feel like I know more people with cancer too, especially younger people, but also wonder how much of it is my age and now relatively extensive network of friends, family and acquaintances. But it does seem like more of them are younger and/or have the “turbo cancers” that appear seemingly out of nowhere and are already very advanced and that get worse very quickly.
Yes, same. Due to all my involvement in so many campaigns in the last year and a half or so I definitely have a much bigger circle, (thanks covid, lol) so that could be part of it as well. I did do a little more looking and the National Cancer Institute's 2022 Report to the Nation was based on 2019 data!?! Typical gov I guess, by the time the data comes out, it is already outdated, just like the Census Bureau.
I’m so happy to see alternative treatments to cancer being reported on. It’s been a major source of income for the corrupt medical system for far too long.
Are you old enough to remember that movie "Medicine Man" with Sean Connery and Lorraine Bracco? They're working on a cure for cancer in the Amazon Jungles thinking they were looking for a plant, and at the end of the movie they discover the secret ingredient comes from ant pee/poop. That's what the ant story reminded me of.
I thought the story on the ants was leading to a new WHO-approved food supply for us pleebs.
Fortunately it's about cancer detection, which is a novel approach. I recall Joe Biden saying he was going to get cancer solved. Haven't heard much about that. Press doesn't seem curious.
Pretty ironic he said that considering we now have turbo charged cancers as a result of his mandated golden calf jab
This is something to keep our eyes on. I've noticed some recent deaths, turbo cancers and well ... I may just be married to someone who took 2 modernas despite my pleas...
So yeah. Still testing. Not pleased.
Ugh. Would (s)he be open to the FCCC protocol after getting the shot? I begged my husband not to & luckily he listened
Yeah I am working on that. She's aware and not continually boosting.
Cancer is the perfect unifier - everyone agrees that cancer sucks. But then, we are not all going to agree on why it has gotten worse. Heck I remember reading back in the 90's or so that COFFEE caused cancer. And bacon. (Maybe they make these proclamations to get more lobbyist money) And given the new eyes with which many of us are viewing the medical establishment these days, even the treatment options are becoming politicized. And turns out all the billions poured into research is largely applied in a lemming-like groupthink model. Kudos to the ant people who are thinking outside the box.
There is a very old saying "There is more money to be made LOOKING for cancer cure than for FINDING one." This observation can be generalized to many fields, particularly those that involve suckling at the government teat. Three years of reading about the massive corruption surrounding Covid-19 "vaccines" and drugs, and learning the rot goes back way earlier, has convinced me that the entire system is corrupt, largely due to the flow of funding and who controls it. I suppose that a new breakthrough is possible, but from what I've read, it sounds as though the entire system is biased to protect the (profitable) status quo and entrenched interests. A good example would be off-label (generic) drugs -- any research into these would be discouraged, their uses restricted (e.g. IVM & HCQ) because it might threaten on-patent expensive products.
Like: The Joe Tippens Cancer Protocol suggests a dose of 222 mg per day (1 gram of Panacur C), seven days a week. Fenbendazole. https://www.laurasmercantile.com/joe-tippens-dog-dewormer-cancer-treatment/
Friend using it for inoperable NSCLC and is NED 2 years in.
🙏🏻
My S-I-L is using FenBen for prostate cancer.
S-I-L?
Son-in-law
Sister-in-law
There is a lot of research on nutrition, supplements and off label medications that can treat and cure cancer, but no Big Pharma $$$ to be made, so they sweep them under the rug and do not get funded for the 'necessary' clinical trials to allow them to be included in my now most hated term - 'Standard of Care'. Almost all practitioners we have encountered in batlting my husband's cancer hide behind theses kind of statements!!
There was a recent study done in Europe where they discovered a metabolic pathway(called SCOT) that can be blocked through supplements, fasting and off label meds. The study was crowd source funded as no pharmas would touch it.
https://researchopenworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Maurice-Isra%C3%ABl-EDMJ.pdf
Same with 'climate change'. I had a lot of 'green' projects for clients in the early Obama years as there were grant money programs for companies to explore green options - feasibility studies. So yeah, studying the issue but no money to actually DO anything. ROI of most of them was sketchy. And in the course of all this digging around, discovered that peer review is just another name for groupthink. I remember reading about brave scientists whose work did not adhere to the 'chicken little sky is falling' narrative who lost grants, jobs and reputations. Sound familiar? So I came into 2020 with a jaded eye from the start.
A relative by marriage did PhD research on a cure for ovarian cancer. The research was ‘confiscated’ by the university and never saw the light of day. So much anger…
That's terrible, I would be angry too.
I’m old enough to remember when cancer ‘burst’ upon the scene. (Just when the major chemical companies began mass producing all the household and farm products we couldn’t live without.). When alarmed folk questioned, ‘why is this happening?’ The answer was, ‘It’s always been happening. We just didn’t know what to call it.’ As a small child, I thought that was odd.
So, I got curious and did a little digging. In 1880, US life expectancy was 39.4 years. https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy So indeed possible that cancer never got around to inflicting people, and medicine was pretty primitive, likely deaths caused by cancer were not properly diagnosed.
Cancer incidence rates were 400.9 per 100K in 1975, and rose steadily through the 80's, peaking at 499.99 overall (men and women) in 1992, but declining after that to 451.16 per 100K in 2019, so still higher rate vs 1975. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/diagnosis/incidence Five year cancer survival rates have grown since 1970 for all cancers except uterine and cervical, which have declined. https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2018/03/Five-year-cancer-survival-rates-USA-v2-01.png Cancer disproportionally affects older adults, so the longer you live, it stands to reason that you have a better chance of getting a cancer dx. Of course, the causes of cancer have always been a hot topic, and something that changes with the wind for some things.
This history of cancer I found fascinating: Cancer has been found in mummies, dinosaurs and preserved remains of people thousands of years old.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijc.29134
"The long-held hypothesis of a link between microorganisms and cancer is of historic significance as it exemplifies how generations of scientists, researchers, and scholars, misguided by flawed hypotheses, often commit their talents and energy, as well as considerable human and financial resources to the unproductive pursuit of a dubious lead. While a resolute pursuit of a worthy goal by many is often necessary, overly enthusiastic adherence to a single hypothesis by many is self-reinforcing and often obfuscates good judgment while dismissing the unwelcome views of few dissenters." (This was published in 2014, but sounds JUST LIKE today)
Great post, very interesting!
Sucked down the rabbit hole, LOL. It seems like I am hearing about a lot more people with cancer these days, but then I am also over 50. My parents came from big families , and I have 35 cousins, and know only one aunt, my dad, and my FIL are the only ones who had cancer. All 3 survived it, although my dad survived prostate cancer for 8 years but died from heart failure while fighting throat cancer at age 79 (in 2014) Have to wonder a little about a genetic link. A friend, her sister and her mom are all breast cancer survivors. Did not try to find more recent incidence data, as I suspect the CDC is probably hiding it anyway and their site is a huge PITA to navigate.
I can imagine. There must be so much information out there to sift through and not all of it accessible or easy to understand. I feel like I know more people with cancer too, especially younger people, but also wonder how much of it is my age and now relatively extensive network of friends, family and acquaintances. But it does seem like more of them are younger and/or have the “turbo cancers” that appear seemingly out of nowhere and are already very advanced and that get worse very quickly.
Yes, same. Due to all my involvement in so many campaigns in the last year and a half or so I definitely have a much bigger circle, (thanks covid, lol) so that could be part of it as well. I did do a little more looking and the National Cancer Institute's 2022 Report to the Nation was based on 2019 data!?! Typical gov I guess, by the time the data comes out, it is already outdated, just like the Census Bureau.
I’m so happy to see alternative treatments to cancer being reported on. It’s been a major source of income for the corrupt medical system for far too long.
Ants are all we can afford on our $80 million/year we spend on cancer research. Wars (Ukraine) is expensive...
That was conditioning us to having our money stolen to fight the new turbo cancer emerging. Remember, we're all in this together.
How I despise that phrase now…
Yeah, me too. I only use it sarcastically.
Oh I thought you were but I still felt moved to comment—that and “mask up” and a few other of those phrases are like nails on a.chalkboard now…
Are you old enough to remember that movie "Medicine Man" with Sean Connery and Lorraine Bracco? They're working on a cure for cancer in the Amazon Jungles thinking they were looking for a plant, and at the end of the movie they discover the secret ingredient comes from ant pee/poop. That's what the ant story reminded me of.
Yes that was my first thought just from the headline.....oh no now it’s “eat ants” 🐜
Even though as a kid one of my uncles came back from some far flung country with a box of chocolate covered ants.
And us kids screaming “Ewwwww who eats bug”🐛
Lol
40 years later...... and here we are wiz de bugs on the menu
Chitin anyone 🤔🦗🤔🦗🤔
Most would prefer "Chitlins anyone?"
I like seeing/reading the original science. This one was published ONE YEAR AGO.
https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(22)00229-2
just after Biden's announcement to re-start his cancer moonshot. Yet...who heard about this research until today?!?
Yes, he hasn’t mentioned his son Beau who died serving in Iraq but apparently of cancer in at least one week... time to play the sympathy card.....
Or his extensive and sad experience with oil cancer 🙄😆