An interesting conspiracy is the satanic principle of inversion... Pfizer spelled backwards is Rezifp, ancient West Semitic god of the plagues.
Of course it's just a coincidence, as the Pfizer is simply the founder's last name. Still, weird huh.
Interesting! I'm a fan of Nietzsche. Have read most of his stuff, understand, well, some of it. Clearly, he was no friend of the church -- his next-to-last work was, after all, called "The Antichrist." He was not advocating Satanism (not overtly at least) rather he was deconstructing Christianity. Anyway, to "inversion." He uses that term often when discussing how a "slave" philosophy (or religion, such as Judaism) would "invert" the values of the "Master" class. The Master considers his class "good" but the Slave "bad" (not "evil," which had a different sense for Nietzsche); "bad" here means the commoner doesn't share the same ethics/standards as the noble. In contrast, "evil" is what the Slave labels the Master's "good." This allows the oppressed to form a world view where they are the "good," while the Master is the "evil" opponent. Fascinating stuff, and quite plausible explanations of how human societies and religions developed the beliefs that they did.
The interesting thing is that no matter the socioeconomic caste, Christians are both the master class and the servant (to humanity for their salvation). Nietzsche never got that. For him it was either/or.
An interesting conspiracy is the satanic principle of inversion... Pfizer spelled backwards is Rezifp, ancient West Semitic god of the plagues.
Of course it's just a coincidence, as the Pfizer is simply the founder's last name. Still, weird huh.
I don’t really see these things as coincidences but rather Satan at work behind the scenes with us completely unaware.
Interesting! I'm a fan of Nietzsche. Have read most of his stuff, understand, well, some of it. Clearly, he was no friend of the church -- his next-to-last work was, after all, called "The Antichrist." He was not advocating Satanism (not overtly at least) rather he was deconstructing Christianity. Anyway, to "inversion." He uses that term often when discussing how a "slave" philosophy (or religion, such as Judaism) would "invert" the values of the "Master" class. The Master considers his class "good" but the Slave "bad" (not "evil," which had a different sense for Nietzsche); "bad" here means the commoner doesn't share the same ethics/standards as the noble. In contrast, "evil" is what the Slave labels the Master's "good." This allows the oppressed to form a world view where they are the "good," while the Master is the "evil" opponent. Fascinating stuff, and quite plausible explanations of how human societies and religions developed the beliefs that they did.
I can’t see the name Nietzsche, without recalling the amusing quote….
Nietzsche… God is dead
God…Nietzsche is dead
I’ll stick with being a fan of the immortal God, rather than the long-dead, mortal Neitzsche.
God always has the last Word - the first and the last. He is the Alpha and the Omega…what is this poor Neitzsche than you are so fascinated with?
The interesting thing is that no matter the socioeconomic caste, Christians are both the master class and the servant (to humanity for their salvation). Nietzsche never got that. For him it was either/or.