No, just normal chess. Pretty typical approach in corporate America, where you can't directly make many claims w/o setting off fire alarms with the various gov't agents (aka HR) and whiny always "offended" crowd. So, you have to make your case in a more circuitous way. Leaders in large corporations do this all the time.
Either way, he made arguments for other existing treatments, which has the same effect as arguing to remove the vaccines. He also paid a heavy price for it, many times over.
More 57-D chess, right?
No, just normal chess. Pretty typical approach in corporate America, where you can't directly make many claims w/o setting off fire alarms with the various gov't agents (aka HR) and whiny always "offended" crowd. So, you have to make your case in a more circuitous way. Leaders in large corporations do this all the time.
Either way, he made arguments for other existing treatments, which has the same effect as arguing to remove the vaccines. He also paid a heavy price for it, many times over.