Phil, I would say that the development of different races from the one set of parents still supports the statement that God “created” different races, albeit through Divine Intent or will. He certainly built a diverse genetic code into those first parents, and apparently the resulting diversity was furthered by the very human characteris…
Phil, I would say that the development of different races from the one set of parents still supports the statement that God “created” different races, albeit through Divine Intent or will. He certainly built a diverse genetic code into those first parents, and apparently the resulting diversity was furthered by the very human characteristic of like being attracted to like. And one would guess that the differing races developed early in the history of mankind. By the time of Moses there was an Ethiopian race, from which his wife is said to have sprung.
Great rationalization but it doesn't hold up. You are mis-defining "race". Does that make them non-human or a lessor human or perhaps a superior human? Marxists and eugenicists would say yes. This was the whole basis for the willful extermination of the "Jewish race" by the "German" Nazis as...and I quote, "an inferior diseased race."
Here is the straight definition: there is only one Human Race. As it is written, so it shall be.
Your wife's background is from the Ethiopian culture which has similar cultural and genetic characteristics which I assume are different from yours. So what? Because you are both of the human race, I also assume you two have no problem breeding together. The term "race" is improperly used in your example.
Phil, I would say that the development of different races from the one set of parents still supports the statement that God “created” different races, albeit through Divine Intent or will. He certainly built a diverse genetic code into those first parents, and apparently the resulting diversity was furthered by the very human characteristic of like being attracted to like. And one would guess that the differing races developed early in the history of mankind. By the time of Moses there was an Ethiopian race, from which his wife is said to have sprung.
Great rationalization but it doesn't hold up. You are mis-defining "race". Does that make them non-human or a lessor human or perhaps a superior human? Marxists and eugenicists would say yes. This was the whole basis for the willful extermination of the "Jewish race" by the "German" Nazis as...and I quote, "an inferior diseased race."
Here is the straight definition: there is only one Human Race. As it is written, so it shall be.
Your wife's background is from the Ethiopian culture which has similar cultural and genetic characteristics which I assume are different from yours. So what? Because you are both of the human race, I also assume you two have no problem breeding together. The term "race" is improperly used in your example.
Total hogwash, Phil.
You even get the WWII post victory jewish propaganda wrong. I bet you even believe in the "holocaust" hoax.
Enjoy your delusions.