Please Phil, you know I didn't say that as my other lengthy comment makes clear. Your comment is absurd.
Starting a response with "So... (completely misstate what the person said) is a pretty tired strawman trick, thought you were above that. Guess not. Shame as we've had great discussions on here respectfully in the past.
OK, I'll back up and apologize. I assumed too much. To the point, how does "species adaptation" refute my statement here: "The worst part of your statement is that "It has nothing to do with denying Scripture." It has everything to do with Scripture. God created all mankind in Adam and Eve. Unless you deny that, God's Word tells us that we are all from the SAME PARENTS or the same gene pool. One cannot say we are different races without subverting language and logical thought."
I think that what everyone is trying to express is that yes, we ARE all of a singular RACE as in species—the human race- but that we have since subverted the term race to mean different things like genetic/physical characteristics eg skin color, eye appearance etc. Kind of how we all used to understand that a vaccine was an injection used to *prevent* someone from catching a disease by teaching the immune system how to recognize /fight it but now it’s just any old thing big pharma wants to stick in a syringe and sell without proving anything or being liable for damages done. Language subversion is important when one wants people fighting about stupid stuff or to get away with murder.
Not true Phil, unless you deny species adaptation (not the same as evolution) takes place as I explain below.
So... you hold to Darwinian evolution of one species into another completely different species. Have fun with that.
Please Phil, you know I didn't say that as my other lengthy comment makes clear. Your comment is absurd.
Starting a response with "So... (completely misstate what the person said) is a pretty tired strawman trick, thought you were above that. Guess not. Shame as we've had great discussions on here respectfully in the past.
OK, I'll back up and apologize. I assumed too much. To the point, how does "species adaptation" refute my statement here: "The worst part of your statement is that "It has nothing to do with denying Scripture." It has everything to do with Scripture. God created all mankind in Adam and Eve. Unless you deny that, God's Word tells us that we are all from the SAME PARENTS or the same gene pool. One cannot say we are different races without subverting language and logical thought."
I think that what everyone is trying to express is that yes, we ARE all of a singular RACE as in species—the human race- but that we have since subverted the term race to mean different things like genetic/physical characteristics eg skin color, eye appearance etc. Kind of how we all used to understand that a vaccine was an injection used to *prevent* someone from catching a disease by teaching the immune system how to recognize /fight it but now it’s just any old thing big pharma wants to stick in a syringe and sell without proving anything or being liable for damages done. Language subversion is important when one wants people fighting about stupid stuff or to get away with murder.
Phil: Yes, we are from the same original parents, Adam and Eve. Now, you tell me why we don't all look alike, then. I'll wait.
Nor did I ever say this about Darwinian evolution, citing Ken Ham's explanation of 'kind' in the Ark story.