3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
TB's avatar

I'm still not convinced that all the people doing this KNEW that it was danger/poison/whatever. Some of them might (maybe the people in Pfizer), but don't underestimate the power of wishful thinking, "Let's rush this through safety testing, we'll be heroes, what could possibly go wrong?" Especially if all the people who stood to profit from it were whispering in their ear that it's "the most safe and effective vaccine in history" and so forth.

Expand full comment
Vicki's avatar

Except for the fact that people in Big Pharma REGULARLY retire to move into the NIH, the CDC, the FDA. Those positions have been interchangeable for decades. That's why they fought so hard to discredit ivermectin and HCQ. They couldn't make the big bucks on the Vax if they had other means of treatment under the Emergency use. And believe me, these guys KNEW the effectiveness of ivermectin and HCQ. It was all planned and carefully coordinated with Big Pharma, the ABC agencies, and the MSM which is why they all pushed the same sound bytes dictated to them.

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

Oh, there is absolutely grift and corruption - the profit motive is strong. I would be prepared to believe that suppression of IVM/HCQ was done for dishonest reasons. It's just the specific claim that all the people involved knew the whole time that the vax was dangerous and therefore didn't get the shots themselves, which I'm skeptical of.

Expand full comment