May I just say, from England, that we are not in fact all that jubilant about the coronation of King Sausage Fingers. The man is a pompous ignoramus who almost nobody likes, and there are very few people who think it's a good use of £100 MILLION to throw him an ostentatious Golden Hat Party.
May I just say, from England, that we are not in fact all that jubilant about the coronation of King Sausage Fingers. The man is a pompous ignoramus who almost nobody likes, and there are very few people who think it's a good use of £100 MILLION to throw him an ostentatious Golden Hat Party.
Mostly we liked Queenie (last of her breed), but now that she's abandoned us to the dullards and perverts that make up the next 2 generations of Windsors, the shine is off the apple, so to speak. Charles could certainly help himself by *shutting up*, but doesn't appear willing or able when it comes to doing that, so I think it won't be long before we wind up this monarchy business all together. Let's see.
Leaders of an anti-monarchy demonstration, Republic, were arrested this morning at 7.30am just walking down the street. Their van with hundreds of placards was also seized. This after planning meetings with the police.
Absolutely DISGUSTING!
Democracy? Free Speech? I am ashamed to be British.
And Charles (a dreadful, spoilt, petulant, whining, free-loading, cheating, mediocre bore) is Not My King!
Agree with you Marc, it was a peaceful, lawful protest. They should not have been arrested, and that action will backfire on Charles, who is already unpopular, for exactly this kind of reason.
The man is a buffoon, and he may well destroy the Crown out of pure arrogance. He should have had the wisdom to pass it to William, for the sake of the institution, but his pride will not let him — he wants to wear the Golden Hat and 'rule'. Be careful what you wish for, eh Charlie boy?
What do you think about William and Kate? I am far from a monarchist but they do seem much more sympathetic to me, at least from the little I know about them.
Yes I agree, it is infuriating and heartbreaking—though I daresay we have been going more in that direction with our political and upper bureaucratic classes being totally disconnected from the average person and totally enamored of their own privileges which they seem to think they deserve for some reason 🙄
I don't really want an elected HoS either, that's like jumping from the frying pan into the fire. 🔥 Imagine if Boris Johnson or Tony Blair had been able to lord it over us from an even higher height?! ...FFS, I'd have to leave the country!
Perhaps we could have a national animal mascot. Let's pick a cat or a dog, and rotate the crown every 5 years. Could be fun. Certainly more affordable.
Cornwall. I’m here in London now. Shocked at so many people embracing this hypocritical King. The ones who don’t mention his treatment of Diana and dislike for Camilla???? Are they unaware of his eugenic underpinnings and embrace of Schwab’s great reset, etc???
Deb B, How I wish I was there protesting yesterday.
Everyone should read Rebel Prince by Tom Bower. It is a biography of Charles which tells it like it really is.
What they did to Diana was digusting! The late Queen cut Camilla dead for years because of Charle's infidelity with her. He is quoted as saying that he was not going to be the only Prince of Wales in history not to have a mistress.
AND he takes £20+ Million a year out of Cornwall as private tax-free income; one of the poorest regions in Europe. Dispicable!
I truly fear for people's stupidity and ignorance - but then, look at covid...
But someone needs to pull Will aside and give him a slap around the face, and tell him to shut up about the 'poor me' stuff. He's headed down the wrong path with the tv programmes about mental health, where he's blubbering and carrying on. I'm not against the Royals doing charity stuff that is dear to them, but they need to be very careful about the emoting in public, and especially careful about coming across like you're saying "Poor little me, life as a Prince was just sooo hard!".
I think the Queen had great advisors around her, that had been around for many decades and understood that the Crown requires for it's authority a good dose of mystique. The younger ones don't appear to have anyone giving them sound advice.
Charles clearly doesn't have anyone sound that he listens to either. Recently he (seriously) informed the public that he's had his Rolls Royce converted to run on leftover wine from the estate, to help fight climate change. He thought that was a wise and relatable anecdote to deliver during a cost of living crisis. That's the kind of delusional disconnectedness that we'd expect from someone raised as he was, but where was the team of Palace people to say "NOPE! ...absolutely not! ...cut that. That segment is NOT going in the broadcast!" ...?
Yes they come across as very disconnected and very self centered. The poor me stuff is 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 for me, maybe they think it makes them more human or relatable or something but I agree that they should just shut up about it and be grateful for their advantages.
Make a spoof "Reality" show "The WindSores" and juxtapose it with the KarTrashians (America's fleeting Royalty). These celebrated dysfunctional train wrecks of families make East Palestine look like a bicycle with a flat tire.
Charles released a video last week where he said there is an urgent need to move to "sustainability COMPLIANCE". He talked about new police forces going door to door. So I think there are two eras, Elizabeth and post-Elizabeth. All the pomp and ceremony is a dying nostalgic backward look at what was, but WEF One World U.N. Government is what awaits looking forward
Nor mine! Hailing from NSW Australia, it was wall to wall media coverage but I doesn’t watch. He is a revolting individual and I want nothing to do with him and his WEF plans.
I am no history expert but the Monarchy revolutions have worked in the past.
If the people turned against them, why would it be different presently or in the future?
When the M fight back as above by capturing the free speakers, it may make the citizens stronger. I think the monarchs have tried fear and muscle before.
The Brits have a unique Mob Mentality. If used for the right purposes it could actually do some good.
We got rid of them once before (Charles 1 - lopped his head off) and then had them back again...
The trouble is, it's all done by tradition and with no real rules of engagement. It's whatever they say it is - just because.
And at the end of the day it makes little practical difference: the country is not ruled by the monarchy or even the government, but by corporate interests and the money markets.
But it would be good to save the estimated £345,000,000 a year cost and use it to pay our public servants, like nurses and doctors.
Ol 'Sausage Mitts is exceedingly arrogant and unlikeable — about as down to earth as a helium balloon. But he is by no means the worst one of them!
Don't forget about Randy Andy, who we have to try to hide from the angry public as much as possible, lest he open his mouth and remind everyone about his graft and perversion.
And the Ginger Whinger, and his grasping wife Woko Ono. Those two never take a day off from playing their tiny violins, sobbing into a camera about the horrendous oppression of being literal royalty and living in mansions with 17 bathrooms. Barf.
Gee .... Seems to me I recall Big Mike whining about how difficult and imprisoning it was being First Lady. Maybe easily-damaged itty-bitty feelings come with the silver spoons furnished by the taxpayers.
As an American, I have always thought the Queen was a classy woman. I know the times have to change but I was sorry to see her exit from this life. It's Harry and his wife (I can’t speak her name!) that I can't stand and I'm sort of happy the Queen didn't have to stick around any longer to watch Harry & wife's family bashing PR circus.
Queenie was the last of her kind, and she maintained the favour and devotion of the people because she was a *symbol*, not a person. She was wise enough to understand that the Crown must be impartial, because it sits atop the nation. It can never become associated with petty and divisive things like politics, for example. She behaved with humility and dignity, never lectured the people about how to live their lives, and never revealed anything personal about herself. She understood, and accepted, her role.
Compare that to Charles — the man refuses to close his yap for even 5 seconds. He cannot stop regaling us with his opinions about Net Zero, the Great Reset, and whatever other faddish and shallow ideas he is presently indulging. Ditto for the boys — emoting in public about how hard their lives were, and earnestly preaching the woke gospels of this and that, from their gilded perches.
Monarchy and celebrity are completely different things, and the younger Windsors are too dumb or too arrogant to accept that they can only pick 1 of them, not both. The monarch is powerful but *silent*, and is revered. Celebrities can be as verbose as they wish, but the public do not love and revere celebrities, certainly not over long time horizons. They all seem to want to ride that rollercoaster, and are blissfully unaware that they will likely bring the entire show to a close in their lifetimes, because they did so.
I have often wondered why the Brits are so enamored with their greedy, ostentatious "monarchy" that really has NO legislative or authoritative power anymore.
as a brit i can assure you most, or at least a significant proportion of us couldnt give a fk about the monarchy. they cancelled tonnes of planned celebrations around the country today due to lack of interest.
Interesting that you say "republic" as your choice of governance "construction". Our forebears decided that was the best route to go after separating from the "monarchistic" form of governance as well. It's an ancient form of governing - the best governance would be theocratic - but that will not happen under the Lord Jesus Christ cleans up the "mess" we have made of His creation and sets up His new KINGdom--now that will be a "monarchy" I will be thrilled to live with!!
i paused when i wrote that word and decided that i didnt care to think too much about what governance would be my preferred choice. i just hate the very idea of a monarchy in any form let alone this bunch of pedo cretins
I totally understand your hesitancy, Ray. The NEW WORLD ORDER that the Lord Jesus Christ will set in place will be something WONDROUS to be a part of - and I long for that day....I do believe it will be forthcoming before we pass into eternity. Just from what has transpired in the past 3 years!
Oh Sharon, Sorry but they DO still have SO much power - and obscene wealth, but it's all hidden. They also sit right at the top of the stinking British Class System that still rules and runs everything by patronage. They are not even British - even their real family name is German!
And for the privilege they cost us almost £1,000,000 a day!
Really? I am surprised by this as I had British friends (met them on a bus trip to NEW England in 1993) and they were very successful in their business and had some wealth (I would say they were upper middle class according to US standards).
Sorry to learn that these "poser British monarchs" are still wielding power over "the people"! Did all this "Germanic" influence start with Prince Albert - the consort to Queen Victoria? Set me straight if I'm wrong, Cornwall!
Yes this last lot started with Prince Albert but The Georges I - IV were also pure German - George I couldn't even speak English. (They got the British monarchy over other claimants because they weren't Catholics.)
So...from what you're saying the Reformation played a huge part in the "German invasion" of the British monarchy! Interesting....my "world history" is a bit rusty, Cornwall! Thanks for the "elucidation"--LOL!
Want more “elucidation”? Go to the Corbett Report (James Corbett) and watch the 25 minute documentary on the actual facts of this “royal” family that Corbett posted yesterday. Unbelievable. You will be elucidated right out of your skin seeing the horrors these people have caused humanity.
I listened to 20 minutes of Corbett's presentation - I appreciate his forthright delivery and he's easy to listen to. I'm falling asleep on it - so it's time for beddie-bye for this chickie--LOL! G-nite Mel and everyone on C & C army!
Hi Mel, I watched it! Only had to close my eyes for half of it (I can't even hear to look at him). Excellent!
I have made it my business to educate myself by reading books, watching films and finding out the truth about the UK monarchy. Why do others not do this? How can they be so ignorant and gullible? If they knew what I know...
But I suppose it's like the covid scamdemic; they're too trusting and brainwashed to think for themselves. Thanks again.
I get it… I’m an American and I thought we’d given up royalty a long time ago. Trouble is, we have our own “royalty” here. People are the same everywhere. They like to have someone whom they feel are their “betters” to worship. I don’t buy that crap and never have. I’m tired of these obscenely rich *****ety-blanks who feel they are more deserving than the rest of us. Hint to them- they aren’t.
Sharon you are most welcome. The whole of European royalty are related and inbred. Our history is littered with monsters.
As for our Church of England - it was founded by a six times married misogynistic two wives murdering tyrant who is celebrated as a historic national great - Henry VIII.
Poor Charles has only managed two wives, and one of them was his married mistress before and during his first marriage. Pathetic!
Yes, Cornwall...I knew well the convoluted shenanigans of your "8th Henry"...and his "virgin" daughter wasn't!! But she WAS a very capable and almost fearless monarch!!
By the way, James Corbett ran a 25 minute mini documentary on this horrid family yesterday. It’s free for everyone to view. Breaks down the actual facts instead of all the bull dung we’ve heard time and again of this family’s actual heinous history. Everyone needs to watch it! Today would be a good day to do so!
I was hoping prince would step in and queen would disown the sausage finger guy. Him and his horse faced girlfriend make me want to throw up. I know Diana was not innocent but he was older and he was an ass.
I had a laugh about the sausage fingers comment. I noticed that today when I saw some part of the ceremony where he placed his hand on a ring or something that was put in front of him, and the TV camera provided a rather icky closeup of those fat fingers. Short fingers, too. Yuck.
There might be hope with William. I truly think they should've demanded that Charles abdicate in favor of William because otherwise, as you say, the whole monarchy may be thrown to the wolves.
May I just say, from England, that we are not in fact all that jubilant about the coronation of King Sausage Fingers. The man is a pompous ignoramus who almost nobody likes, and there are very few people who think it's a good use of £100 MILLION to throw him an ostentatious Golden Hat Party.
Mostly we liked Queenie (last of her breed), but now that she's abandoned us to the dullards and perverts that make up the next 2 generations of Windsors, the shine is off the apple, so to speak. Charles could certainly help himself by *shutting up*, but doesn't appear willing or able when it comes to doing that, so I think it won't be long before we wind up this monarchy business all together. Let's see.
STOP PRESS!
Leaders of an anti-monarchy demonstration, Republic, were arrested this morning at 7.30am just walking down the street. Their van with hundreds of placards was also seized. This after planning meetings with the police.
Absolutely DISGUSTING!
Democracy? Free Speech? I am ashamed to be British.
And Charles (a dreadful, spoilt, petulant, whining, free-loading, cheating, mediocre bore) is Not My King!
Agree with you Marc, it was a peaceful, lawful protest. They should not have been arrested, and that action will backfire on Charles, who is already unpopular, for exactly this kind of reason.
The man is a buffoon, and he may well destroy the Crown out of pure arrogance. He should have had the wisdom to pass it to William, for the sake of the institution, but his pride will not let him — he wants to wear the Golden Hat and 'rule'. Be careful what you wish for, eh Charlie boy?
I still can’t believe that woman was crowned Queen. I never thought it would happen. Diana is turning over in her grave. 😞
What do you think about William and Kate? I am far from a monarchist but they do seem much more sympathetic to me, at least from the little I know about them.
Away with the lot of them! We should have an elected Head of State. It's all PR, managed entertainment and distraction - we can't afford it anymore.
The country is broke, with massive strikes of nurses, doctors, teachers, railway workers etc and we are still giving this one family £ millions! Why?
Those royal layabouts certainly do seem to cost you British folks rather a lot of money, don't they?
Yes I agree, it is infuriating and heartbreaking—though I daresay we have been going more in that direction with our political and upper bureaucratic classes being totally disconnected from the average person and totally enamored of their own privileges which they seem to think they deserve for some reason 🙄
I don't really want an elected HoS either, that's like jumping from the frying pan into the fire. 🔥 Imagine if Boris Johnson or Tony Blair had been able to lord it over us from an even higher height?! ...FFS, I'd have to leave the country!
Perhaps we could have a national animal mascot. Let's pick a cat or a dog, and rotate the crown every 5 years. Could be fun. Certainly more affordable.
They would only be elected for a set term.
No politicians need apply.
Cornwall. I’m here in London now. Shocked at so many people embracing this hypocritical King. The ones who don’t mention his treatment of Diana and dislike for Camilla???? Are they unaware of his eugenic underpinnings and embrace of Schwab’s great reset, etc???
Deb B, How I wish I was there protesting yesterday.
Everyone should read Rebel Prince by Tom Bower. It is a biography of Charles which tells it like it really is.
What they did to Diana was digusting! The late Queen cut Camilla dead for years because of Charle's infidelity with her. He is quoted as saying that he was not going to be the only Prince of Wales in history not to have a mistress.
AND he takes £20+ Million a year out of Cornwall as private tax-free income; one of the poorest regions in Europe. Dispicable!
I truly fear for people's stupidity and ignorance - but then, look at covid...
Yes, I agree, best of a (very bad) bunch.
But someone needs to pull Will aside and give him a slap around the face, and tell him to shut up about the 'poor me' stuff. He's headed down the wrong path with the tv programmes about mental health, where he's blubbering and carrying on. I'm not against the Royals doing charity stuff that is dear to them, but they need to be very careful about the emoting in public, and especially careful about coming across like you're saying "Poor little me, life as a Prince was just sooo hard!".
I think the Queen had great advisors around her, that had been around for many decades and understood that the Crown requires for it's authority a good dose of mystique. The younger ones don't appear to have anyone giving them sound advice.
Charles clearly doesn't have anyone sound that he listens to either. Recently he (seriously) informed the public that he's had his Rolls Royce converted to run on leftover wine from the estate, to help fight climate change. He thought that was a wise and relatable anecdote to deliver during a cost of living crisis. That's the kind of delusional disconnectedness that we'd expect from someone raised as he was, but where was the team of Palace people to say "NOPE! ...absolutely not! ...cut that. That segment is NOT going in the broadcast!" ...?
Yes they come across as very disconnected and very self centered. The poor me stuff is 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 for me, maybe they think it makes them more human or relatable or something but I agree that they should just shut up about it and be grateful for their advantages.
Make a spoof "Reality" show "The WindSores" and juxtapose it with the KarTrashians (America's fleeting Royalty). These celebrated dysfunctional train wrecks of families make East Palestine look like a bicycle with a flat tire.
Charles released a video last week where he said there is an urgent need to move to "sustainability COMPLIANCE". He talked about new police forces going door to door. So I think there are two eras, Elizabeth and post-Elizabeth. All the pomp and ceremony is a dying nostalgic backward look at what was, but WEF One World U.N. Government is what awaits looking forward
Indeed. Charles is 100% on board with the globalist agenda, he could not be more keen to revive feudalism.
Charles is Insane. You can see it in his face and fingers. Gout, alcohol an over indulgent and toxic lifestyle.
That sounds like something our (S)elected Resident Biden would say, thinking he was being clever.
Prince William and Prince Harry are not legitimate heirs to the crown. They have different fathers and not Charles
Really? Do tell! Of course there were always stories about Harry, but William too?
I’ve heard that too. But as long as they are accepted as such, nothing is going to change.
Empty heads.
Charles is also inbred - very very inbred. We who live in Appalachia know the signs and symptoms.
But, hey! Klaus and George both like Charles, and I betcha so do Greta and John Kerry.
You say inbred but we laugh because although we are Americans we have more English blood than the monarchy! 😆
What are those signs and symptoms of inbrededness? Genuinely asking
Retaining phenotypes ( and genotypes ) of genetic diseases.
That is why the try to marry off the island (out of country) once in a while to decrease the " inbred traits ".
Mostly mental illness, sometimes cross-eyed or inability to breed.
Hemophilia was one.
Study inter mountain villages in WV
Thats right. He's the WEFs king.
Useful idiot more like!
And a complete and utter climate hypocrite with a carbon footprint the size of thousands of the rest of us.
Oh yes, he’s just an arrogant hypocrite!
Nor mine! Hailing from NSW Australia, it was wall to wall media coverage but I doesn’t watch. He is a revolting individual and I want nothing to do with him and his WEF plans.
CM,
I am no history expert but the Monarchy revolutions have worked in the past.
If the people turned against them, why would it be different presently or in the future?
When the M fight back as above by capturing the free speakers, it may make the citizens stronger. I think the monarchs have tried fear and muscle before.
The Brits have a unique Mob Mentality. If used for the right purposes it could actually do some good.
We got rid of them once before (Charles 1 - lopped his head off) and then had them back again...
The trouble is, it's all done by tradition and with no real rules of engagement. It's whatever they say it is - just because.
And at the end of the day it makes little practical difference: the country is not ruled by the monarchy or even the government, but by corporate interests and the money markets.
But it would be good to save the estimated £345,000,000 a year cost and use it to pay our public servants, like nurses and doctors.
Glad to hear this counterpoint view!
And “King Sausage Fingers”! 🤣🤣🤣
Ol 'Sausage Mitts is exceedingly arrogant and unlikeable — about as down to earth as a helium balloon. But he is by no means the worst one of them!
Don't forget about Randy Andy, who we have to try to hide from the angry public as much as possible, lest he open his mouth and remind everyone about his graft and perversion.
And the Ginger Whinger, and his grasping wife Woko Ono. Those two never take a day off from playing their tiny violins, sobbing into a camera about the horrendous oppression of being literal royalty and living in mansions with 17 bathrooms. Barf.
🤣"Woko Ono!"🤣
Yup I know all about them and agree with your thoughts. Love the nicknames though 😁😆 I had heard Randy Andy but not the rest!
Gee .... Seems to me I recall Big Mike whining about how difficult and imprisoning it was being First Lady. Maybe easily-damaged itty-bitty feelings come with the silver spoons furnished by the taxpayers.
“We want privacy” as told on a national TV interview to Oprah Winfrey. Rudy a couple of petulant frauds.
As an American, I have always thought the Queen was a classy woman. I know the times have to change but I was sorry to see her exit from this life. It's Harry and his wife (I can’t speak her name!) that I can't stand and I'm sort of happy the Queen didn't have to stick around any longer to watch Harry & wife's family bashing PR circus.
Yes, quite.
Queenie was the last of her kind, and she maintained the favour and devotion of the people because she was a *symbol*, not a person. She was wise enough to understand that the Crown must be impartial, because it sits atop the nation. It can never become associated with petty and divisive things like politics, for example. She behaved with humility and dignity, never lectured the people about how to live their lives, and never revealed anything personal about herself. She understood, and accepted, her role.
Compare that to Charles — the man refuses to close his yap for even 5 seconds. He cannot stop regaling us with his opinions about Net Zero, the Great Reset, and whatever other faddish and shallow ideas he is presently indulging. Ditto for the boys — emoting in public about how hard their lives were, and earnestly preaching the woke gospels of this and that, from their gilded perches.
Monarchy and celebrity are completely different things, and the younger Windsors are too dumb or too arrogant to accept that they can only pick 1 of them, not both. The monarch is powerful but *silent*, and is revered. Celebrities can be as verbose as they wish, but the public do not love and revere celebrities, certainly not over long time horizons. They all seem to want to ride that rollercoaster, and are blissfully unaware that they will likely bring the entire show to a close in their lifetimes, because they did so.
You are right of course.
Somehow the queen never said anything about anything and so became sanctified to the extent that no one is allowed to ever criticise her.
Of course the reality is that no one is perfect...
I have often wondered why the Brits are so enamored with their greedy, ostentatious "monarchy" that really has NO legislative or authoritative power anymore.
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS--right??
as a brit i can assure you most, or at least a significant proportion of us couldnt give a fk about the monarchy. they cancelled tonnes of planned celebrations around the country today due to lack of interest.
personally i'd rather we were a republic
"personally i'd rather we were a republic."
These days, Americans wish the same about the U.S. !
Interesting that you say "republic" as your choice of governance "construction". Our forebears decided that was the best route to go after separating from the "monarchistic" form of governance as well. It's an ancient form of governing - the best governance would be theocratic - but that will not happen under the Lord Jesus Christ cleans up the "mess" we have made of His creation and sets up His new KINGdom--now that will be a "monarchy" I will be thrilled to live with!!
i paused when i wrote that word and decided that i didnt care to think too much about what governance would be my preferred choice. i just hate the very idea of a monarchy in any form let alone this bunch of pedo cretins
I totally understand your hesitancy, Ray. The NEW WORLD ORDER that the Lord Jesus Christ will set in place will be something WONDROUS to be a part of - and I long for that day....I do believe it will be forthcoming before we pass into eternity. Just from what has transpired in the past 3 years!
We in the US wish we had one too. We lost it somewhere as we moved west to the Pacific.
Let me dust off a few vintage muskets and fill the powder horns ... we former colonials can help you with that.
what no AR-15s?
or F15s for that matter
I gave mine up to someone else years ago.
Oh Sharon, Sorry but they DO still have SO much power - and obscene wealth, but it's all hidden. They also sit right at the top of the stinking British Class System that still rules and runs everything by patronage. They are not even British - even their real family name is German!
And for the privilege they cost us almost £1,000,000 a day!
Really? I am surprised by this as I had British friends (met them on a bus trip to NEW England in 1993) and they were very successful in their business and had some wealth (I would say they were upper middle class according to US standards).
Sorry to learn that these "poser British monarchs" are still wielding power over "the people"! Did all this "Germanic" influence start with Prince Albert - the consort to Queen Victoria? Set me straight if I'm wrong, Cornwall!
Yes this last lot started with Prince Albert but The Georges I - IV were also pure German - George I couldn't even speak English. (They got the British monarchy over other claimants because they weren't Catholics.)
So...from what you're saying the Reformation played a huge part in the "German invasion" of the British monarchy! Interesting....my "world history" is a bit rusty, Cornwall! Thanks for the "elucidation"--LOL!
Want more “elucidation”? Go to the Corbett Report (James Corbett) and watch the 25 minute documentary on the actual facts of this “royal” family that Corbett posted yesterday. Unbelievable. You will be elucidated right out of your skin seeing the horrors these people have caused humanity.
Mel, Where can I find it please?
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/meet-king-charles-the-great-resetter
Here it is Marc. Hope this link works. Cheers!
I listened to 20 minutes of Corbett's presentation - I appreciate his forthright delivery and he's easy to listen to. I'm falling asleep on it - so it's time for beddie-bye for this chickie--LOL! G-nite Mel and everyone on C & C army!
Hi Mel, I watched it! Only had to close my eyes for half of it (I can't even hear to look at him). Excellent!
I have made it my business to educate myself by reading books, watching films and finding out the truth about the UK monarchy. Why do others not do this? How can they be so ignorant and gullible? If they knew what I know...
But I suppose it's like the covid scamdemic; they're too trusting and brainwashed to think for themselves. Thanks again.
They aren't "trusting"--they are brainless idiots!! Sometimes I call them "jerkoffs"--I guess the Brits would say "wankers"??
Thanks Mel, I probably won't enjoy it: it's been a tough day for us 20% of republicans (and most of the rest aren't that bothered...)
I get it… I’m an American and I thought we’d given up royalty a long time ago. Trouble is, we have our own “royalty” here. People are the same everywhere. They like to have someone whom they feel are their “betters” to worship. I don’t buy that crap and never have. I’m tired of these obscenely rich *****ety-blanks who feel they are more deserving than the rest of us. Hint to them- they aren’t.
https://www.google.com/search?q=it%27s+good+to+be+king&client=safari&hl=en&sxsrf=APwXEddLj5D3dHmZfeo_V2yKgkmlK8-a8w%3A1683396590506&ei=7pdWZP_DHrOawbkPw4CDCA&oq=it%27s+goo&gs_lcp#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:0ed29dc2,vid:6aogOR8c8Q4 Hey Marc, maybe this great song will get you in a mocking mood. Better to laugh than cry. This long version of Tom Petty’s song is one of the best.
You can find it on YouTube under James Corbett
Sharon you are most welcome. The whole of European royalty are related and inbred. Our history is littered with monsters.
As for our Church of England - it was founded by a six times married misogynistic two wives murdering tyrant who is celebrated as a historic national great - Henry VIII.
Poor Charles has only managed two wives, and one of them was his married mistress before and during his first marriage. Pathetic!
Yes, Cornwall...I knew well the convoluted shenanigans of your "8th Henry"...and his "virgin" daughter wasn't!! But she WAS a very capable and almost fearless monarch!!
That’s why the river Thames is pronounced Temms
You might have been better off had they not dumped the Catholic James II.
actually many people think he is the anit christ because he is demonic
By the way, James Corbett ran a 25 minute mini documentary on this horrid family yesterday. It’s free for everyone to view. Breaks down the actual facts instead of all the bull dung we’ve heard time and again of this family’s actual heinous history. Everyone needs to watch it! Today would be a good day to do so!
https://rumble.com/v2m55ae-meet-king-charles-the-great-resetter.html
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-443-meet-king-charles-the-great-resetter/id887296283?i=1000611874267
Our USA dictator plant by fraud Joe and your plant by blood Charles are about equal!
Read Julian Assange letter to the new King. Brillant. Looks like the new king is expanding prison spaces for you guys.
I was hoping prince would step in and queen would disown the sausage finger guy. Him and his horse faced girlfriend make me want to throw up. I know Diana was not innocent but he was older and he was an ass.
je,
Take him and his wench down then.
They are a huge fraud.
I had a laugh about the sausage fingers comment. I noticed that today when I saw some part of the ceremony where he placed his hand on a ring or something that was put in front of him, and the TV camera provided a rather icky closeup of those fat fingers. Short fingers, too. Yuck.
He should run his own Epstein Island but name it Charlie's Island --oh wait; he does have an Island
Could not agree more! Hear, hear!
There might be hope with William. I truly think they should've demanded that Charles abdicate in favor of William because otherwise, as you say, the whole monarchy may be thrown to the wolves.