You gotta laugh. They just demonstrated by their own words that evolution is a farce.
There is no existing macroevolution of species to species. That fossil record simply does not exist. The oldest fossil records exist in the Cambrian Period rock strata circa 600 million years old. Yet all through the rock strata even back to the Cambrian…
You gotta laugh. They just demonstrated by their own words that evolution is a farce.
There is no existing macroevolution of species to species. That fossil record simply does not exist. The oldest fossil records exist in the Cambrian Period rock strata circa 600 million years old. Yet all through the rock strata even back to the Cambrian Period, there is a complete lack of evolutionary transitions. Complex creatures suddenly appear in the fossil record in an "advanced stage of evolution" with no examples of evolutionary transition even in this Cambrian rock strata.
Their method of dating with radioisotopes is flawed. They’re in bed with the labs that do the dating. It’s like circular logic. “Date the fossil from the surrounding rock; date the rock from the fossil found within.” Fossils had to be buried fast to stay in tact--otherwise they decay. This fundamental fact of fossils is ignored. I read a story about a miner’s helmet that got buried and fossilized. So its age is known. Sent it to some labs for dating--they came back with some exponentially erroneous date.
You gotta laugh. They just demonstrated by their own words that evolution is a farce.
There is no existing macroevolution of species to species. That fossil record simply does not exist. The oldest fossil records exist in the Cambrian Period rock strata circa 600 million years old. Yet all through the rock strata even back to the Cambrian Period, there is a complete lack of evolutionary transitions. Complex creatures suddenly appear in the fossil record in an "advanced stage of evolution" with no examples of evolutionary transition even in this Cambrian rock strata.
Gee, maybe aliens planted them? Couldn't be God.
Their method of dating with radioisotopes is flawed. They’re in bed with the labs that do the dating. It’s like circular logic. “Date the fossil from the surrounding rock; date the rock from the fossil found within.” Fossils had to be buried fast to stay in tact--otherwise they decay. This fundamental fact of fossils is ignored. I read a story about a miner’s helmet that got buried and fossilized. So its age is known. Sent it to some labs for dating--they came back with some exponentially erroneous date.
600 million? Not buying it.... Maybe 550 million, or 423 million? Can't go there...