I think genetic injections would be very appropriate. I would prefer him to say that as well. I just feel that some of those like him, who are in the public eye, trying to get the truth out there are being cautious to not say everything they know to be true yet. I think they give information and see how it is received before they dish ou…
I think genetic injections would be very appropriate. I would prefer him to say that as well. I just feel that some of those like him, who are in the public eye, trying to get the truth out there are being cautious to not say everything they know to be true yet. I think they give information and see how it is received before they dish out things that are even harder to accept. We are all in slightly different stages of being red-pilled. It's more of a course of pills than a single dose. If I had heard everything at once, I would have rolled my eyes and walked away.
I don't know if you saw Jeff on Steve's podcast last night. At the close, Jeff made a comment about how we can't sue the DoD since they have sovereign immunity. Steve just smiled and nodded his head. I believe Steve has had Sasha Latypova on his podcast but it would have been quite some time ago. Point being he knows about the DoD's role. He never writes about it. Why? Curious, no? And Jeff gave him a great big wide opening he could have driven a truck into. Nothing from Steve. What's up with that? There's plenty of factual information he could be pointing to. No conjecture necessary. But, nope, complete silence on the elephant in the room. How is expending all his energy on the pharmaceutical firm angle helping a vast audience understand what has really *really* happened? He could take it one step at a time, but he's not taking step #1. Why? I said somewhere else earlier in comments I think he's another limited hangout. This Consumer Reports low rating on mpg. ...Everybody's got an opinion.
If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck....! I don't think there is much to debate about your conclusions. The only reason people don't see this is a bad case of cognitive dissonance.
I think genetic injections would be very appropriate. I would prefer him to say that as well. I just feel that some of those like him, who are in the public eye, trying to get the truth out there are being cautious to not say everything they know to be true yet. I think they give information and see how it is received before they dish out things that are even harder to accept. We are all in slightly different stages of being red-pilled. It's more of a course of pills than a single dose. If I had heard everything at once, I would have rolled my eyes and walked away.
I don't know if you saw Jeff on Steve's podcast last night. At the close, Jeff made a comment about how we can't sue the DoD since they have sovereign immunity. Steve just smiled and nodded his head. I believe Steve has had Sasha Latypova on his podcast but it would have been quite some time ago. Point being he knows about the DoD's role. He never writes about it. Why? Curious, no? And Jeff gave him a great big wide opening he could have driven a truck into. Nothing from Steve. What's up with that? There's plenty of factual information he could be pointing to. No conjecture necessary. But, nope, complete silence on the elephant in the room. How is expending all his energy on the pharmaceutical firm angle helping a vast audience understand what has really *really* happened? He could take it one step at a time, but he's not taking step #1. Why? I said somewhere else earlier in comments I think he's another limited hangout. This Consumer Reports low rating on mpg. ...Everybody's got an opinion.
If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck....! I don't think there is much to debate about your conclusions. The only reason people don't see this is a bad case of cognitive dissonance.
Thanks for the observations. Interesting, and lots of questions.
Well, that’s possible. I guess time will tell.