Don't agree. This was just a local idiot-- not a military sharp shooter-- who could (on purpose?!) miss by a hair? I don't think so. Killing was the goal.
You are still believing the media story. No bullet came close to him. It was a blood packet.
It's always a local idiot--and what a coincidence--a young, white, male as usual, who was reportedly a registered Republican--because all white republicans are deranged, right? You are missing the bigger picture.
Just my opinion NoWay--which is what this comment section is for. You don't have to like it but maybe check your arrogance--and hey, maybe offer something of substance instead of trolling people and calling them names.
This is posted on a substack who would not trust the NYT or Fox to determine what's false flag or not. From a makeup artist familiar with using blood packets, looking at pictures of Trump - "The first thing that leaps out to you is the blood on his ear, and the dark spot in it. That dark spot is a hole—the symmetry on it doesn’t match the shadow lines on the rest of the ear. The blood could easily be faked, with a bit of practice, by a good stage magician (or under the tutelage of one), but the hole...not so much. The blood dispersal pattern is also a problem for a faker—the top-of-ear smear looks like one would expect for a blood-load ear smash, but the completeness of the coverage, and the active flow down into the ear canal are a lot harder to fake. This bullet wound is genuine.
Now, look at the two streaks, which might be bullet grazes. This would be where he would have had to smear the blood.
First, the bottom streak appears, from this angle, to begin with a thumbprint on the bottom lip, then wanders all over the place. However, if we look at it from the following photo that emerged a little after this article’s first publication, we can see that it looks a lot more like Trump split his bottom lip when he was diving for the ground or getting piled on by the Secret Service.The top streak, though, while it seems to have been touched at the point where the upper lip crease meets the cheek swell, is pretty much dead straight if you assume that Trump’s forehead was tilted forward and facing his assailant when he was shot (which seems to be the case on the video). This could be a bullet graze.
But this isn’t conclusive by itself, and there are other factors to examine. The forward part of the streak begins on his lip, and I can’t quite tell if the mark where the lip flesh meets the skin is an indentation from a wound, or just a shadow. Further back, though, on the upper streak, I’m seeing a slight inflammation of the skin tissue around the graze wounds. That only happens when you’ve actually been scratched." https://hollymathnerd.substack.com/cp/146590823
I read that and don't agree with most of the interpretations. His ear must have been sticking out like Dumbo to have gotten a hole through it, but not his head. He barely flinched, but it's also just not anatomically possible.
I don’t think actually killing Trump was in the script. But they had to add some other casualties to make it look real.
Don't agree. This was just a local idiot-- not a military sharp shooter-- who could (on purpose?!) miss by a hair? I don't think so. Killing was the goal.
You are still believing the media story. No bullet came close to him. It was a blood packet.
It's always a local idiot--and what a coincidence--a young, white, male as usual, who was reportedly a registered Republican--because all white republicans are deranged, right? You are missing the bigger picture.
You certainly are a credible source. The only all knowing one.
Hey if we are all in on conspiracies, trust no one. (That means you as well)
lol
Just my opinion NoWay--which is what this comment section is for. You don't have to like it but maybe check your arrogance--and hey, maybe offer something of substance instead of trolling people and calling them names.
lol
Produce the blood packet evidence.
Produce all the evidence you THINK was there--and that doesn't mean sending me NYT or Fox News articles about it.
This is posted on a substack who would not trust the NYT or Fox to determine what's false flag or not. From a makeup artist familiar with using blood packets, looking at pictures of Trump - "The first thing that leaps out to you is the blood on his ear, and the dark spot in it. That dark spot is a hole—the symmetry on it doesn’t match the shadow lines on the rest of the ear. The blood could easily be faked, with a bit of practice, by a good stage magician (or under the tutelage of one), but the hole...not so much. The blood dispersal pattern is also a problem for a faker—the top-of-ear smear looks like one would expect for a blood-load ear smash, but the completeness of the coverage, and the active flow down into the ear canal are a lot harder to fake. This bullet wound is genuine.
Now, look at the two streaks, which might be bullet grazes. This would be where he would have had to smear the blood.
First, the bottom streak appears, from this angle, to begin with a thumbprint on the bottom lip, then wanders all over the place. However, if we look at it from the following photo that emerged a little after this article’s first publication, we can see that it looks a lot more like Trump split his bottom lip when he was diving for the ground or getting piled on by the Secret Service.The top streak, though, while it seems to have been touched at the point where the upper lip crease meets the cheek swell, is pretty much dead straight if you assume that Trump’s forehead was tilted forward and facing his assailant when he was shot (which seems to be the case on the video). This could be a bullet graze.
But this isn’t conclusive by itself, and there are other factors to examine. The forward part of the streak begins on his lip, and I can’t quite tell if the mark where the lip flesh meets the skin is an indentation from a wound, or just a shadow. Further back, though, on the upper streak, I’m seeing a slight inflammation of the skin tissue around the graze wounds. That only happens when you’ve actually been scratched." https://hollymathnerd.substack.com/cp/146590823
I read that and don't agree with most of the interpretations. His ear must have been sticking out like Dumbo to have gotten a hole through it, but not his head. He barely flinched, but it's also just not anatomically possible.
Yeah, I’m sure there are lots of people willing to give their lives to the cause of “scaring Trump” and acting out an “attempted assignation.” 🙄
You're too thick to even bother responding to. Apparently not your moniker.
You’re such a good democRAT, Al
Time for your pills, CStone--you've repeated that same comment too many times.