It's plausible. But it is low yield retail election manipulation.
High yield election manipulation is accomplished with mail in ballot fraud conducted by "NGOs" and corrupt government "officials" and election "workers" who are receiving daily data about what the results are looking like - because they get to count ballots immediately instead of waiting to count only on election day - and know with absolute precision who has and has not voted and how many ballots are available.
That's what I have always thought, ever since I saw the first election machine. Where I am, we always had a choice of machine or paper ballots. Of course, I always chose paper because I didn't trust the machines and how they could easily be manipulated.
60-minutes last night had Pennsylvania election officials reassuring viewers that there is no way fraud can be committed, which I don't believe. Mail-in-ballot fraud is easy if you know how to do it and have a machine of people organized for that purpose.
I saw that 60-Minutes show and my gut instinct was that the guy they interviewed was lying about it. For one thing, he claimed there was not fraud with such total certainty. Well....he can't really be certain, can he!
Maybe, he was a registered democrat. Florida has purged their voting rolls. I’ll call and find out if he’s still registered. Thank you for pointing this out. I never thought about it.
Emumundo - they are voting for your deceased husband.
Now that's an interesting thought: send out a jury summons and if the individual doesn't respond, cast his vote for him.
It's plausible. But it is low yield retail election manipulation.
High yield election manipulation is accomplished with mail in ballot fraud conducted by "NGOs" and corrupt government "officials" and election "workers" who are receiving daily data about what the results are looking like - because they get to count ballots immediately instead of waiting to count only on election day - and know with absolute precision who has and has not voted and how many ballots are available.
Or simply inject an algorithm into the machine via WiFi which you then scrub after the election.
That's what I have always thought, ever since I saw the first election machine. Where I am, we always had a choice of machine or paper ballots. Of course, I always chose paper because I didn't trust the machines and how they could easily be manipulated.
60-minutes last night had Pennsylvania election officials reassuring viewers that there is no way fraud can be committed, which I don't believe. Mail-in-ballot fraud is easy if you know how to do it and have a machine of people organized for that purpose.
I saw that 60-Minutes show and my gut instinct was that the guy they interviewed was lying about it. For one thing, he claimed there was not fraud with such total certainty. Well....he can't really be certain, can he!
Your guts are instinctive and of course right! Some part of our brains reside in our guts.
They are running commercials in Wisconsin saying the same thing.
I thought the suitcases at midnight were quite efficient. You have to get rid of the other counters first.
And close the shutters.
Maybe, he was a registered democrat. Florida has purged their voting rolls. I’ll call and find out if he’s still registered. Thank you for pointing this out. I never thought about it.