You acknowledge “the self-evident universal consciousness that created everything” and reject theology consistent with that as “completely man-made.” Please explain how that’s not a self-contradicting thought experiment. And since you’re a fan of reality, come clean. Are you the authority on what created everything or a seeker of truth?
Why would an imaginary deity need to be defined?
Thought experiments are for those can't perceive reality.
I don't know where you imagined that I mentioned the accuracy of a completely man-made theology.
You acknowledge “the self-evident universal consciousness that created everything” and reject theology consistent with that as “completely man-made.” Please explain how that’s not a self-contradicting thought experiment. And since you’re a fan of reality, come clean. Are you the authority on what created everything or a seeker of truth?
"Are you the authority on what created everything or a seeker of truth?"
I'll let you answer your own arrogant question first.
I thought it was obviously rhetorical.
Such is becoming the best we can get.