I will say this, that the Judicial Context in which the push back against the dark modalities of Health Terrorism is being made it itself un-Constitutional because the Judicial Context is itself a replacement law system. For example, Title VII says that 'a person' cannot discriminate upon the basis of blah, blah, blah ... and does so by an ersatz claim to inviolable rights law. The unnoticed tell here a is the presumption in law on the part of the state that it is the state which is the bestower of a right. In this, there is no unalienable right bestower God. Hardly a soul notices this corrosive ignominious fact.
What Childers argues is pragmatic given the fallen state of law, and the corrupted state of the pastorate. In large measure, I cannot fault Childers because the corrupt law system is now the only game in town because the pastors don't argue against it. The don't argue against it because the pastorate itself is now captive to ideology and false doctrines. In fact, the pastors themselves are now so dumb as to not know that it's only boys and girls that marry each other ... and nothing else.
Ergo, using the same arguments and methods, but only in reverse within the same corrupt system, is longer term prescriptive of repeat renditions of the same evil. This is the Achilles Heel of Western destruction.
So... A self-reinforcing paradigm of circular logic that, at it's root, is rotting the foundations of Western civilization and will eventually take it down. A "House" built upon such sand will not stand and is doomed to destruction. Civilization must return to the Rock of God's Law-Word to build a society upon a firm foundation that can endure and prosper.
Well, one might think ... but far from me to know the stumblings of empires to probable inevitability, whatever that may be. However, the lesson of history is that nothing lasts forever save the providential one God, Lord of all creation.
Now, and in the interview, the Christian professions are sincere and come with a more or less heartfelt genuine tone ... and that is in and of itself respect worthy. These two do embrace a moral law ordering. But it would take the studied Calvinist to spot the flaws in what is going on in the interview. And still, half or in this case, three quarters of a loaf is far preferable to the hell horrors of none at all. And thank God for the resistance to Evil ... even if not perfect.
The 'good' and the 'bad' in daily life must be balanced one against the other in order to know the proper place of entry in ledger book.
Childers interview in case anyone missed it...............................
https://fedsforfreedom.substack.com/p/45-jeff-childers-author-of-coffee
I think you are a "God thing" Jeff❤️. Great interview.
Loved Jeff’s interview!
This interview is very, very interesting.
I will say this, that the Judicial Context in which the push back against the dark modalities of Health Terrorism is being made it itself un-Constitutional because the Judicial Context is itself a replacement law system. For example, Title VII says that 'a person' cannot discriminate upon the basis of blah, blah, blah ... and does so by an ersatz claim to inviolable rights law. The unnoticed tell here a is the presumption in law on the part of the state that it is the state which is the bestower of a right. In this, there is no unalienable right bestower God. Hardly a soul notices this corrosive ignominious fact.
What Childers argues is pragmatic given the fallen state of law, and the corrupted state of the pastorate. In large measure, I cannot fault Childers because the corrupt law system is now the only game in town because the pastors don't argue against it. The don't argue against it because the pastorate itself is now captive to ideology and false doctrines. In fact, the pastors themselves are now so dumb as to not know that it's only boys and girls that marry each other ... and nothing else.
Ergo, using the same arguments and methods, but only in reverse within the same corrupt system, is longer term prescriptive of repeat renditions of the same evil. This is the Achilles Heel of Western destruction.
So... A self-reinforcing paradigm of circular logic that, at it's root, is rotting the foundations of Western civilization and will eventually take it down. A "House" built upon such sand will not stand and is doomed to destruction. Civilization must return to the Rock of God's Law-Word to build a society upon a firm foundation that can endure and prosper.
Psalm 2:
10 Now therefore, be wise, O kings;
Be instructed, you judges of the earth.
11 Serve the Lord with fear,
And rejoice with trembling.
Well, one might think ... but far from me to know the stumblings of empires to probable inevitability, whatever that may be. However, the lesson of history is that nothing lasts forever save the providential one God, Lord of all creation.
Now, and in the interview, the Christian professions are sincere and come with a more or less heartfelt genuine tone ... and that is in and of itself respect worthy. These two do embrace a moral law ordering. But it would take the studied Calvinist to spot the flaws in what is going on in the interview. And still, half or in this case, three quarters of a loaf is far preferable to the hell horrors of none at all. And thank God for the resistance to Evil ... even if not perfect.
The 'good' and the 'bad' in daily life must be balanced one against the other in order to know the proper place of entry in ledger book.
Well said. Perhaps, and hopefully, resistance will birth a reformation. Towards this end we must work.
I will watch it. Thank you!
Thank you!!
Saw it first time, watched. It again :)🙌