As a matter of fact, Marxism/Pantheism calls for that. Rivers and trees gain rights. I read a piece arguing that to assist indigenous people in central american country whose local environment was being polluted what was needed were 'more words.' It was the lack of words to express the spirit of the environment. I now can read between th…
As a matter of fact, Marxism/Pantheism calls for that. Rivers and trees gain rights. I read a piece arguing that to assist indigenous people in central american country whose local environment was being polluted what was needed were 'more words.' It was the lack of words to express the spirit of the environment. I now can read between the lines of such words. What the author was describing was the need for pantheism. Keep going with pantheism and then trees and rivers are just as important as people if not more so. So instead of the Garden of Eden where man is instructed to care for the environment, man is just another piece of it.
As a matter of fact, Marxism/Pantheism calls for that. Rivers and trees gain rights. I read a piece arguing that to assist indigenous people in central american country whose local environment was being polluted what was needed were 'more words.' It was the lack of words to express the spirit of the environment. I now can read between the lines of such words. What the author was describing was the need for pantheism. Keep going with pantheism and then trees and rivers are just as important as people if not more so. So instead of the Garden of Eden where man is instructed to care for the environment, man is just another piece of it.