Oh geez. My kooky neighbor has been on this adrenochrome thing for years, and I have, in last two years, come to realize that she is NOT kooky, but way ahead of the curve, because most of the frightening things she passes on to me become accepted as real/true.
Oh geez. My kooky neighbor has been on this adrenochrome thing for years, and I have, in last two years, come to realize that she is NOT kooky, but way ahead of the curve, because most of the frightening things she passes on to me become accepted as real/true.
There are some of us who have been “awake” for a long time, trying to tell people. I personally wish I had woken up before I vaxxed my children with the childhood vaxxes. But sadly, I was more like 2014, after they had them. “Trance formation of America” book … which was actually written in 1995 … was a big part of my wake-up call. I realized then that almost all politicians are compromised by sex, money or both.
I apologized recently to my daughter, too, about her health issues early on. And congratulated her on not vaccinating her children. Of course, back then we had nothing to clue us in to the danger.
I as well, regarding children and vaxxes--youngest was born in '86, so fortunately missed much of the poisons (but was doctor-conned into taking HPV).
I have, personally, wondered whether the young global leader weffies (given that when you are young, you are not wise) are feted at cocktail parties, perhaps with interesting concoctions, propositioned by beautiful members of opposite? same? sex, with offers of same, go to hotel room thoughtfully provided with hidden recording equipment.....and then, from then on.......verbum sapienti satis est.
I've been thinking about this phenomenon recently, of kooky-sounding stuff that may be or is true, particularly in regards to the resolutions being passed in Florida county Republican Executive Committees calling the injections 'biological weapons' and calling for their seizure and destruction. Right now, I'm not persuaded that this is the best tactic, as it sounds too kooky, so I don't think it's persuasive to enough average people, though I think that given how they were developed, not tested, and then fielded without informed consent, they shouldn't be put into any more humans. I just think that the argument needn't be on the basis of 'biological weapon,' but rather no science, no ethics, and no informed consent. What do you think?
I agree--using term 'bio weapons' would just allow an easy go-around. No science (well, how do you define 'science'?), no ethics (same), no informed consent--that leaves less wiggle-room, I think
On the ethics question, we could use the standards of the mandatory course in the ethics of humans subjects research which all of us who lead such studies have to take, all thrown in the wastebasket for the injections. For science, there's a millennia-long history of how it's defined and conducted, and it would be trivially easy to point out how the methods used for the injections didn't satisfy modern standards; many have already done so.
Oh geez. My kooky neighbor has been on this adrenochrome thing for years, and I have, in last two years, come to realize that she is NOT kooky, but way ahead of the curve, because most of the frightening things she passes on to me become accepted as real/true.
There are some of us who have been “awake” for a long time, trying to tell people. I personally wish I had woken up before I vaxxed my children with the childhood vaxxes. But sadly, I was more like 2014, after they had them. “Trance formation of America” book … which was actually written in 1995 … was a big part of my wake-up call. I realized then that almost all politicians are compromised by sex, money or both.
Same here. I apologized to my kids saying if I had done my due diligence and not blindly trusted, they wouldn't have gotten most or any vaccines.
I apologized recently to my daughter, too, about her health issues early on. And congratulated her on not vaccinating her children. Of course, back then we had nothing to clue us in to the danger.
I as well, regarding children and vaxxes--youngest was born in '86, so fortunately missed much of the poisons (but was doctor-conned into taking HPV).
I have, personally, wondered whether the young global leader weffies (given that when you are young, you are not wise) are feted at cocktail parties, perhaps with interesting concoctions, propositioned by beautiful members of opposite? same? sex, with offers of same, go to hotel room thoughtfully provided with hidden recording equipment.....and then, from then on.......verbum sapienti satis est.
I would totally find that plausible.
I've been thinking about this phenomenon recently, of kooky-sounding stuff that may be or is true, particularly in regards to the resolutions being passed in Florida county Republican Executive Committees calling the injections 'biological weapons' and calling for their seizure and destruction. Right now, I'm not persuaded that this is the best tactic, as it sounds too kooky, so I don't think it's persuasive to enough average people, though I think that given how they were developed, not tested, and then fielded without informed consent, they shouldn't be put into any more humans. I just think that the argument needn't be on the basis of 'biological weapon,' but rather no science, no ethics, and no informed consent. What do you think?
I agree--using term 'bio weapons' would just allow an easy go-around. No science (well, how do you define 'science'?), no ethics (same), no informed consent--that leaves less wiggle-room, I think
On the ethics question, we could use the standards of the mandatory course in the ethics of humans subjects research which all of us who lead such studies have to take, all thrown in the wastebasket for the injections. For science, there's a millennia-long history of how it's defined and conducted, and it would be trivially easy to point out how the methods used for the injections didn't satisfy modern standards; many have already done so.