I hope that the family and doctors demand answers. In the old days such an event would have evoked shock and a desperate search for cause. Nowadays, I wonder.
It would be conceivable that an infant could have a cardiac event of some kind due to severe pre-existing congenital heart disease. But I would expect the family would already have known about that, and would have shared with friends before now.
Or Kawasaki Disease can cause this, but the kids are very ill w fevers and rashes for many days leading up to the event, and I am not certain this condition even develops in babies.
Just offering other ideas.... because I hate always jumping to the jab conclusion. But, it also seems the jab conclusion is the most common explanation for most medical mysteries nowadays, unfortunately.
Wonder if these were the kinds of conversations some folks had when SIDS first became a thing whenever that was, so many decades ago? "You know, ever since (whatever the new vaccine was then) came out, all these babies keep dying in their sleep."
Our 9 month old had Kawasaki's - and caught pretty early as "well, it could be this because a lot of the symptoms line up". Gave her the treatment and she recovered quickly, with annual heart checkups for 5 years (all clear). Sadly, now wondering if any of her vaccines might have played into that, but I don't remember what was going on back then.
As for babies getting the mRNA shots - I just don't understand the reasoning, and especially not for ones in the NICU who are already struggling to survive. :/
As for the reasoning, they do not see it any differently than any of the other childhood shots. After all, the you know who has said they are safe and effective. And especially important for the vulnerable babies in NICU because they are even more susceptible to infections etc.
I’m not agreeing with that. But that is their logic. They truly do not have any idea that these shots are a problem. None. They are mostly in echo chambers that are their professional boards. Most of them have zero idea that their professional boards would be lying to them or perhaps not have all the information. They have been trained to view contrary views as “quacks” or “Dr Goofle” level information, not worthy of even considering. It’s sad but true. And even many of the most compassionate doctors I know do not question this.
This is very, very sad.
I hope that the family and doctors demand answers. In the old days such an event would have evoked shock and a desperate search for cause. Nowadays, I wonder.
It would be conceivable that an infant could have a cardiac event of some kind due to severe pre-existing congenital heart disease. But I would expect the family would already have known about that, and would have shared with friends before now.
Or Kawasaki Disease can cause this, but the kids are very ill w fevers and rashes for many days leading up to the event, and I am not certain this condition even develops in babies.
Just offering other ideas.... because I hate always jumping to the jab conclusion. But, it also seems the jab conclusion is the most common explanation for most medical mysteries nowadays, unfortunately.
Wonder if these were the kinds of conversations some folks had when SIDS first became a thing whenever that was, so many decades ago? "You know, ever since (whatever the new vaccine was then) came out, all these babies keep dying in their sleep."
Our 9 month old had Kawasaki's - and caught pretty early as "well, it could be this because a lot of the symptoms line up". Gave her the treatment and she recovered quickly, with annual heart checkups for 5 years (all clear). Sadly, now wondering if any of her vaccines might have played into that, but I don't remember what was going on back then.
As for babies getting the mRNA shots - I just don't understand the reasoning, and especially not for ones in the NICU who are already struggling to survive. :/
Wow, glad your young one is okay!
As for the reasoning, they do not see it any differently than any of the other childhood shots. After all, the you know who has said they are safe and effective. And especially important for the vulnerable babies in NICU because they are even more susceptible to infections etc.
I’m not agreeing with that. But that is their logic. They truly do not have any idea that these shots are a problem. None. They are mostly in echo chambers that are their professional boards. Most of them have zero idea that their professional boards would be lying to them or perhaps not have all the information. They have been trained to view contrary views as “quacks” or “Dr Goofle” level information, not worthy of even considering. It’s sad but true. And even many of the most compassionate doctors I know do not question this.
There is no reasoning, no "science", it's a religion.