6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jeff C's avatar

Exactly. It's not "tit for tat revenge" but making them live by their own rules. We didn't change the rules, they did. We were perfectly happy with the old system where boundaries between legal disputes and political disputes were respected. We didn't ask for this.

But the fact remains that the new rules are now here. So we can hyperventilate about "hypocrisy" or we can show them that we won't stand for two-tiered justice. If a NY DA indicts a republican, then a Missouri (or Tennessee, Alabama, etc.) DA should indict a democrat. We can start with Hunter Biden or Hillary Clinton. Show them that the new rules apply to them too.

Leftists are bullies and they only thing they respect is power. They laugh at and frankly enjoy hand-wringing about "principles" and "hypocrisy" because it shows how weak and pathetic the conservative establishment is.

The left is marching forward on all fronts in the US, but there is one place where they are losing ground: transgenderism. That is because fearless warriors like Matt Walsh have said, "to hell with you, you are mentally ill, you are evil, and we are not going to let you abuse and brainwash our children". That's why state after state is now banning this stuff, it's not "tit for tat revenge" but a recognition of the left's destructive intent and relentless pursuit of its agenda. The fact that it took mutilating children's genitals for conservatives to finally recognize this is shameful.

The hour is late, either we fight them as ruthlessly as they are fighting us, or we may as well give up. It's not about revenge but actually standing up to these barbaric people.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Great comment!

“So we can hyperventilate about "hypocrisy" or we can show them that we won't stand for two-tiered justice.”

THIS!!!

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

I just love your comment so much!!! So spot on!! I can’t wait for a local DA to get started!

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

The thing is if we file suit we have to be correct and perfect. They only have to cry foul. We also have to prove them wrong like so many politically motivated arrests and hoaxes. The facts are there but it takes a long time. God bless Durham.

No tit for tat / eye for an eye needed. We can and should go all out on criminal corruption.

However, we need real cops, FB eyes, judges and prosecutors to do what needs to be done - uphold the law.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

I disagree, the point is not to convict them (which would be icing on the cake) but to subject them to the process. Let them twist in the wind running up huge legal fees and wasting years of their life being pursued by a Javert-like prosecutor. So what if they cry foul? They are going to do that even if the complaint is perfect.

What people fail to understand is that these are the new rules. We didn't make them, they did. That fat NY DA's complaint is a joke but does anyone think he's worried about people crying foul? He couldn't care less.

Unless we hold them to the exact same standard they hold us then this will not stop and will get much worse. This is what I mean about hand-wringing, people really need to knock it off as it's suicidal for our side. These are not normal times as the old rules are over.

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

Yes the old rule are over. If we don’t fight, we will cease to exist at some point in the future.

Expand full comment
ErrorError