Should we talk about the hospital that Ukraine shelled, and tried to blame on Russia? Shall we discuss Ukraine forces shooting Ukrainians trying to flee? Shall we discuss Ukraine shelling the nuclear plant and trying to palm it off as the Russians?
There is pretty much nothing coming out from either Ukraine or the US that is even halfway believable. Perhaps that has something to do with Zelenskyy having seized all media, at the same time other political parties were outlawed, and their leaders arrested, and partly because our legacy media is as completely and utterly useless as anything other than a propaganda machine.
To put not too fine a point on it, I ain't buying the BS you're selling...
No, Ukraine did not shell a hospital. On the contrary, Russia did hit a children's hospital early on in the war.
Ukrainians aren't shoot folks forced to flee. But Russians are.
And Russians are the ones using the ZNPP as a staging ground and parking vehicles and troops inside the plant structures. And also firing from it. When the IAE inspectors came to the ZNPP
You don't have to buy what I'm selling. In fact, I prefer you don't.
But when Russia states it "abandoned Kherson and Luhanks to Ukraine" as a a "good will gesture", I called it first.
The past 3 weeks has seen the largest gains for Ukraine since the war began. All gains since June or May have been reversed. Kharkiv is free. Ukrainians are using western style tactics and seized Kupyansk in days. Lyman fell and was a massacre for the russians-look at telegram. Dozens of smashed convoys fleeing the city. Now the Ukrainians are at the gates of Kremmina and panic is over sweeping the Russians.
The Ukrainians are doing fantastic.
And no, Zelensky has not outlawed all media. Nor has he outlawed other political parties.
Feel free to read what the Russian MOD puts out and the russian mil bloggers. They are despondent and depressed right now. I follow them also :).
Their answer would likely be that they were responding to being shot at.
In this scenario, it comes down to who is more believable. Given the situation that we created/helped create, the level of continued/continuing corruption of both Ukraine and the US, and the amount of outright lies and propaganda put forth by not only Ukraine, but the US, NATO. and the EU, the result is that their actions give Russia a credibility that they would not have otherwise. That's sheer incompetence, or hubris, or both, and that results in pretty much any garbage that is expelled from their pie holes being completely or mostly unbelievable.
Russia claims that there would not be a mobilization. Once their professional army was chewed up and the began to run out of men from Luhansk and Donetsk to snatch they started a "partial mobilization of 300k men". On the Russian MOD draft order paragraph 7 was missing. When asked why Shoigu stated it was a secret and referred to the number of men being drafted. Of course, that was already announced-300k, so that makes no sense. In reality it's going to be about 1.2 million and it's not only previously military, but guys who have never been in the military to begin with and even some with major health defects,
The current record is 4 days from Draft to capture courtesy of some poor bastard from Kursk oblast.
Russia has zero credibility at this point. They still claim they withdrew from kharkuv as a strategic withdrawal, yet the hundreds of tanks billions of rounds, hundreds of APCs, and hundreds of Artillery pieces and armored vehicles captured prove that's a lie.
You either have no clue other than what you have been spoon-fed, or you're simply trying to be misleading. In my book, that means that you are either a tool, or a tool for the government, neither of which is commendable. I have no desire to waste time with the likes of you.
The Donbas has been getting shelled regularly since 2014. Since it is Ukraine committing that 'war crime', most people pretend it never happened.
Yeah, yeah, I already know: 'that's different'.
Except it's not..
Nice try... smh
Should we discuss the water treatment facility in donbass russia bombed?
It’s not a war crime to shoot back at someone shooting at you.
Why did russia try to seize Kyiv if tnis was only about donbass? Why Kherson?
Should we talk about the hospital that Ukraine shelled, and tried to blame on Russia? Shall we discuss Ukraine forces shooting Ukrainians trying to flee? Shall we discuss Ukraine shelling the nuclear plant and trying to palm it off as the Russians?
There is pretty much nothing coming out from either Ukraine or the US that is even halfway believable. Perhaps that has something to do with Zelenskyy having seized all media, at the same time other political parties were outlawed, and their leaders arrested, and partly because our legacy media is as completely and utterly useless as anything other than a propaganda machine.
To put not too fine a point on it, I ain't buying the BS you're selling...
Couple things:
No, Ukraine did not shell a hospital. On the contrary, Russia did hit a children's hospital early on in the war.
Ukrainians aren't shoot folks forced to flee. But Russians are.
And Russians are the ones using the ZNPP as a staging ground and parking vehicles and troops inside the plant structures. And also firing from it. When the IAE inspectors came to the ZNPP
You don't have to buy what I'm selling. In fact, I prefer you don't.
But when Russia states it "abandoned Kherson and Luhanks to Ukraine" as a a "good will gesture", I called it first.
The past 3 weeks has seen the largest gains for Ukraine since the war began. All gains since June or May have been reversed. Kharkiv is free. Ukrainians are using western style tactics and seized Kupyansk in days. Lyman fell and was a massacre for the russians-look at telegram. Dozens of smashed convoys fleeing the city. Now the Ukrainians are at the gates of Kremmina and panic is over sweeping the Russians.
The Ukrainians are doing fantastic.
And no, Zelensky has not outlawed all media. Nor has he outlawed other political parties.
Feel free to read what the Russian MOD puts out and the russian mil bloggers. They are despondent and depressed right now. I follow them also :).
Since Russia and their DPR and LPR proxies were shooting, what did you expect? Ignore someone shooting at you?
Their answer would likely be that they were responding to being shot at.
In this scenario, it comes down to who is more believable. Given the situation that we created/helped create, the level of continued/continuing corruption of both Ukraine and the US, and the amount of outright lies and propaganda put forth by not only Ukraine, but the US, NATO. and the EU, the result is that their actions give Russia a credibility that they would not have otherwise. That's sheer incompetence, or hubris, or both, and that results in pretty much any garbage that is expelled from their pie holes being completely or mostly unbelievable.
Russia claims that there would not be a mobilization. Once their professional army was chewed up and the began to run out of men from Luhansk and Donetsk to snatch they started a "partial mobilization of 300k men". On the Russian MOD draft order paragraph 7 was missing. When asked why Shoigu stated it was a secret and referred to the number of men being drafted. Of course, that was already announced-300k, so that makes no sense. In reality it's going to be about 1.2 million and it's not only previously military, but guys who have never been in the military to begin with and even some with major health defects,
The current record is 4 days from Draft to capture courtesy of some poor bastard from Kursk oblast.
Russia has zero credibility at this point. They still claim they withdrew from kharkuv as a strategic withdrawal, yet the hundreds of tanks billions of rounds, hundreds of APCs, and hundreds of Artillery pieces and armored vehicles captured prove that's a lie.
Where is Russia more credible, again?
Since it was Russia that initiated the conflict and also broke the agreement their word is shot.
Most ceasefire violations came from the Russian lines.
Why would Ukraine want to Join nato?
See the current conflict.
"Broke the agreement"? You mean, like, Minsk II?
You either have no clue other than what you have been spoon-fed, or you're simply trying to be misleading. In my book, that means that you are either a tool, or a tool for the government, neither of which is commendable. I have no desire to waste time with the likes of you.
Good day.