Good catch. It really makes you wonder who writes this crap.... Call me a grammar Nazi, but I cringe whenever I see such sloppiness in purported "professional" publications ...
Good catch. It really makes you wonder who writes this crap.... Call me a grammar Nazi, but I cringe whenever I see such sloppiness in purported "professional" publications ...
It's a hint that it's not from the real CDC, as those publications go through such repetitive, meticulous review before release that it can be frustrating, as it takes forever and is a highly bureaucratic process that often reduces the products to bland pap. This is from The People's CDC, which expresses what they wish the real CDC would do.
Good catch. It really makes you wonder who writes this crap.... Call me a grammar Nazi, but I cringe whenever I see such sloppiness in purported "professional" publications ...
It's a hint that it's not from the real CDC, as those publications go through such repetitive, meticulous review before release that it can be frustrating, as it takes forever and is a highly bureaucratic process that often reduces the products to bland pap. This is from The People's CDC, which expresses what they wish the real CDC would do.
Or the real CDC is doing, under cover of “The People’s CDC”?
Here is more on those idiots at 'The People's CDC'. Not sure which 'people's ' they might be referring to but it's not my people.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-activism/the-case-for-wearing-masks-forever
TOOK IT. TOOL KIT. Hmmm. They can't be that wicked smart, can they?
I agree!! Especially when it is an important article or point, but the grammar is so bad it takes away all the cred.
It's not from the CDC. It's from the People's CDC. Very different.
It was totally hysterical. Literally and figuratively!