1243 Comments
User's avatar
Catherine's avatar

Happy about the straws but can we get to the really important stuff -- light bulbs!! I don't want that LED garbage in my house. Bring back regular light bulbs!!

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

How about backing off the new appliance regulations? So we can buy appliances that actually work properly again.

Expand full comment
P Flournoy's avatar

Especially washing machine machines that fill to more than a cup of water

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Check out Speed Queen. I 'understand' SQ filled in all the requirements in one phase, was passed, now rest works right for laundry.. If only dishwasher manufacturers had been that wise? Need appliances NOW, but when this changes warehouses will still be full of the offending products with limiting

chips; which cannot be removed.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

Speed Queen is awesome. We got one back in July after our Whirlpool died after only five years. There is a button that you can push that FILLS the tub full of water for all cycles (if you want). It also allows you to open the lid and put an errant sock in after the unit is on (no stupid locking lid). It is 100% made in WI, USA and is solid as a tank. No shaking and going becoming out of balance and it gets clothes clean (because you get to actually use enough water). The best made machine I've ever seen. No wonder laundromats use them. Also, there is a huge difference between your local Appliance store and the "big box store" versions of appliances. And the box stores to best of my knowledge do not have SQ's.

Expand full comment
char's avatar

79-Thank you. One recommended was laundromat type but too costly. Hoping for a more 'regular' model that still does the job. Whgt a blessing I learned this. Do you have a model number by chance?---- How about dishwashers? I was a fool, did not know about chips. Rather than replacing rack on 30 year old great working Kitchen Aid DW--went for new. KA had food grinder 'disposer'--dishes only needed to be scraped. New Maytag requires washing dishes before go in. However heard KA might now have 'problems' with electrical panel. Simply purchasing an appliance these days is daunting. Thank you for any suggestions/opinions.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

char: Model # AWN632SP116TW02 Product Code: TC5003WN

Ours is the classic model with as few electronics as possible.

Expand full comment
Sir Jeff Morency, Ph.D.'s avatar

No one should be using ANY dishwasher. The soap you have to use contains a surface tension reducer that stays on dishes to make them shiny when they dry. This chemical is NOT natural. It is mildly toxic to the human body. It can accumulate in the body and become one of the 5 causes of Cancer.

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

Built in obsolescence I think it's called, Char. I detest the throw away mentality of engineers/manufacturers today! And I won't go down the trail of 'smart' appliances that allegedly spy on your daily activities.

Expand full comment
Donna Oliphint's avatar

A friend ask her repairman (while he was administering last rites to her third washing machine in just a few years) which machine was the best, and he said, hands down, the Speed Queen. He said he never had repair calls for them.

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

Donna O, remember the 'lonely Maytag repairman commercials?

I know, I'm dating myself and I no longer watch a TV.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

thanks for this info!!

Expand full comment
Cal B Twitty Sr's avatar

Speed queen, coming with the expectation of it lasting 25+ years... Thumbs up!

Expand full comment
ACroneintheWoods's avatar

I bought a Speed Queen, it cost more, but so worth it. I love it. It is like a tank!

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

which model? I'm in the market for a new machine!

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

Speed Queen.

The fewer electronics the better.

Expand full comment
Leo Woman's avatar

In my opinion, you can't beat the Speed Queen classic model!

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

Now can somebody make a toaster that gets hot enough to toast, and last longer than a couple years? I finally resorted to purchasing a 50's vintage rebuilt Toastmaster B-14. Works wonderfully!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I had to buy a new toaster what a hassle I bought a Cuisinart. Don't waste your money I have to push the handle down 3 times to make it work

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Thank you! Last month husband fixed my spewing-water-on-floor Maytag from ~1990 but....

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

Kudos to husband! Hang on to that Maytag.

I have a 35 year old kenmore stored downstairs. I found out after I'd replaced it with a new $2,000 Speed Queen that all the kenmore needed was a new (inexpensive) shock absorber.

Expand full comment
MJ's avatar

Speed Queen, purchased after a Kenmore of many years. It's worth the $$

Expand full comment
Karmy's avatar

I love my Speed Queen. I purposely bought it because it was a top loader that filled up the washer with water!

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Happy to hear this. My stackable Kenmore washer and dryer are 20 years old now. Still getting it done, but nothing lasts forever.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Chips may not be removeable... But sensors may be hacked!

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Doug. Perhaps but for some more tech savvy than I. Instructions?

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

I think you need to be a LITTLE tech-savvy for this.

I remember as a kid when my dad removed the little washer that was a faucet's "water restrictor", drilled it out to a larger hole and re-installed it.

Washers have water-level sensors tat may be moved higher to allow more water to be present. But this may impact the gearbox, if it's not robust enough to handle the extra resistance more water would provide.

I'm naturally curious and resent state control over things I purchase, so I do my research, learn how something's built, and see if there's a way to circumvent controls. There almost always is. But you may have to be a techie to figure it out. Sorry...

Expand full comment
Austin's avatar

I bought a Speed Queen decades ago. It lasted 34 years!!!!

Then I bought another one.

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

and the "New" machines require you to "wash" the washer about once a month.... using an extra long cycle of hot water & an expensive additive (that you can replicate with bleach or vinegar)

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

truly a racket. infuriating.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

It’s so stupid!! 😡 And even so, my washer randomly spits out gunk into my wash every so often (usually my lighter colors, conveniently enough 🙄) and I have to rewash that load 🙄 I will definitely be replacing it with a Speed Queen as soon as I can!

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Wait until it just starts to fill with water, turn it off and add a tub of water (often with pre soaked clothes and/or added borax or bleach).

Expand full comment
RANGER71's avatar

You know you can buy GE or speed queen washers and dryers

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Ranger. I am tryong to learn where GE appliances are now manufactured. Country. Do you k now? Unable to find that info.

Expand full comment
RANGER71's avatar

Maybe this will help you https://geappliancesco.com/operations/

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Ranger--Thank you. I really appreciate. Searching for 2 critical things. Dishwasher with grinder [disposer]--had ancient but foolishly went new over repair before knowing. AND safest oven --without chemicals to bake into foods. The hours spent--learning nothing. Told induction safest, but sounds like that is for cook tops, not ovens.....Avoid convection and air fryer.......ok, but just yikes. .Mentioned earlier. recalls for not listing allergens in foods like soy or dairy. Yet unable to learn the contents of oven linings? Spending lots extra for VOC free products in small cabin being built--THEN searching for safe air fryer for grandson, learned bad news of many. Led me to question ovens, learning nothing . Spend so much for VOC free products then bake them into foods.? Serious worry to me. Thank you for the GE info especially. Really appreciate. Spose everything has some components from chyna, but factories here is good to hear. Might chance GE. 'Some' --like induction range even with incomplete information. Refrigerators. Got to make choices like 2 months ago.

Expand full comment
Renea Buchholz's avatar

We only buy used. Our used washer broke a few days ago, but we found GE at an estate sale. They seem pretty good. I have heard great things about speed queens though

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

GE is no longer made well!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I had a GE that ran perfectly for 22 years, then gave out. We looked at everything, but got a lot of negative comments about the new GE quality so didn't buy that. We were warned everywhere to stay away from Samsung, and actually no one seemed enthusiastic about any of the brands. We were told by many people the new refrigerators were expected to last about 5 years, no matter how much you pay. We got a fantastic deal on an Italian Bertazzoni floor model fridge with a dent in the back that you can't see plus a 5 year warranty on it, so although its original price was about $3800, we got it for $1400. I love the fridge, but at a only year in I have no idea how long it might last. Wait and see.

Expand full comment
ROKM's avatar

And dish washers!! My new $800 Boschdoesnt have enough water to rinse the detergent off the plates. And it won't dry unless you use the 3hour cycle!!!

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

We've been using Bosch 800 dishwashers for 13 years. Unfortunately one died 2 years ago. American Home Shield would only replace it with a Kitchen Aid. HATE IT!

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Jut because parts of CA and other areas in the SW are a desert, doesn't mean the rest of us need to be on water restriction.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

Get a Speed Queen washer. It has no bells and whistles to break down, uses lots of water to wash, is commercial grade, and is a beast. After having one of those low water washers a few months, I put it on the curb and bought the Speed Queen.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

🙌

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

LOW FLOW TOILETS!

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

yes - horrible, horrible, horrible. Requires flush after flush and ends up using as much if not more, water!

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Its so stupid. It's like solar and wind. It's a net negative in terms of effect on the environment.

Same with low flow toilets. You waste twice as much water. Which has a cost to you and the local government.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Anything the crazed environmentalists design is a failure. Proven over and over again!

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Well, I'll say....it's almost as if it was planned....:)

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Nearly All the "standards" are not to modernize or conserve...that's at best secondary, new regs and standards are primarily smoke and mirrors pushed by a Progressivist (Wilson) system of overpaid agency/dept. bureaucrats, engineers, industry, sales reps, suppliers selling upgrades and artificial innovations that fix the ONE prominent "issue or problem" while creating 2 or 3 more by doing so; this is work for work's sake whether changes in global energy sources or a more "water efficient" toilet design required by state or municipal code; perpetual, periodic production/supply/costs/installation with certification, intentionally drive the economy and spending and collaterally cost-crush some into subsidy dependency for compliance...or broader "investment" when renovating and complying to new codes and ordinances.

Truly non-standardization is also maddening, where 10,000 parts exist to repair said Low Flow Toilets in all their various incarnations, stylings, flushing mechanisms etc--not to mention your incoming water quality has to be nearly filtered and softened to perfection ($$$), and longevity of product is NOT an enforceable standard.

Expand full comment
Sir Jeff Morency, Ph.D.'s avatar

We got one piece standard volume Glacier Bay toilets from Home Depot. They produce an extra turbulence during the flush that is very forceful and works great! They are the BEST!

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Actually, there’s a high end ($700+ a few years ago; no idea now) Toto that works better than any other. Their lower cost models are good, but not amazing.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

I have 3. Problems. Had to replace the main valve stem unit on them all because they constantly failed to re-fill the bowl completely. Call to service worked well-- free replacements in mail. But, I had to do the work. Putzed with them(new) for months before giving up and making the damn call.

Expand full comment
Parachutepants's avatar

I made the mistake of using a bidet once!

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Hahaha!

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Invigorating...

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

We swear by them!

Expand full comment
Karmy's avatar

I have a Kohler Persuade toilet with dual flush and I have never in 12 years had to flush more than once or use a plunger. I recommend it highly. I bought 2 more for another property. Under $570 and it looks awesome with a skirted trapway. Easier to clean.

https://www.kohler.com/en/products/toilets/shop-toilets/persuade-curv-comfort-height-two-piece-elongated-dual-flush-chair-height-toilet-75790?skuId=75790-0

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Our entire property was fitted with Kohler. There is nothing better!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Don't get me started on that one! Plus the low flow shower heads, although those are easy to defeat if you remove the little filter in them.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Someday I’d like to try a compost potty.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

Yes, yes, and hail yes!

Expand full comment
Catherine's avatar

Yes! So tired of scraping food off of “clean” dishes. My appliance repairman said the water doesn’t get hot enough to actually clean the dishes. So annoying!!

Expand full comment
R1ghtTh1nk's avatar

Set the hot water heater - if you have one - temp at 140 instead of 120 [energy saving]. I've let the kids know that the hot water is HOT so that the grands - and they - are not at risk of scalding. I learned ~15 yrs ago, when one of the buildings at work was evacuated and closed b/c of an outbreak of legionnaires disease, that 140 KILLS the bacteria but that 120 does not. That was enough for me.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Mine is set at 128°F; I use SOFT water . . . and it cleans fine on all levels:

Express, quick wash, normal, heavy.

as to disease: I believe ALL dishwashers(certainly, GE, MINE) have heat boosters to bump the cleaning temp to 160°F. Leave the main hot water heater alone, if so.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

Anti scald valves for the fixtures humans use are in order of you go that route.

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

Correctomundo!

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

thank you!!

Expand full comment
RANGER71's avatar

Hand washing 🍽️ disher works 💯 better !!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

we do that for easy, nearly clean stuff. The main stuff all goes through the machine. Wake up every morning to a clean tub of dry dishes.

Expand full comment
Kathi M's avatar

I actually rinse them very well, AND use the extra hot feature to get them clean now. For washing clothes, I use extra water and higher temps, so all their energy saving features actually make me use more energy!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

CHeck your water to be sure it is SOFT. If so, verify the hot cycle is reaching 160°F, I believe. Read the manual. Almost all these units have 2ndary heaters to boost temp . . .

Finally, try different levels of cleaning: HIGH, NORMAL, Express, quick wash with heavy food on plates and determine the one that works for YOU.

That will be $100 for the service call.

Expand full comment
BelleTower's avatar

But the dry cycle gets incredibly hot, baked that stuff on solid. Why is hot air okay and not hot water??

Expand full comment
Carolyn’s Rae Of Sunshine's avatar

Funny you say that! I’ve been buying old washing machines…you know, the kind that actually fill completely full of water and do a little “shimmy & Shake” for about 10 min…off the market place for years now. When my beloved old Maytag finally bit the dust, I caved and bought a new one (which I immediately regretted) and which now sits collecting dust in a conex in our back 40 lol! I was able to eventually find another old Maytag (which I love)!

These so called “efficient” appliances may save on water, but they use ten times as much electricity trying to get the job done!! Please “Make Appliances GREAT (and common sense) Again”!!

Expand full comment
Nancy Benedict's avatar

Can we make refrigerators again like my 1948 GE that's still running?

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

no, we can't.

HUGE compressor, will never fail but eats electricity like a big dog.

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

They may eat electricity but is that cheaper, in the long run, than repetitively having to buy new units?

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I ran across brochures from the 1950's advertising refrigerators. They looked more innovative than what we have now and they probably worked better, too.

Expand full comment
cat's avatar

Twice now, my 2-year-new top-load washer with an agitator has let a spider survive an entire washing/rinsing/spinning cycle. I kid you not. Each time, the spider was on the agitator, enjoying the relatively dry ride.

If I insert any clothing in this washer that is folded, it comes out folded. There are clothes that come out with some dry spots that never got wet.

Expand full comment
Donna Oliphint's avatar

OH MY GOODNESS! This cracks me up!

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

LOLOLOL, i'm sorry - that is funny notwithstanding your frustration with a flawed product that wastes your time!

Expand full comment
cat's avatar

Yeah, first time it was funny. Second time, I began wondering where these spiders were coming from. Still haven't figured it out.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

husbands pants pocket

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

what brand??!

Expand full comment
cat's avatar

Maytag. About the only brand I could get in top loader w/agitator. Bought near the end of the lockdowns.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

oh did you strike a nerve, Kathy... my husband was complaining how our new, high efficiency, low water and poor results washing machine, which came with our new built home in 2022, doesn't really clean the clothes, even using the "Deep Water Wash" function on every load and "hot water. Said his Dad's machine in Michigan really gets things clean. I told him well, yeah, your dad's machine is 20 years old, uses real hot water and has a center agitator that really agitates. pointing to our agitator, I told him it's for decorative purposes, doesn't really work - it's so ridicuous - an old fashioned washboard works better than this piece of crap, which will surely break down in another year, forcing us to buy another worthless machine, Rinse and repeat, pun intended!

Expand full comment
GG's avatar

I had one of those that was missing the agitator. My clothes often emerged from the washer dry! The manual said that's because the washer did a super job spinning the clothes. 🙄 Aside from the fact that my laundry didn't get washed, the machine used to tear little holes in my clothes. So efficient!

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

GG, what brand was your clothes eater?

Expand full comment
GG's avatar

I don't remember! I know before the clothes eater, I had a Maytag washer and dryer that I had owned since 1993 but when I got married, my husband wanted new appliances, so I gave my Maytags to my mother. She still has them! I could kick myself (or maybe the hubby🤔😂).

They weren't very durable, either. I think we had them for like five years when they broke down. I have one with an agitator now and it mostly fills up (way more than the clothes eater, at any rate). At least all my clothes get wet when I wash them. Someday, maybe I can afford a Speed Queen!

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

good news!!!! https://x.com/TrumpDailyPosts/status/1889316878688071709

I am hereby instructing Secretary Lee Zeldin to immediately go back to my Environmental Orders, which were terminated by Crooked Joe Biden, on Water Standards and Flow pertaining to SINKS, SHOWERS, TOILETS, WASHING MACHINES, DISHWASHERS, etc., and to likewise go back to the common sense standards on LIGHTBULBS, that were put in place by the Trump Administration, but terminated by Crooked Joe. I look forward to signing these Orders. THANK YOU!!!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Yes!! Maybe add soap that actually cleans.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

I'm a person who loves to blend things - I don't know why, but it borders on a compulsion..

Anyway, I have a few different types of laundry detergent down in the garage. I mixed some detergent that was thick and viscous with some other thick and viscous detergent from Trader Joe's, and the result was thin and runny. The TJ's detergent is soapy/foamy. The other detergent (from a "cheap stuff" store where the poors shop) is slippery, but feels more oily than soapy. Maybe it's missing the phosphate or maybe it's something else.

Not washing my clothes with that crap anymore, as I don't want whatever's in it up against my skin. Call me suspicious, but something in me tells me it's just another way "they" attempt to poison us out of existence...

Expand full comment
nancy roberts's avatar

Make your own with washing soda, borax, baking soda oxy-clean and grated bar soap. It will satisfy your love of blending and knowing what you're getting, and it makes everything smell fresh not like you simply took a perfume shower!!!

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Thanks, Nancy! I'll try this. I collected essential oils for years after I read "Jitterbug Perfume" by Tom Robbins. So I do like some scents. But my stepmom washes her sheets (the ones in the guest room we sleep on) in some nasty, cloying Gain detergent. She must use a lot of it, because it's hard to even fall asleep, it's so strong.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Take your own sheets - that fragrance you're inhaling is toxic!! I don't understand the obsession with highly fragranced items.

Expand full comment
nancy roberts's avatar

Happy blending, Doug!

Expand full comment
badEnglish's avatar

Dr Linda, my original comment seems to have gotten lost, so I’m replying again.

In short, the soap probably works fine but modern detergent is missing phosphate, which is needed for a proper rinse. May I suggest adding TSP to your wash in addition to your detergent; it should improve the final result. I don’t have a ratio (tsp/gal or ml/L), sorry.

Expand full comment
alongername's avatar

We buy a large bag of baking soda ( the larger the better , cost wise) .......

About a handful in a full wash (clothes) , with just a squirt of vinegar........... SAFE AND EFFECTIVE !

And no side effects . Clothes detergents and softeners have lots of chemicals . The more fragrant ones being badddd to the bone(s)

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Vinegar and baking soda is how I made a "volcano" in my elementary school science class...

Expand full comment
nancy roberts's avatar

😀😀😄 That combo works to unclog slow draining pipes too, but it was probably more fun making a volcano!!

Expand full comment
PEL's avatar

Yes I need a new dishwasher. The relatively new one we have is crap. Three hour cycles and does not clean the dishes. The old one had a quick wash—45 minutes and done. Have already replaced the circuit board even. Free the appliances!!!

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Bosch dishwasher, 17 years old - cleans/works great with no repairs.

Expand full comment
PEL's avatar

Yes the older ones are better. Keep it forever!!

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Heat pumps too. We’re due for a new furnace but we’ll have ‘up grade’ both because the new furnace won’t work with the old heat pump, or vice versa. They regulated (updated?) heat pumps to be obsolete, once they die, they both essentially die.

Note: our heat pump is much newer than our waaaay old furnace.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

'Cash for Clunkers' was an Obama era scam to get rid of perfectly good vehicles.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

It messed up the used car market for a long time too.

Expand full comment
Joanne Shannon's avatar

They are deigned to fail. Forced con$umeri$m.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

The irony is that GE made washing machines that could have worked with less water 60 years ago. Instead of relying just on agitation, they had a pump to sprinkle the clothing from above. The water went through a filter basket to catch lint. Filter Flow they called it.

Make the pump stronger and spray down from above and the clothes on top would get clean even if not submerged.

Expand full comment
SB's avatar

Yes! Now that y’all mention this, I’ve been wondering who is the best person at the W. H. To send letters to requesting things like this be handled. For the first time in my life, I really think if Trump hears about these things, he will fix it. But we need the best contact info. Anyone know?

Expand full comment
Judith's avatar

Came here to say just this. I hate paper straws but I really hate LED bulbs.

Expand full comment
Virtue Mustwin's avatar

LED light is bad for your retina.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

Did not know that….not sure why that would be but will check with the CDC to find out. 🤭

Expand full comment
MaryLS's avatar

I have a friend with an eye degeneration illness, and she cannot tolerate LED lights. I often find them harsh and glaring. There was no scientific basis for eliminating incandescent bulbs.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

The worst are the LED Christmas lights!!!

Expand full comment
KCwoofie's avatar

They actually hurt. Weird Brightness.

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

I’m quite sure some politicians made $$ on them.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

You can buy LED bulbs at nearly any color temp. The 5000 °K are usually cheapest and most available and probably lots of folks buy them without knowing you can get the same color temp as old incandescents(2900) in LED form too. They should be no "harsher" than the old type as they radiate the same light "rays".

EDIT: Correction, not true; the BLUE peak is higher in many LED lights. Look down further for my suggestion for LED lights that basically have the same spectra with minimal blue peak.

Philips HD LED.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Check with the CDC, but verify with Fauci…….😂😂

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

😋

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Priceless. I looked askance at your first words, then cracked up when I realized you were interviewing for a job as Jeff's satirist.

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

They’ll lie

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

LOL!!!!!

Expand full comment
PJ's avatar

Don't rely on CDC for info on LED. They will tell you what obozo/bidumb want you to know. Check Dr. Mercola's substacks- he wrote about these a while ago.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

LED bulbs are harmful to our health. Great Substack by "The Light Doctor" who goes deep into the woes of the lighting issues. https://lightdoctormartinmooreede.substack.com/

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

Bad for your brain too, due to the amount of blue wavlength LED light contains.

Expand full comment
Lorita's avatar

The LEDs emit electro magnetic energy that isn't good for us, it causes cellular damage. Look up Arthur Firstenburg. Not sure about the spelling of his last name.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

incandescents emit the same EM energy,

cellular damage? show proof in a scientific paper link, please.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

LED bulbs are harmful to our health. Great Substack by "The Light Doctor" who goes deep into the woes of the lighting issues. https://lightdoctormartinmooreede.substack.com/

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Regardless of the generation medium, equivalent EM energy will be the same!

The obvious advantage of LED is the reduced electrical consumption.

EM emission is EM emission, period!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

!!!!

Expand full comment
LiveDreamRepeat's avatar

LED lights are absolutely AWFUL for our overall health. We need to limit our exposure as much as humanly possible.

Expand full comment
John of Oregon Fame's avatar

Here's a link to neurosurgeon Jack Kruse who who reveals some huge medical scandals including the serious blue light health risks. You won't regret watching.

https://youtu.be/TcbuqQd57rY?si=1nY13YuMv6DGcufM

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

very good! Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeR2uPPCA2k&t=51s

buy Philips UHD / LED bulbs;

about same spectra output as incandescent!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

hmmmm. How do you figure that?

at a particular color temp? 5000°K?

standard incandescents are about 2900° K

Expand full comment
Peggy Bojduj's avatar

Led lights in neighbors home invade my bedroom. I feel like my home is at motel 6. Just awful and I think they make people cranky and probably add to mental illness. Since no sleep. But when they turn them off. My body is so happy and sleeping well brings wellbeing. They are hostile lights. Especially driving highways!!!

Expand full comment
DeColores's avatar

My workplace (hospital) recently went through a renovation and installed LED lights with dimmers. I keep them as low as my coworkers will tolerate. But I hear that my coworker who works on alternate days from me walks in and turns up all the dimmers. Many feel assaulted by the bright light.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Studies have been done - in hospitals, I believe, - about the harmful effects of these LED lights on patients - and workers. LED bulbs are harmful to our health. Great Substack by "The Light Doctor" who goes deep into the woes of the lighting issues. https://lightdoctormartinmooreede.substack.com/

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

ridiculous!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeR2uPPCA2k&t=51s

buy Philips UHD / LED bulbs; about same spectra output as incandescent!

Expand full comment
Peggy Bojduj's avatar

I’ll buy some of your stockpiles of incandescent bulbs 🙂

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

REALLY?!

Fantastic. I will DM you Peggy.

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Incandescents and fluorescents available for the asking!

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

I hope you are aware that LEDs are available at various light penetration levels. E.g. cold light 5000°K, and warm light 2900° K. These are very different 'brightness' levels. If you are unhappy at the light levels of your neighbours homes then I would suggest that you ask them if they are aware of the differences!

Expand full comment
Peggy Bojduj's avatar

They have three in one fixture all warm spectrum. But bright enuff to pierce my hallway from there garage which is set quite a ways back from the street into my house all the way to the back wall of my kitchen and back bedroom on the backside of my house

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Maybe invest in some miniblinds..?

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

Or black out curtains!

Expand full comment
Navyo Ericsen's avatar

Agreed. And they're invariably bright white instead of that lovely warm glow. The light of cities has changed awfully in this regard.

Expand full comment
Starsky's avatar

I recently bought a box of floodlights at Costco after my stocked supplies ran out. I was really annoyed, because the floods are in my kitchen and I figured the damn LEDs would be a different color from the incandescent still in the ceiling. But they now have a color switch on them, so you have 4 settings. The lowest setting matched the incandescent perfectly.

Expand full comment
MarkGW's avatar

My understanding is that even with the warm light setting, it is still an LED and causing problems with our eyes and brains. Not sure if anyone knows this in more detail.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeR2uPPCA2k&t=51s

buy Philips UHD / LED bulbs; about same spectra output as incandescent!

Another option for LED screens--app removes blue light screen output on a schedule you set: https://justgetflux.com/

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

the problem, apparently for some, is there is too much blue light included in the spectra of MOST LED bulbs.

That which I show in lower post here, does not.

Expand full comment
Merry McIntyre's avatar

You can buy full spectrum lightbulbs at healthlighting.com. Incandescent at Amazon.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

or I will be glad to sell a bunch of mine sitting in my attic for 8 years!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeR2uPPCA2k&t=51s

buy Philips UHD / LED bulbs; about same spectra output as incandescent!

Another option for LED screens--app removes blue light screen output on a schedule you set: https://justgetflux.com/

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Wow, there are more LED haters here than I realized...

LEDs are pulsed - they blink on and off rapidly, which may be part of the issue people have with them. Incandescent bulbs do this, too - it's a function of alternating current, which changes polarity in the US 60 times per second (passing through a zero-current moment each time). The difference is, on a filament bulb, the filament doesn't go all the way out at that zero-current moment, because it's still hot from the max-current moment 1/120th of a second before. It dips in brightness a little, but it happens so fast that we don't notice it.

Aside from the blue of the 6500K LED bulbs (vs. the 2700K "warm" bulbs that mimic incandescent bulbs), it could be the much-more-defined pulsing of the LED bulbs that people find annoying and even unhealthy. If you look at an LED and swipe your head to the side really quickly, under certain conditions you can see a "trail of dots" in your persistence of vision, as opposed to the "smear" you'll see under the same conditions with incandescent.

LEDs blink, by the way, because at the energy level they produce their brightest light, they would burn out almost instantly if they were held at that level constantly. The blink allows them to cool off during their off state, keeping them from burning out. Dimmers that work with LEDs vary the ratio between on time and off time - when off for longer than on, the LEDs appear as less-bright.

There's your physics lesson for today, folks. Yes, I know - I'm a geek.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

BTW, fluorescent lights make me sleepy, for some reason. I had to fight to stay awake in school a lot of the time, because of those darned fluorescent tubes across the ceilings...

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Doug, succinctly put.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Thanks for the physics and EE lesson.

Another option for LED screens--app removes blue light screen output on a schedule you set: https://justgetflux.com/

Expand full comment
Michelle's avatar

I’ve noticed lately that after reading text on a screen, when I look away, I see stripes, like lines of blurred text that remain in my vision for a while burned into my retinas after I look away from the screen. Do you know what’s going on there?

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Persistence of vision. It's your vision system's natural response to staring at high-contrast images.

You can try lowering the brightness on your screen to reduce eye fatigue. As a matter of fact, I just did this on my monitor as I was replying - I often walk away from the screen with tears in my eyes from eyestrain. Thanks for the reminder!

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

And nowhere are they more insidious and dangerous than on the road.

Newer model cars are all equipped with them and make driving a nightmare, even in daylight.

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

can't stand the LED's. I have one incandescent left & it's the only lamp I can read under for long periods. After about 15 minutes under an LED lamp, my eyes are aching!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

but WHY??!

I replace all my incandescents with LED's and see no problems. I use about 15% of the energy now to light my house.

With 92 LIKES on your post. . . I MUST be missing something. LOL!

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

LED bulbs are harmful to our health. Great Substack by "The Light Doctor" who goes deep into the woes of the lighting issues. https://lightdoctormartinmooreede.substack.com/

Expand full comment
🌱Nard🙏's avatar

I bought a bazillion lightbulbs in 2012. Brought them all with me when I moved cross-country in 2015. I STILL haven’t run out..,but I’m close. This would be perfect timing 🤣.

Expand full comment
Gina C's avatar

I purchased (100) incandescent 60 watt bulbs 2 years ago too as the "prohibition" was getting close. Replaced all bulbs in the house with them and have not yet had to replace any. Oh the lies we've been told.

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

I bought some on eBay, but then I really scored when I found a box of them at a garage sale!

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

You folks flaunting your treasures must appreciate that C&Cers are trustworthy!

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

I'm just here to find out who has lightbulbs I will burgle when I fall on hard times.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

The LED police are watching...

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Garage sales, estate sales and auctions are great places to score light bulbs.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

I still use incandescent bulbs which I buy off of Amazon.

Expand full comment
Susie & Security's avatar

Dollar Tree is another place to find these.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Is Dollar Tree selling incandescents still?!

Expand full comment
Susie & Security's avatar

Me too! I recently moved and was shocked by my own incandescent hoarding. 😁

Expand full comment
Debra Jackson's avatar

I loaded up a Home Depot shopping cart with regular lightbulbs when O’Bummer outlawed them. Got them for $.99 a package. I too carried them cross states to have on hand and am still using them and loving them. None of that LED light for me.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Same here and running out. Trump got in just in time to restock with a quadzillion.

I hate LED with a passion. All except one place. LED strips under the kitchen cabinets above of the countertops. Very practical for that!

Expand full comment
Starsky's avatar

Me too! I’m on my last box of 60w and need to restock. When I bought these in bulk, I bought Philips, which don’t last as long as the GE did. Hard to believe the supplies have last 10+ years!

Expand full comment
skeptic bruh's avatar

Buy "appliance" bulbs. Same conventional light and not a high cost. I bought a bunch of oven-safe bulbs with the standard base and use them all around the house.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

Same!!! LOL!

Expand full comment
Conservative Contrarian's avatar

And rational pricing for paper towels & paper de toilet. I might want to roll my neighbor's front yard some night but not at these prices ..... 🧻🧻🧻

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

Papier de toilette. But I get your drift.

Expand full comment
Conservative Contrarian's avatar

Hablo no Frenchie amigo

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

hahaha

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

🤣🤣🤣. In all seriousness, I wonder if this is a forestry issue. I believe that the smaller trees are harvested for pulp and if that isn't happening then there will be supply and demand issues.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

A major issue with paper products and the forever chemicals is thy are introduced through the bleaching process. Unbleached toilet paper has fewer chemicals and napkins and paper towels and . . . .

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

...and coffee filters.

Expand full comment
Chevrus's avatar

Hemp solves this

Expand full comment
EJay's avatar

It's a racket! Bamboo can often be used in place of trees/wood pulp. 💔🤗

Expand full comment
Donna Oliphint's avatar

Forestry is a big business in Alabama. Pine trees are planted on land and harvested 20 years later, replanted, etc. It’s used for kid’s college funds, retirement, etc. I have a friend who is in the tree harvesting business, and it’s been a tough go these last 4 years. The mills aren’t open as much now due to downturn in building because of high interest rates. Hopefully, that ends this year!

Expand full comment
jmsmithmd's avatar

There are sooo many trees here

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Gma, did you ever get my email asking if you want to meet for coffee? It was a long while ago! How time flies!

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

What are you, ten? 🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Let's bring back landline phones!! Remember the "party line" when everyone could talk and you could actually hear them all??

No. I didn't think you'd remember. 😑 It was the good old days. You didn't dare mention your dirty laundry unless you WANTED it told. Free News!

Expand full comment
Me's avatar

I still have my landline. I think you can still get them...at least for now. I do remember party lines. Weird to think of it now...

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

Smart... EMF radiation, WiFi, 5g... is getting a little scary...

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

We have one. It was an add on to our Spectrum cable. I prefer the old fashioned answer machine anyway. I’ve never set up a message box on my iPhone and don’t use that number for my first contact.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I believe almost all landlines are now the new fiber optic cables.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Yes. But I prefer messages and call screening on an answering machine. I don’t necessarily want to be contactable every single moment and left messages on my cell phone. I’m retired and everyone I care about knows where to find me. . Leave a message on my machine. One less layer of annoyance.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Ah yes, the answering machine...my dad's was called a Code a Phone. I think it was one of the original answering machines.

Expand full comment
TW's avatar

Yea, they're VOIP (voice over internet provider) so if the internet is out so is your phone :/

Expand full comment
Bgagnon's avatar

Yes, they are

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

iPhone??

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Landlines are called POTS lines in the telephone biz. POTS stands for "Plain Old Telephone Service".

I used to be a phone guy...

Expand full comment
Jamison's avatar

I have a landline, too. When we first moved to a more rural area, the cell connection was a bit iffy, so I kept the landline.

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

Tried getting a landline for my parents but it’s only digital?? Not an actual landline. And it was expensive.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

One of the big problems is that you lose phone service if the power or the cable goes out. You didn't on the old land lines. I remember my godmother was in her 90's and every time the cable went out, her landline went out and she could not call anyone if she needed help and no one could call her. It was a huge problem.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Fun fact: when we evacuated a wildfire in 2003, I kept calling our landline, because when the machine answered, I knew our home was not one of the over 2200 burned.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Wow. Clever way of keeping tabs on your home!

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

My cousin had the ring cameras and actually watched his burn down until the camera lost connection. Total loss all the way down to the foundation.

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

Exactly why we need one, they loose power occasionally and or WiFi we want the peace of mind of a landline. 😕

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I have a landline and it is expensive. I call it insurance and suck it up. 😣

Expand full comment
Shelle's avatar

Yes, they are digital now and yet you pay about as much on taxes (set long ago) as you do for the line. But there are still very good reasons to have one. If parents would get landlines for their kids to use, there wouldn't be as much pressure from the kids to have cell phones. A smart phone handed to a child is like handing them access to every vile thing in the world.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

And dialing "Popcorn" for the time.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

When I worked as a phone guy, we had special 10-digit numbers we could call known as ANIs that allowed us to identify the line we were dialing from. Helps if you're in a dark phone closet and you're trying to find that new line you're supposed to install for a customer.

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

Hello.

Is Mr. Walls there?

No.

Is Mrs. Walls there?

No.

Are there any walls there?

No.

You'd better run, your house is falling down!

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣 Hello you’re dog is peeing in my bush

We don’t have a dog

That’s Ok, we don’t have a bush

Hello Is your refrigerator running?

Yeah…???

Better go catch it!

Hello is John there?

No

Call again Hello is John there?

No you might have the wrong number.

Call again Hello is John there? (Few more times)

No (each time)

Then

Hello, this is John. Do I have any messages?

Truly the most silly and juvenile pranks 🤣 I know there’s smarter and funnier ones out there but these are the ones I recall friends doing whenever I was at their houses.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

I loved all the Bart Simpson prank calls to Moe's Tavern...

Is Amanda there?

Amanda who?

Amanda Hugankiss.

[Moe, yelling across a crowded bar] Hey, I'm lookin' for Amanda Hugankiss!

<sigh> Caller ID killed Bart's little fun pastime...

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

Jeff, bringing back memories of "phony phone calls!"

Expand full comment
alongername's avatar

If you want to have some fun....... register for some event with the name Dick Hertz .

Than wait for the instructor to ask ............. "Whose Dick Hertz ? "

Expand full comment
Ann Moody's avatar

Ask for Mike Hunt.

Expand full comment
alongername's avatar

I'll tell Dick when he gets back from the doctor's ..........

ahhhh...... forever young (lol)

Now.......... back to all the pain and suffering in the world .

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

I still do have a landline. Cell service in my house sucks and I work from home, so having a phone that I don't have to keep asking clients/callers to repeat themselves is essential. Plus I learned from Jeff that the Gazans in tunnels used landlines as the spy tech couldn't intercept them, and think in the US the gov actually has to have a warrant to tap it. It's getting pricey, but I am now dug in that I will keep it. Also saves me from having to tote my cell phone around the house with me and I turn it off at night and use an alarm clock. Old school, lol.

Expand full comment
TW's avatar

Is it actually over the telephone lines though? When I was trying to find a landline, all the offerings are VOIP (voice over internet provider). It seems theyve abandoned the telephone lines which seems short sighted as if the power is out, the internet is out and so is your phone. We were wanting something that would be a separate system as an emergency prep but I dont think its available like that anymore..

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

No its still a true landline. We get an insert in our bill (yes I am also stubborn and refuse paperless billing - no one gets automatic access to our checking account or credit card, and already get too many emails) trying to get us to switch to VOIP technology but that negates the whole reason for having a landline in the first place. Like if the power is out it still works, although we use cordless handsets, we do have a non cordless phone that we can plug in and use.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

I once read that cordless phones are REALLY bad in terms of EMFs...

Expand full comment
Marilynne Martin's avatar

If you measure with an RF meter they are higher than cell phones.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Sigh...can't win!

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

We had landline but we were at the end of the line. Oldest house in the area. They could NOT keep the lines from every kind of damage. I had to call them every week and often i couldn't call... Oh wait! I have the same problem with my Wi-Fi. Sigh... If there were just privitized making money, without gov pickers...

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Ours is still an analog line and we did have a spate of service calls several years ago but they did come out and replace some of the lines. (Include the one I snipped with the hedge trimmer when I was trimming a bush too close to the house, lol) But I suspect at some point that will go away. Sigh.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I’m in Mid Mo, I suspect the same.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Well, ya never know....we got rid of a lot of our vinyl albums in the early 2000's as we could not find a replacement needle for our turntable, but still hung on to some for sentimental reasons. But then around 2010 our daughter gifted us a record player for Christmas so we could listen to them again, and now vinyl has made a little bit of a comeback. Perhaps with this growing awareness of EMPs landlines will do the same? Buildout is probably too expensive, though.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

My 95 yr old mom still has a landline. She has never wanted or had a cell phone. Therefore she’s never distracted when she’s doing anything or interrupted when she’s around others. Life is simpler and better when you’re not available to phone calls, emails or text messages 24/7.

P.S. she doesn’t have a computer or IPad either!

Expand full comment
banjocat's avatar

We are all conditioned now like lab rats to respond to a ring, ding, buzz... you can't relax unless you shut the phone off and then feel compelled to turn it back on as the "what if" scenarios start to create minor bouts of anxiety. Modern life is ridiculous... and the younger tech generations have no idea what life is like sans an extra appendage that they carry in their back packet (brewing cancer) and whip it out every 10 minutes so it can tell them what to do next.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

My God!! How does your mom come to her political beliefs??

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

The best part of babysitting was listening in on party lines!

Expand full comment
Judith's avatar

We have a landline. I pay absolutely no attention to it so if someone calls and leaves a message I may listen to it in six months. We use Ooma which costs about eight bucks a month - which is really the only reason we still have it.

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Judith, Wait--Ooma? Never heard of it. Can be used on ATT line [same had for decades]? --ATT land line is outrageously expensive. Hope to learn this will work.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

Ooma is a Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) service.

Last office I worked at had that on our "landline" phones.

Costs very little a month, but it has the same sketchy sound quality as any other over internet phone set up...

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Anita. Thank you. Yet understand VOIP not exactly safe/operational if wifi goes out? Perhaps will just keep ATT and continue being gouged.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

Not recommending it at all.

Just putting some info out there.

I have a hard time hearing and understanding people on phone calls using VOIP (and 'smart phones,' too). Usually have to use speaker phone.

Kinda hate it a little.

But it's a fact that I used it in an office I used to work in.

I think Ooma might be to ATT, what ROKU is to television channels/livestreaming services in a way, but with a small monthly fee, not just a one time fee.

Our office used it to cut down on phone costs - I'm trying to remember if it went out when the wifi did. I don't think so. It's probably using the phone company network's internet. So if theirs went down, it would go down.

Someone more technologically savvy could probably weigh in on that.

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Sounds a lot cheaper than our sole $65/month Consumer Cellular line on which we receive probably one non-spam call/month!

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

RJ, I DO remember AND kept my landline!😀

Expand full comment
LogicFirst's avatar

Amen on the lightbulbs.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

I thought he already signed the order, but I guess not. Amazon started selling incandescent again, however, there are a limited amount of suppliers. I'm sure it will ramp up soon as so many people have problems with LEDs. They hurt my eyes and give me a headache.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-roll-back-appliance-light-bulb-standards-2025-02-11/

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

Wow, that’s awesome!

Sorry about your headache some one here said that you can already buy incandescents online. “LEDs produce short-wave, high-energy blue light, which has been linked to biological and sleep disturbances.” https://health.clevelandclinic.org/are-led-lights-damaging-your-retina

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

The Biden administration made selling Incandescent light bulbs in the US illegal in August 2024. Amazon quit selling them then, but it looks like they are already allowing them again.

Expand full comment
MarkGW's avatar

to Grok : do LED lights on the "warm" setting still produce blue light?

Yes, LED lights on the "warm" setting still produce some blue light, but significantly less than those on cooler or daylight settings. Here's how it works:

LED Color Temperature: The color temperature of LED lights is measured in Kelvin (K). Lights with lower Kelvin values (e.g., 2700K to 3000K) are considered "warm" because they emit a more yellow or amber light, similar to traditional incandescent bulbs. Higher Kelvin values (e.g., 5000K and above) are "cool" or "daylight" and produce more blue light.

Blue Light Emission: Even warm white LEDs emit some blue light because the technology often involves using a blue LED chip coated with phosphors. These phosphors convert some of the blue light to longer (warmer) wavelengths, but the conversion isn't perfect, so a small amount of blue light still gets through.

Impact: Although the amount of blue light from a warm LED is lower, it's still present. This can be important for people sensitive to blue light, especially in the evening when blue light can affect sleep patterns by suppressing melatonin production. However, warm LEDs are designed to minimize this impact compared to cooler LEDs.

Expand full comment
tjsplace's avatar

There is also lightbulbs.com. They seem to carry everything, even Christmas light bulb strings that take the old-fashioned incandescent large colored bulbs.

Expand full comment
banjocat's avatar

Same here... my brain interprets LEDs like a toxin to be avoided. I ordered incandescent light bulbs off Amazon and they turned out to be cheap crap that don't last but a few months with regular use. It was an off brand so maybe I should try to find a well known brand... I sure hope this ridiculous green investment money maker for the parasite class goes the way of the dinosaur ;)

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

Ya wanna bet those suppliers make their bulbs in Chyna ?

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

100%. GE switched over all their production to LED years ago when they first passed the stupid law. The China bulbs don't last as long, but that's my only choice.

Expand full comment
char's avatar

CHop--off topic , sort of. Do you know if GE appliances are now manufactured in chyna? I cannot find out. Been recommended , yet do not buy from cHyna if at all possible. Thank you.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

Not sure. My BIL was working for GE at the time when they converted their plants to LED

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

Seems here they do: https://geappliancesco.com/operations/

Someone else here in the comments gave this link, and I'm just copy and pasting it.

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Anita. Thank you I did check this from other post. Factories here is great news. Spose unavoidable to have anything with out 'components' from chyna. Might be time to simply stop checking, been exhausting. However would still like to know what chemicals used in linings of ovens. It is secret--or perhaps my poor searching abilities just have not found. Do you perchance have information or where to find?

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Looking today

Expand full comment
Gigi Gummerson's avatar

I buy mine from estate sales 😉 and you usually can find 75 and 100watt

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

Still have a couple "pre-ban" ones...

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

Toilets that flush!

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Going back to the fact 'tards are stupid, low water flush mandates for toilets is a perfect example. I know people who have brought toilets back from Mexico, Anyone ever been to Germany.? Their toilets have 2 flush options, essentially #1 (low water flush) and #2 (high water flush). Not labeled of course, but common sense required (so you would have to label them if they were sold in America).

Is that so difficult, morons at the EPA and OSAH?

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

You can buy those here

Expand full comment
NoWay's avatar

Yes, we have them. Bought them at Costco!

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

How do they get around the maximum flush per mandates? I'll bet the #2 flush is just the new normal flush, and the only difference is you get a lesser flush if you want for #1. I mean, when those German toilets do a full flush, you aren't going to find any crap hanging around

Expand full comment
CraigN's avatar

Toto. Put those in 20 years ago and have not needed a plunger since. Eljer Titan are just as good and you can get those at the big box home improvement stores.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

We had to get rid of our water saver because the plunging effect broke the seal over and over AND the handle kept falling off, into the tank and couldn't be retrieved without incredible about of time and hardship! 😡🔥

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

Dunno bout that….LEDs work pretty well….run cooler, illuminate well, cheaper to operate, and last longer. Initial cost is my only objection. What am I missing?

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I do like that they don't heat the house up in the summer and I need brighter light if I'm doing detail work like hand-sewing. Regular light bulbs don't provide enough light for me to do that. At the end of the day, the issue is not banning one type or the other but giving people the freedom to buy the bulbs they prefer to use.

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

^^^ THIS ^^^

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

LEDs have a fast flicker that some people are very sensitive to.

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

Yes: 60 cycles per second, same as fluorescent bulbs.

Expand full comment
char's avatar

Wasnt the flicker the ''reason' fluorescent bulbs banned in schools? Then LEDs, which also flicker........ So?

Expand full comment
Virtue Mustwin's avatar

I had a sick parakeet years ago, and the vet told me to put a light next to the cage to keep the bird warm. My father used to keep a light on in the basement to keep the pipes from freezing. And yes, LED light is not good for your retina.

Expand full comment
FreeBird07's avatar

We keep a light on in the garage to keep the boat "warm" during chilly Vegas nights...lol....

Expand full comment
Jaci's avatar

Safety of your eyes...

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

The reality I’ve discovered is that they do NOT last! The LEDs I’ve bought cost three times as much, and on average last about 6 months, depending on their location and how much use they get.

Some of them have an irritating delay when switched on and they produce an ugly, unnatural light.

I’m sure improvements could be made to incandescents, but LED is not an improvement IMO.

Expand full comment
TW's avatar

We recently found out that there are 2 types of LEDs, those that are rated for high temps and those that aren't. While LEDs dont put off heat like incandescents, the little circuit boards do and there are some that dont handle the increased temps at all. For every 5 deg off of ideal (let's say 70 deg) it will reduce their lifespan by a considerable percent. So in an enclosed light, in a house that reg stays above 75 deg (AC is expensivo) your "10 year lightbulb) will last maybe 3 years. They label them now, the ones that are rated for enclosed fixtures. So we've already replaced every bulb in our house twice- and we've only lived here 6 years. Since we removed the covers on all the lights, they dont go out near as fast.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

So I need to keep my house cooler than I want in the summer to make my light bulbs last longer. These government officials are brilliant. Only kidding, they aren’t

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Another electrical engineering mind... Welcome to the geek club! 🤣

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

Good to know!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Agreed, they do not last as long as advertised. It’s a con.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yup same experience and it annoys me to no end 😡

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

The cheap ones burn out quickly, but get this: the LEDs inside are wired in series (like the old Christmas tree lights), so if one LED burns out, none of them function! There are probably millions of these in landfills that would work perfectly fine if one LED was replaced.

If we were a truly efficient society, we would demand that all LED bulbs sold be designed with their LEDs wired in parallel.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

You are correct. The old incandescent bulbs last much much much longer than the LEDs.. there are still incandescent bulbs in service for over 100 years. What wears them out is to turn them on and off.

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

I use them for all of my outside (28) Dawn-to-Dusk Lights. So far they have saved me a fortune in electricity costs!

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

You are missing the fact (that they don't tell you) they emit harmful EMF's, and are bad for your eyes, and have mercury in them, but other than that, they are great.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Don’t incandescent bulbs have mercury as well? I could be uninformed.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

No.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

fluorescent tubes apparently have some mercury. My local Lowe's used to accept them when they burned out (supposedly to properly dispose of them), but not longer does. I have yet to find a way of disposing of the bad ones, although I have been told to just thrown them in the trash!

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

I have never heard or read that

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I just looked it up

“Standard, incandescent bulbs and halogen bulbs do not contain hazardous materials. However, compact fluorescent light (CFLs), fluorescent tubes and light emitting diodes (LED) bulbs contain toxic metals such as mercury, arsenic and lead. CFL light bulbs contain about 3 milligrams of mercury gas. If the bulb breaks, individuals can easily breathe in toxic levels of mercury vapor and other metals.* If the bulbs are improperly disposed, these metals can contaminate our soil, groundwater, lakes and streams.”

We have been conned again

Expand full comment
Trilby's avatar

Me too. I don't get the love for incandescents. My LEDs work fine and I don't have to climb ladders to change bulbs frequently. Don't cancel me!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

There are advantages. I guess we should have choice not government mandates?

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I am looking across the room at two different light bulbs. One is old incandescent "yellow" bulb and the other is a bright, white LED. The white light looks cleaner. To me, the yellow bulb looks dingy by comparison. Again, it's a preference.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Sunlight (natural) seems warm color. So wondering why they label the cool light bulbs = "daylight."

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Must be the yellow hue that incandescent or low lumen bulbs give off- yellow being a warm color compared to the more blue tone that daylight bulbs give off which is considered a cool tone. Just guessing...🤔

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

My Incon distance last much much longer than the LEDs

Expand full comment
CarO Lyn's avatar

Incandescents radiate heat as well. I’ve used a 100w trouble light with an incandescent bulb in my RV wet bay for years when the temps are low. Works perfectly.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Cheaper to operate because gov subsidies? Windmills? Solar panels all over acres and acres and acres of ppl feeding farmland? Chinese made? Maybe it's all a lie.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

This is the reply my electrician husband always gives me when I complain that I want to go back to incandescent. I’m not sure if he and you are right or if he has just been trained to see it that way? 🤷🏼‍♀️

The flickering of them really annoys my eyes and brain. It’s sort of like how a strobe light eventually affects you.

As for lasting longer: that’s true with most bulbs around our house, but NOT the ones that normally take a halogen bulb. The LEDs in my bathroom fixtures burn out constantly the same way the original bulbs did and so half the time the lighting is too low for me to see anything well because I’m waiting for him to replace them. I think both kinds of bulbs cost a lot so he always drags his feet replacing them. He does grumble that the halogen gets too hot.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Halogens will burn you. But then again if an incandescent has been on and you touch it, you'll also get burned.

Expand full comment
Curtis's avatar

I dislike the dark shadows myself.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Dean - what you are missing, is doing a little research on your own. We’re not your secretaries.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

We kind of are, lol.

This is C&C.

: )

Expand full comment
Michael Miller's avatar

How about gas cans that can actually flow gas into my lawnmower??

Expand full comment
MarkGW's avatar

Amen. I bought extra pieces to remove the locking mechanism, add an air hole at the back, and an easy screw on screw of tube and top.

Expand full comment
Skenny's avatar

Plastic straws today!!!!

Gas cans tomorrow!!!!!!!

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

And the regs around air conditioners. We are hanging in there with an A/C system we last replaced in 2003. My understanding is that due to new environmental regulations the cost of replacing it is supposed to go up by a $1000 or more starting this year. At least that is what the tech who was at our house last time we got it repaired told me. Granted, he may have just been trying to earn a commission on a new unit, but I told him I will wait and see what Trump will do when he gets elected. That shut him up.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

FYI there are Energy Star tax credits that kicked in in 2023 and suppose to go to 2032.

Expand full comment
Peter Schott's avatar

I wouldn't really mind the LED bulbs if they actually _lasted_. The cooler temps are welcome in the summer months around here, but the "10 year" thing is ... not. So bringing back incandescents and such will be nice.

Had an all-in-one fixture with LEDs die. But looks like it was just one of the settings for the light so a switch got it working again and not needing a whole new unit. Had to nix _that_ idea for a new overhead light at one point. :)

Expand full comment
CeCe Brown's avatar

Our house is just 5 years old. It wasn't even a year in and we've been replacing LEDs since. They don't last and aren't bright. Don't get me started on my new appliances. Already replaced stove once and have had tech out on new one....need to have them back. Turn on one burner and the one beside it comes on too. Ice maker hasn't worked in a year and dishwasher is crappy....and all were name brands.

I hope he goes after all stupid regulations on appliances next!

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Almost everyone I know has had to replace a major appliance in the last 6 months, unlike my godmother who still had her washing machine from the 1950's. They don't make anything to last anymore and it's infuriating. We've replaced one appliance every year in the house we moved into and the house was newly renovated with new appliances. It's ridiculous. No one cares about making a quality product anymore. They only care about making a profit. And they keep adding all of these "special features" that break. Can't we focus on just making a quality product that lasts, please!!!

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

They need repeat customers.

Expand full comment
NDCrouch's avatar

There are are Quality products out there that will last, but cheap knock-offs will not!

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Thank you thank you thank you. Hallelujah. The return of common sense.

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

Speed Queen washing machines. $1500 but built old skool, all mechanical, like those found in laundromats. Some Homer Depots sell them.

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

The appliances don't work anymore because you can decrease the water flow, OR the electricity consumption, but not both if you want the appliance to still clean or wash, So what does the EPA do ? Reduce both by mandate.

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

My dishwasher started smoking, the tech was all shoulders, don't know. WHAT??

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Yep. Can't find reliable people to fix anything. When my godmother's old refrigerator broke, the repair company had to send 3 different people out to try to fix it! The last guy was an older, experienced repairman.

Expand full comment
alongername's avatar

I am having the same exact problems with my latest girlfriend :

Nothing is made to last anymore !!

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

I see what you did there, lol.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Our cook stove is a 1950 model. Our washing machine is from the mid-1970’s. And we wash our dishes by hand.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Our house is 19 years old and it has some of the original incandescent lights from when we bought it (new construction)! And yet the LEDs keep having to be replaced all the time 🙄

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

The actual bulbs last, but the wiring and other components can affect the life of the LED. I view it as deceptive marketing of the LEDs

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Exactly. Lies from the get go. They tell you in small print that the 10 year lifespan is based on something like 4 hours of use a day.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

The LEDs always burn out rapidly for me.

I’ve never had any LED bulb blast more than a few months.

Expand full comment
Jean V's avatar

We opted for really bright LED integrated light fixtures for our barn. The first set lasted about 3 years, and then, all of a sudden, they were all blipping out. We had to shear our alpacas in very low light, because it happened right around that time. On shearing morning, two of the lights right over the shearing area went dark. So, we replaced them all with the same style, but brighter. Guess what? Those only lasted about a year. So, our next trick is to replace all of the direct wiring with plugs, and get the plug in versions, which will not require an electrician to replace. Our barn ceiling is 14' tall, so it's no easy task.

Expand full comment
Jaci's avatar

They are and you can buy incandescent at 1000 bulbs.com

Expand full comment
Gina C's avatar

Yes... the straw switch was ridiculous. Instead of plastic straws wrapped in paper, we got "paper" straws sealed in plastic.

Expand full comment
Donna Oliphint's avatar

And metal straws that end up piercing small children’s throats if they fall or are bumped with one. ER physicians hate them.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I’m so furious at these judges trying to stop Trump and his administration from cutting waste and thus allowing more money to go back to the regular people in this country! Tarring and feathering would be appropriate for them!

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Notice though what the administration isn't doing. There are no lofty speeches saying things like, "we respect the court's authority and will pause the activity while the case works it's way through the courts. We are a nation of laws and look forward to the appeals process". There is no pabulum like that whatsoever.

Instead, the administration is saying nothing, no platitudes, no hostile defiance, no "nation of laws" nonsense. Instead, Vance puts out a tweet implying the courts actions are lawless. The administration quietly files the proper paperwork response to move through the appeals process. And most importantly, it looks like they are just ignoring the court orders.

As far as I can tell, nothing is stopping but accelerating. There's no outright defiance of the orders, but no acceptance of their legitimacy either. The judge who put out the first order is already huffing and puffing that it's not being followed. But so what? What is he going to do about it? But since Trump isn't getting all angry and defiant there's no target for the media to attack.

Trump understands that not everything requires a response, it's often best just to reject a bad faith premise. Cuck conservatives never understood this. The media and Democrats would call the GOP racists, and conservatives would run to the microphones to defend themselves and explain how it wasn't true. Total loser mentality. Trump taught us that when they call us racists, you laugh at them and call them pedophiles. A deliberate bad faith action requires a response in kind.

Yet I see one conservative after another wringing their hands about "out of control left wing judges" without realizing their anguished posts gives them power and legitimacy. It's a loser menatlity and no surprise that the country was nearly lost under their leadership. Thank God for President Trump.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

From Sean Davis this morning, one of the few conservatives that gets it:

The theater kids running the Democrat Party are insecure and desperate for attention, so of course they’re going to pretend it’s a “constitutional crisis” any time they don’t get their way.

The proper response to spoiled children who have public temper tantrums whenever mommy doesn’t buy them the candy they demand is to ignore their nonsense and go about your business.

This country’s laws and constitution do not grant nationwide veto power to unelected inferior district judges. The proper response to these clowns is to ignore them, impeach and remove them, and/or eliminate entire federal judicial districts and thereby force the Supreme Court—if it refuses to rein in these little bolsheviks in robes—to handle every single district case on its own.

https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1889323332031357244

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Preach!!!! I love it!

Expand full comment
Jack Bergeron's avatar

There’s a time, like now, when the Supreme Court needs to step in immediately and end this nonsense. The list of cases that have been subject to excessive cost and years of delay because the Supremes will only take up a very limited number of cases to fit into their schedule is a miscarriage of justice. Way too much time is wasted studying prior cases and precedents when the plain, easily understood language of the Constitution is all that is needed to decide a case.

Expand full comment
Porge's avatar

And that's a fact jack! How much do we pay these Supreme Court a -holes anyway?

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

Ditto!

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Excellent!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

That was a good post, thanks for sharing.

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Yes. One of the things I am working hard to internalize is the stoic saying "you don't have to have an opinion on everything"

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

As a Christian it took me a long time to be deprogrammed from the media-defined behavior supposedly required of a Christian. The fact that the media is overwhelmingly non-Christian makes me shake my head at my foolishness in letting it happen.

There is no requirement to be "nice" to people acting in bad faith, it's not required to be a Christian. Christ certainly wasn't, he called out the scribes and Pharisees right to their faces as vipers and sons of satan. He called the hypocritical Jews "a perverse and corrupt generation" in front of a large crowd.

We think we have to respond to everything, and take people's opinions seriously, as we've been brainwashed that we have to always be "nice". We don't. When someone is deliberately lying to you it is acceptable and morally courageous to call them a liar. When someone demands in bad faith you "care" about something, it's perfectly acceptable to laugh at them.

The key is determining when it's in bad faith, but it's actually pretty simple. If the person is dealing with us in a dishonest manner, that is misrepresenting things, exaggerating the significance, lying by omission, intentionally manipulating emotions, etc. then that's bad faith. Period. Good people do not interact with other people in this manner. Once I detect that my obligation to be "nice" ends.

I've gradually come to the conclusion that it's actually the moral position that we must not be nice to people who behave this way. They need to experience negative reinforcement or they will just continue their manipulative behavior on others.

Expand full comment
YourGalapagosGullfriend's avatar

The bad actors in both the media and the Church have done a solid job convincing people of two things:

1. Jesus was some sort of hippie (couldn't be further from the truth)

2. "Love" means accepting and validating everyone's behavior, no matter how harmful and sinful.

We've got some work to do breaking through this, but God is with us so I think we can do it. :D

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Spot on.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Everybody needs to reread this! I remember you saying it's more important to be kind than nice and I agree.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Think about it this way, when the lying, pushy, and manipulative salesman comes to your door, is the moral thing to be pleasant to them? Or is it moral to call them out as a scumbag liar and slam the door in their face?

Here's the thing, if enough people call them out as scumbags then just maybe they'll get tired of it and get an honest job. But if everyone is "nice" to them then they are more likely to continue at it and scam your elderly, gullible neighbor. They get no negative reinforcement for their dishonest behavior.

Yet people have been conned into thinking being "nice" is a good thing when it's really just a coward's way to avoid confronting dishonest behavior. And shockingly of course, the most dishonest people are those that demand we be "nice".

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

You had me at hello!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes. That last paragraph especially 🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

It’s more important to stand up and speak out then to be nice.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Exactly right. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Positively Paying It Forward's avatar

Jeff,

Based on your comment:

"There is no requirement to be "nice" to people acting in bad faith, it's not required to be a Christian. Christ certainly wasn't, he called out the scribes and Pharisees right to their faces as vipers and sons of satan. He called the hypocritical Jews "a perverse and corrupt generation" in front of a large crowd.",

in today's world, Jesus would be considered an 'anti-semite'.

How ironic.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

My Son & I have been studying Epictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius. Opinions and judgments keep us from living in the present. Although, we do have to be aware of the past & future.

Mark Twain was a stoic. He is one of my favorite quotes regarding imagination: “You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.”

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Excellent. Keep it up. I started reading Ryan Holliday's popular daily posts on Stoicism until one day he wrote about how all of the J 6'ers deserved what they got for their "insurrection".

I Love Mark Twain, and along with TJ, they produced more of my favorite quotes than anyone. Two other gems from Twain were "If you don't read the papers , you aren't informed. If you do read the papers, you are misinforemed'. And my all-time favorite ," It isn't what you don't know that will kill you. IIt's what you think you know for sure, but just ain't so".

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Ryan’s book got started.

Expand full comment
Jamison's avatar

A wise person told me, “Just because you have something to say, it doesn’t mean you should say it”.

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Nice

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

At least we don’t have to state our opinion on everything. Having a reasoned opinion is a good thing.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Well put! Which makes me wonder what they have up their sleeve. Trump KNEW this is what they would do. I think he has a plan and it is in motion. But you nailed it!

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

What we do not know is if all is turned back to them, can the records be changed hidden or altered? I doubt it, yet do not know.

I suspect they are not only trying to delay, but also to hide information, and hoping for an avenue to open to impeach President Trump.

Why cant a different federal judge file a contrary order?

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Or other (red state) AGs counter the liberal AGs?

Expand full comment
Georgette Benidt's avatar

I wish they would come and call out Minnesota's corruption

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

Ditto!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Thanks for the added perspective. I appreciate Jeff’s take (which I hadn’t had time to fully read when I posted obviously) and your points about Trump’s lack of reaction. That makes a lot of sense. I also hope your reference to conservatives wringing their hands and the loser mentality comment isn’t partially directed at me. I was simply expressing frustration at their sheer arrogance and hubris (and I definitely think all of these judges are personally getting something out of the profligate government spending). I haven’t posted anywhere else or said anything to anyone about this besides this post. I’m glad all of this is coming to light and coming to a head. I hope their pride will indeed be their undoing.

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Judges, Politicians, Media who try to circumvent cutting waste, fraud and financial crimes, are outing themselves as conspirators to the biggest heist in Human History. I hope Pam Bondi is taking note and will act swiftly.

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

Can't another judge file an order demanding Musk continue as Trump orders and NOT turn over anything?

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Hmmmmmm…….wouldn’t that be cool!!!! Like a judge duel…….i like it!

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

Yes, and it could state that likely crimes are being exposed, so the documentation must continue and be preserved.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

I thought the same thing... One would think then that would accelerate the process to the Supreme Court because you would have multiple "cases" that would need to be adjudicated at the same time.

And since when is the "Supreme Court", which derives its power from Article III (Judicial), superior to either the Article I (Congress) or Article II (Executive) co-equal branches of government???

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

It baffles me that these crooks believe that they will not have to pay the price for their crimes

Expand full comment
Queen Hotchibobo's avatar

It’s true that they never have yet. I suppose they think the past is prologue.

I’m hoping it’s a new day.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

well said

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes I’m thinking and hoping the same. They’re showing to whom they’re beholden.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

They just tarred and feathered themselves as they did with abortion by trying to overturn pro-life initiatives in individual states.

They inadvertently caused the issue to be taken to SCOTUS.

Now abortion law is back in the hands of the states based on overturning what WAS the law of the land, Roe

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

But I still feel that Roe was overturned conveniently for the summer of 2022, just in time for the mid term elections. Too many Blue States such as Michigan, used this to get radical abortion legislation on ballots and to use abortion to get blue governors and legislators elected. I know of at least 6 states that got radical abortion legislation passed and no state’s that got pro life legislation enacted. However, if this wakes up the Right to Life movement then it achieved some purpose.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

I’ve had the same thoughts. These states are packed with murdering POS’s who jumped at the chance to make it easier and faster to murder unborn babies - WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT. They are loving it! It is sick and twisted.

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

Yes, it is, but God still knows what He intends. Perhaps he is telling us to encourage women in every way to have their babies, to find God given ways NOT to become pregnant, instead of ignoring it and holding up our hands in defeat. David slew Goliath with a rock. Our giants are before us, but we have lots of rocks.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

exactly right

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

Yes, to motivate people to the polls, but big money was poured into states to get it passed because it A) is population control and B) fuels a lucrative beauty industry. Late term aborted fetuses can be sold for several purposes, one being stem cells for anti aging products.

https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/the-babies-who-are-murdered-to-order-7195092.html

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

As someone who was a ballot initiative facilitator in the summer of 2020 to get an ancient Michigan law repealed that was allowing our governor unending lockdown measures, my eyes were opened to how corrupt my state was. We organized signing parties at rest stops, outside businesses still open, farmer’s markets, anywhere we could while still being locked down. In 3 months we got almost double the needed amount of signatures to get this initiative reviewed by our Republican led legislature to remove the law from the books. But the SofS slow walked the review of the signature for months effectively delaying it until well after the election. But within 6 weeks of the Roe v Wade overturning, they had 750, 000 signatures to get a radical abortion law on the November ballot. The language was found to have all kinds of grammar errors and misspellings that should have doomed it to going on the ballot, but at the last minute a partisan judge allowed it. Yes, I now know how the Swamp, both Federal and State works.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

We know Michigan well. And it’s disheartening to hear this but I am not surprised at all. Oregon had enough signatures to recall Brown back in 2020 and she found a way to stop it. Because they cheat, it is difficult to stop them. Not impossible. But very difficult.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

I know how much you suffered under Whitler as I have friends and family in Michigan. One step to stop it is to get your voter rolls cleaned. That's key in the cheating.

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

To do that you need a SofS that is not as corrupt as the current governor and AG, and also NOT running for governor herself in 2026, which this one is. But we do have good people trying to get the voter rolls cleaned up, one in particular is still trying to get to the bottom of all of Michigan’s cheating.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

probably funded by USAID

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

It’s really hard to “like” this post because of the content. It’s so sick. 😭

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

It actually gets worse. There is video/photos of what Russia soldiers found in Kharkiv. I'll spare you as it is worse than any nightmare.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

I just read your above link and even that is too much to bear. God have mercy 😭

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I “like” it only because I appreciate having the information!

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

Sick.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I believe TN had already passed very pro-life legislation prior to 2022 but of course it was immediately challenged in court. If I recall correctly, because of the 2022 SCOTUS decision, the TN decision stood. I think some other conservative states also passed very pro-life legislation. But naturally, the left swept into blue states and totally lied (because that's what they do -it's in their very nature to lie) to win elections and put forward very horrible pro-abortion laws.

Expand full comment
Starsky's avatar

Just like all the cannabis votes, bought and paid for by Soros…with OUR money, it turns out! Now the cannabis industry is failing, going from $3000 a bale to $500 and they’re all closing up shop in Humboldt county. It’s too expensive to farm it, just like we told them would happen… just a money-grubbing, taxable slush fund for the politicians.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

The case had worked its way through the appellate court and application to the Supreme Court for years.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

I agree with that 100%. And I am certainly not a proponent for abortion, but conservatives made a big mistake bringing that case before the primaries.

They should've assumed there would be a leak given everything that happened during Trumps term.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

That’s what I’m hoping also but it still makes me mad!!!!! 😡😡😡

Expand full comment
Steenroid's avatar

Well no one ever accused them of being intelligent.

Expand full comment
🌱Nard🙏's avatar

Let the cases go to SCOTUS…let’s settle the issue of constitutionalism so that no administration can undo what he has done. Next step…codify them! I’ll bet we have some legislators ready to spring into action once the issues are settled by SCOTUS. it’s going to be beautiful to watch.

Expand full comment
Peter Schott's avatar

But on the other hand - it's really amusing to watch the (D)ifferent politicians keep on defending the fraud and waste rather than saying "hey - this needs to stop". The inability to read the room is quite telling.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Right?? You can really tell whose side they’re on!

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

I also find it interesting that biden circumvented the courts and cancelled student loan debt anyway. “Piss off courts…I’ll do what I want anyway.” I HOPE as we maneuver through getting real judges back in charge we replay over and over again bidens circumventing the courts.

I still wonder if anyone actually got their debt erased 😒 or was it all for show? I paid mine off in 2024 after almost 10 years of paying them back, and several people I know are still paying. So WHO actually got let off at our expense?

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

From what I understand it was the children of wealthy donors who got their loans forgiven. And those who work as aides in DC, and democrat activist’s.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

You would think THAT would wake up braindead demoncraps. But, hard to wake them up when nobody will expose it. Mainstream most certainly won’t. They don’t want it advertised that he did it against court rulings and they don’t want anyone to know WHO exactly got their debt erased. I wish someone like Charlie Kirk who has the influence and capabilities to find all this out would report it.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

If true, no surprise

Expand full comment
Beth M's avatar

I applied to the program but never heard back. I read that only people working in rural, government positions were eligible. Or something like that; either way, my conservative ass was NOT worthy 😅

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes I agree and of course not one of these fakes on the Left had any qualms about Biden doing that 🙄

Expand full comment
Pat Wetzel's avatar

You're too kind.

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
NAB's avatar

Curious to know Jeff's thought's on this lawyers suggestion:

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1889139311431606285

He basically says, let TRUMP go to the Treasury with Elon and DOGE boys in tow, and access the records personally and see what the judiciary has to say to the PRESIDENT looking at info.

Expand full comment
L  Young's avatar

Apparently you haven’t checked on what a bag of feathers cost these days.

Expand full comment
Gma HighDesert Oregon's avatar

Some of my hens cost upwards of $25 - $50 each to add to my layer flock these days. But I always have year round eggs and sell in the summer at just enough to almost cover 75% of feed costs, which has gone up 20 -35% in the last 5 years.

Expand full comment
L  Young's avatar

My coop has been empty for five years now. A store bought egg is not even the same food.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

True 😆 And tar is probably crazy expensive too 😛

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I was thinking the other day of what the Democrats remind me of right now...My mother and several other older people have told me about killing chickens. You cut the head off and then the chicken will crazily run around for several minutes before finally keeling over. Thus the phrase, "like a chicken with it's head cut off."

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

They will also fly a short distance with their heads cut off. I still have childhood nightmares of watching an aunt kill chickens by chopping their heads off with an axe and headless chickens flying and dropping all over the yard.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I worked with a guy who had similar nightmares of a chicken chasing him around the yard after it had been beheaded.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Was it here that someone mentioned Judges can be impeached? I would love to see some of these fools impeached.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Marxists gonna marxist.

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

Yup. Haha.

Expand full comment
Alan Davis's avatar

I am wondering if these lower courts really will learn any lessons that Trump is trying to teach them here. They will continue to impede progress in this term and future presidential terms if they dont get slapped hard here.

Impeachment of these judges need to happen.

Expand full comment
Deb's avatar

Sack then up and throw them in the DC gulag!!!! Picture that for a minute!!!!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

It would be crowded

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

That's what GITMO is for.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Perhaps they should be set adrift in the Gulf of America.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Only during the winter when an Alberta clipper comes thru. Never during Hurricane season.

Expand full comment
Mary Mc's avatar

It would be a good start anyway... 😉

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Make it a televised event as well

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

Of particular interest to me in North Carolina, is that the name Fort Bragg has been restored to the Army base which had been renamed Fort Liberty. I don't suppose our President can force a name change on the shopping center in Raleigh which was originally named Cameron Village. Whoever Cameron was, he had some tenuous tie to slavery, so it is now called the Village District. Does anyone see hypocrisy in these leftists renaming places because of a perceived moral flaw in the person for which they are named, while at the same time advocating for the killing of babies and the mutilation of children? How about their constant criticism of our President's (admitted) moral failings while supporting any kind of sexual perversion for themselves?

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

George Orwell in his book 1984:

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day be day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except the endless present in which the party is always right.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Standard Commie Operation Procedure!

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

My brother served at Bragg. I visited Bragg. I'm not just bragging, either.

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

Ha ha, love it!

Expand full comment
Paula's avatar

I'm in Northern Virginia and they're renaming schools and roads at such a fevered pace no one can keep up.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

So ridiculous that in Chicago, the Democrats changed the name of a school that focused on science because it was named after Ben Carson. After all, why would you want a school meant to inspire people to be named after a man who was the most brilliant neurosurgeon in the world - I mean who would be inspired by that?! Thick sarcasm intended .

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

The stupidity of these people is boundless.

Expand full comment
KATHERINE JERNIGAN's avatar

It’s simply racism.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

It's a hatred towards all that is conservative and common sense.

Expand full comment
KATHERINE JERNIGAN's avatar

It’s simply racism.

Expand full comment
Georgette Benidt's avatar

It's amazing that they can't respect a very successful conservative black man! They hypocrisy is crazy but so very sad!

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
Tricia Westling's avatar

Evidently it’s named now for a different soldier named Bragg who served in WWII’s Battle of the Bulge and earned a Silver Star and Purple Heart

Expand full comment
Debra Jackson's avatar

Yes it was renamed to Private Roland Bragg. It was a clever way to get Fort Bragg back without all the hysterical pearl clutching.

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

At least they didn't name it after Alvin Bragg.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

No, Bragg was a Confederate General... which is why the left tried to purge him... they purged a lot of such.. even the great Robert E. Lee.

Sad that the South lost.

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

Yes, I saw that. I'm glad for the name change, no matter who it's named after.

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

In this house we say Fort Bragg and Gulf of America! History never ended. A globe from 1991 shows how much the world has changed and will continue to change: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/end-of-history-last-man-globe

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

The irony is monumental - no pun intended.

Expand full comment
Starsky's avatar

Not only that, but I can guarantee you Cameron was a Democrat, a truth which seems lost on the Democrats. And I went to NCSU, so it will always be Cameron Village to me!

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

As it is to me.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Also UNC-Chapel Hill went about renaming numerous campus buildings whose benefactors were confederates who funded them. Such virtue!

https://rha.unc.edu/renaming/

(I'm sure many other colleges are doing the same)

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Now that the money has been spent and they won’t be giving it back 🙄

Expand full comment
William Foster's avatar

The Camerons had quite a few slaves, around 900. Nonetheless, I agree the name change was nothing but virtue signaling. The only good thing about the name change is you can tell who the six people are that were actually born in Raleigh, no one from there calls it The Village.

Expand full comment
Anne Clifton's avatar

My husband and I managed a missionary guesthouse in Accra, Ghana for three months in 2013. A woman from the U.S. came to visit, thinking she was going to see a utopia that her ancestors had been forced to leave. After going out the first day, she came back and refused to leave her room again until time to return to the U.S.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Once Kennedy was murdered, Marxism was introduced. And it was not really evident at the time that this was the course embarked upon, and it was not likely a lot of the people involved at the time knew what was going on or being introduced. After all, the opportunism inherent in self-serving agendas such as Lyndon Johnson's 'Great Society' are a kind of blindness. The term useful 'useful' idiot comes to mind.

One prime feature of Commie Revolutions is name changing. Commies always have to turn the house upside down and raze everything to the ground for the sake of their New Creation. And they do it with a religious fervor because Marxism in whatever form is a religion. The Soviets did the same thing. BUT ... Leningrad is now once again St. Petersburg. And Stalingrad is returned to Volgograd [formerly Tsaritsyn (1589–1925) and Stalingrad (1925–1961)]. A lot of cultural de-Sovietization went on and now the new Russian Federation is a fairly normal place. That is, for most people and in their daily lives and that of the culture.

The United States has been living under a form of Communist government for decades now, brought in slowly at first with all kinds of It's a Small World, Global Eco-Terrorist and New World United Nations sourced political agendas/political policy promotions. And it also may be said that a large part of the BRICS Plus movement was just to get out from underneath this God-awful Woke Commie agenda, deceptively called Globalism. And It is also all the stuff such as we have seen in the USAID promotions.

In short, we all have had a belly full. Time to move on to a real normal normal. And this what we are seeing in the new and well-organized New Narrative being brought in. The scope of it is breath-taking. Because when 'orders' reach down to the Super Bowl and Google's calendar designations, you can bet your boots that a real counter-revolution. It's now comply or get left behind ... only in reverse gear. Mitigation of the horrors, relief in law is now well on the way.

Expand full comment
Anita Söderman's avatar

You should see Sweden.....!

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

I saw Sweden in the 1980s and it was already rotting away. Just not so obvious as it is today.

My own dark hunch is that the West will never fully recovery from what has happened. Maybe things will get better, but never the same as before.

Expand full comment
Rhonda's avatar

Fellow NC’er here. They also renamed my college dorm because of some musty and obscure perceived slight to someone. So irritating.

Expand full comment
PatriotWatcher's avatar

I've been in Texas for awhile now... Just recently found out about Fort Bragg, didn't know about Cameron Village 🤯 I'm from Timberlake 🥰

Expand full comment
SB's avatar

Great! I was wondering about that this weekend! Of course everyone in NC always called it Bragg.

Expand full comment
Starsky's avatar

We always called Fayetteville “Fayette-Nam.”

Expand full comment
Uncle Juan's avatar

Pray for Trump and team! They have many adversaries…

for a wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries.

‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭16‬:‭9‬

Expand full comment
Cynthia's avatar

As furious as I am about these liberal judges, trying to slow down Trump’s momentum I will take your advice, Jeff, and not panic until you say so! Meanwhile, I’m praying!

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Once these judges' rulings have made it to the Supreme Court they will be overturned and Trump will have the full power and authority to clean house as needed.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

IMO, serous sanctions should be applied to judges, if their lawfare is found to be spurious and partisan... removal from the bench would be appropriate in many of these cases...

It would sure slow a lot of these corrupt scumbags down...

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

And the judges will be publicly humiliated. Justly so.

Expand full comment
Neil Kellen's avatar

How long will that take? 3 years? That's too long.

Expand full comment
MayBella82's avatar

Jeff mentioned an emergency hearing. I would think it would happen quickly.

Expand full comment
Steenroid's avatar

My guess is at some point the DOJ files a writ of mandamus but I’m not a lawyer so I’m just guessing.

Expand full comment
KBB's avatar

Echoing Jeff's analysis is this excellent X post from Kurt Schlichter:

Here is a long take on the court injunction crisis, which is less crisis than an opportunity… OK, stop panicking about all the stupid legal decisions from leftist judges that the left is getting from judge shopping in leftist jurisdictions. Stop. Panicking. First, no one should be surprised by any of this. The administration certainly isn’t. We always knew exactly what they would do. Do not take the fact they are not screaming and yelling as them rolling over. They are not rolling over. There’s plenty going on behind the scenes as administration lawyers prepare their papers for the legal fight to come. Second, since we have to have this fight, this is the time and the battleground to have it. Why? We want it settled right at the beginning of the administration so that we don’t have to deal with this down the road. And we want to fight on these orders because 1) they are manifestly the result of bad faith judge shopping and the opinions themselves are both procedural and 2) they are substantively ridiculous. They are legal jokes. Don’t listen to the dummy lawyers on Twitter - only listen to me or the people I tell you that you can rely on. Everyone telling you these are reasoned, valid legal decisions is either a legal illiterate or thinks you are stupid. Third, the way this fight is happening is to our advantage. Wait, you ask, we’re getting decision after decision against us! How can that be good? Because they are leaving the Supreme Court no choice. People want Trump to sound off about this, but he doesn’t need to. What’s left unstated is the fact that he can just not obey these manifestly improper orders. They say it’s a constitutional crisis now, but that becomes a real one when they push Trump too far. He’s not going to submit forever to micromanagement of the executive branch by activist District Court judges in blue cities across America. And Chief Justice Roberts knows it. CJ Roberts and majority of the court know these are ridiculous legally, and the last thing they want to do is stake the credibility of the Court – which famously has no divisions – on this kind of nonsense. They are not going to jump on the grenade that is these decisions. There might someday be a fight with a president about something where he is legally in the wrong, but this is not that time. This is not the hill the Supreme Court will die on. Wisely, Trump’s not adding fuel to the fire by threatening to do what it’s very clear he can do, which is disobey. This provides SCOTUS the cover it needs to deal with these upstart district courts without looking like Trump strong-armed it. So relax and let the process go forward. We’re going to win on all these injunctions, and I expect fairly quickly

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

“Even the Führer knew to support German science”

Finally! A mainstream(ish) publication acknowledging the NIH is responsible for genocide! Technically, it’s democide, but that subheading still merits revocation of their Holocaust denial badge (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier).

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

The "holocaust" was a LIE. Only an uninformed fool would NOT deny it. Example:

https://www.unz.com/article/auschwitz-six-facts-and-seven-questions/

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

You know NOTHING.

I have personally met Holocaust survivors, including members of my family. While the level of detail that each of them gave about their experiences was different, all of them were unequivocal in their testimony that they and their fellow Jews were targeted for mass extinction, and that they were lucky to have survived. They also testified that Jews were not the only ones who are victims of hair, Hitler and his genocidal thugs. There were something like 16 million Jews worldwide in 1939. Why has the population of Jews not roughly quadrupled, like that of the rest of the world since that time?

You are an ill informed ass, someone who has an ideological ax to grind against the Jews for some reason, (as well as all of the millions of others who were murdered by the Nazis). I really hope for your sake that you like warm weather, because that’s where you’re headed, for eternity. More sincerely, I hope you wake up from your Jew, hating stupor and realize how very wrong you are and have been, and that you beg God for forgiveness for your willful ignorance and hatred.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Corrie Ten Boon's biography is a great place to start. It can be viewed on YouTube on Vision Video. Rather than retaliating in anger, she was compelled by the horrors (horrors is an understatement) she survived to share the love of God and the power of forgiveness with others around the world. By the way, I cannot even begin to imagine living through the horrors she and her entire family endured - many did not survive including her sister, her brother, and her father. There are countless other stories. Jan Jekeliek's of Epoch Times did a documentary with his father about his experiences in a concentration camp and how he escaped by jumping from a train which saved his life. So many more heart wrenching stories of survival and death.

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

It is well and good to forgive others for what they have done to you. However, you simply cannot forgive someone for what they did to someone else. Understand that there are since against God‘s law, and sins against human beings. These are two very different things. Even God cannot forgive me if I do something wrong to you. Only you can do so. God certainly can, and mercifully does, forgive those who sincerely repent of their sins against His law. Oh, it is absolutely impossible for anybody living, now or at any time in the past or future, to forgive those Nazis and their collaborators who murdered so many millions of people, choose and not choose. People can forgive them for the effect that those murders had on them, as survivors, but they cannot forgive the actual murder itself or the pain inflicted on those people prior to end during the murder.

That is Jewish law and tradition, and has been for thousands of years. Even on Yom Kippur, the Jewish day of atonement, we ask God for forgiveness for the sins we have committed against His law. However, we are obligated to go to each person who we have wronged and ask for their forgiveness. I understand that Christian theology and is different, but I would ask every person who is a Christian of whatever stripe.to understand that Jesus during his lifetime was a practicing Jew and would have agreed with what I have said about Jewish law.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

You are so full of bullcrap... typical of your malignant tribe.

https://www.unz.com/article/auschwitz-six-facts-and-seven-questions/

Expand full comment
Kelly's avatar

I just bought a book called The Boys: the story of 732 Young Concentration Camp Survivors the other day. Written by Martin Gilbert. I havent started it yet, but this convo made me think maybe somebody would be interested in reading it.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Thanks for the recommendation. One of the old books that's no longer in print is Hansi: Hilter's Youth. It's the story of an orphan who ended up in Hitter's Youth and all of the unbelievable things she lived through and eventually how she became a Christian during the Cold War and she immigrated to the United States and began a Christian ministry. It's interesting to look at how the youth were captured and propagandized.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Lots of lies here. And you failed to mention the biggest victims: In WW2 over 55 million people died, with Christians being at least 30 million of them.

But their deaths are underrepresented due to Woke-ness. Check this out:

America has 90 Holocaust memorials but only 53 WW2 memorials!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Holocaust_memorials_and_museums_in_the_United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_memorials_in_the_United_States

Expand full comment
Valerie's avatar

I visited Auschwitz and Birkenau back in 1990 and I can assure you that it’s not fake. I don’t know what it’s like now, but back then there were huge rooms filled with braids that had been cut off the women before they were gassed, huge piles of eyeglasses, etc. And I mean HUGE piles. There’s no way someone would go to that extent to fake it. You’ve been misinformed.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

You know nothing. The jews have made that into some sort of craven Disneyland.

Read, learn and wake up:

https://www.unz.com/article/auschwitz-six-facts-and-seven-questions/

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

To Mr. Weiss:

Why don't you stop it with all of it. This re-treaded, recycled knee jerk reaction is ... well, jerky. The truth about the Holocaust is somewhere in between ... and the truth is not all Holocaust Museum lily white. And it certainly is not all human lampshades and the like.

And tell me, why is it ... or why was it until recently that only one Holocaust mattered? And that it was nearly a sin to mention any other genocides, and maybe genocides more real the Official Narrative Genocide being promoted?

Look at the real history. The Soviets did horrific things. The Americans did really horrific things, especially after the war was over. And the Germans did bad things? And so, who were the worst? The answer might well-surprise us. And speaking of which, why was David Irving hounded, imprisoned and lawfared to death? David Irving? For telling the truth in his well-researched and meticulously footnoted histories? And there have been many, many others persecuted for the same 'crime', truth telling.

And by the way, just who does the persecuting? Who are the biggest persecutors on earth? Answer me this Lucy!

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

You’re an ass. I don’t have the time or the inclination to write a 50 page paper on why, but I definitely could.

I hope that you grow a heart and sufficient brain cells to figure out how mistaken you are, and that you can somehow forgive yourself for the drivel that you post online.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Oh! My feelings are so hurt by your Big Boy Artillery barrage with a 'you're an ass' written on every shell. And actually, Sir Mister Wrong Side of the Equation, you will be convicted in the Court of Public Opinion ... for felony lameness and for perjury.

You were wise to run and hide. Because you would have lost.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

You, being a jew, and very likely a Talmudic, Zionist jew... are, like all of your ilk... a lying scumbag... that despises all non-jews.

Reading your vile, filthy talmud proves this.

Jews were not targeted by Hitler (a great leader) for mass extinction... but for mass expulsion/relocation... many countries have expelled all jews, for good reasons we see today... jews are a cancer... corrupt, manipulative and slimy. Examples in congress: Raskin, Goldman, Schiff, Sherman, Blumenthal, Wasserman-Shitz, Sanders, Schumer, Nadler... the STENCH!!

https://rumble.com/v457fgc-jews.html

What are YOUR answers to the questions in the above link, you simpering zio-assclown? Refute all the FACTS in this too, you jagoff Judah-ben-ahole:

https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/BreakingTheSpell-Kollerstrom.pdf

Speaking of asking for forgiveness, scumbag... spell out the justification for murdering 300,000 innocent Gazans, more than the number of jews that died in the relocation/expulsion camps of WWII (less than 300,000, proven many times)

https://rumble.com/v5ic05f-atrocity-inc.html

Then justify the criminal use of white phosphorous on Gazan civilians, and other WAR CRIMES, you spawn of Satan:

https://rumble.com/v5urom2-the-evidence.html

All justified by the Oct 7 IDF FALSE FLAG... which jew media Haaretz admits the IDF knew WELL in advance was coming, let it happen... and Haaretz admits that the IDF killed most of those that died that day, NOT Hamas.

Well, you cockroach????

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Bravo, Abiding Dude! That was a very undudelike but impeccable example of hysterical antisemitism in action.

I have previously critiqued the weaponization of the term “anti-semite” to smear dissidents (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/requiem-for-a-smear-victim-clemens) and the hyperbolic exaggerations of rampant antisemitism to justify censorship (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/on-fearing-freedomplus-thanking-substack), but this is such a textbook example, I have saved it to my files as a living demonstration of the power of propaganda to induce dehumanization of a group so you no longer see them as individuals but rather as vermin, or shall I say cockroaches.

Such vitriol doesn’t require censorship, though—on the contrary, I’m grateful you’ve shown us who you truly are and hope you leave this comment proudly on display for all to see.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

You are welcome, you dumb bitch... and my post was an example of hysteria-inducing truth... obviously...

How many of the links did you read and review, turd? Any SPECIFIC rebuttals to the truth therein, or just your simpering, woke bullcrap response, which didn't address anything?

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Since you were responding to a delusional belief due to your reading comprehension challenges for the second time in a row, there was nothing for me to rebut because I wasn’t even discussing that topic. I was talking about the vaxxicide Holocaust presently underway. I apologize if I used too many syllables there.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Another brilliant example! Thank you, Tim! Classic 🤣

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Sir, just because someone disagrees with the propaganda put out does not make them hate anyone. The numbers and info put out about this is not all fact nor is all true. Stop jumping to accuse someone who you do not know. There is truth out there if you search for it. Go down the rabbit holes and search.

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

With all due respect, it is a FACT that roughly 6,000,000 Jews and roughly 5,000,000 non-Jews were murdered during the course of the Holocaust. Entire communities have been like out, by the thousands. That is to say, thousands of communities. I have personally met many Holocaust survivors during the course of my life, including some family members. One of my relatives was in the Auschwitz complex of death camps, and he said that it was a death factory. Cattle cars were coming in constantly, and leaving empty, with the occupants of those cars going up in smoke after cremation within 2 to 3 hours of having arrived there. This is a fact, it is not subject to disagreement. The only thing that can be subject to disagreement is a) what to do about rectifying the wrong that was perpetrated, and b) how to prevent another such horrific crime from ever occurring again to any group of people.

In my experience, and I’m 63 so I have a fair amount of it, those who deny either the Holocaust itself, or the scope of it, have an ulterior motive, and in virtually every case, that motive has a lot to do with not liking Jews very much. Now, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but no one is entitled to their own facts. Facts just are, regardless of how many people don’t like those facts.

You know, it is interesting that at the end of the war, General Eisenhower ordered the filming of what was going on in all of the camps that had been liberated by Allied forces, because he knew that “some son of a bitch is someday going to say that this never happened.“ His words, not mine. Well, look at this thread and tell me that Eisenhower wasn’t right.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

The 6M number emerged only decades after the event.

It kept getting revised up as the $$$ started rolling in from playing the victim card.

It's been very profitable for the Chosen.

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

BS. I can remember in the late 1960s that the number was 6 million, and that this number was long agreed upon by virtually all scholars of the subject (of various religious and national backgrounds) by that point in time. Stop with the revisionist history.

You’re entitled to your opinion on any subject you choose, but you are NOT entitled to your own facts.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

The slimy jews have been using the "6 million" bullcrap long before WWII.

many of the photos use to depict the 'holocaust' were actually from Eisenhower's own death camps for German POWs.

Why did Eisenhower fail to mention any "holocaust" or mass murder of jews in his memoirs, you dumb ahole? maybe he "forgot"? LOL!!

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

Well, Abiding Dude settled this question all by himself. Read his 2nd post, and tell me that he is not one of the most hate-filled people you’ve ever come across.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Talk about an epic self-own 😆

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Once again, you're speaking without understanding the context. If you looked at the link, you would see I'm referring to the present Holocaust underway.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Thanks for the clarification. I thought you were the WW2 one, which has a lot of BS associated with it. That link that Abiding Dude provided (on unz.com) explains it well.

The gaza genocide is real. https://www.gettyimages.com/search/2/image?phrase=gaza

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

Thx. This too...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZZ0g6GdcwYLz/

jews are a cancer on any society.

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

Then don’t go to any Jewish doctors, don’t use any antibiotics or other medications developed by or with the help of Jews, and don’t have any surgical procedures done using equipment and techniques developed by Jews. You’ll be dead before long…and missed by few.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

So... jews are the "Supreme race"... eh?

Straight from the unflushed toilet called the "talmud".

https://x.com/DanBilzerian/status/1825211759906693465

You are craven, pathetic and... typical of your vile ilk.

Small wonder you are reviled, rejected and expelled.

Expand full comment
Paul  Weiss's avatar

No lies whatsoever. And the reason that I didn’t mention the several tens of millions of people who died during World War II is that they died as a result of a war. For sure, it was a war of aggression wage by Germany, Japan and Italy, and we did put people like Albert Spear and various German generals and the German foreign minister on trial for waging aggressive war. Today we call that crimes against humanity. But dying in a war is different than being purposely selected based on your heritage for extermination. You have to understand that women, children, old people, and even infants were targeted and massacred by the millions. That is categorically different from dying in a war, though in each case the person is just as dead. I was addressing Abiding Dude’s moronic, false and hateful comments - because “the Holocaust” refers to that purposeful selection and genocide.

WRT WW2, one of my grandfathers volunteered at age 35, because he was an immigrant and thought that he owed something back to this country. He was also a doctor, and he helped to save many lives. Every one of my uncles also served, as did every other mail of age in my extended family. One of them that I know of died during the war, as a result of injuries suffered in battle. I have long thought that we need to remember these veterans and their sacrifice, as well as those from every other war in our history. We are free because of those people and what they did for us.

As for being “woke,” I am the furthest thing from it that you can imagine. I have had many supposed friends and many people in my extended family cut off contact with me because they don’t like the ideas that I spout, ideas which are just traditional, American or traditional moral values. Wokeism is a mental disorder, and I am not a victim of it.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

German science was furthered by torturing and killing people. That’s how he did science.

They are by sleight of phrase self justifying gain of function and depopulation.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

The rest is off, but you’re close on the cats 😹

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I see we have some common ground, after all!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Only two people misunderstood—you and Unabiding Dude. Unless you think the NIH was a Third Reich agency? 😆

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I see your reading comprehension skills are almost as challenged as Abiding Dude’s (his are significantly poorer as this is his second time going off on an insult-laden, reactionary tangent based on a fallacious premise). As I clarified elsewhere, I was referring to the *present* Holocaust underway. This one’s more like 17 million and counting.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Shoooot. The NIH IS The Turd Reich!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😆

Expand full comment
Bill Campbell's avatar

LMAO!

Expand full comment
AM Schimberg's avatar

I like it!

Expand full comment
Gwyneth's avatar

Given that the Gulf is bordered by North America, Central America and South America, the more appropriate name would be Gulf of the Americas.

Expand full comment
Mike Perceval's avatar

Except that South America definitely doesn’t border the Gulf and, technically, neither does Central America. The only bordering nations are Cuba, Mexico, and the United States. Mexico is always considered North America (Remember NAFTA?), and Cuba is (historically) almost always considered a part of North America also.

Expand full comment
Gwyneth's avatar

Technically, you are correct. However, I still think Gulf of the Americas more fitting as it is more diplomatic and offends none.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

I'm offended by the idea.

Now what?!

See how that works? LOL

Expand full comment
Gwyneth's avatar

It is really a matter of complete indifference to me. "A rose by any other name...."

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Let’s move past being offended. Especially about names of geography. We’ve lived through 15 years of destroying historic statues and renaming military bases… and even renaming schools.

Expand full comment
Media Luna's avatar

I deeply value the name 'Gulf of Mexico' as it honors highly advanced civilizations that existed before the continent was called 'America.' While 'Gulf of America' resonates with me, I interpret it as referring to the entire Western hemisphere, not just the United States or North America alone.

Having grown up in South America, I was raised with the perspective that North and South America form one unified continent—a view still held in parts of Europe.

When I moved to the United States, I found it curious when people would say 'Welcome to America,' since I had lived in 'America' my entire life.

This distinction reflects a broader historical shift. Before World War II, North and South America were commonly viewed as a single continent. The term 'The Americas' emerged to collectively describe both continents and the Western Hemisphere. It wasn't until the 1950s that most American geographers began treating North and South America as separate continents.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Plus 'Golf' is President Trump's favorite sport.

Expand full comment
Media Luna's avatar

Stand corrected 🤣. (Comment edited)

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

I wasn't sure if that was y'all's way of spelling. But I couldn't resist.

Expand full comment
Media Luna's avatar

My native Spanish ear gets in the way of English, my adoptive language. 😵‍💫

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Highly advanced civilizations that worshiped snakes such as Amaruca (America) and engaged in gruesome human sacrifices, who embedded an army of literal demons into their lands that still terrorize people to this day and still demand human sacrifices and blood? Sorry, but that dog don’t hunt.

Expand full comment
Media Luna's avatar

Like all civilizations throughout history, pre-Columbian societies were complex, made up of human beings with both virtues and flaws. They made remarkable advances in mathematics, astronomy, architecture, agriculture, and medicine, while also engaging in practices that we find troubling today. This complexity is true of virtually every historical civilization, from ancient Rome to medieval Europe to imperial China. Understanding and acknowledging this full history, both achievements and shortcomings, helps us better comprehend our shared human journey.

Expand full comment
Gwyneth's avatar

Pithy, but to the point.🤣

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

So, I hear Biden put the Gulf of Mexico off limits to drilling for oil. But now, no one will be drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. They will be drilling in the Gulf of America. See? I think Trump is trolling the enemy once again. The same enemy that hates any wholesome words. Words like America.

Just a thought.

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been to many Latin countries and yes, the cultures are diverse and the peoples lovely, but I think the case can be made that widespread pre-Christian ophiolatry in Latin America is likely the spiritual reason for the rise of violent dictators and drug cartels in those lands, not to mention the gathering of Nazis and Communists there. Ancient snake worship and human sacrifice has drawn demons and demonic activity to Latin America, and it’s still happening today.

‘The Spanish exorcist (Father José Antonio Fortea) warned that “to the extent there is more witchcraft and Satanism going on in a country, to that extent there will be more extraordinary manifestations of those powers of darkness.”’

https://www.ncregister.com/news/when-an-entire-country-becomes-infested-with-demons-catholics-exorcize

“Many of the gruesome murders, including beheadings and human sacrifices, committed by Mexican drug gangs are done so in the name of Santa Muerte, said Almonte, who is writing a book about the cult.” https://nypost.com/2021/12/21/religious-saints-of-murders-outlaws-worshiped-by-cartels/

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Interesting for sure.

Expand full comment
Media Luna's avatar

I hear you.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

One letter off. I’ll take it!

Expand full comment
Marilynne Martin's avatar

All that understand and research Agenda 21/Agenda 30/ Great Reset or whatever they are calling it these days are or should be concerned about this switch of names. The NWO - Agenda 21 calls for the world to be divided into 9 or is it 11 regions. One is the North American Union which we always assumed was Canada, Mexico and The US. Patrick Wood who writes about the group from the early 1900's called "Technocracy Inc.", found a "North American Technate" map from 1934 which included Greenland down to Panama in that region. Are changes to this system being subtly socialized and implemented? Time will tell.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

I like that!

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

It's a dumb idea.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

What's an 's' between friendly nations.... LOL!!!

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

PSALM 8:4-5, 6-7, 8-9

What are human beings that you are mindful of them,

mortals that you care for them?

Yet you have made them a little lower than God,

and crowned them with glory and honor.

You have given them dominion over the works of your hands;

you have put all things under their feet,

all sheep and oxen,

and also the beasts of the field,

the birds of the air, and the fish of the sea,

whatever passes along the paths of the seas.

O Lord, our Sovereign,

how majestic is your name in all the earth!

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

Thank you for posting this wonderful passage of scripture…revealing at once our significance in God’s eyes and our insignificance in the spectrum of His vast creation.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

❤️

Expand full comment
Pecos Bill's avatar

Paper straws.

So symbolic. Like Dems, they just suck harder and collapse.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

LOL

Expand full comment
AM Schimberg's avatar

Lol

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

The Left is making the same mistake they made with abortion. They "allowed" SCOTUS to rule on Roe because they fought a GA law that limited abortions.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Exactly, they are playing right into Trump's hands.

Expand full comment
Bill Campbell's avatar

Shh. Don't tell them. Although they don't listen anyway.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

They are incapable of listening. The hubris is too great.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

They listen here.

Expand full comment
Bill Campbell's avatar

"Trump’s legal strategy is brilliant, and it is working. Let the man work."

Jeff, your analytic, disciplined, lawyer brain once again lays this out so calmly to those of us that tend to fly off the handle at the slightest provocation. Thank you, again, for that. Brilliant. Both you and Team Trump.

Expand full comment
RSgva's avatar

Yes, and Jonathan Turley has also warned. Elon needs to calm down a little on ignoring or self-“nullifying” the legal system. These things can play out very quickly at the “TRO level”. And on the other hand almost all these judges are so vain that “disrespecting” the legal system, i.e. trying to work around it instead of with it, will put you on the losing path right away. He should not fall into that trap – – Trump alienated Roberts for years for that reason.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

Yes! I think they should keep quiet and carry on!

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Oh. So that is what Roberts problem is. Not sure I believe that is the issue

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Roberts has been bought. Trump probably has something over him as Robertshas been both sides lately rather than all leftist.

Expand full comment
RSgva's avatar

I think it made Roberts even more comfortable opposing Trump, maybe put it that way.

Expand full comment
Gary's avatar

I don't know how many saw the pathetic news clip of Schumer and others chanting "WE WILL WIN". They just don't seem to understand the majority of us want the government reduced and our freedoms back. They could care less what happens to the country as long as they can fill their pockets. So sad and disconnected!

Expand full comment
Lone Star's avatar

He better not take away National Chocolate Cake Day.

Expand full comment
Conservative Contrarian's avatar

The man might be a little crazy but he sure ain't stupid!!! 🥮

Expand full comment
Jeff S's avatar

It's time to have a National White Cake Day too?

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

I’m having a panic attack!!!!!! Not chocolate day!!!!!

Expand full comment
Dean's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

😜

Expand full comment
Faith's avatar

Here's another email from one of my corrupt congressmen: April Delaney. She wants to know "Have you been personally affected by Trump’s actions? To anonymously share your experience with me take my Survey https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/EsurveyForm.aspx?__cid=MD06AM&__sid=100009&__crop=14300.6664283.5018404.7316693"

PLEASE GIVE HER YOUR THOUGHTS!! PLEASE PLEASE! And consider joining her town hall tonight. Wouldn't it be great to derail it with pro-MAGA support? https://mcclaindelaney.house.gov/live

Expand full comment
Horizons's avatar

Loved this! Wrote mine as if I were a former crazy blue-haired lib who has now done a 180 thanks to DOGE exposure of government corruption and money-laundering. Sending to every conservative I know!

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

Perfect!

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I let her know how happy I am that Trump disallowed biological males in women's sports & spaces. LOL.

Expand full comment
PutativePathogen's avatar

Thanks - that was fun!!

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

I got an email from my rep too with a survey asking if I was concerned with Elon Musk's DOGE's actions.....NO

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Did it!!!!! And it was, indeed, FUN!!!

Who was it on here said, I think yesterday(I think). “If my smile gets any bigger, I may have to get a bigger face!” Does anybody remember who that was?

Expand full comment
Monterey's avatar

Yes, I also replied to my congresswomen's newsletter saying she was concerned about Doge. I simply replied: "We love Doge!"

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

This is what I wrote--

I've never laughed so hard at the freakout from the Dems and some Repubs. I'm happy for the first time in 5 years! MAGA and MAHA! He will be on Mt Rushmore!

Expand full comment
Georgette Benidt's avatar

Minnesota, Amy Klobuchar, just started a "tip-line" for people worried about President Tump's EO's. It's backfiring as people are reporting the Democrats.

Expand full comment
Susie & Security's avatar

Thank you for sharing this link! I supplied my thoughts despite the crappy UI and the tiny text box provided. 😄

Expand full comment
MayBella82's avatar

Done

Expand full comment
AKnorr's avatar

✅ That was fun!

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Done!

Expand full comment
PutativePathogen's avatar

As we restore the calendar, let's also eliminate "BCE" and "CE". - 2025 anno Domini

Expand full comment