48 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jamison's avatar

For sure. Fear is from Satan, not God.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

Psalm 33

Let all the earth fear the Lord;

let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!

For he spoke, and it came to be;

he commanded, and it stood firm.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

I don't why a loving god should be feared.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

I questioned that at one point. I found that there's a different definition of "fear" than what first comes to most minds.

Fear, noun - profound reverence and awe especially toward God

Fear, verb - to have a reverential awe of (ex. fear God)

You're welcome.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

I was unaware of that definition,

but you are correct.

So then, god fearing is just god revering.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 28, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Reported as spam. Selling stuff isn't allowed on Substack.

Expand full comment
Sharon Beautiful Evening's avatar

Danke schoen - I was getting kind of annoyed about that schemey scammer posting, Grammy!

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

Regardless of its source, fear is an extremely effective recruiting ploy.

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

"I sought the LORD, and He answered me and RESCUED me from ALL my fears" Psalm 34:4

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Amen 🙏

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

He wouldn't have to rescue you from anything he didn't create to threaten you.

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

NO, he didn't create to threaten me, but OTHERS would use even the GOOD things the LORD has given us (weather, food, air) to threaten our existence... His peace gives me comfort, and DISOLVES ALL MY FEARS!

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

Who created all the angels that defected from heaven?

Expand full comment
Dena's avatar

I have a suspicion you know the answer to that question 🙂

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

Because it overturns the table of the theologians just like Jesus did the moneychangers'.

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

Is God morally responsible for the free choices of creatures? Or do you argue that God is incapable of granting free will to angels or humans?

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

I can't answer that question because I do not believe in God.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

This explains why none of this makes sense to you.

I Corinthians 2:14

“The unspiritual man does not receive the gifts of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. “For who has known the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.”

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

OK, my question wasn't about whether YOU believe in God, but about whether your response is a strong argument.

You were asking "who created the angels that defected" and that God "wouldn't have to rescue you from anything he didn't create" which suggests you think that God (if existing as described in the Bible) is responsible for evil. So in that context, my question is whether a God who creates angels and humans with free will is still responsible for their evil?

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

Yes... and... Who created the woman that married Cain and who was she and where did she come from?

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

Same One who created all the humans who spit in His face in various ways.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

The same one invented by men to control other men.

Expand full comment
Tio Nico's avatar

if a god were invented by men, there would be legion of them, not just one. Since so many billions attest to the same God as He has revealed Himself in many ways over thousands of years, that God must be real. All the other imaginations purporting to BE the one rue god have tobe fabricaions. And are.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

The best way to conceal the legions of deities worshiped by mankind is to insist that there is only one god.

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

If you can't get a camel through the eye of a needle... you will burn in hellfire for eternity.

That's not a threat?

Sounds like Baalam's ass has spoken again!

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

Vonu, did the teachers do your homework for you? Does your boss pick you up from home and drive you to? Does your mother still wipe your butt after you crap?💩

You have an internet account or we wouldn’t be texting. That means you have a search engine. I took less than 5 minutes and got an answer.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

I think it was a rhetorical question.

Like: How can an Earthling know what has happened

in Heaven or Hell?

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

I mean, obviously - IF God is real - then he can tell people? That doesn't tell you whether any *particular* earthling had a real revelation from God or is just BSing, but it shows that it's possible.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

Usually, if someone is conversing with a god,

it is because they are hallucinating. A god could easily

prove their existence by appearing to a mass of people

all at once, not just to one person alone in the desert eating peyote.

Expand full comment
Janice P - Words Beyond Me's avatar

He already did and will again, and on that day *every* knee will bow and *every* tongue confess Jesus Christ is Lord. Scoff now, bow later.

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

"For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. " (1st letter to Corinth, ch.15:3-6)

You can question whether the above is actually true or not, but apparently somebody tried to answer that objection in advance, as regards Christianity.

(And my point wasn't really to argue about specific claims, only responding to your comment that seemed to imply that nobody on earth could know what was happening in heaven - I'm saying, that's pre-supposing that nobody in heaven could or would tell them.)

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

Arriving at your necrodestination requires that you have died.

If you are dead, you will have no ability to communicate your situation to the living.

Noone can know if you have ascended to Heaven or Vahala, or descended into Hell, or Niflheim depending on your persuasion.

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

.... it seems like you kind of missed my point. Of course the evidence suggests that dead humans are unable/unwilling to communicate back to the living (otherwise we would see it happening a lot). But the existence of heaven/valhalla/whatever presumes some kind of deity, and most versions of such deity have power enough to communicate with still-living mortals. Therefore, "earthlings cannot ever know what happens in heaven" is not logically sound.

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

The only person that it matters to will certainly know.

Expand full comment
jmsmithmd's avatar

You don’t think you can get a sign?

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

Typical MD... pompous, rude, entitled Big Pharma puppet... and asshole.

Expand full comment
Roger Kimber, MD's avatar

- I don't know that I am a typical MD, most are specialists, I am a Family Doc.

+/-Pompous, well, opinions are mixed on that one.

+ Rude, yes, I admit to being rude at times, usually retaliatory,

+/- Entitled, well, evidence is mixed: social security, several retirement accounts, have my license, and prescriptive privileges, entitled to pay dues to my specialty society--don't know if that is entitlement.

- Big Pharma puppet, no actually not at all--anti-Big Pharma and no $$ from them.

++ Asshole, well I have one and some have called me that.

Score: 3 +'s, 2 -'s, 2 +/-'s for a slightly above .500 (since it is baseball season).

So on balance, you are sorta correct. Sorry if I offended your sensibilities. I don't know if you will see this or not, as SubStack tells me that you blocked me--you can give it out, but you can't take it, eh? That says a lot.

Expand full comment