763 Comments
User's avatar
Kelly's avatar

Is anyone else suspicious of how the Democrats are going along with the rule of law suddenly and very uncharacteristically? There was not one dissenting vote from the Democrats?

I smell a rat. Beware a Trojan horse.

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Agreed! This compliant behavior by the Democrats is completely out of character. Something is up! In the meantime Blinken, Sullivan, Austin are meeting with unsavory World leaders, like they will be keeping their jobs for the next 4 years. Garland’s DOJ is still prosecuting J6’ers (from 2021) even though they know Trump will pardon J6’ers on January 20th. Something is definitely up!

Expand full comment
DefCon-Dan's avatar

The Dems selected the worst possible candidates, and didn't really do any serious campaigning, so they basically threw the election to Trump. I am suspicious too.

I expect the real Trump to be revealed soon, and it won't be good.

Be very careful what you wish for!

Also, annexing Canada could be the first step in forming their one world government. If he suggests annexing Mexico next, look out!

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

And, they didn't cheat enough to win. Why not? They've never suffered a single repercussion from blatant cheating, there was no meaningful disincentive. The only blowback with teeth has been against anyone calling them out. This was a close enough election they could have stolen it. Close enough that we actually lost seats in the house, due partially to the fact they DID cheat as usual in several California districts. Strange indeed. And I agree Trump is coming out with troubling pronouncements. Talk of annexing Canada and Greenland is a distraction from what we care about, completely counterproductive and seems weird.

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

I don’t think Trump wants to annex Canada, Greenland and Panama. He does want a close alliance to protect American economic and national security interests from the CCP/Globalists.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Why try to read his mind? Why not just listen to his words? That usually works better. Sometimes it's necessary to read between the lines, that's true. For example, I THINK (don't know) some people in Trump's team know how destructive the childhood vax schedule is, but realize it's something we have to chip away at, and coming right out and saying we need to do away with polio, measles, and all the others is not the way to win, and get where we want to go. I don't see a similar excuse for talking about annexing foreign territory.

Expand full comment
Monterey's avatar

I somewhat agree. Too many people have not been red pilled yet about this issue.My lack of trust in the covid shots started with suspicion after someone I know in a related medical field said they didn't like any of them very much, and then gathered steam as more and more evidence against them came out.After that, I started thinking about the other vaccines and began slowly learning about their problems.

Prior to all this, I thought that parents who didn't vaccinate their kids were sickos who enjoyed seeing their children be sick. I was so ignorant for so many years.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 7Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

I have wondered about how the cheating was kept so low as to allow Trump to win - would love to hear a good explanation!

Expand full comment
Amuzed_Traveler's avatar

When the global economy crashes from the decades of graft and corruption by global progressive governments, they want a “conservative” government in power to blame it all on.

Read Brandon Smith at alt markets.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Dang! That makes sense.

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

Look up “North American Union”… Wiki describes as a conspiracy theory… interesting how so many so called conspiracy theories eventually turn out to be true… will this one?

Expand full comment
Merry McIntyre's avatar

Yes! A huge red flag! On the globalists’ agenda: the North American Union, the South American Union, the Asian Union, etc. Which side is Trump REALLY on? Keep on being vigilant!

Expand full comment
nancylee's avatar

conspiracy theory vs 'truth' about 15 minutes

Expand full comment
Ohio Deb's avatar

…..and changing the name of “Gulf of Mexico” to “Gulf of America”!

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

⬆️⬆️⬆️this 100%

Expand full comment
DefCon-Dan's avatar

They have been thinking about a North American Union for a while, so it is probably one of their plans.

Remember when they were considering the 'Amero' dollar for all 3 NA countries? It might still happen?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_monetary_union

Expand full comment
John infinity N's's avatar

Wasn’t Agent-86 the chick from the old Get Smart show?

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

99 😉 Maxwell Smart was 86.

Expand full comment
jacob silverman's avatar

what are you, a trans? That was Smart!!!

Expand full comment
nancylee's avatar

cool. we could become fluent in spanish and french! and I won't feel like such an idiot when I travel.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

😂

Expand full comment
Susan Clack's avatar

🤣🥰🤗

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Take a deep breath and be calm: this is a very good article quoting his former economic advisor.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/donald-trump-tariffs-canada-trudeau-gretzky-51st-state-1.7420586

'Analysts say this approach echoes the trademark negotiating style that Trump has employed for many years, both in business and the presidency.

Stephen Moore, who served as an economic adviser to Trump during his first term in the White House, says the president-elect is aiming to get leverage in renegotiating the three-way trade agreement between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

"I think there's no question that that's what he's doing here," Moore said in an interview with CBC News. '

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

Agent-86, you can be certain that when Jesus and his cult arrived on the scene 2,000 years ago, most people were thinking, "We've got to watch out for this guy. He's different."

And don't let your imagination get the best of you. Annexing Canada could be the best thing since Lewis & Clark. Annexing Mexico would be as smart as annexing Haiti. Don't believe every hysterical thing being screamed right now.

Expand full comment
Juliaah's avatar

Look at the UK! Conservatives had an 80 seat majority, disposed of their very popular with the people leader (who may well have wanted to be gone) and brought in a billionaire Davos type who suddenly called a General Election way before the end of term, handing power to a lot not unlike your Dems.

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

That is exactly what I was thinking. Everyone needs to keep their guard up - X Files was right - Trust No One

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

'Analysts say this approach echoes the trademark negotiating style that Trump has employed for many years, both in business and the presidency.

Stephen Moore, who served as an economic adviser to Trump during his first term in the White House, says the president-elect is aiming to get leverage in renegotiating the three-way trade agreement between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

"I think there's no question that that's what he's doing here," Moore said in an interview with CBC News. '

Expand full comment
DefCon-Dan's avatar

There are reasons in the globalist's plan that DJT had this election thrown to him. The record short time to certify him confirmed that. It is the plan!

The lawfare and TDS against him was the disguise.

Expand full comment
Loretta's avatar

When I woke up the day after the elections, and it was clearly Trump that won, my immediate thought (which was never a thought before) was:

BREAD AND CIRCUS

The thought keeps coming back again and again as the weeks go by.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 7Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Kim - you are that bot who relentlessly posts junk. I do not understand why this platform does not seem able to get rid of you.?

Expand full comment
Sharon Beautiful Evening's avatar

I'm sure Childers COULD rid us of "Bot Kim" - but knows we, his loyal audience, are wise to this 'bot rot' - so just "leave Kim alone" is his thinking. Just proposing this as highly plausible, LamedVav!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Also they keep changing names and reposting so it might be like playing Whack a Mole 😕

Expand full comment
Sharon Beautiful Evening's avatar

Cute, R.L.!! I see the "Bot Rot" comment has "disappeared" now!

Expand full comment
SusanMc's avatar

She or he is active today. Hope no issues n falls for the link.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 7Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Cousin Clem's avatar

Die kimbot

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Everyone should be suspicious of any political party that's more concerned with men pooping in women's restrooms than thermonuclear war...sayin'

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

One is foreign the other is domestic, and we can’t keep sweeping our domestic security under the rug as less important. Sabotaging the safety of women and children right in our own backyards (including bathrooms) and undermining our deepest held beliefs at every turn from within is just as destructive as war. We have to fight both.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Yeah i agree 100%. I'm just being silly.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Nuclear war not domestic?!

Expand full comment
Kristina the Short's avatar

men don't merely poop in women's restrooms. In a December during Obama's 2nd term, I entered a clearly marked "women's room" one day in a Burger King; all was quiet. I thought I was alone. Soon I began to hear sounds...groans... finally figured out it was a man, 2 stalls over, masturbating to climax. And note he clearly didn't identify as female: he wore jeans, work boots, guy stuff-- plus a full beard. I was frozen with fear. He finished his fun and came out of the stall, washed his hands AND STAYED THERE WAITING FOR ME. I did not leave my stall. Finally he left. i reported it to the restaurant staff and to local law enforcement but they said he hadn't broken any law, so they couldn't do anything. what if I had been a small girl? I thought he had done this before, somewhere, didn't his actions constitute "reasonable suspicion"? couldn't he be detained and a DNA sample obtained? nope.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

So sick and disgusting

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Man. That is scary.

Expand full comment
SusanMc's avatar

Ugh! And unsettling to say the least.

Expand full comment
Loveall's avatar

Why can't they be equally concerned about both?

Expand full comment
PE Bird's avatar

They are likely doing more than just pooping, but this is family blog.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Im sure it involves poop one way or another...gross...;)

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

So. You’re okay with men in women’s restrooms?

Good to know.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Not in the least

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

Yesterday I read a substack by Elizabeth Nickson provided by someone in this group. It was published Dec. 14. “Why didn’t they steal the election?” Was the title. Her end conclusion was they allowed Trump to win. Chilling as I had been thinking, it all went too smoothly. We have the weakest Republican majority in the House ever. I don’t trust Johnson and neither does Nickson. This is all being set up for Congress to oppose all of Trump’s agendas. Yesterday’s certification just cements my thoughts.

Expand full comment
Patty's avatar

I read the same substack and have been thinking about ever since. She says the bankers were nervous and let Trump win, but didn't let Kari Lake and others win. We really need election reform that they cannot manipulate.

Expand full comment
LMWC's avatar

We saw it in Michigan as well. An open US Senate seat and the Trump and GOP endorsed candidate was ahead until the day after the election when votes were still being counted. Slowly, just like 2020 the votes reversed and the Democrat won by less than a 1/2% of the votes. The Republican candidate conceded which I thought was suspect at the time. Never really liked the guy but I wasn’t going to vote for the Dem. We had a chance to flip that seat Red, I am suspicious.

Expand full comment
FreeBird07's avatar

Same thing happened in NV with Sam Brown and Jacky Rosen senate race.

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

Indeed. It will only happen if millions descend on DC and demand it.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Yes, but if large numbers of honest citizens descend on DC again to protest corruption again, like they did because of the fraudulent election in 2020, then the FBI and Pelosi will organize an entrapment operation again too.

We need a movement with EXTREMELY simple and clear goals, say a Constitutional amendment stating something like this:

"All federal and state elections must be conducted with paper ballots only, filled out by hand only, completely counted by hand within 24 hours of election day, and stored for ten years after each election, for recounts. Every voter must present government-issued proof of US citizenship in person before voting. No mail-in ballots are to be allowed under any circumstances, but pairs of trained poll workers may personally visit those unable to vote in person for medical reasons."

Once the wording is settled, we need a nice viral tag for the call to fair elections, and to relentlessly spread the word on every form of media and with posters and handouts.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

No monkeying around with the constitution. John Kerry and others want to change the 1st Amendment.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

I wouldn't want to remove or change any existing text, only to add a short MISSING amendment to make US elections secure, which they definitely are not at the moment.

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

I agree wholeheartedly here and I came across that same article. I tell people all the time that, even though we don’t like to admit it, both sides (Dems and Reps) are on the same side.

The movie, “They Live” tells us all about this. I’m sure more of you have seen it, but it’s a good reminder of our reality: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lets-look-at-our-society-through

Expand full comment
Justin's avatar

https://youtu.be/YoEuHlCqgu8?t=2611

Actually, watch the entire video. It's VERY good! Filmed 10 years ago, and titled "Exposing the Enemies of Freedom". You'll go through a chronological sequence of how a "one world government" is being built up, and will seek to suppress individual freedoms.

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

Good movie. One world government.....have we been taken over by the Federatiin of Planets?

Expand full comment
KBH Geronimo's avatar

Give your ID card to the border guard. . .

Expand full comment
nancylee's avatar

hopium springs eternal. at least in people who adamantly refuse to grow up and take back their own power.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

I don't think they let him win. They figured out how the cheating was done. Grassroots groups across the country were doing the maintenance to the voter roles that by law, should have been done by the states. Obama made the decision not to enforce that law. Voter rolls were bloated with dead people, those who moved out of state, noncitizens, variations of registered voter names and fake names. A voter registration group registered Henry Kissinger until the citizen groups realized what they were doing and turned them into the elections board. Republicans organized more poll watchers and had hotlines with lawyers ready to challenge. Every state didn't have the citizen challenges so cheating still took place. North Carolina removed almost 800,000 from their voter rolls and shortly after, the hurricane hit the red side of the state. Trump still took NC. Democrats have been organized for 20-30 years. Ending the cheating will take a while. When it does, I'm sure we'll see more Independents, Libertarian, & Tea Party politicians.

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

Interesting...a friend witnessed an event of ballot harvesting when he saw a mentally deficient person be allowed to vote, and his chaperone was allowed to be in the machine and to tell him how to vote. The chaperone got to vote twice. How many times did this happen? A person with a child's capacity should not be voting.

Expand full comment
Wendy Montgomery's avatar

Is there a plan to assassinate him on the day of his inauguration? That’s my biggest concern. What do they know that we don’t?

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Think positively, fear is of the devil. Pray for his protection.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Ditto Ditto Ditto !

Expand full comment
John of Oregon Fame's avatar

Wendy, there is a plan by the white hats and it has been in the works at least since the Pres Kennedy assassination. Trump is the pointman for the plan. Check out this Retired Airforce Lt Colonel, Dr Sandy Miarecki. Very encouraging

Expand full comment
Double Mc's avatar

My great fear is they let him win, because they have something planned. We still have 12 days to go, more than enough time for something awful, so awful, to happen that martial law is declared, or the Constitution suspended, or something that prevents Trump from taking office. I pray it is not assassination, but we know the Iranians are here for just that purpose.

Expand full comment
MARCI's avatar

I always wonder if Trump has these suspicions also and if he is prepared. Whatever happens, if it’s bad, I pray the military will back Trump and take orders from him if for any reason whatsoever his inauguration is stopped. And isn’t the inauguration just a formality? On January 20th Trump is president no matter what!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Maybe they made such an unbelievable mess of things they realized they just didn't know how to fix it. So they're going to let Trump fix it. They probably also knew they just didn't have a candidate that could win.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

That’s the best possible and most hopeful reasoning. I pray that’s what it is. But they have done some truly evil sh*t the past 8+ years, things that otherwise decent people simply having poor judgement could never, ever do. Too many of them committed treason and were clear traitors, and they did or allowed things that were sadistic to our own citizens. That just doesn’t fit that hopeful reasoning …

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

If it seems weird (and it does) then something weird is probably going on. There are no disincentives to Democrat election cheating. They always get away with it. So, why not?

Expand full comment
Justin's avatar

If I might interject an idea.

The reason they have gotten away with it (despite NUMEROUS voices calling it out over the years) is because most people need to "see it for themselves". I think the sequence of Trump losing and then winning has show ALL of us (who have a brain and are open to seeing beyond our biases) that the 2020 election was rigged. Who would have believed it back in 2020? And now we have a supermajority of people who don't think the election is safe from tampering.

I imagine that this will be something that is addressed in the coming two years, if not within the 1st year. a LOT of people want voter ID's. They had to suffer and see what a lack of Voter ID's has done to our local, state and national elections. People WANT fairness! They WANT THEIR VOICE TO BE HEARD!

It sometimes takes a huge loss to wake people up! We came DAMN CLOSE to losing our country! Let's do something to help save it!

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I hope you're right. You're much more aware than most, but I disagree on a few points. Who would have believed in all the election rigging in 2020? Millions of us, it was obvious. Changing rules, expansion of mail-in voting, drop boxes, expanded ballot harvesting, all due to the COVID fearmongering was an obvious play by the democrats to take advantage of the lockdown mentality. They've always cheated way more than Republicans. Make it easy for cheaters, you get more cheating, naturally. Especially when there are never consequences. Millions of us knew BEFORE the election cheating, virtually all by Democrats, would be through the roof.

People want secure borders. Doesn't matter. People don't want bail-outs of corrupt corporations. Doesn't matter. People don't want the revolving door at FDA, CDC, NIH, DOD, etc. Doesn't matter. The populace is so lame, I'm not sure a majority want freedom of speech and no forced medication, especially with experimental substances for a non-threat. But whether it's over 50% or not, doesn't matter, we get forced meds and overt censorship.

So, people want fair elections? That won't matter either. Although there will be a few much-touted improvements around the edges, for appearances sake.

At some point we WILL lose our country. Historically, it's happened every time. We aren't that special, we're just humans beings here. All it takes is an effective fear campaign, 90% will go along with anything, as we just saw. Some of those who didn't see COVID as a giant scam from the get-go may seem awakened. That's temporary, they'll revert to their innate, inner sheepishness.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Agreed.

The compliance of Democrats is creepy after so much batshit insane anti-Trump hysteria for years.

I suspect that Trump made a deal with Pfizer. Sorry, I really do. I think he's corrupt that way. Just look at how he keep pushing the death jabs even now.

OTOH, I think Trump really will do some good things in spite of selling out to Pfizer, like closing the border and ending the Deep State's war in Ukraine.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Right, we can't expect any accountability for the COVID response from Trump. He's one of the worst offenders. He'll be good on the border, probably better on foreign wars. He does have a major ax to grind against the deep state, so he might go after them with everything he can muster, which will be required to get anywhere. Half-measures don't work against them. Accountability for COVID crimes is at the top of my list, so I'm not as enthusiastic as Trump groupies.

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

Face it... irregardless of political party. ..there is no representation in the halls of the Senate or Congress unless you donate 5 figures or more. We just vote

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Absolutely suspicious. They KNEW the people wanted Trump and there were so many eyes on the election…..so I think they caved and plan B is in operation now. They are always deceptive and do what we don’t expect. Be watching because whatever we do not see coming is what they will do. If it’s the most egregious, nefarious, criminal “thing” they will do it. At some point their dastardly plan will rear its ugly head. I hope we aren’t surprised or shocked this time….but well prepared for battle.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

Since 2020, I'm suspicious about everything not just politics etc... IMHO after giving us the last 4 years of torment and showing us Joe acting like a fool, then "letting" Trump win by not even trying... says to me that was the plan.

I have a lot more facts to say about Trump and why I no longer trust him, but it is too much for here. However, I do trust God's plan.

I remember when Trump left office he said, "I"ll be back before you know it." Like he knew for sure. At the time I was comforted, but now it feels wrong.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

I can’t find that DT quote. Do you have a link to it?

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

Correction.... "We will be back in some form." I recall he said before you know it at some point but it was at the end and who knows where.

Maybe he said it here in his speech. At the 9 min mark...

'Goodbye, I love you, we will be back': Trump delivers final message as he departs | ABC News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf8H6fElHMw

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Thank you. I watched that search back then. It seemed sincere. That was when he and all of us were getting kicked off platforms. I took it to mean he was working on a new social media platform or he would remain active in politics behind the scenes. Never a hint of him running against.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yeah I’m waiting for them to try something too 😕

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

🙏 is everything.

Expand full comment
PrayerWarrior's avatar

Well it could possibly be because they literally are defeated

I feel the shift even in my most DEM(ented) friends! I think going against a popular mandate would crush their careers and they know it

Let’s pray the change is coming worldwide, Canada was a good start yesterday !

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I think there is an element of being disoriented and in disarray because so many of them drank the kool aid and believed they’d win, out of sheer arrogance and disconnection with a good portion of the population.

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

I was thinking the same thing.

Expand full comment
TerriS's avatar

Or… they are just trying to “prove” how they are so unlike the Jan6ers… still stinks to high heaven!

Expand full comment
MaryAnn's avatar

Speaking of J6, I saw Liz Cheney’s X post to “Donald”. I think it was yesterday. A Fb friend posted it to her Fb page. Ol’ Lizzie is not going away quietly and her AWFL supporters are cheering her on. 😖

Expand full comment
Ransom Stoddard's avatar

Trump is Trump and the Democrats are Democrats. We should expect only so much from Trump and be aware there is no bottom for the Democrats. In 1860, they voted to secede and started the Civil War to advance the cause of enslaving their fellow Americans. Today, they advocate for the murder of a million babies each year and the mutilation of children. In 2020, they inflicted Covid on us and burned our cities. They still have tremendous power and are likely hunkering down in their arrogance, fear, and loathing. God knows how they will they respond if Trump actually follows through.

Expand full comment
MARCI's avatar

I wouldn’t go to president Trump’s inauguration if you paid me. Another assassination attempt or perhaps, god forbid, success? A huge terrorist attack? I don’t trust the democrats’ smooth compliance in succeeding to Trump one damn bit. Trump’s not president until the fat democrat lady sings.

Expand full comment
NAB's avatar

Well, I am going with my son and husband. Can't wait! Trump is a once-in-a-generation political figure. I never made it to one of his rallies and this is likely the last opportunity I will have to be in a crowd of MAGA supporters so, we're going.

Expand full comment
Wendy Montgomery's avatar

You and I share the same thoughts. I’m very concerned about the inaugeration.

Expand full comment
Kristina the Short's avatar

I understand your view, really.

But my kids are grown and doing fine, so i am available to be another Corey if necessary. I don't trust democrats OR the secret service (& especially not the FBI). Somebody has to be there to protect our hardworking friend. I can't afford McDonald's, though, let alone a trip out east.

Expand full comment
MaryAnn's avatar

I saw an article about the fences going up for 1/20.

I hope to see re-run vids of Joepedo’s ‘inauguration’ as compared to #47’s. I still wonder if the military guard really did turn its back to the Cauliflower in the limo as he rode past.

Expand full comment
Danielle's avatar

Trump needs to publicly invite Pelosi, and a few others to join him on the dais for the day

Expand full comment
NAB's avatar

I think PART of the reason the Dems acquiesced to certifying the election was to give them cover for the current narrative which is: "see, WE can do a peaceful transfer of power unlike the MAGA party." It's all politics, all the time. That's the reason you have people like Sunny Hostin proclaiming Jan 6 to be the moral equivalent of Pearl Harbor or the Holocaust.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Right. "It's all politics, all the time." Heads up - take the long view.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Suspicious of Trudeau shutting down Parliament--giving them time to huddle in conference? I do recommend watching Jordan Peterson and Pierre Poilievre chatting: I haven't finished it (it's the-new-normal-LONG) but am from it taking a different view of PP----whom, since Feb. of '22, I have seen as "soft", or "damp" (to use a UK term). Also, my contention is that many of these Young Global Leaders embarked on that ship as a resume-builder--and have had time to re-think its 'value'. So I don't discount a pol simply because WEF is in his youthful bio.

Expand full comment
Kristina the Short's avatar

I have wondered if some joined the WEF to learn who's in and how they work, in order to oppose them.

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

Trudeau did NOT resign. He just said he’s GOING to resign and shut down parliament until the Lieberals can choose a new leader…what happens if they can’t find someone? He still technically could “change” his mind. And while I “hope” a change to a more “conservative” government is coming to Canada, I still am leery that there will be significant change. The Conservatives were pretty much fully on board with all the CoVid lockdowns, testing, mandatory injections and awarding large government contracts without going to tender. Their members benefited financially off the scam as they hid their own conflicts of interest. During the Trucker Freedom protests, almost none took a pro- freedom stance. Like Jeff, I’m not a Q person, but one still has to wonder if this is all just a big performance to make us think we have any agency over any of this. Looks to me like more of a conspiracy and less of a theory every passing month.

Expand full comment
jacob silverman's avatar

Of COURSE it's a "big performance." What is anything they do?

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

It was a virtue-signal: "See how much more *civilized* we are than those nasty Republican thug criminals."

Expand full comment
barbara ford's avatar

Jamie Raskin was not shy saying he would not allow trump to be president….

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

They might be planning on jailing Trump shortly. Then killing him in prison. But it might be they pinned everything on him being an insurrectionist. They can’t then decertify the election. As far as moral consistency goes - HE IS LITERALLY HITLER - to ‘Congrats Don. You won.’ They have no morals.

My guess is they are planning how to monkey wrench him for four years.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

It looks a lot like good cop / bad cop.

We're being led to want the good cop. "Circumstances" might be in the works to make us BEG for the good cop. In the end, the good cop is still one of "them."

Time will tell.

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

Don't forget to add Tommy Robinson to your prayer list today. Being held in a hell hole in GB for speaking up about the horrors happening to young girls. God uphold him and keep him in your everlasting arms of love.

Expand full comment
Patty's avatar

I watched his video last night, and started praying for him. I will continue. He has done his work at such a high personal cost. But as many of us know how it felt over the past 4 years, we cannot NOT speak the truth. He apparently has this same motivation.

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

Would you happen to have a link to his video to share? Thank you

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/tommy-robinson-arrested-as-100-000-peaceful-patriots/

if you go to the Gatewaypunding.com search Tommy Robinson.. there are multiple articles with video and links as to what is happening over in GB..

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

WOW! This was completely the opposite of what MSM is saying about Tommy...

Thank you so much for sharing the links and allowing truth to flow out!

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

Thank You!!

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

IT STUNK OF George Floyd all over again!

Expand full comment
Positively Paying It Forward's avatar

Tommy Robinson finds himself in a 'difficult' situation by poking one of the Cabal's revenue streams right in the eye.

Since the beginning of time (read about Khazarians if you want to only go back 1500 years) the corrupt elite have funded their revenue streams & wealth off of:

Prostitution

Pedophilia

Drugs

Other forms of sex trades

Slavery (a variation of the above listed)

Hired mercenary might (who were compensated in plunder and the above mentioned list).

Gambling

Predatory lending

Alcohol/creating addictions

Funding wars and seizing assets

Tommy must know something that would crack open an unwanted group/power player/entitled group/etc.

Yes, in our prayers he remains.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

More people ought to denounce this evil as Jesus did. This mafia is the most dangerous.

Don't expect Trump's support on this.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Amen!

Expand full comment
Susan Clack's avatar

🙏🏼🔥🙏🏼🔥🙏🏼

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

🙏

Expand full comment
JT's avatar

It’s amazing what a little alcohol can do to unburden one from imagining what might have been.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Agree 💯 I used alcohol, specifically champagne, to celebrate all that unburdening from imagining what might have been. Lol 😉 We dodged a big bullet. 🤣

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

In Florida, don’t buy from Trulieve. They are acting like big pharma and not safe products & they don’t treat employees fairly.

Expand full comment
Jacqueline Bernard's avatar

Same here🥂

Expand full comment
Mary H.'s avatar

Why did the HHS just report that alcohol is the third most common cause of cancer?!

Turbo cancer is at epidemic levels. We ALL know what is causing this.

Expand full comment
Garden Lover's avatar

Anything but their sacred cow must be blamed.

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

And make you forget The Pledge Of Allegiance!

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

She also does not know the name of the country of which she acted for four years as vice president--from her mouth, "The United States". Got news for ya, babe: it's the United States of America (to be distinguished [or maybe, not for very long, if DJT gets on a roll]) from the Estados Unidos Mexicanos.

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

It also unburdens one from considering the significance of the passage of time ... especially since one does not experience such passage when under the influence. Or so I'm told.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

SO - sarcastic optimist!

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

You win the inter web comments today!

Expand full comment
Fred Jewett's avatar

The following was forwarded to me by a friend of a friend who has dug into the Covid Scamdemic.

"Hasta La Vista Trudeau?

In 2015, Justin Trudeau became the 23rd Prime Minister of Canada. At

the time, his net worth was reported to be CAD $1.2

Million. Considering he's a public servant whose finances are

supposed to be transparently disclosed, it's remarkably difficult to

find accurate net worth estimates. But I did some digging. I looked

at all kinds of sources and judge the following numbers to be the

best estimate based on the references I've provided:

Estimated Net Worth 2015: CAD $1.2 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2016: CAD $1.5 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2017: CAD $1.8 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2018: CAD $65 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2019: CAD $70 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2020: CAD $77 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2021: CAD $84 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2022: CAD $92 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2023: CAD $129 Million

Estimated Net Worth 2024: CAD $131 Million

There's a pretty big jump in one year but I assume that that leap

corresponds with a reported inheritance of CAD $40 to $50 Million

(depending on who you ask). His father, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, was

Prime Minister long before Justin was so the family wasn't exactly

eating KD and Cheerios. It was a rich family so it's not unexpected

that Justin would have high net worth values.

Justin Trudeau's annual salary as PM reached CAD $379,000 and when

you add that to what would certainly be a lot of investment income,

you get the sort of annual gains shown:

2018 -> 2019: CAD $5 Million

2019 -> 2020: CAD $7 Million

2020 -> 2021: CAD $7 Million

2021 -> 2022: CAD $8 Million

But there's a pretty big anomaly during the COVID lockdown era when

many people lost their jobs and their homes and when countless middle

class Canadian businesses were obliterated...

2022 -> 2023: CAD $37 Million

So what's that all about?

I certainly can't say that "I know" but If I had to guess, I'd

speculate that like so many other politicians, JT used his position

as PM to derive record gains from a circumstance that deliberately

imposed record losses on the Canadian populace. Call me cynical but

that explanation sounds plausible.

And now that our glorious leader has presided over the decimation of

the Canadian economy, now the rats are leaving the sinking

ship. First the Deputy Prime Minister / Minister of Finance,

Chrystia Freeland, jumped ship. And now the PM himself has announced

that he'll be donning his water wings too. How totally

predictable. The economy's in the toilet with Trudeau's approval

polling circling the drain and getting ever closer to single

digits. That leaves two choices: try to win another election or

silently slink away. It brings to mind the following idiom:

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and

remove all doubt!"

Anyway, his departure can only improve things for Canada so I say....

"Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out." My only

concern is that liars will always be liars and a turd will always

remain a turd. Just because Trudeau has SAID that he'll resign in

March doesn't mean that it will actually happen. That has yet to be

seen. He's proven himself to be diabolical in the past so I'm sort

of expecting the same in March... something diabolical. But there's

certainly hope! Somewhere in the distant background you can just

about hear the sounds of birds chirping, children playing and choirs

of angels singing as we leave JT in the rearview mirror of Canadian politics."

Did Trudeau sell out the citizens of his own country??

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Excellent analysis of Trudeau’s net worth over the years. He’s not leaving until March so he has an opportunity to steal millions more from the Canadian People. These Global Communists are like roaches. They are persistent, invade your personal space and are difficult to exterminate.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

There seems to be a pattern with well groomed politicians who tsk, tsk the little people. Perhaps the wall surrounding Obama's wealth will start to crumble.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Politics sure pays well.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

And it's all they are living life for. If you don't believe in a righteous God then you are a fool to not follow in this way in your time on earth.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Matthew 16: 24 Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me. 25 For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. 26 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? 27 For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Wow more evidence of how disgusting he is!!! 😡

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

Yes he did sell them out. Trudeau's family Foundation owns stake in Acuitas which brought us the lipodnanoparticles, the delivery system of the mRNA shots. Trudeau contracted for Canada to buy 8 shots for each citizen.

https://capforcanada.com/canadian-politician-ties-justin-trudeau-to-pandemic-profit-making/

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

Holy crap!

Expand full comment
Treemcg's avatar

In the meantime, the value of the Canadian dollar dropped from 80 cents to 69 cents in relation to the U.S. dollar. Click on the ALL button to see the graph.

https://www.poundsterlinglive.com/history/CAD-USD-2014

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Excellent comment

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

🤔🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment
that-scoundrel's avatar

As a Canadian, eh, I saw the title and knew exactly what news is covered in today’s C&C! Love it, Jeff! :D

Looking forward to reading today’s post.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Thank you for posting. And thanks for Gary Varvel.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I love his work! And his son makes great movies too! (Disciples in the Moonlight) 😊

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

😂🤣😂

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Trump definitely knows how to work the media and make liberal heads explode. 51st state! North Jersey! 😂😂😂 I am loving it! 🥰

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

We would prefer Cascadia. Starts and ends with the same letters and sounds cool 😁

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

Or dishwashing soap!

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Crazy like a fox! But the TDS sufferers will never see it.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Ever notice how the NHL doesn't have any tattooed loudmouth freaks like Dennis Rodman? Despite it being an extremely physical game, sometimes almost brutal, the league has few self-centered jerks and almost all are gentlemen. The league runs on a Canadian small town ethos. Everyone takes on the persona, even players from big cities and other counties. It's what's expected and almost all the players adopt a gentlemanly posture.

Unfortunately, that ethos is also why the Canadian people are getting steam-rolled. Politeness is wonderful when dealing with honest people acting in good faith, it makes life very pleasant. But when dealing with dishonest, bad faith actors, you need people willing to be impolite and jerks right back to them. You also need people with enough critical thinking to challenge what they are being told, and an ability to discern good faith from bad faith. And you need people willing to treat bad faith actors as exactly as they deserve to be treated.

This phenotype (basically a Trump type) doesn't seem to exist in Canada, it's been bred out by decades of peace, prosperity, and a homogenous society. Canada is realizing far too late that their country was sold out from under them, while their manners never allowed them to object. Doing so would be considered rude, and that's just not Canadian. It's likely too far gone, as the people don't seem to have what it will take to turn things around, basically the ability to be mean SOB's to rotten people, parasites, grifters, and the like.

It's a shame as I've always loved Canada, enjoyed my visits there, and am a hockey nut. But it seems clear the country is too far gone. Pierre Poilievre is good with the media, but he's still a cucked Pre-Trump style conservative who doesn't want to appear "mean". It's a death knell and pretty much guarantees he will fail before he starts. Canada needs leaders who don't care about image, but will make the hard choices and tell Canadians the truth. Their own self-imposed decorum won't allow them to do it. What's really interesting is as usual, it's all about pride and vanity (as it always is). The country is committing suicide rather than harming their self-image as "nice" people.

Edit: typo fixed

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Same as Great Britain? Politeness above everything? (Even as your children are being r*ped by gangs?)

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Yup. A kind and just person (as Christ commanded us to be) would have done whatever it takes to stop this. Instead, weak people have replaced being kind with being "nice". It's perverted morality that never allows confrontation or truth telling if it would upset people. Amazingly people defend this as being some sort of virtue when it's really just a coward's way to avoid temporary unpleasantness.

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

I think Christ would be more like the biblical example where He threw over the tables of the money changers “ den of robbers” Mathew 21:12-13… He wouldn’t just grin and bear it to be polite….

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Exactly.

It still amazes me that Justice and Mercy ride together. I often imagine one is racing the other to get there first….but no.

True and REAL Justice IS Mercy.

True Justice is Mercy for the victim, and oftentimes is also mercy for the guilty, as the guilty party may be led to repentance as a result of receiving Justice.

What a mystery.

"Just as the heavens are higher than the earth, so my ways are higher than your ways, and my thoughts are higher than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:9

“After all, He isn’t a tame lion, you know.”

(CS Lewis, Chronicles of Narnia)

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Romans 11:33 Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

“It’s really just a coward’s way to avoid temporary unpleasantness.”

🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

Loosely quoting of Revelation states ..."but the cowards, unbelieving, vile, murderers, sexually immoral... will have their fate in the lake of fire" Rev 21

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

What about Jordan Peterson? He finally had enough and wasn't going to be made to lie about reality. He basically got to the point of "enough is enough!"

Expand full comment
mark romkee's avatar

Regarding Hockey:

I guess you haven't seen Brett Burns do an after game interview WITHOUT his sweater on. The man has more tattoos than a platoon of drunk sailors. Moreover, the league is anti faith based and censors any conservative thought on their websites. I was kicked off of one league sanctioned site for stating my opposition to forcing players to wear pride garbage, and then the Sharks blocked me from commenting for asking why they support perversion but not Christians who object to this forced behavior.

The league did finally make it optional, but almost every player who took a stand was traded or released...Ivan Provorov, James Reimer,and the list grows...

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

You know Mark, stating a single counter-example doesn't invalidate a *generalization*. If I say men are generally taller than woman, finding a single woman taller than a single man doesn't make me a liar.

Plus I'm talking about the ethos of the players (as I made clear), not the league office in NY or the owner's suites. Plus the reason the pride non-sense stopped was specifically because of the Player's union demanding it stop.

On top of that, it was an allegory regarding Canadian, small town ethos, not an argument about how great the NHL executive leadership is. I'm sure this was obvious to nearly all who read it.

I'm telling you the truth (not being polite) as making this sort of superficial, completely off-topic response makes you look foolish. Plus you started your response with the condescending "I guess you haven't seen..." which cancels any obligation on my part to be polite to you in response.

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

As a Canadian, I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis. Canadians basically had their goodwill weaponized against them and are too naive to believe it could happen and too brainwashed to believe that sometimes you need to act in your own best interests to save yourself when dealing with predatory narcissists. I have little hope that we have the will to turn this around.

Expand full comment
Alan Devincentis's avatar

Y’all invited islamistan in forty years ago,and it hasn’t stopped. So your pols gave your country away starting then. The only way to turn that around is with guns. Guns make for a very polite society when every one has them. Take a look at the “ wild” west. It wasn’t like the Hollyweirdo movies.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

Good analysis (much of which also applies to the British), but don't give up hope! Re-read the indictment portion of the Declaration of Independence and see what your prognosis would have been for the people who had allowed themselves to get into that state of affairs.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

I hope you are right as I've spent a fair amount of time in Canada including living in Ontario for months on business. They are, on balance, wonderful people who are very generous and hospitable. They don't deserve this.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

And it legendarily only took 3% of American colonists to be active in the fight back against tyranny. They had guns and cannons, though.

Expand full comment
Wendy Montgomery's avatar

And real men.

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

Guns, cannons and a lot of grit.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

Yes; a *lot.*

Expand full comment
Fred Jewett's avatar

A study was done and when more than 3.5% of the population peacefully protest they always get what they want from their rulers.

Expand full comment
Just Comment's avatar

Congratulations! Now that Trudeau is leaving.... Looking good !

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Exile him to Cuba

Expand full comment
Just Comment's avatar

That would be like he is going to his fatherland.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Still too close and we may want to annex.

Expand full comment
UnvaxxedCanadian's avatar

Do you know Pierre Elliot Trudeau (raised him, daddy???? prob not....) and another left wing turd Jacques Hébert (politican and father of a current CBC "jurno") got into a boat in Florida and tried to get TO CUBA after the revolución in Cuba. IE they went the WRONG WAY.

Got intercepted by the USCG and sent back. Our elites in a nutshell.

Expand full comment
Alan Devincentis's avatar

That’s why Cuba hasn’t been mentioned. We will clear that rats nest.

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

Do you think Carney would be any better?

Expand full comment
Heather Candy's avatar

Nope. Possibly worse 😬🙏 This Canadian is hoping for a Conservative win 🙏

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

Agreed!

Expand full comment
Fred Jewett's avatar

NO, he is also a WEF tool.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

I heard when Trump annexes Canada as our 51st state the Canadians can rent concentration camps in Greenland from the US!

/sarc/

Expand full comment
George's avatar

If we Canadians “eh” become Americans do we have to say “hunh” instead?

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

We can let “eh” slide. But we will have to have a discussion about “oot”.

Expand full comment
Guy White's avatar

We got ways of making you pronounce the letter “O”

https://youtu.be/fZThwUWKmmw?feature=shared

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

Does it involve poutine deprivation?

For all my jokes, I really do appreciate Canada. Where else would we have gotten Dr. Jordan Peterson and You Can’t Do That On Television? Canadians, please know that my needling is good-natured. 🥰

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment
UnvaxxedCanadian's avatar

I'll say whatever if I get my CDN peso's at par with the greenback and become a free citizen.

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

Anyone notice Trump said BEING the 51st State? 😆😎 I don’t believe his words are unintentional.

Expand full comment
Just Comment's avatar

That and Greenland.

Expand full comment
Solzhenitsyn’s Ghost's avatar

Jeff, there is literally nobody like you out there. You blow them all away with humor they can't touch, subtle but exceedingly effective. From one humorist who never made a nickel off his work to another, cheers 🥂🤣🤣🤣👉🏼

"I will say this about Kamala Harris: she’d be a fun day-drinking friend. Wouldn’t she? Don’t get me wrong, she must be kept miles away from the nuclear football at all times. But just hanging out, she would laugh at the dumbest of jokes about our mutual unemployment and even find something amusing when the last bottle of chardonnay accidentally spilled down the back of the couch." ONE TIME, yes...one time only!😸

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

I am confused on this one. I thought Jeff was a practising (51st state spelling) lawyer. What is meant by “mutual unemployment?

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

I believe it was a hypothetical. It gave me pause for a bit myself.

Expand full comment
Karkar's avatar

Yes, because if you are day drinking with Kamala you most likely are unemployed.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

There are only so many elected employment positions available in the Senate, House, and Executive Branch.

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

Thank you 😊

Expand full comment
Solzhenitsyn’s Ghost's avatar

In his hypothetical possibility, you'd need to be freshly unemployed and quite drunk for everything to line up...

Expand full comment
MoonlitNight's avatar

Thank you. I think I need more coffee!

Expand full comment
Erin Montgomery's avatar

I just finished reading and was about to ask the same question.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Well given his name is on the name of his firm, I don't think he would fire himself. https://smartbizlaw.com/our-team/

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I don't know about that. She gets really really annoying about about 5 minutes....that laugh!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 7
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😆

I don’t think I could stand her hyena cackling long enough to even share a glass of wine with her 😛 Let alone get to the point of holding back hair 😝

Expand full comment
Solzhenitsyn’s Ghost's avatar

Assumption: Meet her with 3 on board already (she too will be several in). Then make her the butt of every joke. Could be fun!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I can’t drink that much sorry 😆 So not a good plan for me but might be for others 😁

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Or how much alcohol would you have to consume to handle all her cackling? That cackling alone would drive me to drink heavily. 😉

Expand full comment
Solzhenitsyn’s Ghost's avatar

A lot. This would be part of the challenge that may constitute fun. As the Expedia ads with the lawn gnomes used to say, "fun for some"🤣

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

More than I could stand for sure!

Expand full comment
alongername's avatar

Maybe be fun to hold her hair ..... and play a little game called waterboarding

"Who is the puppet master Kammie ? "

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Word salad isn't so bad when it comes back up.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Oh ewww 😝

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Make the truth north strong and free again! Never forget that human rights NGOs like Amnesty International sided with Trudeau against the truckers. “Honk honk is code for heil Hitler.” From the Downfall parody of Trudeau: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/downfall-trudeau-canada

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

I used to give $ to an NGO supporting docs in poor countries. Early on in the lockdowns, one of their docs warned that it would hit the poor, just like Dr. Ladapo did. Then changed course and my donations went to Reclaim the Net.

Expand full comment
Connie Lemmincakes's avatar

Regarding the recall of Oakland’s Mayor and DA, why is it that those people are always so ugly? Looking at those photos, can anyone else see demons? It’s horrific.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Kind of like "The Picture of Dorian Gray" in reverse.

All that craziness eventually shows up in the face.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yeah I’ve thought the same thing!

Expand full comment
KCwoofie's avatar

I see an uncanny resemblance between JT and Dorian Gray. And I’ll bet the portrait in his attic it’s just as gross.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Did you see the day Castro’s son was doing a press conference and his eyebrows started sliding down his face? (It was a sunny, warm day and the glue wasn’t holding very well 😂).

I had heard that he was voted in by women who gushed about his being so ‘gorgeous’……I never checked to see if that was true or not.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

I remember...the eyebrows looked like caterpillars.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I hate it when women (or men) gush about politicians being sexy and gorgeous, tbh 🙄 You can tell with those people that it’s the main reason they’re voting for someone 🙄

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

It's pretty hard for an Asian woman to look have that ugly, masculine, worn-out look that is so unattractive in woman, but Oakland's mayor manages it at a pretty young age.

So what's cause and what's effect, did her looks make her bitter or did her bitterness affect her looks? My guess is the latter as it takes decades of snits and quarrels to offset the natural softness of an Asian woman's facial features.

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

My second glance said “That’s a Man, baby” 😆

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Mine too😂

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

Truth to both!

Expand full comment
Sheri veley's avatar

Exactly my thoughts. Both are men.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

That thought crossed my mind too. Ugly, mean looking person whatever he/she is.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

I think that's "she"'s a man, myself. First thought I had when I saw the picture.

(Oakland and San Francisco are in the same political and cultural vicinity.)

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

I think I was wrong about this after watching her and listening to her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6STUMJ--KZw

Maybe, it's her Hmong features that make her look fiercer than what we may think of as typical "Asian" features.

But in that picture, she looks quite fierce.

Expand full comment
Susan Seas's avatar

She did look more female in this video. But It’s RIDICULOUS that people get Fired and continue on for months! 🙄

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Liberalism/leftist loony is a disease. Rots you from the inside and outside. I believe she's in the advance stage of this disease.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

The answer to your either/or question is simply “YES”.

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

I couldn't look long enough to tell.

I was too busy dodging all those daggers coming from those eyes.

If looks could kill.......

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Agree 💯 I thought the same thing. These creatures are nasty. 🤮 Is it a requirement to be fugly in order to run or identify as a progressive?

Expand full comment
Alan Devincentis's avatar

You’ve nailed it. One reason there are so many willing to destroy anything good. They were blessed with less than attractive features, which means all their life, they wished to be the skinny attractive blonde or the fit jock. And they consider it another’s fault that they aren’t. Fifty years ago they started with this everyone’s the same shit. And this is where it got us. So the uglies gravitate to the democrat party. Why do you think Antifags and blm look like a horror movie designed by Dali? It’s almost a natural thing.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Demons are simply ugly. Evil makes you ugly. Even if you start out as beautiful, when you choose evil, it makes you ugly.

Same goes for ugly people who choose ‘good’. People cease to look at the outside and see the goodness and that ugly disappears and they become quite lovely.

Expand full comment
Connie Lemmincakes's avatar

I learned that way, way back in the late 70’s. When I went for an interview. The office manager was an older woman who was not especially good looking and, due to a surgery, had a very hoarse, raspy voice. I was taken aback. I subsequently got the job, and worked with her for a number of years. She was a loving, caring person who was wonderful to work with and we became good friends. That taught me, at an early age, it’s not what’s outside, but that beauty comes from within.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Definitely demons. Their eyes are windows of souls in hell.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Yes. Their eyes are demonic.

Expand full comment
KCwoofie's avatar

Yea that too. “Devil in a blue dress.”

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Yup! Just like the pics of Hellary and Soros.

Expand full comment
Carlos's avatar

Or the wife’s of Chuky Shumy or E…Micron

Expand full comment
Carlos's avatar

Those two duds sure look like big Mike.

You are totally right.

It reminds me of the line in Terminator

“You are an ugly MoFo”

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Having fled Cali culture and returned home to Texas (twice), I have the impression Cali is interested in freaky fun and random surprises. I suspect they elect progressives and hope for clownish kerfuffles and fireworks. At any rate, they put the “no” in “normal.” Maybe Oakland learned its lesson.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

I used to live in SF and as it started getting unaffordable, many of my (former) friends and acquaintances moved to Oakland. They SAID it was for the cheap rent, but I always suspected that it was also a big virtue signal, as these were mostly white peeps moving to the big black-populated city. They had successfully gentrified the Mission, and now were taking their act to a new town, a new culture.

For example, none of them moved to the equally cheap/cheaper San Bruno. None of them moved to Richmond. None of them moved to Pinole.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

That fits my impression that appearances are a bit over-emphasized on the left coast. If we could separate the concept of culture from race, we could have some meaningful national discussions about social divisions.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

If we could also start accepting that race is an artificial construct with no clear definitions and nebulous criteria, we could stop it from being used as a way to divide us into competing groups.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Well, WE can separate that, but it is part of the inherent racism/sexism of the lefties that they essentialize everything. A four year old girl who plays with toy trucks MUST be a boy 'born into the wrong body.' Because Boys = Trucks. Blacks are only 'allowed to be' struggling, gangsta, suffering from oppression, because blacks are in their essences SO DIFFERENT from whites that there is simply no place for them in white-constructed society (see Smithsonian (https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333) for examples). And that's how the lefties want it. They don't want to move into a self-contained and dprospering black community, because then where would their savior and mea culpa credits go--they NEED blacks to be one way and one way only...and that way is...NOT LIKE THEM. It is stunning to me how the left can preach diversity out of one side of their mouth, but the second an Asian wins the Indy 500 it has to turn into a story of how they are the yellow face of white supremacy because they are not cringing still about Asian hate crimes and the agony of whites assuming they are good at math.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

It’s nauseating to see our great institutions fall to progressive rot. “Race guideliness.” What an insidious concept, and Newsweek magnified it. While most people just want to live in peace and take care of themselves and their families, the lunatic fringe works to make racism systemic. Haters would be ostracized if they couldn’t stir up hatred outside of their own camps.

Expand full comment
Sherry Fariss's avatar

If you look up the mayor on Wikipedia she looks a lot more attractive. Which is the real one? She was also (per Wikipedia) a paragon of virtue and an amazing overcomer of victimhood. I don’t trust that source any more than MSM, but I was curious about her. Is there an honest version of Wikipedia out there?

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

maybe Wikileaks. lol

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Wikipedia is intel community.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Yep but it is a quick 'solve a trivia question or argument' easy button, Lol. Although the Brave Browser AI is starting to perform that same function

Expand full comment
Merry McIntyre's avatar

I literally jumped when I saw the ex mayor’s face! Yikes!!

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

They look like a couple of drag queens

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

“Mucho props to Mr. Starbuck. They should give him free value meals for life.”

Jeff! We like Mr Starbuck; we don’t want him dead.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

What did Mr. Starbuck ever do to you, Jeff?

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

lol, like.

Expand full comment
Kristina the Short's avatar

he could feed them to his dog....

Expand full comment
Concerned mom's avatar

Would NEVER do that to my dog!

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

What.....and give it pancreatitis?!?!?!?!!!

Expand full comment
Kristina the Short's avatar

LOL dogs usually have the sense to decline bad stuff

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

None of those climate models mention wireless radiation or the electromagnetic force of the Sun as a potential influence, yet satellites go up by the 1000s without anyone batting an eye, or considering the electrical envelope of the ionosphere: https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/drones-and-the-us-space-force

Expand full comment
Bruno's avatar

And what about toxic stratospheric aerosol injection happening EVERY DAY in our skies?? Why is this not mentioned?Stop climate geoengineering!! Geoengineeringwatch.org.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

True - that plays a part as a synergy with wireless radiation + heavy metal particulates. Thanks Bruno - When did you become aware of geoengineering?

Expand full comment
Bruno's avatar

So many years ago I cannot say for sure. The unnatural clouds spewing from airplanes (and never mentioned in weather forecasts) was a dead giveaway, pun intended.

Expand full comment
John A George's avatar

Didn't ask, but me? 2008.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Thanks John. Why 2008, any reason in particular?

Expand full comment
John A George's avatar

I was out playing tennis in upstate NY, saw four lines spanning the entire southern sky, wondered why, investigated, been preaching against it ever since. I even have a "Stop Geoengineering" yard sign in the front yard. Hope JFK Jr. will end it!

Expand full comment
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

Trying to describe an explanation today, regarding climate, change is like trying to explain the ending of “War and Peace” after reading the Table of Contents.

Expand full comment
william howard's avatar

not to worry - DOD & Bill Gates are spraying toxic chemicals in the atmosphere to block out the sun and keep us all cool - the chemicals cause cancer and poison our food supply but those are small prices to pay for this wonderful earth saving program

Expand full comment
John A George's avatar

Yeah, geoengineeringwatch.org explains much...

Expand full comment
Lynn46's avatar

Gates needs to be forced to watch Snowpiercer on a loop.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

Gates, Soros et al can now be sent to gitmo, apparently there are a few empty cell now compliments of President Cabbage.

Expand full comment
william howard's avatar

Recognizing that climate models are always wrong might lead to questioning why they are so wrong

Better yet - why anyone pays attention

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

True William. Models only account for manmade climate variability, and not natural (aka THE SUN) How's that for a mind-blower? When did you become aware these models were wrong?

Expand full comment
Principled Pragmatist's avatar

“All models are wrong; some are useful.”

From a few years working in modeling and simulation I came up with the following (I’ll call these Ellen’s Postulates):

1. Any model containing more than 5 variables will have limited utility. (I might flex on the number, based on following points).

2. Models that rely on variables with a high percentage of binary choices (1 vs. 2; A vs. B; Male vs. Female) are more likely to produce accurate predictions than models that rely on variables with a broad set of choices and choice ranges.

3. Models designed to predict future states for situations in which there are an unknowable number of factors or variables can offer, at best, crude speculations on what can be expected.

4. In these complex situations, the limitations on what is unknown and unknowable, and the interactions between and among known/unknown/unknowable variables is effectively impossible to quantify or comprehend.

***

Weather can be somewhat reliably predicted (within a short term window — typically 5 days). With each additional day, likelihood of prediction declines.

To wit, weather forecasts beyond five days don’t have much value, when you factor out the main fixed aspects of what season and what climate zone you are in.

Climate forecasts gets very complex and therefore unreliable in a hurry IMO.

Expand full comment
CraigN's avatar

I would put 'climate models' in the same category as the 3 body problem as it is not solvable/predictable. Also, the climate has many, many more variables than the 3 body problem.

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

See my posting. Same idea.

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

The problem with climate models is very simple: Garbage in, garbage out. If you’ve programmed your model with a fundamental assumption that’s wrong to begin with, you ain’t gonna get an accurate conclusion, or one that’s probably even CLOSE to being accurate. It’s the same with cosmology. All professional telescopes are built and programmed with incorrect assumptions from the outset, so astronomers and theoretical physicists end up seeing what they want or expect to see. Scientific American magazine published an excellent article a few years back by Bjørn Ekeberg, PhD, revealing this very disturbing and mostly hidden kernel of truth: “…most observations of the universe occur experimentally and indirectly. Today's space telescopes provide NO DIRECT VIEW OF ANYTHING—they produce measurements through an interplay of theoretical predictions and pliable parameters, in which the model is involved every step of the way. The framework literally frames the problem; it determines where and how to observe. And so, despite the advanced technologies and methods involved, the profound limitations to the endeavor also increase the risk of being led astray by the kind of assumptions that cannot be calculated.” In other words, garbage in, garbage out. Cosmologists are wrong about the universe, space, and the nature of Earth because they usually hold anti-God, anti-Creation biases which are programmed into their models. Same with climatologists.

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

Or DARPA or HAARP

Expand full comment
Susanna Bythesea's avatar

My mother-in-law is a Canadian refugee - she and my American father-in-law fled Canada, their home for decades, just before Biden closed the border in early 2021. Our children would have been unable to see their grandparents for three years if they had not gotten out! The stories their friends (in small town rural Canada, not even just cities!) shared about discrimination against unvaccinated citizens were pretty shocking. I mean, we’re not shocked, sadly, anymore, but at the time it still was. And should be.

Anyhow, our family watched the Trudeau resignation live. And cheered. Thank you Lord. I hope perhaps Canada can be made great again too.

Badlands Media has a really interesting video on the multi-century fight for a Continental Republic here in the North America. I’m not done yet but it’s been fascinating so far.

https://rumble.com/v64s5ey-breaking-history-ep.-77.html

Expand full comment
Carlos's avatar

I do agree a 💯 percent with you

Let’s make The North American Continent Great Again…

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

Kinda shocking to think that a country so like ours would see people seek refuge in another country. Like CA, Canada seems to be The Ghost of Freedom’s Future. I’m so happy your family got out while the getting was good.

Expand full comment
Tuco's Child's avatar

A ☕ &🦠 Classic:

"It is telling that Democrats in Congress more fear unarmed grandmothers from Orlando and retired firefighters than radicalized communists with real improvised explosive devices."

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Winning feels so good I'm putting the finishing touches on my "Blackface" for our Canadian brothers!

Liberals know with 100% certainty that Trudeau doesn't stand a chance of being re-elected so now they're in desperate mode trying to find a leader who might beat Conservatives.

But keep in mind, every single liberal was responsible for destroying Canada alongside Trudeau

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Maybe Canada will import Kamala Harris and give her the Prime Minister job???

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

I wouldn't be surprised.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

It would be the ultimate virtue signal 😆

Expand full comment
JacquelineP's avatar

Yes!!!

Expand full comment
Ed Thorrens's avatar

““All who rage against you will surely be ashamed and disgraced; those who oppose you will be as nothing and perish.”

‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭41‬:‭11‬ ‭NIV‬‬

https://bible.com/bible/111/isa.41.11.NIV

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Philippians 2:10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee will bow, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Expand full comment
Ed Thorrens's avatar

Read and obey Acts 2:38

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Noting that belief in the following passage indicates one believes Christ as Lord and Savior. "Lord" indicates that you place yourself under Christ, He is your Master and you follow His ways and not your own which would include following His example of baptism as a proclamation of your faith in Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Romans 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; 10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes in Him will not be disappointed.” 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him; 13 for “Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and [a]that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

Many of these folks seem incapable of remorse or shame

Expand full comment
Bard Joseph's avatar

Not in the Christian belief of forgiveness.

Expand full comment
Anthony's avatar

There's forgiveness and then there's justice. They aren't mutually exclusive.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Exactly.

Expand full comment
Ed Thorrens's avatar

The same God that is love …. He is also Consuming Fire, do not forget about that!

Expand full comment
Anthony's avatar

"And He shall purify..."

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Not true. Christians believe in Justice. Also, Forgiveness and Justice are not mutually exclusive. You may be forgiven, but you will still ‘reap what you sow.”

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

BardJoseph: Not everything is eligible to be forgiven!!!

Some things need to be destroyed.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

That's God talking, in a specific circumstance, about particular people. Not every verse is universally applicable. If we choose to read it as what happens to people who rage against God and never repent (not the context, but in trying to apply the entirely of the Word to this Old Testament verse), then they will indeed "be as nothing and perish."

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

You know not.

Expand full comment
Emily Terrell's avatar

The coolest thing happened because of this community. Jeff asked us to donate to React19. Being an amazing group we did. Bigly. They doubled their fundraising goal! How do I know? Jessica from React19 called me personally to thank me. Y’all I only gave $102. Is she calling all of us? I think maybe they deserve a little more money.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

That is amazing! Love how effective our multipliers are!! 😍

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

That water heater policy is insane. For the sake of virtue signaling, progressives want to mandate the use of energy in the least efficient way possible. They ignore the thermodynamics of using heat to generate electricity and then transmitting it across the grid, and then turning it back into heat.

They have no regard for the climate. They only care about learned helplessness, authoritarian control, and ultimately, eugenics.

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

AND for all those government grant dollars extorted from us.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

🎯🎯🎯

Well said, Tom!!

Expand full comment
diane's avatar

Tks for the info. Natural gas is the best heat option for those who have it.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Propane

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Grew up with a wood burning stove and remember the necessity of going to cut fire wood. It was a great lesson in hard work.

I also knew a woman I worked with who was from Minnesota. She said her family had a corn stove. All the neighbors went in on a small silo and filled it with corn. She said a bucket of corn would heat the house for a day and it would burn so hot that you had to go outside to cool down.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

Facts. We can still have a nice shower if a hurricane knocks the power out. I’m not so sure I’m worried about this particular stunt, though. It seems like something Trump can undo 5 minutes after resuming office. That said, I am happy my gas water heater is only 6 years old.

Expand full comment
Alan Devincentis's avatar

What stupid people in cities don’t get is that so many farms, so many properties, at least in NYS, have their own gas wells. They’ve been in service for 100 years. Not this blooming idiot is gonna tell them how they can use that gas? lol I think not.

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

How does the state regulate them? In the West in some places they want to put meters on water wells on private property.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

They already do that for farms, here in CA.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

😳🙄🤯

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Illinois is working toward this goal! They, the university and the geological survey is wanting to control the underground water aquifer. To protect it you know. 😭

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

Thankfully, most of the NYS areas outside the big cities run pretty red, from what I understand. It would be great fun to see them remember who they are and what they have.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I found most to be discouragingly passive during Covid, sadly 😕 It’s like they’ve been worn down. Or maybe the real firebrands have all left.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

That’s what I hate about this migration. The major blue centers have become echo chambers and some beautiful cities, places I once really wanted to see, I think have little hope of making a comeback.

Expand full comment
Alan Devincentis's avatar

Having only left fifteen years ago, I can guarantee you that nys is redder than red. The five cities, buffalo, Rochester,Syracuse, Binghamton,and nyc steal all elections there, and it’s because it’s easy. Conservatives in nys are brainwashed into thinking they can’t win, so they don’t vote.20% is a huge turnout. Imagine that. And in my business, all I did was travel to every small town in the state, pretty much.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

A disgusting tragedy. I can’t help but hope that the brainwashed start to see the new Trump admin as a chance to come out.

Expand full comment
Oregon Kathy's avatar

Mine is only a year old and I noticed when standing over it that I smelled gas. I called the gas company and they came out and said that it’s that particular thermostat, it just leaks gas. But it’s within standards so it’s A-ok.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

It does take some acquaintance, I’ve noticed. They stopped plumbing a lot of new houses around here for gas decades ago, so I’m used to electric. But it’s worth it. I could stand to be without my gas fireplace, though. I want a way to cook and heat if I lose both electricity and gas and a wood fire is just so much more pleasing to the senses.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

The are running new gas lines in my area. But I'm in a deep red area.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

One of the many things to love about the red places. Options!

Expand full comment
Sarcastia's avatar

I cook in the living room all winter. It's great. I love my wood stove.

Expand full comment
diane's avatar

The question is how does the pres. have such power? Seems not right.

Expand full comment
Stacy's avatar

All these ridiculous agencies is my guess. But I’m hopeful that the Loper decision will address what DOGE doesn’t.

It is, as you note, the question to ask. But this is where we are and what we’re dealing with. Until we can scale this government back, I like the idea of legally giving them a run for their money, as Jeff suggested. There’s a YouTuber I like to follow, calls himself “HaxMan”. His motto is “be ungovernable”. In other words, let them herd cats.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

The question really is: Who manufactures the heat pumps they push instead of gas heating appliances? These are the companies that stand to reap millions, if all of a sudden everyone is "nudged" into buying electric. Bet you any amount they and their lobbyists are drafting this legislation.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

He doesn't. But Democrats don't let the rule of law or the constituion get in their way.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Kersting's suicide was discovered on a Sat night, 9 PM by police. Ok what was he doing at the office late Sat night? Know these folks could have a heavy case load or burning the midnight oil before a trial...but what made the police show up at his office at that relatively late hour? What was he working on? Relatively young guy, I read that he worked prosecuting sexual assault cases and won a case against a child predator in March - it's also possible that his work took an emotional toll on him. Hard to know what to believe these days - may he RIP. Sad either way.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

I used to be in the office at that time on a regular basis.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Well I've worked from home for 13 years now and agree - early mornings and late nights are more productive due to no phones and emails pinging. But how was it police came on the scene? Were others also working late and heard a gunshot? All of the stories I saw just said 'police arrived to find him dead' without saying what prompted them to show up in the first place. That was the point I was making - no mention of what tipped them off.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes it just seemed kind of off to me 😕

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Comments on Nadler's X post are skewering him as he deserves!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes he definitely deserves it!! Piece of garbage 🤬

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Gotta love the state of reporting these days. That prosecutor suicide article has more about the terror attack than about the so called self-inflicted gunshot wound. Nothing to see here, I guess. SMH

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Right? 😕

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

But thanks for all the links, I forgot to say!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Glad you liked them!

Expand full comment