If Mattis, McMaster and the other high-ranking goofballs make their return we'll know. I want to give Trump and his advisors the benefit of the doubt at this point. His election victory shows that he understands the game. My hope is that there's a strategy involved with these nominations given that the nomination process with appointments like Kennedy and Gabbard is going to be difficult. There are too many RINOs and DNC allies in congress whose only interest is self-preservation and blocking Trump's efforts.
I agree 100%. I am trying to stay positive and not get all worked up at this point. As Jeff likes to say Trump is playing 4D chess. Let’s see what happens. He’s not stupid. He knows how people feel and o don’t think he’s going to appoint a bunch of pharma shills. Bobby has his ear and the transition team all has input into who might get nominated.
Clearly a paid troll of some sort. No one posts the same comment that much unless they are being paid by the comment. More importantly, have people not figured out that Trump argued to remove the mrna vaccines from the market? The vaccines were only allowed to be on the market due to emergency use authorization, which meant no other effective pre-existing treatments could exist. So, when Trump argued for alternative, existing therapies (like hydroxychloroquine and others) he was, in effect, arguing to pull the vaccines.
No, just normal chess. Pretty typical approach in corporate America, where you can't directly make many claims w/o setting off fire alarms with the various gov't agents (aka HR) and whiny always "offended" crowd. So, you have to make your case in a more circuitous way. Leaders in large corporations do this all the time.
Either way, he made arguments for other existing treatments, which has the same effect as arguing to remove the vaccines. He also paid a heavy price for it, many times over.
LOL. Way to take my words out of context and quote only the part you wanted. As I said, when he argued for alternative therapies - which he did, repeatedly - it was in effect an argument to take the vaccines off the market. If there were any other existing effective drugs, the mrna shots could legally not be on the market. Simply the facts. Move along.
👍🏼 I agree LuAnne. When a person posts the same message this many times it becomes noise (and seemingly an agenda they are promoting ) and I ignore and skip over them.
I like to think I put principles (like the right to choose what goes into your own bloodstream) above people.
I'm for Trump the degree that he aligns with good principles and opposed to the degree that he does not. Right now, he looks like he sold out to Pfizer.
I'm right there too. I really hope we're somehow wrong about him.
And I was initially ecstatic to hear Gaetz and RFK to be nominated.
But I can't forget how Trump filled his first term with Deep State shills, over and over and over again. (Not to mention how he screwed RFK the first time.)
He's not a good man. He's not even a decent man. He's a narcissistic idiot with a cult following.
An awful pick and very difficult to comprehend.
I really really REALLY hate to say it, but it reminds of Trump's hiring of the Swamp in his first term.
Yeah, ouch. I so want to put my fingers in my ears and say, "LALALALALA." But I do like your apostrophe.
Yes, possessive with a gerund, for any other grammar geeks.
Thanks, Reasonable! That's mighty ... Uh, ... Er, I mean uh ...
Nevermind.
Punctual?
If Mattis, McMaster and the other high-ranking goofballs make their return we'll know. I want to give Trump and his advisors the benefit of the doubt at this point. His election victory shows that he understands the game. My hope is that there's a strategy involved with these nominations given that the nomination process with appointments like Kennedy and Gabbard is going to be difficult. There are too many RINOs and DNC allies in congress whose only interest is self-preservation and blocking Trump's efforts.
I agree 100%. I am trying to stay positive and not get all worked up at this point. As Jeff likes to say Trump is playing 4D chess. Let’s see what happens. He’s not stupid. He knows how people feel and o don’t think he’s going to appoint a bunch of pharma shills. Bobby has his ear and the transition team all has input into who might get nominated.
"He’s not stupid."
Then he must be evil. Or maybe little of both.
I'm shocked at how tone deaf the man is when it comes to ideology.
Trump has a lot of talents but on a lot of things he is not the sharpest tool in the shed. He really has no ideology of his own, just pragmatism.
I hope she's another sacrificial lamb for the advise and consent process. Problem is, she just might get confirmed.
Sacrifice!
I wish the Senate would remember that the language is "advise and consent;" not "advise and reject."
Someone so dedicated to the profits of Pfizer will not have the slightest difficulty in getting confirmed. And Trump knows it.
Agree 😕
Exactly.
To comprehend it, I find myself forced to conclude that Trump is betraying us all to Pfizer.
🤣 C&C readers, we have ourselves a major Trump hater & divider among us.
Bot, paid dnc 🤡, or an IA goon?
Scram commie!
Clearly a paid troll of some sort. No one posts the same comment that much unless they are being paid by the comment. More importantly, have people not figured out that Trump argued to remove the mrna vaccines from the market? The vaccines were only allowed to be on the market due to emergency use authorization, which meant no other effective pre-existing treatments could exist. So, when Trump argued for alternative, existing therapies (like hydroxychloroquine and others) he was, in effect, arguing to pull the vaccines.
More 57-D chess, right?
No, just normal chess. Pretty typical approach in corporate America, where you can't directly make many claims w/o setting off fire alarms with the various gov't agents (aka HR) and whiny always "offended" crowd. So, you have to make your case in a more circuitous way. Leaders in large corporations do this all the time.
Either way, he made arguments for other existing treatments, which has the same effect as arguing to remove the vaccines. He also paid a heavy price for it, many times over.
"Trump argued to remove the mrna vaccines from the market"
WOW are you delusional. This is Trump just four days ago:
"During the COVID-19 pandemic, she worked on the front lines in New York City
treating thousands of Americans and helped patients in the aftermath of President
Donald Trump's Historic Operation Warp Speed that saved hundreds of millions
of lives."
Does that sounds like he's about to remove them from the market?
LOL. Way to take my words out of context and quote only the part you wanted. As I said, when he argued for alternative therapies - which he did, repeatedly - it was in effect an argument to take the vaccines off the market. If there were any other existing effective drugs, the mrna shots could legally not be on the market. Simply the facts. Move along.
I wish he would get a life and start his own substack. He weighs in on every post.
Your wish has been granted:
https://patrickdotnet.substack.com/
Actually l've had it for a few yeas now.
Nope, I'm a real person with a very long history and my own website, patrick.net
It's Trump himself is dividing us by appointing a Pfizer shill.
Well, whatever you're selling, I'm not buying it. Constant negativity is a sign of a chronic complainer who has nothing good to offer.
👍🏼 I agree LuAnne. When a person posts the same message this many times it becomes noise (and seemingly an agenda they are promoting ) and I ignore and skip over them.
My agenda is only:
1. stop the deadly mRNA jabs
2. try and punish everyone who mandated them
3. try and punish Pfauci for creating the virus in Wuhan with our money
I have never wavered from that even an inch.
A little "question everything" is in order when objecting to mass murder by injection (OWS).
I'm selling truth and justice. I make no money from my site, not even ads. Just proving I have a long history as a real human.
A little negativity is in order when objecting to mass murder by injection.
Patrick.net, go back to your website and bloviate there.
(Bloviate..intransitive verb
: to speak or write verbosely and windily pundits bloviating on the radio…or C&C!!)
Just look at what Trump is openly telling you. He _still_ praises the death jab to the heavens.
Nope, nope, nope. You've been exposed as a HERETIC who doubts Dear Leader!
How dare you!
Off to the Orange Gulag with you. (And no second helping of pumpkin pie, either.)
Doesn't it seem that way?
I like to think I put principles (like the right to choose what goes into your own bloodstream) above people.
I'm for Trump the degree that he aligns with good principles and opposed to the degree that he does not. Right now, he looks like he sold out to Pfizer.
I'm right there too. I really hope we're somehow wrong about him.
And I was initially ecstatic to hear Gaetz and RFK to be nominated.
But I can't forget how Trump filled his first term with Deep State shills, over and over and over again. (Not to mention how he screwed RFK the first time.)
He's not a good man. He's not even a decent man. He's a narcissistic idiot with a cult following.
I like your memes
Thank you!
Check out John Leake's Substack today about Pfizer. Yikes. If it's possible, they really are worse than we thought.
Thank you Mary Ann.
There’s no other explanation except the usual “it’s 5D chess!” bullshit.
Trump is still proud of Operation Warp Speed.
Why is everyone surprised?
Yeah. Many of us spoke out and tried to warn everyone that Trump is a big swamp member himself. But most people here found that theory blasphemous.
Guess we should have voted for Obama’s pick, Kamala, ha? News flash…they are all in the swamp.