By definition, evolution is not something that intelligently designs. It's haphazard, and bows to the conditions of the environment. Yet these "scientists" want to tell us that AI is instant evolution -- seemingly never considering that AI is a human engineered "intelligence," that designs things (including itself) based on the original …
By definition, evolution is not something that intelligently designs. It's haphazard, and bows to the conditions of the environment. Yet these "scientists" want to tell us that AI is instant evolution -- seemingly never considering that AI is a human engineered "intelligence," that designs things (including itself) based on the original designs created by human beings. Therefore, AI's instant evolution is really just intelligent design.
And I agree. I'll keep the God I already have. He's the one, afterall, who made the environment to which AI and evolution must subject their processes.
Right. These morons are actually claiming godhood for humanity, for themselves, when they claim to have created something that can create other things ... it is all so idiotic ... open your eyes ... you made something that made something ridiculous and useless.
You gotta laugh. They just demonstrated by their own words that evolution is a farce.
There is no existing macroevolution of species to species. That fossil record simply does not exist. The oldest fossil records exist in the Cambrian Period rock strata circa 600 million years old. Yet all through the rock strata even back to the Cambrian Period, there is a complete lack of evolutionary transitions. Complex creatures suddenly appear in the fossil record in an "advanced stage of evolution" with no examples of evolutionary transition even in this Cambrian rock strata.
Their method of dating with radioisotopes is flawed. They’re in bed with the labs that do the dating. It’s like circular logic. “Date the fossil from the surrounding rock; date the rock from the fossil found within.” Fossils had to be buried fast to stay in tact--otherwise they decay. This fundamental fact of fossils is ignored. I read a story about a miner’s helmet that got buried and fossilized. So its age is known. Sent it to some labs for dating--they came back with some exponentially erroneous date.
By definition, evolution is not something that intelligently designs. It's haphazard, and bows to the conditions of the environment. Yet these "scientists" want to tell us that AI is instant evolution -- seemingly never considering that AI is a human engineered "intelligence," that designs things (including itself) based on the original designs created by human beings. Therefore, AI's instant evolution is really just intelligent design.
And I agree. I'll keep the God I already have. He's the one, afterall, who made the environment to which AI and evolution must subject their processes.
Nicely said
I actually was going to say the same.
SOME ONE had to DESIGN the AI. The AI did not design itself. So whatever the AI came up with is not random but intelligently designed. At some level.
Right. These morons are actually claiming godhood for humanity, for themselves, when they claim to have created something that can create other things ... it is all so idiotic ... open your eyes ... you made something that made something ridiculous and useless.
No human can create from scratch anything.
Amen but those doors can’t even see this most simple of truths
You gotta laugh. They just demonstrated by their own words that evolution is a farce.
There is no existing macroevolution of species to species. That fossil record simply does not exist. The oldest fossil records exist in the Cambrian Period rock strata circa 600 million years old. Yet all through the rock strata even back to the Cambrian Period, there is a complete lack of evolutionary transitions. Complex creatures suddenly appear in the fossil record in an "advanced stage of evolution" with no examples of evolutionary transition even in this Cambrian rock strata.
Gee, maybe aliens planted them? Couldn't be God.
Their method of dating with radioisotopes is flawed. They’re in bed with the labs that do the dating. It’s like circular logic. “Date the fossil from the surrounding rock; date the rock from the fossil found within.” Fossils had to be buried fast to stay in tact--otherwise they decay. This fundamental fact of fossils is ignored. I read a story about a miner’s helmet that got buried and fossilized. So its age is known. Sent it to some labs for dating--they came back with some exponentially erroneous date.
600 million? Not buying it.... Maybe 550 million, or 423 million? Can't go there...