904 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Texas nurse's avatar

Love Dr. McCullough and I couldn’t agree more! The jabs should be and I think will be a huge election point. I sure wish Trump would acknowledge the truth!

Expand full comment
NAB's avatar

I agree they SHOULD be a major election issue, but I don't think they will be. It seems like everyone has gone silent on them. Yes, I still hear ads to get "up to date" on vaccines, but not nearly the full-court press like before. No one in my family or in my social circles talk about them at all whereas before they asked for updates on shot status.

Expand full comment
Sharon Wood's avatar

Paxlovid is a common commercial I am seeing.

Expand full comment
God Bless America's avatar

More expensive poison… 🤨💩

Expand full comment
SB's avatar

Yep, that's my fear, it will all get pushed under the rug and we will end up in a Groundhog Day scenario where we keep repeating the same bad policies. Drs are still on it, a friend just told me they still get asked about giving her kids the shots at their Dr visits.

Expand full comment
taxpayer's avatar

I wish Dr. McCullough was clearer on the math. If 40% of people (or more) understand to oppose the jabs, and 60% of people vote, that doesn't mean that 2/3 of the voters oppose the jabs. Still, the data he presented be encouraging.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Exactly! You don’t know how much of the 40% falls into that 60% who vote! LOL

Expand full comment
John Johnson's avatar

Did he really mean it that way? Almost has to be overlapping voters and non-voters. Any portion of those non-voters deciding to vote due to that issue, or normal voters letting that issue tip their vote a certain way, could have a huge effect on elections. And if RFK takes advantage, major party candidates may take notice.

Expand full comment
taxpayer's avatar

I agree with you. But let's say 40% of 60%, that'd be 24%. A big number, but then people vote on other things besides jabs. Some are concerned about other issues, and many just vote for whoever they find likeable, or whoever their influencers recommend. Many suffer from TDS and will vote for whoever they think can vanquish Orange Man.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

He's a doctor, not a mathematician, or...oops, he really should know math better than this. And now it looks like he's entering politics.....

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

I like citizens who enter politics to fix issues. Career politicians seem better suited for jails and asylums.

Expand full comment
Lisa in Michigan's avatar

Those 40% are very upset and VERY LIKELY will be voting because of how strongly they feel. So his assessment is accurate.

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

Big pharma is a huge lobby!!!!!

Expand full comment
Karin's avatar

And now the Covid jab is on the list of mandatory jabs when one applies for permanent residence in the USA or even applies for a J1 visa.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

I was glad to see that Aaron Siri's firm has been busy with exemptions for people legally applying for residence in the U.S.: https://www.sirillp.com/immigration-attorneys/vaccine-exemptions-and-waivers/

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Bigger than most of the lobbys (lobbies?) put together.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

I have wondered whether Mt. Trump is simply biding his time (no pun intended) until the 'conventions' are in the rear-view. Then he can come out with a heavy-hitting anti-vax platform which will be fresh in the minds of voters in early Nov. Edit: Came in to change "Mt. to Mr.--but decided to leave well enough alone.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Yeah, but not likely after he’s touted the shots as “miracles” and “saving millions of lives” even recently. This one issue has made me think he’s one of them with the great rhetoric. Just playing his part.

Expand full comment
Amy's avatar

Al, you are accurate and I appreciate some one else sees this too. I would assume since C&C readers tend to be more critically thinking, they ALL should be asking themselves this.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Thanks Amy--I hate to say it, and I hate to think it, but after almost 4 years of information, it seems unlikely to me that anyone can rise up in the ranks and gain the highest power in the land without the deep state on board. People need heroes--I get it. And many people have gotten angry at me and said, "if you're right, there's no hope!" I disagree but I see how devastating it would be for those to entertain the idea that Trump is part of the ruling class mafia. Again, I hate to say it, but all signs point that way.

It seems to be a matter of accepting how powerful the ruling class/bankster cartel is--how long they have been ruling the world and manipulating its citizens and how clever, strategic and well funded these people are.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

It’s hard to make sense of it all though given all the grief they’ve given him and everything they’ve put him through. Is it all theater? Could be but it seems like a lot of trouble to go to and too many people involved to keep that quiet. It makes sense on some levels but doesn’t on others 😕

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

If you think about each of the "griefs" it doesn't seem that far-fetched to me. J6 was an intelligence operation, and all of these lawsuits would be easy to set up--you don't need too many people involved--the process takes care of itself. Isn't curious how he is overcoming all of these accusations though and mostly all before the election (that's fast for the judicial process)? Insurrection (set up to be overcome), documents at Mar-a-Lago, GA election fraud (oh, the drama there that obliterates the charges!). Is it possible all he has to do is play along?

I hear you. But what bothers me is also what is NOT happening. Real candidates are not given any press or GOP/DNC support--those entities were long-ago captured. No press for them, banned from Youtube, or shadowed on Twitter, or absent on Google. And yet, Trump has gotten tons of media attention DAILY since 2015---even these past 4 years when he was no longer president. Why would the press keep that memory alive?! Why not occasionally mention him as mere history? Why did CNN host him? The NYT and Atlantic publish anti-trump articles DAILY. It takes an enormous effort to keep inundating readers with Trump.

I think if one assumes that the people in power do not have that level of control over the dissemination of information, and\or that there is an "organic" aspect to one's rise to fame/power, then it's easy to think he got here all on his own and his magnetism is the only reason he is the main object of media. He took a $250m loan from Soros (so did his son), he hobnobbed with the Clintons for years, he was a democrat. He was part of that club and then just changed his mind? We're so used to watching movies, we believe this schlock.

I go back and forth too. But that annoying little vaccine issue just keeps getting to me. He knows damn well how bad they are, he knows it was a DOD op from the start, he knows it was an American virus through NIH/NIAID/UNC pretending to be released in China---and still calls it the China virus. I just smell a rat!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

All fair points and interesting perspective. I’m not sure that’s all there is to it but for sure lots of things don’t seem to line up 😕 I’m not as bothered as you are by the hobnobbing and party switch, actually. I think there can be quite plausible “innocent” explanations for those. I guess I’m more inclined to think that the people involved in orchestrating all this are more self important and full of hubris than they are smart, so I have a hard time believing they have everything perfectly thought out and planned to the last detail. I do think there are a lot of missing pieces though. Too many for me to feel comfortable or confident that any particular theory is correct.

Expand full comment
Joy sister's avatar

Trump was heavily influenced by Birx and Fauci, somewhat naively perhaps, but it was new frontier and I have to believe he was doing what he could. He needs to acknowledge the harm now, or he is complicit however. So much is now known. Some of us proclaimed from the start that you cannot know long-term effects without studying them in real-time, but 4 years later any logically thinking human should understand these shots cannot be mandatory ever again.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Our naive president. He must have also overlooked that this was a DOD operation from the beginning, forgot that he signed more executive orders that obliterated rights, forgot that it was Fauci himself in charge of the gain of function research through the NIH, NIAID, UNC whose scientists worked for US in Wuhan and that this was 100% an "American" virus.

But yes, even that tired old excuse doesn't play anymore. You are right that he cannot NOT know what has transpired now 4 years later. And still touting the Pfizer line.

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

How many children have been vaxxed because of Trump’s statements? We have kids dropping dead and suffering disabilities and Trump refuses to acknowledge that the jabs are dangerous. His statements influence people to get themselves and their children jabs. It’s unforgivable in my book. The lives of America’s children matter!

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

That's the thing. I don't care if someone could convince me his political strategy is brilliant-- because in the meantime more children are being killed by these shots (all of the "vaccines" in my opinion--we've been lied to for over a century). My kids are fully vaxxed but after all I've read in the past 4 years, I have regrettably come to believe that all "vaccines" are killing/disease agents and that's what keeps the cartel in business.

If this were a poker game, Trump's vaccine stance would be his "tell."

If you are against vaccines, you are out. Dead, censored, etc. Vaccines are the only issue--too much riding on it.

RFK is playing his role illustrate that what I just said is not true. Nothing will come of him. It's an intricate game, well-strategized and funded for the long term.

Expand full comment
Dakota Grace's avatar

If the IMF likes you it’s no better than the WEF on your side. That doesn’t bode well for Argentina or the world. Possibly just another show and another actor like Zelensky, just with better acting chops.

There is no way the globalists are giving up on their plan to enslave everyone with worldwide socialism, a one world govt., depopulation, etc. Not a chance.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

100%. To look at it with rise colored glasses is just plain stupid…or worse. How he could have written that opens up an entire can of distrusting worms.

Expand full comment
Dakota Grace's avatar

Well it’s either he’s one of them or he was fooled by them, and if the latter, his ego will never allow him to admit it. He did say when he doesn’t know something-medicine and science for that bill-he looks to the experts. I think he may have underestimated the extent of the corruption and pure evil prevalent through the US and world institutions.

I’d like to see an apology tour, an I was wrong admission, but I keep going back to that original plan he had in 2016 to institute a vax safety committee with RFK Jr at the helm and then he’s elected, Pfizer donates to the inauguration events and that plan is nixed.

I’m on the fence, but leaning toward the worst option of the two possibilities.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Yes- and that particular alliance with RFK back in the day tells us he knows plenty about “vaccines” — more than your average anybody. My gut is screaming he’s bought and paid for by pharma. Is it possible pharma is simply just too big to fight? I think it is, at least for now.

Expand full comment
Gram's avatar

I wonder how he will rectify 17 million CV vax deaths?

Expand full comment
Amy's avatar

How is that possible when he still insists they are good and he did the right thing?

Expand full comment
Bitsy54's avatar

I am hoping he is smart enough to know the Pure Bloods that rejected The Shot don’t care who endorses forced medication- we will make up our own minds. BUT the growing number of sheeple who took the shots are still fragile and Trump wants to make sure THOSE people feel comfortable coming to his platform. Just my humble opinion.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

He goes pretty far though, overselling its virtues and not even mentioning the pitfalls, much less the millions of lives killed. There would be a better way, don't you think, if he's just cunningly stringing everyone along?

My guess is that the shots are non-negotiable. You cannot go there--RFK is there to quell the masses and he'll never win. But even if he did, he's been a life-long liberal and will be as bad as Biden/Obama. He'll insist on new safety measures for vaccines and all will be right with the world.

Expand full comment
Donna B's avatar

If he says he was duped and relied on what was told to him they would go after and blame him for all the deaths. He’s in a catch 22. He would be involved in more lawsuits for manslaughter.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Yes, indeed, plus he is credited with OWS--as the originator of the life-saving vaccine. But this is more than just ego. This was part of the palybook. They needed Republicans and Democrats to take the vax--this was the only way. Have Trump deliver it to his people, then have Biden and his goons come in for the rest of them.

Expand full comment
cltwilson1's avatar

I think Mt. Trump is quite appropriate!

There will be space on Mount Rushmore for him in the future.

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

Trump has blood on his hands.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Hadn't even considered that---my fingers did the walking. Your brain did the talking.

Expand full comment
richardw's avatar

I’m sure many of us are experiencing the surreal aspects of the covid op. The numbers don’t lie, the people, outside of the hard core marxists and those who are completely brain dead are not taking the shots. This is a community immune response to a very real disease threat, one which issues not from a tiny bug, but from politicians and commissars and on a level below what can be detected by public expression of outrage that it deserves. People understand that this is a whack a mole game and they will evade as much as possible and hope to somehow get through it, but it remains part of what can be termed the unspeakable-that ongoing horror that cannot be voiced. It may come out from the safety of the voting booth or that too will be suppressed

Expand full comment
richardw's avatar

For more about the term unspeakable read the book “JFK and the unspeakable “

Expand full comment
PermieGeek's avatar

Craziest to me is this is an issue that Marxists should be on board with as they hate corporate corruption.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

It think that is because they only pretend to hate it. If it serves their purpose they don’t care.

Expand full comment
Carole's avatar

Yes, that issue along with calling out the lack and impossibility of a world-wide pandemic. We must ditch the Who.

Expand full comment
Nikki (Gayle) Nicholson's avatar

I agree 200%, the WHO needs to be destroyed/desolved along with the United Nations .

Expand full comment
Kristine's avatar

The UN bldg demolished, the grounds turned into a park and all UN employees/workers with diplomatic immunity status returned to their country of origin

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

Yes, I find that disturbing. How many parents have or are getting their children vaxxed because Trump still endorses them and brags about how many millions of lives have been saved.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I was so glad he brought up Jamie Fox. Everyone loves him. Brings the harms out in the open. Could also have brought up Celine Dion but she’s not as universally loved (I for one don’t care for her music or style).

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

I agree. However, the real big question is how many people will not go R but will go for RFK bc they are dems who feel Med freedom most impt! This is what will determine the election. That and cheating.

Expand full comment