Many argue neither safe nor effective for anyone. It is my view, people are welcome to take experimental drugs or treatments so long as they know it's experimental and the known risks and limitations. Safety and efficacy was largely unknown, yet authority figures and institutions continue to follow the script of "safe and effective".
It's not borderline criminal. It's just criminal. Everyone involved knows about the corruption hiding the true risks and likely deaths and inuries. Everything they did shows a conspiracy to injure and harm.
Good thoughts. The people in the mRNA trials were probably given a thorough informed consent. After EUA, the drug was really almost as unknown and just as risky and they were told "safe and effective" rather than a realistic informed consent.
Risk may be acceptable if it's known and agreed to. Most people had no idea the risk they were taking.
Most people had no idea ... if true that is a loud condemnation of government education. We are surrounded, it seems, by self-absorbed twits who neither can, nor want to, engage reality.
Nor take the time to actually research a questionable product coming out of pharmaceuticals. I did the research when my gut told me to. Then again I have a brain I put to good use.
The fact that little information was given, the rush to administer these shots and the evidence of censorship of any contrary narrative should have been enough red flags for everyone to say no.
Before mandates, I thought uptake would be 60-70% for high risk groups (elderly and comorbidities), 10% for low risk groups and less than 1% for pregnant/breastfeeding women and for children. I was completely wrong, and so saddened once I learned people I knew had already taken it.
The reason I still speak on this issue is because I know more experimental shots/drugs/treatments are underway, in particular for the flu, combo, or a universal shot.
It is totally safe and effective. The manufactures have legal protections so they are "safe" and their bottom lines have been doing great so they are "effective". You just need the proper context.
I wish that everyone in the world could watch this and understand what their governments have done to them. It was a coordinated effort to force this neither safe nor effective "vaccine" on the population at large. Truly a scandal of epic proportions.
Thanks for the link! I tried getting to it from my Microsoft and Google browser and "link was not found". Had to get to it from Duck Duck Go. Censorship at its finest.
You're welcome 😊 I switched to Brave from DDG because auto complete search suggestions seemed filtered in DDG just like with Google. I don't like seeing that. I've been very happy with Brave.
Praying for you and your team 💗🙏🏼💗
Now approaching 500,000 views in just over 4 days:
"Safe and Effective - A Second Opinion" documentary
oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
Please watch and share with at least one other person. It is excellent.
"Safe and effective" no longer means what it is supposed to.
"Safe and effective" still means the same thing to me. People were lied to and provided the "safe and effective" script.
https://leemuller.substack.com/p/safe-and-effective-vs-safe-and-effective
Many argue neither safe nor effective for anyone. It is my view, people are welcome to take experimental drugs or treatments so long as they know it's experimental and the known risks and limitations. Safety and efficacy was largely unknown, yet authority figures and institutions continue to follow the script of "safe and effective".
I would add... and forcing someone else to take an experimental therapy both violates all well established medical ethics and is borderline criminal.
It's not borderline criminal. It's just criminal. Everyone involved knows about the corruption hiding the true risks and likely deaths and inuries. Everything they did shows a conspiracy to injure and harm.
You've got that right. No borderline about any of what's happened and is happening. Pure criminal and evil.
Mandates seek to eliminate the control group which is political mad science
Good thoughts. The people in the mRNA trials were probably given a thorough informed consent. After EUA, the drug was really almost as unknown and just as risky and they were told "safe and effective" rather than a realistic informed consent.
Risk may be acceptable if it's known and agreed to. Most people had no idea the risk they were taking.
Most people had no idea ... if true that is a loud condemnation of government education. We are surrounded, it seems, by self-absorbed twits who neither can, nor want to, engage reality.
Nor take the time to actually research a questionable product coming out of pharmaceuticals. I did the research when my gut told me to. Then again I have a brain I put to good use.
But plenty of time and interest in carefully checking food labels. But pharmaceuticals? No way!
I know, right. And I'm sure we can completely trust those too. 😂
Reality isn't fun. 😐
The fact that little information was given, the rush to administer these shots and the evidence of censorship of any contrary narrative should have been enough red flags for everyone to say no.
That's what you'd think! I figured uptake would top out at no more than 50%. But that was before the mandates.
Should have been more like 25% or less, but there's a lot of low info people out there
Before mandates, I thought uptake would be 60-70% for high risk groups (elderly and comorbidities), 10% for low risk groups and less than 1% for pregnant/breastfeeding women and for children. I was completely wrong, and so saddened once I learned people I knew had already taken it.
The reason I still speak on this issue is because I know more experimental shots/drugs/treatments are underway, in particular for the flu, combo, or a universal shot.
Agree. Also, was dosage/mix of ingredients experimented with and adjusted before they started administering to young children?
https://leemuller.substack.com/p/did-phase-i-of-clinical-trials-which
Yeah, another definition change.
Definition change or:
- erroneous?
- mislabeling?
- false advertisement?
- uniformed consent?
- fraud?
They should change it to "deadly and useless injection", or DUI for short.
I prefer the term “woke poke”
Like everything now. Nothing means as it used to.
It is totally safe and effective. The manufactures have legal protections so they are "safe" and their bottom lines have been doing great so they are "effective". You just need the proper context.
Excellent documentary - well-worth everyone's time!
Let’s multiply this group
Best film I’ve seen on this topic!!! 🙏🏻
I watched & it was heartbreaking. 💔
I wish that everyone in the world could watch this and understand what their governments have done to them. It was a coordinated effort to force this neither safe nor effective "vaccine" on the population at large. Truly a scandal of epic proportions.
Wow! Watched & been sharing too. Thank you!
Excellent but heart-wrenching. Sharing.
Thanks for the link! I tried getting to it from my Microsoft and Google browser and "link was not found". Had to get to it from Duck Duck Go. Censorship at its finest.
You're welcome 😊 I switched to Brave from DDG because auto complete search suggestions seemed filtered in DDG just like with Google. I don't like seeing that. I've been very happy with Brave.
Thanks, great suggestion. I've been meaning to try Brave.
So glad you posted this! Such a well done documentary. Thank you. And thank you to everyone who is helping it spread.