Kennedy to address the nation tomorrow. Kennedy and Children’s Health Defense also now can go forward with the lawsuit against Biden administration for censorship.
Kennedy to address the nation tomorrow. Kennedy and Children’s Health Defense also now can go forward with the lawsuit against Biden administration for censorship.
Kennedy is expected to drop out and endorse Trump. Trump has said he will certainly consider putting RFK Jr. into a cabinet position. Robert Barnes thinks that is the reason the betting markets have switched to favor Trump, more so than the disaster of the DNC.
Did Trump say a "cabinet" position or a position in his administration? There's a difference, and I hope it's the latter. Kennedy is still a far-left liberal.
I respectfully disagree. Remember, some of the far left things you’ve heard were stated when he was perceived as a threat to some of Trump’s votes he does not want to cut up children, he does not want to abolish fossil fuels, He is anti-war machine, and is a constitutional and free speech absolutist. If you are referring to the fact that he is pro-choice, perhaps that is why you think of him as far left. I know that is a huge issue to so many people. But the amount of lives he could save all over the world if he could throw a monkey wrench and bio weapons and gain of function research, as well as getting to the bottom of the poisoning of our people with toxic food, pesticides, and drugs, is hard to even quantify. Remember, one of the biggest problems with the jabs is and fertility, reduced sperm, count, and motility, spontaneous abortions, still births and premature births. Kennedy could help put a stop to that not to mention the fact that turbo Is rising like crazy. And dementia and autism. We spent three times as much on “healthcare” as we do on the military budget. They are also going to try to pull more pandemics on us. Kennedy is invaluable on all of these issues. He has a deep understanding of the science, and the ability to clearly communicate it. That is why corporate media hates him so much.
Medicine’s goose is deeply browned, and RFKJr may be the only way to save what little meat is eatable. A (decidedly leftist) news blog (Medscape) dared run the piece on Kory and Marik, and I was happy to see so many truth tellers come out of the woodwork. Sprinkled of course with the occasional, “wow, there’s a lot of quackadoodles on Medscape today.”
At least 20-1 against them loosing their certification.
Doctors need to band together and leave the allopathic medicine paradigm and all of its Big Pharma controlled medical boards behind.
All of the good medical practitioners that actually heal people have their licenses to practice medicine revoked. Everyone should seek out treatments outside of the Big Pharma drug pushing treadmill that so many people are stuck on.
Loosing (loose) is a great word if aptly used. Loosing an arrow is one example. I wouldn't consider it stupid to misspell lose as it is something of an aberration. We don't pronounce close as "klooz", for example. English is a melange of languages and interesting to study. Even close is pronounced differently depending on the context!
Like you, I also believed in the US Gov for decades, and mostly regarded the CIA taking out RFK as conspiracy theory. Your info, if all facts are true, shows so MUCH circumstantial evidence the CIA has their dirty hands in deep-- contaminating the US political system and wrecking our country.
You do not implicate the WEF but it is hard to imagine it is the CIA, alone.
Had an email exchange with a friend this morning, and told him "[A]s the instant substitution of Kamala (who no one voted for) indicates, the Deepstate's got this and we need not worry our little heads about it."
I do not trust RFK Jr. Remember invitees to his birthday party were required to be covid jabbed to attend. When challenged on this, he blamed his wife! But did not change her policy on the required jabs. I'll never trust him.
A marriage has a different set of dance steps and conditions that apply. Some people, I'm thinking of his wife are governed by their fears and perceived responsibilities.
I can just say, those dance steps can be difficult to master but necessary for the harmony of the relationship.
Im moving toward ethical anarchism more rapidly. no idea if I'll vote at all. consider the government just a branch of the mafia. that said, nobody is going to be perfect. Frederick Douglass — 'I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.'
Good point. If we rise above factions and personality cults, we’ll tap into specific talents and passions and direct them to where they’ll best serve the nation. In the right role, RFKJr could be amazing. Maybe he could dice up HHS, FTC, and DOE and return power to the states. If he’s a statesman, he’ll love working himself out a job.
If we move above factions we have a chance to survive the globalist agenda - they who purposefully and skillfully manufacture factions. sad to see us leaping into their trap
Anyone who supports global warming, or cooling, or climate change or anything else these evil people want to call it cannot be taken seriously. It is a created crisis to change global wealth and power, FULL STOP. The idea that any "scientist" TM can say they have a clue on what is going on with climate on a massive planet, rotating on a weather causing tilted axis, with a sun and moon which has profound impact on it's weather, while it is also traveling around the sun on an annual 550 MILLION MILE trip through the cosmos, and has been doing this for millions and millions of years with all matter of naturally occurring climate change has been smoking way too much weed, hash, cocaine, LSD, sniffing their chemical concoctions, etc etc. These "scientists" TM are like pollsters, liars paid to sell a narrative supporting an agenda.
Climate change has been clearly and soundly debunked more times than brandon has had his depends changed (that's a lot) and kakala has nauseatingly cackled and yet, for power and money, the corrupt criminals will never give it up. And a small number of loud mouth indoctrinated loons support the insanity.
Our world's climate changes profoundly over a 100 degrees in a year in many places in the world and yet these buffoons are going to tell us a 2 degree change in a 100 years will kill off humanity. Insanity and its why fools like AOC and that dimwit delusional child greta "How dare you" thunberg are allowed to "lead" the charge.
environmental issues - clean water, air, healthy soil, healthy food - are where he's at with environmental issues, not on CO2 mania. It could be good to listen to recent interviews with him.
Think of this way: Children's Health Defense makes Kennedy the enemy of Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food, Big Tech, Big Med, Big Banks, and the other Big whatevers that I'm too lazy to think about.
Kennedy would fit in perfectly with the Trump administration based on the enemies list.
But Kathy, is he the only one who could do that? Isn't there a principled Republican--like maybe one of our Red State AGs--who could do just as well without RFK's baggage?
"as well as getting to the bottom of the poisoning of our people with toxic food, pesticides, and drugs, is hard to even quantify. Remember, one of the biggest problems with the jabs is and fertility, reduced sperm, count, and motility, spontaneous abortions, still births and premature births. Kennedy could help put a stop to that not to mention the fact that turbo Is rising like crazy. "
Long Video on Tucker a night or two ago as he hosted the Means (Calley & Casey, Stanford MD grads) who roasted the entire Medical/Food/Pharma Industrial Complexes. Worth a listen if you're so inclined.
He's really not. He was, but judging by his words he's no longer. I listened to his interview with Elon Musk a year ago or so and honestly he sounded to the right of Trump. At any rate, we do know he's solid on medical tyranny and deep state\CIA issues. His view of gay marriage albeit wrong has no bearing on what he would be tasked with doing in a Trump admin.
My personal feelings aside, and likewise my distaste of “two daddy’s” children’s books, how can those of us on the freedom side continue to want discriminate against gays having the legal protections of marriage? ( /r. I know what the Bible says). Going out on a shaky limb here, but there’s a pretty good chance that “we” may have contributed to at least some of the gender issues with “our” hormone disrupters. And might I add that gays have served honorably in our military for decades, well before this politicization of gender.
No reason for gays to marry. They cannot produce children and already had the option of legalizing their financial and social contract via civil unions.
Yes. Marriage is a sacrament. The union of a man and woman to procreate and bring children into the world. Gay “marriage” mocks the sacrament which was the entire point. I was for civil unions which was the way to handle it but no they had to go all the way.
I disagree. Marriage is a spiritual union designed by God and it is the inseparable joining of two souls so that the man and wife become one. This spiritual union actually has nothing to do with government or law other than that the governing authority should be respectful of God’s design and recognize marriage as such. Marriage between a man and a woman is, however, so profitable to a nation/culture/society that many nations protect and promote it through legal incentives/moral disincentives.
20The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found.
21So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he slept, He took one of the man’s ribs and closed up the area with flesh. 22And from the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man, He made a woman and brought her to him. 23And the man said:
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for out of man she was taken.”
24For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
I’m glad you asked! Note, if one does not believe that the Bible is the Word of God, in written, infallible, and perfectly preserved form, then any arguments from it are perhaps not particularly convincing. Likewise, if one is happy to consume some modern paraphrases that claim to be “The Bible” but are simply muddy waters, one may not even be able to find these following verses or word studies.
But in the King James Bible,
Genesis 1:27 “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”
Genesis 2:20-25 (Fla mom kindly shared); vv. 23-24 being particularly salient to this conversation: “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
If you go to a Bible app and enter marriage” (I use the KJB so I can’t vouch for how this shows up in modern translations) into the search bar, you can see a host of verses that describe or prescribe the pattern of marriage that God has set forth. Levitical law describes in detail what is acceptable and not acceptable related to marriage - adultery was a crime worthy of death. (For anyone balking at this, to be fair, ALL sin is crime worthy of death: Romans 6:23 “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” God assigned a heavy earthly price to pay for adultery, due, I believe, to its extreme detriment to the health of families, religious communities and nations. We can see clearly today what happens when you accept a little immorality…then you are expected to celebrate it…then it consumes you and your children…)
For our dispensation in particular, I see God’s instruction through Paul, in 1 Corinthians 7:2 “…to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.”
I Timothy 5:9 describes a widow worthy of being supported by the church as “having been the wife of one man”, I Timothy 3:2-5, 8-12 says bishops and deacons should be “husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.” It seems a simple inference to see that marriage has a hierarchy and a purpose - husbands leading in their homes, and wives loving their husbands and children and obeying their husbands (Titus 2:4-5; “That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”)
For women chafing under the instruction to obey your husband - our culture will put you under obedience to any random dude at the workplace but you chafe at the idea of ONLY having to obey your own husband? I think it is an incredible delight to have ONLY one earthly boss and he is the man who sacrificially loves, serves and provides for his family. Best boss ever.
But I digress, a bit. I hope this helped answer your question, or offer a starting place for your research, Bryan. I have to chase down dinner for my kids (thankfully not literally!) so I may not see future responses but thanks for the question, I appreciate your engagement.
No, I am sorry, but all of that verbiage does not address my question.
Firstly, it starts with an inconsistency. In Genesis 1, a man and a woman are created at once. In Genesis 2, we get the crazy story of Eve being created from Adam's stolen rib.
In any case, husbands and wives are mentioned but it is not defined how they were married.
Lastly, how does your god feel about polygamy?
'King David had at least eight wives. His first two wives were Ahinoam and Abigail, whom he married before he became king of Judah. His next four wives were Maakah, Haggith, Abital, and Eglah, whom he married while he reigned in Hebron for seven and a half years. His most famous wife was Bathsheba, whom he married after he moved his capital to Jerusalem. Each of his wives bore him sons, except for Bathsheba who bore him four sons.'
A man will never be the "husband " of another man. No matter what SCOTUS (incorrectly) states in Obergefell. It should be overturned on the same basis as Roe.
Corruption of marriage is found throughout the Holy Bible which is a historical document. The original couple Adam and Eve were the ideal, but over time, natural man/woman became enemies to God. They were tempted to leave the presence of God and live on their own. Just like today, many feel they don’t need spirituality, faith, or an understanding of the purpose of life to be happy. Or is it they are prideful? Seeking truth through God is not easy, but worthwhile because it is strengthening and ennobling. How unfortunate that we have lost dignity in our society.
It is almost like this god is not omnipotent, omnipresent, and all knowing if puny insignificant humans can just live blissful lives doing as they please pretending this great deity is nonexistent.
Fred, I agree with you, our food supply and the products we use are full of hormone disruptors and cancer causing agents. And gays have been in the military for many years, but may I point out there’s a huge difference between openly trans and gay, and DEI hires and promotions, for example, into our federal government that have made a mockery of gay people.
Being gay in the military is really not the issue. The military on the surface is honorable, but I hate that they use war for profit and our men/women as fodder. There is another very dark side that does secret operations/experiments on it's own and others. We know of a few like Paperclip, but there are operations that do horrific things to children and train them to do horrific things too all for research and spiritual satanic purposes in the high ranks of the military.
If we knew how sinister the world's leadership (and entertainment industries) probably from the beginning, is/was, we would not be able to comprehend or handle it.
2 Corinthians 4:4 In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
IMHO, we can do nothing but pray and trust God. When it is time, God will give us the ability and knowledge we need. It really seems we are in the end times so we must guard our hearts and minds until sin is wiped from the earth.
You know that verse that men will pray for death and will not find it? Death is not the worst that can happen and God tells us to set our minds on higher things. God bless.
"The Constitution isn't a suicide pact," said George Will once, back in the day. Yes, let's pretend that all of human history has been wrong, but we're right, and see how things go. No; that's how we got here. They can have medical and general power of attorney, they can inherit, they can co-own, they can live together, whatever; but they're not married. They had all of the above, sans the 'marriage' status, before the terrible Obergefell Supreme Court opinion, but it wasn't enough, because it's never enough, until our faces are rubbed off in it and we're not allowed to express *our* opinions.
No he didn’t. He said there should be limits but he’s a medical freedom absolutist so that is tricky issue for him. He wants government out of ALL medical decisions.
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sense NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
You're correct. But you've got it backwards - he walked back his statement that abortion should be illegal after viability, and moved to a no restriction position.
To be fair, that was when he was still running for the Democratic nomination, but that's not much of a defense.
I really like RFK, but just propensity to reverse himself is not a great recommendation.
Just trying to call balls and strikes here. Major problem with candidates who "misspeak" and walk it back in the face of pressure.
I always welcome being corrected. But I believe RFK Jr's "whip-lashy" changes of mind and "misspeaking" are even more frequent than you realize.
It's absolutely true that he flip-flopped on abortion from illegality after viability to a "no restriction" policy after pressure from a DEI interviewer. However, within the week, after mounting disgust and outrage from the public, he flip-flopped again. It I find the video, I'll share it.
By the way, I am also a proponent of the Latin Mass. And someone who is thoroughly disillusioned with the nonsense coming out of the Vatican and its anti-Catholic figurehead.
Has he walked back this quote from 2019 stating (in the inverse) that he is FOR mandating medical interventions if . . . " "I don’t think we should be MANDATING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS for unwilling Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping them rather than hurting them." RFK Jr. Oct. 21, 2019
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sesse NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
I wouldn't say he's far left at all, unless you think being pro-choice, which he is reluctantly, far-left. The DNC has been persecuting him because he has more integrity in his little finger than they do as an entire organization. He has never attacked or insulted anyone - including harris or trump - personally. Most of the time he seems to me like the only adult in the room. And I trust his wanting what's best for the country. If that means supporting Trump, than good for him - and for Trump. I'd love to see him head up the HHS or - hahaha - the CIA.
I, too believe Kennedy is far left. I watched an interview he did where he stated his position on a lot of issues and found him to be too far left for my liking. I cannot remember who he interviewed with and I really wish I could find it. Just like Cackle Harris, I feel like he’s trying to appear more moderate in order to appeal to more voters. That’s just my opinion, though.
He was interviewed on Epoch Times and his positions were far left and if you go to his campaign website, those positions are spelled out. Definitely left of center and the only common ground I probably share is anti-vaccination. I did appreciate his Documentary: "The Real Anthony Fauci." (The system kept changing to anti-tax rather than vax.)
He is full-on about making corporate polluters pay to clean up their messes. A clean environment is his priority. He has been vocally AGAINST obsessing about carbon emissions—the central focus of the climate change fear-mongers. He believes in ending all government subsidies to industries (including fossil fuels) so that market forces alone dictate the costs/prices of energy, etc.. He's a radical capitalist, not a Leftist.
Yes, that was years ago. He changes his views and stances based on new information. He believes polluters are the biggest environmental hazard and he is wholly against technocratic climate change "solutions" embodied by anti-liberty autocrats like the WEF.
I don’t trust him and don’t want him in a position where he can damage our country any further or throw a monkey wrench into Trump’s administration. We had enough issues the first term.
Actually it seems a bit more murky than that... "members of the Kennedy campaign" confirmed to WaPo and others that he was trying to meet with Kamala to make a deal, but then the next day he posted a tweet denying that he was ever considering it.
Could be "his campaign" did it without asking him first. Or "members of the campaign" who wanted to undermine him. Or perhaps he really did for his own reasons, but denied after backlash. I sure don't know the guy to be able to say!
And if he doesn’t choose to drop out and endorse Trump, has he created more of a ‘Trump-like, but because of lofty principles must continue on, so vote for me because of the nobleness of my sacrifice’ perception?
If it’s true that Trump has teased a position in his administration and R.F.K., Jr. is out there saying he’s been promised a cabinet position, that’s very problematic. If R.F.K., Jr. is negotiating, offering his voters in exchange for a cabinet position and Trump doesn’t trust him for that and says, no, what then?
What if it is a matter of how to most damage Trump; as an inside obstacle or a vote splitter?
The drama has been created. Everyone is watching and waiting.
I don't know for sure. He said something on CNN recently. Probably a position in his administration. Barnes thinks Kennedy would be interested in heading up Health and Human Services which would make sense. People have also mentioned AG but that makes no sense to me, except as a tribute to Jr.'s father.
As AG he could go after ALL the corruption, in and out of government. Think of all the crony corporatism that has sabotaged the American dream and our health and wellbeing. He could go after corporations AND the three-letter agencies that are corrupting our system.
Do you believe everything you hear? Why wouldn’t he seek to create that perception if indeed he is a plant?
Why did he record his phone conversation with DJT, then leak it, then deny knowing how it got leaked?
Anyone can say anything. It’s their actions that count.
I hope his announcement tomorrow is not a disappointment in which he declares that for the future good of government, he needs to push through with creating a third party.
WS, Sundance's 'proof' that RFK talked to Kamala about a Cabinet position is . . . the WaPo. Sourced to a couple of people in the Kennedy campaign, but Nicole Shanahan said the Dems had put ringers into their campaign staff. And sometimes I think that Sundance is Q for people who can somehow read his lengthy tomes every day. He seems to claim to be the only person who knows a lot of semi-hidden esoteric information and how to link it all together into, I don't know, his material.
I’ve read his lengthy tomes since the beginning of the Obama campaign back in 2007. I’ve seen him call out people that no one else was noticing and seen him be correct over and over again. (Mike Pence, for a more recent example, but it has happened multiple times. I think he has a very superior understanding of how government is working now and how the dots are connected.
He does analysis, not ‘drive by reporting’. It takes more effort to follow him, but I find it well worth the effort. And by and by that seemingly semi-hidden esoteric information becomes quite clear.
That is my experience and perception in regards to Sundance.
Here are some other sources to the story; Fox News among them and the N.Y. Post. There were many, many other links, but I got tired of copying them. (Sorry, they didn’t copy as links from my Notes, but they should be easy to find. I use Duck, Duck, Go.)
RFK Jr. Sought a Meeting With Kamala Harris to Discuss a Cabinet Post - The New York Times
RFK Jr. Tried To Meet With Kamala Harris About Cabinet: Report | HuffPost Latest News
RFK Jr. says he has "no plans" to endorse Harris after reports he tried to discuss admin job
RFK Jr. sought meeting with Kamala Harris to discuss cabinet job in exchange for endorsement
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sought meeting with Kamala Harris for Cabinet job
RFK Jr. tried to set up meeting with Kamala Harris to discuss Cabinet role
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to meet with Kamala Harris to discuss Cabinet job
RFK Jr. Sought Meeting With Kamala Harris To Discuss Cabinet Position and Endorsement: Report
RFK Jr. reached out to Harris campaign about administration role in exchange for endorsement | CNN Politics
RFK Jr. Is Begging His Opponents for a Job
RFK asked Harris for cabinet position in exchange for dropping out: report | Fox News
Similar, I find SD to be generally pretty perceptive - if perhaps a bit prone to attributing motivations, and not hedging his opinions at all such that the result often comes off rather "black-pilly" (I don't think that's his intention per se, just that he seems like more a "facts don't care about your feelings" kind of guy).
So his takes on the observable effects are good (Kennedy running takes votes away from trump), but his takes on the motives might warrant a grain of salt (Kennedy doing it on purpose to hurt Trump / benefit the IC / whatever).
I'm paying close attention to thiis matter and never heard Trump say "cabinet" position. But that is what RFK Jr was peddling in exchange for his endorsement.
Kennedy demonstrated a lot of courage in writing "The Real Anthony Fauci" and telling the truth about our corrupt public "health care" and their bed partners in Pharma. He exposed them all and the proof it was 100% facts and truth is that not one damn person sued him. I'd be all in on him if he would abandon abortion and turn 100% pro life. But without that, it bothers me he would lead a "public health" agency.
I think if he was given very strict marching orders with clear left and right limits and reporting requirements, he has insider knowledge which could really help clean out the deep disaster people like the human cockroach Fauci and the walking crime against humanity bill gates have brought down on the world.
I don't understand what you are saying. 6 days ago, after WaPo claimed this, he refuted that he was asking for a cabinet position, but asked for a meeting for another reason. Now, one can believe WaPo or RFK JR as they wish, but to claim he did ask for a posittion when it is a he said, she said situation is not accurate. If you want to believe that, it is your right, but it's not a proven fact.
"That's fake news. I didn't ask Kamala Harris for a Cabinet position but I've reached out to all the candidates. I've met with some," Kennedy told guests during his "TikTok Town Hall" live-streamed event.
Any person with a personal agenda/vendetta can become single-issue focused and lose sight of the broader mission. RFK Jr, if he is in Trump’s Cabinet, will need to get out from behind the microscope.
Not cabinet, admin. I think he should be Trump's Chief of Staff. Trump needs people around him who are serious people to keep him in line. JD Vance and RFK are serious men. Trump keeps going off the reservation into silliness, like that whole thing with "I'm prettier than Kamala".
He's trying to bring levity to an otherwise terrible, scary potential outcome. It's not silly. It's the need to laugh at the total stupidity and debauchery that is the current dnc.
Trump needs no "keeping him in line" - he needs staff which will provide honest, legitimate, alternate courses of action on key issues - he will make the right decision. What he doesn't need is more deep state operatives and I think he learned that lesson well in his first term. If you think he needs to be kept in line, you've been watching too much MSDNC.
Hearing anyone talk about having a one on one with Trump, he always wants to hear their opinion on topics, doesn’t matter who they are. I think that’s a good quality.
Read my comment again Dan. "Trump needs no "keeping him in line" - he needs staff which will provide honest, legitimate, alternate courses of action on key issues...". This is precisely what I was saying. Staff providing what you list would be keeping him in line and on mission and message.
No FGB what you said was "keeping him in line". If you've ever been a leader then you know that is far, far different from having a staff which provides recommendations, alternative courses of action, and then ACTS PROMPTLY and DECISIVELY based on the bosses decision. Keeping him in line means he is unable to make sound decisions, kinda like Brandon, Kakala, Obama and all the others run by the global corporate marxists. As you can see from his 2016 to 2020 successes, he ran things remarkably well, and accomplished many many great things for the Citizens and the Country, in spite of having a "staff" of deep state operatives which sought to undermine him at every turn, Pence being one of the many scumbags. You may not like his messaging, I thought it was spot on and exposed the deep state and the government wide corruption for the first time so that the people could see what the hell "our" government has been doing to us.
They stole 2020 from us, they stole 2022 from us and now they are set to steal 2024, Trump is really our only hope to turn it around, and he will, if we can overcome their treasonous election manipulation.
Somebody needs to rein in the FDA and the USDA with respect to both Pharma and food freedom. RFK Jr. has been concerned for years about the dangers of vaccines to children and was against the Covid vax. I think he would be wasted as chief of staff.
Precisely correct, Willing! Everything he has done has been to expose their abuse of the American People, the true Sovereigns of the country. He will return our sovereignty. I'm not certain but perhaps FGB3 is a never trumper trying to undermine Trump and us.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Yours is, "What you consider ‘silliness’ is very strategically done. President Trump does not need helpers to keep him in line". So Will what are YOUR credentials? I mean really! How self-righteous!
I am able to have admiration for someone who has accomplished what Donald Trump has accomplished in his lifetime. He is a giant of a man. What is wrong with you that you can’t appreciate that level of greatness?
I know I don’t have the credentials to give advice to anyone with that level of success.
There is nothing "wrong with me" Will. I never said anything about Trump's greatness or lack of greatness. These are all things you are manufacturing. You are being very defensive over nothing. His success prior to being president is not at issue.
I will say that I find him not being as serious as he should be right now. This country is in serious trouble. Sometimes I see him as not exhibiting constancy of awareness of this situation. Trump just cannot resist the temptation, many times, to be careful of his words and actions. And this is just who he is.
That is why I say he needs some folks around him who can balance out his tendencies to lose track of what needs to be said and done. He didn't have that in his first administration. He had villains around him.
I can point out one instance in which he just could not keep his eye on the ball. That was when Sidney Powell, Mike Flynn and Patrick Byrne were so worried about Trump not getting good advice on the election steal, that they "crashed" the White House one night in December 2020. They laid out what he ought to do and he liked that, and then the next thing you know he didn't follow thru on it.
This was all part of the plan. But, the real race starts today as Jeff said! She just screwed herself by accepting the nomination last night. Something about the Delegates.
Absolutely unbelievable the comments of vax defenders. I was going to reply to the first one I read and realized it was a usless waste of time, there are so many and they are so brainwashed and propagandized.
Thanks a lot! I don't normally comment on X but I saw some stupid replies and OF COURSE couldn't keep my fingers shut. Luckily I will never see their replies!
Seems like it. Same with RFK. People judge both of them by views held years ago yet don't hold that same standard regarding Trump's past views. People who aren't zombies (most Democrats) change (become more conservative) as we get older. Many don't! Some do
Vaxx-washing; Not a single Vaxx-hesitant Biden Voter would have taken a shot in 2020 or after as they wouldn't trust a Trump Vaccine... BUT, the Day after Biden was coronated by media as winning the Election, and the narrative shifted 180 degrees, THEY ALL WANTED to be the FIRST to get the Virus-stopping safe and effective Shots..so much so that the Dem Media was decrying the "Vaxx deserts" of communities of color suffering from the SHORTAGE of avail. jab juice, and how Unfair it was that all the White Liberal Suburban Moms, their 10 year olds, their embryos, and Grandmas were getting all the recommended doses without hinderance while CoVid was killing thousands of Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Migrants in the shadows due to systemic institutional racism ( Not Biden's nor Democrats' FAULT ).
Oh those wonderful shots and boosters...that keep on working.
I was at the doctor's office today for quarterly blood work. I overheard the nurses talking. and apparently, just about the entire staff, most doctors as well, recently had covid.
My doctor said that they have been extremely busy with sick people...Yes, it is going around again (south Florida) and being that it is here to stay, Big Pharm will keep tricking and scaring the sheep into getting those boosters.
Aww, come on... Don't you know there's a new and improved vaccine available now for the most recent variants? Don't be the last on your block to get one - they're all the rage!
It’s crazy isn’t it? Can’t they think for themselves? I understand why the people in power shifted the narrative since it was all about gaining more power and money.
It's as if the Big (p)HARMyA-Political-Military-Media-Depopulation-Profiteering Complex was immediately ushered in to seamlessly, smoothly assure Harris-Biden and ALL Dumbocrats that the "Trump" Vaxxes HAD TO go out with their full throated approval and without hesitation to ensure Operations were unhindered and without a hiccup or adverse reaction. They then labelled all the Election Denying MAGA Nuts as being Vaxxiphobic and anti-science and a threat to both democracy and normalcy and everyone else's health and safety. Could've easily named it: Operation 180-Max-Vaxx
I am sort of surprised that she got the shots because I thought she had a vax injured child....maybe my information was bad--not surprising as I really didn't read much about her other than she supported CHD. Maybe her reason is her own injury...
The discussion is about how having Rober Kennedy Jr endorse him and be on Trumps staff would significantly help the vote. Rand Paul, though an excellent Dr, wouldn't have that benefit.
The discussion I responded to was about Shanahan and she is not qualified as assistant HHS. And Trump isn't giving RFK jr anything before the election. He will consider it. Period. I think there is a place for him but not a cabinet position. People tend to get ahead of their horse.
It’s better to watch on Tuckercarlsonnetwork because there will be less commercials and no blacked out censoring bits, which they do a lot in the YouTube version.
Actually No! I haven’t paid a dime and I watch most of his longer interviews with ease. He has some specials that maybe only subscribers get, and some are early released to subscribers first, and then available to everyone a few days later. The kinds like these are too important to keep behind a paywall. He’s gracious. And he is doing fine. Whenever I am able to financially support him I will out of gratitude. I just select from his drop down menu “see all” and then they are listed by most recent. In two months I’ve only ever come across one that I wanted to see that was for subscribers only.
Kennedy to address the nation tomorrow. Kennedy and Children’s Health Defense also now can go forward with the lawsuit against Biden administration for censorship.
Kennedy is expected to drop out and endorse Trump. Trump has said he will certainly consider putting RFK Jr. into a cabinet position. Robert Barnes thinks that is the reason the betting markets have switched to favor Trump, more so than the disaster of the DNC.
Did Trump say a "cabinet" position or a position in his administration? There's a difference, and I hope it's the latter. Kennedy is still a far-left liberal.
I respectfully disagree. Remember, some of the far left things you’ve heard were stated when he was perceived as a threat to some of Trump’s votes he does not want to cut up children, he does not want to abolish fossil fuels, He is anti-war machine, and is a constitutional and free speech absolutist. If you are referring to the fact that he is pro-choice, perhaps that is why you think of him as far left. I know that is a huge issue to so many people. But the amount of lives he could save all over the world if he could throw a monkey wrench and bio weapons and gain of function research, as well as getting to the bottom of the poisoning of our people with toxic food, pesticides, and drugs, is hard to even quantify. Remember, one of the biggest problems with the jabs is and fertility, reduced sperm, count, and motility, spontaneous abortions, still births and premature births. Kennedy could help put a stop to that not to mention the fact that turbo Is rising like crazy. And dementia and autism. We spent three times as much on “healthcare” as we do on the military budget. They are also going to try to pull more pandemics on us. Kennedy is invaluable on all of these issues. He has a deep understanding of the science, and the ability to clearly communicate it. That is why corporate media hates him so much.
Yes I would be THRILLED to have him at the helm of HHS and to be able to bring in others from CHD to back him up!! Very exciting times!!!
Medicine’s goose is deeply browned, and RFKJr may be the only way to save what little meat is eatable. A (decidedly leftist) news blog (Medscape) dared run the piece on Kory and Marik, and I was happy to see so many truth tellers come out of the woodwork. Sprinkled of course with the occasional, “wow, there’s a lot of quackadoodles on Medscape today.”
At least 20-1 against them loosing their certification.
Doctors need to band together and leave the allopathic medicine paradigm and all of its Big Pharma controlled medical boards behind.
All of the good medical practitioners that actually heal people have their licenses to practice medicine revoked. Everyone should seek out treatments outside of the Big Pharma drug pushing treadmill that so many people are stuck on.
I’m a huge fan of the FARMacy, and eschew big pHARMa
Same here. I have not taken even an aspirin in 20 years.
I have never had a prescription for a drug.
*losing, not "loosing." (sic)
Losing rhymes with "boozing," which is what I do when people misspell "lose."
Bottoms up!
Retired to my home bar - refreshed my Mule, and listening to America's "History - Greatest Hits" on my turntable.
(I know, I know - their lyrics are almost as stupid as folks who's can't spell "lose.")
Life's good, but imma hafta start reading C&C later in the afternoon. It's unseemly for a man with my gravitas to be drinking so early. Lol
Loosing (loose) is a great word if aptly used. Loosing an arrow is one example. I wouldn't consider it stupid to misspell lose as it is something of an aberration. We don't pronounce close as "klooz", for example. English is a melange of languages and interesting to study. Even close is pronounced differently depending on the context!
"Hey denty!"
"Hey denty!"
I see what you did they're. 😉
Fred, I read your bio and info on CIA.
Like you, I also believed in the US Gov for decades, and mostly regarded the CIA taking out RFK as conspiracy theory. Your info, if all facts are true, shows so MUCH circumstantial evidence the CIA has their dirty hands in deep-- contaminating the US political system and wrecking our country.
You do not implicate the WEF but it is hard to imagine it is the CIA, alone.
Thanks for the comment.
Had an email exchange with a friend this morning, and told him "[A]s the instant substitution of Kamala (who no one voted for) indicates, the Deepstate's got this and we need not worry our little heads about it."
He's been far left on environmental issues for years. As far as I know, he's never denied that he believes in global warming. Keep him out of the EPA.
pretty singlehandedly cleaned up the hudson and has fought for clean air and water (and food and medications) that's what bothers you?
No. It's his stance on global warming.
Perhaps he's moderated a little bit since, but this was unfortunate:
https://theweek.com/speedreads/445746/robert-f-kennedy-jr-wants-law-punish-global-warming-skeptics
I do not trust RFK Jr. Remember invitees to his birthday party were required to be covid jabbed to attend. When challenged on this, he blamed his wife! But did not change her policy on the required jabs. I'll never trust him.
Doesn't surprise me. Wife is an actress. Hollywood. Ugh.
oh for heaven's sake.
Jabbed or they were asked to test. He didn’t take it.
Source?
Kennedy himself, defending his wife's decision which supposedly conflicted with his own stance on covid jabs. How do you trust someone Iike that?
A marriage has a different set of dance steps and conditions that apply. Some people, I'm thinking of his wife are governed by their fears and perceived responsibilities.
I can just say, those dance steps can be difficult to master but necessary for the harmony of the relationship.
that's from 2015. dont know about you but I've changed a LOT since then. current stance
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/19/biden-trump-climate-voters-rfk-jr-00153471
Im moving toward ethical anarchism more rapidly. no idea if I'll vote at all. consider the government just a branch of the mafia. that said, nobody is going to be perfect. Frederick Douglass — 'I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.'
‘Ethical Anarchism’? Be careful what you wish for. Whose ethics?
mine.
Well, for my sake, I hope they’re at least somewhat similar to mine.
Good point. If we rise above factions and personality cults, we’ll tap into specific talents and passions and direct them to where they’ll best serve the nation. In the right role, RFKJr could be amazing. Maybe he could dice up HHS, FTC, and DOE and return power to the states. If he’s a statesman, he’ll love working himself out a job.
If we move above factions we have a chance to survive the globalist agenda - they who purposefully and skillfully manufacture factions. sad to see us leaping into their trap
Anyone who supports global warming, or cooling, or climate change or anything else these evil people want to call it cannot be taken seriously. It is a created crisis to change global wealth and power, FULL STOP. The idea that any "scientist" TM can say they have a clue on what is going on with climate on a massive planet, rotating on a weather causing tilted axis, with a sun and moon which has profound impact on it's weather, while it is also traveling around the sun on an annual 550 MILLION MILE trip through the cosmos, and has been doing this for millions and millions of years with all matter of naturally occurring climate change has been smoking way too much weed, hash, cocaine, LSD, sniffing their chemical concoctions, etc etc. These "scientists" TM are like pollsters, liars paid to sell a narrative supporting an agenda.
Climate change has been clearly and soundly debunked more times than brandon has had his depends changed (that's a lot) and kakala has nauseatingly cackled and yet, for power and money, the corrupt criminals will never give it up. And a small number of loud mouth indoctrinated loons support the insanity.
Our world's climate changes profoundly over a 100 degrees in a year in many places in the world and yet these buffoons are going to tell us a 2 degree change in a 100 years will kill off humanity. Insanity and its why fools like AOC and that dimwit delusional child greta "How dare you" thunberg are allowed to "lead" the charge.
environmental issues - clean water, air, healthy soil, healthy food - are where he's at with environmental issues, not on CO2 mania. It could be good to listen to recent interviews with him.
RFK jr has fought against dams. You like electricity and irrigation for crops? He flip flops on abortion and says “more choices fewer abortions,” whatever that means? He is for racial reparations which is unconstitutional. How about his anti-fracking agenda: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/rfk-jr-says-ban-fracking-10-point-plan-tackle-plastics-pollution
Good to hear that!
Think of this way: Children's Health Defense makes Kennedy the enemy of Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food, Big Tech, Big Med, Big Banks, and the other Big whatevers that I'm too lazy to think about.
Kennedy would fit in perfectly with the Trump administration based on the enemies list.
Doctors might be the most important issue, because now they are literally killing us, taking our lives with their tyranny.
RFK 👏🏻is way out in front on that issue!👏🏻
But Kathy, is he the only one who could do that? Isn't there a principled Republican--like maybe one of our Red State AGs--who could do just as well without RFK's baggage?
Excellent point, T Kosse.
Here is the latest pandemic they're already pushing . FOOD !
https://phys.org/news/2024-08-pandemic-animals.html#google_vignette
You have forgotten RFK Jr's far left climate agenda.
How do you define far left climate agenda? and would love to see your sources.
This is called trolling. Or perhaps worse: willful ignorance of information in the public domain.
Protecting our planet from corporate pollution is actually a good thing.
"as well as getting to the bottom of the poisoning of our people with toxic food, pesticides, and drugs, is hard to even quantify. Remember, one of the biggest problems with the jabs is and fertility, reduced sperm, count, and motility, spontaneous abortions, still births and premature births. Kennedy could help put a stop to that not to mention the fact that turbo Is rising like crazy. "
Long Video on Tucker a night or two ago as he hosted the Means (Calley & Casey, Stanford MD grads) who roasted the entire Medical/Food/Pharma Industrial Complexes. Worth a listen if you're so inclined.
https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-casey-calley-means
"How Big Pharma Keeps You Sick"
He's really not. He was, but judging by his words he's no longer. I listened to his interview with Elon Musk a year ago or so and honestly he sounded to the right of Trump. At any rate, we do know he's solid on medical tyranny and deep state\CIA issues. His view of gay marriage albeit wrong has no bearing on what he would be tasked with doing in a Trump admin.
My personal feelings aside, and likewise my distaste of “two daddy’s” children’s books, how can those of us on the freedom side continue to want discriminate against gays having the legal protections of marriage? ( /r. I know what the Bible says). Going out on a shaky limb here, but there’s a pretty good chance that “we” may have contributed to at least some of the gender issues with “our” hormone disrupters. And might I add that gays have served honorably in our military for decades, well before this politicization of gender.
No reason for gays to marry. They cannot produce children and already had the option of legalizing their financial and social contract via civil unions.
Yes. Marriage is a sacrament. The union of a man and woman to procreate and bring children into the world. Gay “marriage” mocks the sacrament which was the entire point. I was for civil unions which was the way to handle it but no they had to go all the way.
And it happened just like that, I remember.
Many heterosexual couples never have children.
Marriage is a legal contract between two people.
It has everything to do with the state, and nothing to do with religion.
There are many legal and property rights reasons for people to want
to be married.
I disagree. Marriage is a spiritual union designed by God and it is the inseparable joining of two souls so that the man and wife become one. This spiritual union actually has nothing to do with government or law other than that the governing authority should be respectful of God’s design and recognize marriage as such. Marriage between a man and a woman is, however, so profitable to a nation/culture/society that many nations protect and promote it through legal incentives/moral disincentives.
Where have you seen this god's design for marriage outlined?
Bryan, Genesis 2:20-24
20The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found.
21So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he slept, He took one of the man’s ribs and closed up the area with flesh. 22And from the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man, He made a woman and brought her to him. 23And the man said:
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for out of man she was taken.”
24For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
How is marriage defined in that passage?
Bryan,
I’m glad you asked! Note, if one does not believe that the Bible is the Word of God, in written, infallible, and perfectly preserved form, then any arguments from it are perhaps not particularly convincing. Likewise, if one is happy to consume some modern paraphrases that claim to be “The Bible” but are simply muddy waters, one may not even be able to find these following verses or word studies.
But in the King James Bible,
Genesis 1:27 “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”
Genesis 2:20-25 (Fla mom kindly shared); vv. 23-24 being particularly salient to this conversation: “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
If you go to a Bible app and enter marriage” (I use the KJB so I can’t vouch for how this shows up in modern translations) into the search bar, you can see a host of verses that describe or prescribe the pattern of marriage that God has set forth. Levitical law describes in detail what is acceptable and not acceptable related to marriage - adultery was a crime worthy of death. (For anyone balking at this, to be fair, ALL sin is crime worthy of death: Romans 6:23 “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” God assigned a heavy earthly price to pay for adultery, due, I believe, to its extreme detriment to the health of families, religious communities and nations. We can see clearly today what happens when you accept a little immorality…then you are expected to celebrate it…then it consumes you and your children…)
For our dispensation in particular, I see God’s instruction through Paul, in 1 Corinthians 7:2 “…to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.”
I Timothy 5:9 describes a widow worthy of being supported by the church as “having been the wife of one man”, I Timothy 3:2-5, 8-12 says bishops and deacons should be “husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.” It seems a simple inference to see that marriage has a hierarchy and a purpose - husbands leading in their homes, and wives loving their husbands and children and obeying their husbands (Titus 2:4-5; “That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”)
For women chafing under the instruction to obey your husband - our culture will put you under obedience to any random dude at the workplace but you chafe at the idea of ONLY having to obey your own husband? I think it is an incredible delight to have ONLY one earthly boss and he is the man who sacrificially loves, serves and provides for his family. Best boss ever.
But I digress, a bit. I hope this helped answer your question, or offer a starting place for your research, Bryan. I have to chase down dinner for my kids (thankfully not literally!) so I may not see future responses but thanks for the question, I appreciate your engagement.
No, I am sorry, but all of that verbiage does not address my question.
Firstly, it starts with an inconsistency. In Genesis 1, a man and a woman are created at once. In Genesis 2, we get the crazy story of Eve being created from Adam's stolen rib.
In any case, husbands and wives are mentioned but it is not defined how they were married.
Lastly, how does your god feel about polygamy?
'King David had at least eight wives. His first two wives were Ahinoam and Abigail, whom he married before he became king of Judah. His next four wives were Maakah, Haggith, Abital, and Eglah, whom he married while he reigned in Hebron for seven and a half years. His most famous wife was Bathsheba, whom he married after he moved his capital to Jerusalem. Each of his wives bore him sons, except for Bathsheba who bore him four sons.'
And those same property property rights are protected by civil unions. Marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman.
By what authority?
Can you cite a definition of 'marriage' from your bible.
From my reading, a marriage in the bible amounts to a suitor
and the girl's father negotiating a purchase price.
This would obviously be considered misogynistic by modern values.
A man will never be the "husband " of another man. No matter what SCOTUS (incorrectly) states in Obergefell. It should be overturned on the same basis as Roe.
Why?
Corruption of marriage is found throughout the Holy Bible which is a historical document. The original couple Adam and Eve were the ideal, but over time, natural man/woman became enemies to God. They were tempted to leave the presence of God and live on their own. Just like today, many feel they don’t need spirituality, faith, or an understanding of the purpose of life to be happy. Or is it they are prideful? Seeking truth through God is not easy, but worthwhile because it is strengthening and ennobling. How unfortunate that we have lost dignity in our society.
It is almost like this god is not omnipotent, omnipresent, and all knowing if puny insignificant humans can just live blissful lives doing as they please pretending this great deity is nonexistent.
Fred, I agree with you, our food supply and the products we use are full of hormone disruptors and cancer causing agents. And gays have been in the military for many years, but may I point out there’s a huge difference between openly trans and gay, and DEI hires and promotions, for example, into our federal government that have made a mockery of gay people.
Being gay in the military is really not the issue. The military on the surface is honorable, but I hate that they use war for profit and our men/women as fodder. There is another very dark side that does secret operations/experiments on it's own and others. We know of a few like Paperclip, but there are operations that do horrific things to children and train them to do horrific things too all for research and spiritual satanic purposes in the high ranks of the military.
If we knew how sinister the world's leadership (and entertainment industries) probably from the beginning, is/was, we would not be able to comprehend or handle it.
2 Corinthians 4:4 In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
Absolutely stunning quotation!
Thanks. We can only put bandaids on the evil.
IMHO, we can do nothing but pray and trust God. When it is time, God will give us the ability and knowledge we need. It really seems we are in the end times so we must guard our hearts and minds until sin is wiped from the earth.
You know that verse that men will pray for death and will not find it? Death is not the worst that can happen and God tells us to set our minds on higher things. God bless.
Because homosex is a disgusting and unmentionable perversion that was illegal throughout human history until 5 seconds ago and should be again.
"The Constitution isn't a suicide pact," said George Will once, back in the day. Yes, let's pretend that all of human history has been wrong, but we're right, and see how things go. No; that's how we got here. They can have medical and general power of attorney, they can inherit, they can co-own, they can live together, whatever; but they're not married. They had all of the above, sans the 'marriage' status, before the terrible Obergefell Supreme Court opinion, but it wasn't enough, because it's never enough, until our faces are rubbed off in it and we're not allowed to express *our* opinions.
He recently said he supports abortion through the ninth month. I hate that about him. 😑
No he didn’t. He said there should be limits but he’s a medical freedom absolutist so that is tricky issue for him. He wants government out of ALL medical decisions.
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sense NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
You're correct. But you've got it backwards - he walked back his statement that abortion should be illegal after viability, and moved to a no restriction position.
To be fair, that was when he was still running for the Democratic nomination, but that's not much of a defense.
I really like RFK, but just propensity to reverse himself is not a great recommendation.
Just trying to call balls and strikes here. Major problem with candidates who "misspeak" and walk it back in the face of pressure.
I always welcome being corrected. But I believe RFK Jr's "whip-lashy" changes of mind and "misspeaking" are even more frequent than you realize.
It's absolutely true that he flip-flopped on abortion from illegality after viability to a "no restriction" policy after pressure from a DEI interviewer. However, within the week, after mounting disgust and outrage from the public, he flip-flopped again. It I find the video, I'll share it.
By the way, I am also a proponent of the Latin Mass. And someone who is thoroughly disillusioned with the nonsense coming out of the Vatican and its anti-Catholic figurehead.
It's hard to describe how completely demoralizing politics is.
I've turned from that to loving the Mass more and more, though, at the same time watching the antipope and the V2 sect with increasing alarm.
Stay confessed my friend.
Thanks for the comment.
Has he walked back this quote from 2019 stating (in the inverse) that he is FOR mandating medical interventions if . . . " "I don’t think we should be MANDATING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS for unwilling Americans UNLESS we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping them rather than hurting them." RFK Jr. Oct. 21, 2019
JFK Jr did say that live on camera. That he supported legal abortion "through the 9th month." That it was "entirely the woman's decision."
After a HUGE public outrage in the days that followed, he "changed his mind." What's to say he won't "change his mind" again once he gets political power? He's not to be trusted. Either you have the moral sesse NOT to kill a full-term baby or you don't. It shouldn't take public outrage for him to develop a moral compass at the age of 70.
That is not true.
I do too.
And that was in reaction to the leftist Democratic pushback to his earlier statement that he thought abortion should be illegal at viability.
Nonetheless, I'm voting for RFK, even after he withdraws because he's the only one calling out the Deepstate and opposing Big pHarma.
We need Kennedy to head Health and Human Services! I don't care what his other positions are.. they are irrelevant for the HHS role.
The current joker has to go.
I wouldn't say he's far left at all, unless you think being pro-choice, which he is reluctantly, far-left. The DNC has been persecuting him because he has more integrity in his little finger than they do as an entire organization. He has never attacked or insulted anyone - including harris or trump - personally. Most of the time he seems to me like the only adult in the room. And I trust his wanting what's best for the country. If that means supporting Trump, than good for him - and for Trump. I'd love to see him head up the HHS or - hahaha - the CIA.
I, too believe Kennedy is far left. I watched an interview he did where he stated his position on a lot of issues and found him to be too far left for my liking. I cannot remember who he interviewed with and I really wish I could find it. Just like Cackle Harris, I feel like he’s trying to appear more moderate in order to appeal to more voters. That’s just my opinion, though.
He was interviewed on Epoch Times and his positions were far left and if you go to his campaign website, those positions are spelled out. Definitely left of center and the only common ground I probably share is anti-vaccination. I did appreciate his Documentary: "The Real Anthony Fauci." (The system kept changing to anti-tax rather than vax.)
Anti-vax is what we want. He shouldn't head up the EPA because he's been pushing global warming for decades.
He is full-on about making corporate polluters pay to clean up their messes. A clean environment is his priority. He has been vocally AGAINST obsessing about carbon emissions—the central focus of the climate change fear-mongers. He believes in ending all government subsidies to industries (including fossil fuels) so that market forces alone dictate the costs/prices of energy, etc.. He's a radical capitalist, not a Leftist.
He was quite radical years ago. Maybe not now:
https://theweek.com/speedreads/445746/robert-f-kennedy-jr-wants-law-punish-global-warming-skeptics
Yes, that was years ago. He changes his views and stances based on new information. He believes polluters are the biggest environmental hazard and he is wholly against technocratic climate change "solutions" embodied by anti-liberty autocrats like the WEF.
Changes based on new information is one thing. Changes because of running for office and needing to create a perception are another.
Time will tell.
At least RFK Jr has positions and articulates them!
Unlike the Cackler and the Coach.
I don’t trust him and don’t want him in a position where he can damage our country any further or throw a monkey wrench into Trump’s administration. We had enough issues the first term.
Far left, yet probably dropping out and endorsing Trump? How does that square?
He offered his endorsement to KAMALA for a spot in her cabinet FIRST. She turned him down. That's how it "squares."
Now that is a lie. He never offered to endorse Kamala and immediately called it out as a lie.
Don't lie about people you don't like. I HATE that phony Trump, but I would never stoop so law as to lie about him.
Actually it seems a bit more murky than that... "members of the Kennedy campaign" confirmed to WaPo and others that he was trying to meet with Kamala to make a deal, but then the next day he posted a tweet denying that he was ever considering it.
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/14/rfk-jr-kamala-harris-cabinet-trump/
As much as I've read about RFK and his intractable hatred of the Deepstate that assassinated his father, I doubt this story deeply.
But who knows? Could be.
Could be "his campaign" did it without asking him first. Or "members of the campaign" who wanted to undermine him. Or perhaps he really did for his own reasons, but denied after backlash. I sure don't know the guy to be able to say!
And if he doesn’t choose to drop out and endorse Trump, has he created more of a ‘Trump-like, but because of lofty principles must continue on, so vote for me because of the nobleness of my sacrifice’ perception?
If it’s true that Trump has teased a position in his administration and R.F.K., Jr. is out there saying he’s been promised a cabinet position, that’s very problematic. If R.F.K., Jr. is negotiating, offering his voters in exchange for a cabinet position and Trump doesn’t trust him for that and says, no, what then?
What if it is a matter of how to most damage Trump; as an inside obstacle or a vote splitter?
The drama has been created. Everyone is watching and waiting.
I agree with you, Wendy.
I don't know for sure. He said something on CNN recently. Probably a position in his administration. Barnes thinks Kennedy would be interested in heading up Health and Human Services which would make sense. People have also mentioned AG but that makes no sense to me, except as a tribute to Jr.'s father.
Ken Paxton should be AG.
Karmy,
❤️❤️❤️
As AG he could go after ALL the corruption, in and out of government. Think of all the crony corporatism that has sabotaged the American dream and our health and wellbeing. He could go after corporations AND the three-letter agencies that are corrupting our system.
Unless he’s an IC plant, whose task would be to sabotage and obfuscate, always with plausible deniability.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/is-rfk-jr-working-for-us-intelligence-to-pull-support-away-from-donald-trump/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=usa
Anyone who knows anything about RFK Jr. knows of his skepticism—one might say antipathy, even—towards the intelligence community. Let's be serious.
Do you believe everything you hear? Why wouldn’t he seek to create that perception if indeed he is a plant?
Why did he record his phone conversation with DJT, then leak it, then deny knowing how it got leaked?
Anyone can say anything. It’s their actions that count.
I hope his announcement tomorrow is not a disappointment in which he declares that for the future good of government, he needs to push through with creating a third party.
I really hope not.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/08/15/robert-kennedy-jr-today-denies-what-robert-kennedy-jr-said-yesterday/
I've been following him for two decades, so I'm well acquainted with how he talks and how he walks. The "intelligence plant" is preposterous.
I disagree. I may be wrong, but it’s unlikely 😂
Time and actions will tell.
WS, Sundance's 'proof' that RFK talked to Kamala about a Cabinet position is . . . the WaPo. Sourced to a couple of people in the Kennedy campaign, but Nicole Shanahan said the Dems had put ringers into their campaign staff. And sometimes I think that Sundance is Q for people who can somehow read his lengthy tomes every day. He seems to claim to be the only person who knows a lot of semi-hidden esoteric information and how to link it all together into, I don't know, his material.
I’ve read his lengthy tomes since the beginning of the Obama campaign back in 2007. I’ve seen him call out people that no one else was noticing and seen him be correct over and over again. (Mike Pence, for a more recent example, but it has happened multiple times. I think he has a very superior understanding of how government is working now and how the dots are connected.
He does analysis, not ‘drive by reporting’. It takes more effort to follow him, but I find it well worth the effort. And by and by that seemingly semi-hidden esoteric information becomes quite clear.
That is my experience and perception in regards to Sundance.
I did like some of what he said about who was funding DeSantis.
Here are some other sources to the story; Fox News among them and the N.Y. Post. There were many, many other links, but I got tired of copying them. (Sorry, they didn’t copy as links from my Notes, but they should be easy to find. I use Duck, Duck, Go.)
RFK Jr. Sought a Meeting With Kamala Harris to Discuss a Cabinet Post - The New York Times
RFK Jr. Tried To Meet With Kamala Harris About Cabinet: Report | HuffPost Latest News
RFK Jr. says he has "no plans" to endorse Harris after reports he tried to discuss admin job
RFK Jr. sought meeting with Kamala Harris to discuss cabinet job in exchange for endorsement
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sought meeting with Kamala Harris for Cabinet job
RFK Jr. tried to set up meeting with Kamala Harris to discuss Cabinet role
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to meet with Kamala Harris to discuss Cabinet job
RFK Jr. Sought Meeting With Kamala Harris To Discuss Cabinet Position and Endorsement: Report
RFK Jr. reached out to Harris campaign about administration role in exchange for endorsement | CNN Politics
RFK Jr. Is Begging His Opponents for a Job
RFK asked Harris for cabinet position in exchange for dropping out: report | Fox News
Similar, I find SD to be generally pretty perceptive - if perhaps a bit prone to attributing motivations, and not hedging his opinions at all such that the result often comes off rather "black-pilly" (I don't think that's his intention per se, just that he seems like more a "facts don't care about your feelings" kind of guy).
So his takes on the observable effects are good (Kennedy running takes votes away from trump), but his takes on the motives might warrant a grain of salt (Kennedy doing it on purpose to hurt Trump / benefit the IC / whatever).
that's a stretch.
Even the AG has to win lawsuits. Takes time.
Of course. But it takes an AG willing to file the suits in the first place. Most aren't. He would.
I think AG Paxton of Texas would make a much better choice as AG of the USA.
I'm paying close attention to thiis matter and never heard Trump say "cabinet" position. But that is what RFK Jr was peddling in exchange for his endorsement.
Kennedy demonstrated a lot of courage in writing "The Real Anthony Fauci" and telling the truth about our corrupt public "health care" and their bed partners in Pharma. He exposed them all and the proof it was 100% facts and truth is that not one damn person sued him. I'd be all in on him if he would abandon abortion and turn 100% pro life. But without that, it bothers me he would lead a "public health" agency.
I think if he was given very strict marching orders with clear left and right limits and reporting requirements, he has insider knowledge which could really help clean out the deep disaster people like the human cockroach Fauci and the walking crime against humanity bill gates have brought down on the world.
True statement ... and maybe not anything anymore to lose? Like him or not, Robert Kennedy has been a visible voice on some very important stuff.
I don't understand what you are saying. 6 days ago, after WaPo claimed this, he refuted that he was asking for a cabinet position, but asked for a meeting for another reason. Now, one can believe WaPo or RFK JR as they wish, but to claim he did ask for a posittion when it is a he said, she said situation is not accurate. If you want to believe that, it is your right, but it's not a proven fact.
"That's fake news. I didn't ask Kamala Harris for a Cabinet position but I've reached out to all the candidates. I've met with some," Kennedy told guests during his "TikTok Town Hall" live-streamed event.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rfk-denies-report-he-asked-position-harris-cabinet
Any person with a personal agenda/vendetta can become single-issue focused and lose sight of the broader mission. RFK Jr, if he is in Trump’s Cabinet, will need to get out from behind the microscope.
Not cabinet, admin. I think he should be Trump's Chief of Staff. Trump needs people around him who are serious people to keep him in line. JD Vance and RFK are serious men. Trump keeps going off the reservation into silliness, like that whole thing with "I'm prettier than Kamala".
He's trying to bring levity to an otherwise terrible, scary potential outcome. It's not silly. It's the need to laugh at the total stupidity and debauchery that is the current dnc.
You need to Laugh.
Trump needs no "keeping him in line" - he needs staff which will provide honest, legitimate, alternate courses of action on key issues - he will make the right decision. What he doesn't need is more deep state operatives and I think he learned that lesson well in his first term. If you think he needs to be kept in line, you've been watching too much MSDNC.
Amen to that!
Hearing anyone talk about having a one on one with Trump, he always wants to hear their opinion on topics, doesn’t matter who they are. I think that’s a good quality.
Read my comment again Dan. "Trump needs no "keeping him in line" - he needs staff which will provide honest, legitimate, alternate courses of action on key issues...". This is precisely what I was saying. Staff providing what you list would be keeping him in line and on mission and message.
No FGB what you said was "keeping him in line". If you've ever been a leader then you know that is far, far different from having a staff which provides recommendations, alternative courses of action, and then ACTS PROMPTLY and DECISIVELY based on the bosses decision. Keeping him in line means he is unable to make sound decisions, kinda like Brandon, Kakala, Obama and all the others run by the global corporate marxists. As you can see from his 2016 to 2020 successes, he ran things remarkably well, and accomplished many many great things for the Citizens and the Country, in spite of having a "staff" of deep state operatives which sought to undermine him at every turn, Pence being one of the many scumbags. You may not like his messaging, I thought it was spot on and exposed the deep state and the government wide corruption for the first time so that the people could see what the hell "our" government has been doing to us.
They stole 2020 from us, they stole 2022 from us and now they are set to steal 2024, Trump is really our only hope to turn it around, and he will, if we can overcome their treasonous election manipulation.
Somebody needs to rein in the FDA and the USDA with respect to both Pharma and food freedom. RFK Jr. has been concerned for years about the dangers of vaccines to children and was against the Covid vax. I think he would be wasted as chief of staff.
What you consider ‘silliness’ is very strategically done. President Trump does not need helpers to keep him in line.
Are you seriously in a position to offer advice? What are your credentials?
Precisely correct, Willing! Everything he has done has been to expose their abuse of the American People, the true Sovereigns of the country. He will return our sovereignty. I'm not certain but perhaps FGB3 is a never trumper trying to undermine Trump and us.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Yours is, "What you consider ‘silliness’ is very strategically done. President Trump does not need helpers to keep him in line". So Will what are YOUR credentials? I mean really! How self-righteous!
I am able to have admiration for someone who has accomplished what Donald Trump has accomplished in his lifetime. He is a giant of a man. What is wrong with you that you can’t appreciate that level of greatness?
I know I don’t have the credentials to give advice to anyone with that level of success.
There is nothing "wrong with me" Will. I never said anything about Trump's greatness or lack of greatness. These are all things you are manufacturing. You are being very defensive over nothing. His success prior to being president is not at issue.
I will say that I find him not being as serious as he should be right now. This country is in serious trouble. Sometimes I see him as not exhibiting constancy of awareness of this situation. Trump just cannot resist the temptation, many times, to be careful of his words and actions. And this is just who he is.
That is why I say he needs some folks around him who can balance out his tendencies to lose track of what needs to be said and done. He didn't have that in his first administration. He had villains around him.
I can point out one instance in which he just could not keep his eye on the ball. That was when Sidney Powell, Mike Flynn and Patrick Byrne were so worried about Trump not getting good advice on the election steal, that they "crashed" the White House one night in December 2020. They laid out what he ought to do and he liked that, and then the next thing you know he didn't follow thru on it.
Go here and read about it Willing. I think it will change your opinion and you'll see what I've been trying to say. Here's the link: https://wentworthreport.com/2021/02/10/patrick-byrne-how-trump-lost-the-white-house-fateful-decision-day/ ... and that's my last word on this tempest in a tea cup.
It ain’t that simple! But do let’s be done.
I think he should have Musk in a position to create efficiency in governed like he's doing at X. Not sure it's a cabinet position, but...
Listen to this and follow him.
https://rumble.com/v5bzk19-jeffrey-steele-storm.html
You have to listen to this! Pause and read all pages. The end is the Best with Trumps buddy Steve.
https://rumble.com/v5bzk19-jeffrey-steele-storm.html
I think he should have Musk in a position to create efficiency in governed like he's doing at X. Not sure it's a cabinet position, but...
Maybe Trump would give RFK Jr. a cabinet position that Harris refused to.
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
This was all part of the plan. But, the real race starts today as Jeff said! She just screwed herself by accepting the nomination last night. Something about the Delegates.
"One of us took 3 doses of the Moderna mRNA vaccine, and the other did not. Guess who?
Here is the devastating reality: it is not a safe vaccine, and must be recalled immediately. Many people are suffering who took it."
https://twitter.com/NicoleShanahan/status/1780324062075736161
(pic of Nicole with a vax-injured dude with t-shirt saying "At least my tin foil hat won't give me myocarditis")
Look at all the vax defenders replying to her tweet. It's terrible to see how many people out there are still brainwashed.
Absolutely unbelievable the comments of vax defenders. I was going to reply to the first one I read and realized it was a usless waste of time, there are so many and they are so brainwashed and propagandized.
Some of them are probably paid shills or bots.
You will know how many are brainwashed on November 6
Thanks a lot! I don't normally comment on X but I saw some stupid replies and OF COURSE couldn't keep my fingers shut. Luckily I will never see their replies!
Fingers shut. Lol. Love that
Yes! Same problem here.
me too! LIKE
Lmbo!! That’s so funny!!
Has she taken the red pill?
Seems like it. Same with RFK. People judge both of them by views held years ago yet don't hold that same standard regarding Trump's past views. People who aren't zombies (most Democrats) change (become more conservative) as we get older. Many don't! Some do
To see current views, go to his campaign website. I wouldn't consider him conservative on anything but vax.
Vaxx-washing; Not a single Vaxx-hesitant Biden Voter would have taken a shot in 2020 or after as they wouldn't trust a Trump Vaccine... BUT, the Day after Biden was coronated by media as winning the Election, and the narrative shifted 180 degrees, THEY ALL WANTED to be the FIRST to get the Virus-stopping safe and effective Shots..so much so that the Dem Media was decrying the "Vaxx deserts" of communities of color suffering from the SHORTAGE of avail. jab juice, and how Unfair it was that all the White Liberal Suburban Moms, their 10 year olds, their embryos, and Grandmas were getting all the recommended doses without hinderance while CoVid was killing thousands of Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Migrants in the shadows due to systemic institutional racism ( Not Biden's nor Democrats' FAULT ).
Oh those wonderful shots and boosters...that keep on working.
I was at the doctor's office today for quarterly blood work. I overheard the nurses talking. and apparently, just about the entire staff, most doctors as well, recently had covid.
My doctor said that they have been extremely busy with sick people...Yes, it is going around again (south Florida) and being that it is here to stay, Big Pharm will keep tricking and scaring the sheep into getting those boosters.
Aww, come on... Don't you know there's a new and improved vaccine available now for the most recent variants? Don't be the last on your block to get one - they're all the rage!
https://abc7ne.ws/3yNt9Jk
Hahaha..the gift they will keep on giving, another covid vaccine! And on and on and on it will go!
WP William,
It’s crazy isn’t it? Can’t they think for themselves? I understand why the people in power shifted the narrative since it was all about gaining more power and money.
It's as if the Big (p)HARMyA-Political-Military-Media-Depopulation-Profiteering Complex was immediately ushered in to seamlessly, smoothly assure Harris-Biden and ALL Dumbocrats that the "Trump" Vaxxes HAD TO go out with their full throated approval and without hesitation to ensure Operations were unhindered and without a hiccup or adverse reaction. They then labelled all the Election Denying MAGA Nuts as being Vaxxiphobic and anti-science and a threat to both democracy and normalcy and everyone else's health and safety. Could've easily named it: Operation 180-Max-Vaxx
Right on. Many people here have certainly changed over the past 4 years.
You mean 'are' zombies right?
Oh yes totally.
I am sort of surprised that she got the shots because I thought she had a vax injured child....maybe my information was bad--not surprising as I really didn't read much about her other than she supported CHD. Maybe her reason is her own injury...
I took it that Nicole took the shots and tshirt guy did not.
Even he isn’t wearing his tin foil hat, that is a GREAT t-shirt
Wow. Maybe she could be assistant director of HHS.
Why not Rand Paul? At least he's a doctor.
The discussion is about how having Rober Kennedy Jr endorse him and be on Trumps staff would significantly help the vote. Rand Paul, though an excellent Dr, wouldn't have that benefit.
The discussion I responded to was about Shanahan and she is not qualified as assistant HHS. And Trump isn't giving RFK jr anything before the election. He will consider it. Period. I think there is a place for him but not a cabinet position. People tend to get ahead of their horse.
I think her best use would be to harness AI and keep it used for good, and not totalitarian control. She is an expert in this field.
This Tucker interview is eye-opening. We need RFK on health issues especially child vaccines which are poisoning them,
https://youtu.be/mUH4Co2wE-I?si=-RRHQfjKwsIF0na7
It’s better to watch on Tuckercarlsonnetwork because there will be less commercials and no blacked out censoring bits, which they do a lot in the YouTube version.
https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-casey-calley-means
You have to pay to watch on his channel
Actually No! I haven’t paid a dime and I watch most of his longer interviews with ease. He has some specials that maybe only subscribers get, and some are early released to subscribers first, and then available to everyone a few days later. The kinds like these are too important to keep behind a paywall. He’s gracious. And he is doing fine. Whenever I am able to financially support him I will out of gratitude. I just select from his drop down menu “see all” and then they are listed by most recent. In two months I’ve only ever come across one that I wanted to see that was for subscribers only.
Thanks for the info! That was a great interview and I’d like to watch it again sans commercials.
I don’t agree with everything they talked about, but in a two hour interview that was only maybe 2%.
I disagree with my husband more than that, but still love and respect him, too 😁
Hope JFKj does form a coalition with Trump,
The Democrat crime syndicate MUST be stopped.