Through 13 presidential elections I have never voted for a democrat. I watched RFK Jr's candidacy announcement and various interviews and I believe he is truthful. Besides being totally anti-vax, he's anti war, he understands how we need to work with China and Russia rather than be belligerent, he cares deeply about children and he wants to reorganize the FDA, the intelligence agencies and others. I think he can beat Biden for the nomination .
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Except vaccines are inherently unsafe and RFK Jr. says so on the podcast with Rogan. I don’t really know if there is a way to make a safe vaccine, and quite honestly, I’m not willing to be a lab rat in their quest. Its funny, but similar to how Jeff made this post about focusing on the positive vs the negative, everyone tries to discredit RFK Jr by calling him an anti-vaxxer, while we should be focusing on what he actually stands for, which is truth, health and safety of our children, population, or humanity as a whole.
I agree with you completely. And I am disappointed to see the author use this terminology to describe RFK, BECAUSE it is known and used primarily as a derogatory term, intended to discredit everyone who so much as dares question ANYTHING regarding "regular" vaccination.
Thank you for pointing that out. People are applauding RFK as if he’s a white knight galloping in to save the world. He could also be a Trojan Horse. He’s a Democrat and a Kennedy.
He could be backed by something Trojan Horsey (y'all), but he didn't really want to run, goes to nine 12 step meetings a week, meditates every morning, and took up his cross as a sacrifice for the country and for us. He said he has so many skeletons in his closet that if they could vote he'd win in a landslide. Robert Jay Lifton calls these category labels "thought-terminating cliches". Let's not put him in what Iain McGilchrist calls "The Procrustean bed of the category" but evaluate him as an individual and in terms of how what he is saying is resonating with Americans. If he could stop the vaxes, and the liability shield, stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag, and stop endless war profiteering, and money printing, do you think he would care about the power and status of being president. I don't.
“If he could stop … the liability shield,” and “stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag.” Those two policies are contradictory, aren’t they? The liability shield is not what the American people want according to the comments I read in this report alone. Giving them immunity from prosecution is just why we are where we are with vaccine injuries. But I digress. I can’t possibly believe that anyone can know what RFK would think if he were to rise to POTUS. I believe Americans evaluated many of our POTUS’ on the basis of their individualism and in terms of what they were saying and how it was resonating with Americans, e.g. Obama and his “fundamentally change America” platform. More people need to do their own research on who or what they’re supporting and not be hypnotized by eloquent words and promises.
I was a Kennedy Democrat when I was young, stopped being a Democrat when Carter was President. I'll never vote Democrat again. That being said, he sure couldn't be worse than Biden. It will be interesting to see how this plays out with the Dems.
So true. Biden being installed meant one thing - if not a gazillion more. He was to put the great reset on overdrive. So, everything being done now is way out in the open. Most of the Dems in the past hid their power-over-the-people plans (with the support of some Republicans and with the silence of the people). You remember, don’t talk about politics or religion was the mantra for decades. Religion may be okay to leave off the table, but not politics. It’s what our world is all about. It will be interesting to see what the Dems do. I’d love to be a fly on the wall listening in on the Dems strategy on Biden, et al. I don’t think all of the revelations about the FBI, DOJ, lying representatives is fazing them. They thrive on chaos and corruption. Keep watch but speak up.
No… and it’s affected me and mine personally… after decades as work job transplants to Houston, later Austin… after decades of hearing the hollow political lies, especially about promised relief for property taxes, the unconscionable illegal unconstitutional open borders, the insane lockdowns and handling of the Covid response by Abbott… but when our personal finances are targeted, enough is enough. Our 1600 sf rental property tax surged from a piracy theft of $4300 in 2020 to $9300 in 2022!!! Of course we contested and of course we were literally smirked at by the “just doing my job” clericals. We’re the idiots foe saving, scrounging, planning for retirement, and buying an income producing property, only to be rewarded with double the tax burden overnight. Add that to the literal invasion across Texas borders, the WEF affiliation of Abbott to the WEF/CCP, his outright lies term after term about property tax relief, the suspicious targeting of AG Ken Paxton… our major cities gone woke, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Dallas… before this woke cancer spreads to the rest of Texas, we’re leaving… correction, fleeing…. done… just done.
Dems are mafia..always have been. The party roots are never learned. Climate change is such a hoax when they chem trail us and impose wind energy and solar panel scams upon us. Just another money grab.
I know. I despise the whole climate change fraud. But he checks off so many other issues for me -- and I think he is sincere. I don't think any politician will ever satisfy all one's beliefs so you have to compromise and hope for the best.
The deal seems to have been sealed in 2020, with the stipulation that should Trump come roaring, back—he would be taken down once for all and RDS would not have to run against him.
Plan hasn’t gone quite as smoothly as hoped.
Pray for President Trump’s safety if there is a heart in your chest.
Agree with all that except the beating Biden part. No matter the circumstances, I can't imagine the DNC allowing RFK to get the nomination. Even if he got the most votes, which he wouldn't as there aren't enough sane Democrats.
They didn’t let Bernie either. Not that I’d vote for him but he was deliberately prevented from nomination. He was furious but still backed Hil when she “won” it.
Agree. But my guess is he’ll run as an independent once Biden secures the DNC nomination. And if he already has this much support in the polls, he shouldn’t have a problem meeting the threshold to hopefully be in the debates…
That would be an interesting scenario. If he runs as an independent, who would he siphon more votes from, Biden (assuming he's nominee) or Trump (assuming he's the nominee)?
My guess would be from Biden. I envision a scenario somewhat similar to how Trump won in 2016. 3rd party/independent candidates siphoned enough votes from Hilary to lead to a Trump win. But I do think he could attract some Republican voters as an Independent who can't get over the mental hurdle of voting "Democrat" (if he were the DNC nominee). I also think there would be a much larger percentage across the board voting for RFK as an independent than were voting 3rd party in 2016, especially if he's able to debate.
I would think the opposite. I would expect the majority of RFK support to come from the right; conservatives and libertarians. His main focus is on dismantling deep state, biomedical fascism, vaccines. All items many folks on the right are concerned with and are pretty much anathema to most on the left. Only his name would attract some older Dems, but they'd probably say "ick, so much disinformation!" as soon as they heard what he is about.
I think the spread will be a lot more evenly distributed between the left and right. But, as anecdotal evidence, I have heard from a few friends who aren't Republicans per say but voted for Trump at least once, and are "anti-vaxx" for lack of a better term, and are not planning to vote for RFK and will either vote for Trump or Desantis. That said, it's still very early on, so things could change.
Yes, it's such a unique situation and environment now, it's hard to to predict. I'm a double Trump voter who would have a hard time voting for Trump if RFK was on the ballot.
Don’t get too carried away.... while I respect and like RFK Jr. he is an open borders guy and a climate change guy. He’s a liberal guy as is his wife. Though it may be just rumors, I’ve read that every person invited to the Kennedy Christmas party last year had to show proof of the jab. It was the wife’s who insisted but he went along. That was disappointing if true.
He is not open borders. He stated clearly in the Rogan interview and elsewhere that he wants the borders closed and immigration controlled. Had you heard otherwise?
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
I know he’s anti vaxx which is so appealing but he is also pro climate change and pro gun grabs. The scary thing is there are still soooo many single issue voters.
I believe he is more anti environmental toxins and large corporations that get away with polluting than the carbon climate change hoax and I think he has addressed this topic in some of his speeches.
I'm generally in favor of clean air, water, etc. Problem: I've never heard a coherent solution to this problem: We pass laws here to restrict pollution, to avoid the exploitation of labor, etc. Then we wonder why the factories are closed, the jobs gone, the townsfolk unemployed. The few who still have money (government hand-outs, perhaps) then go to the local Wal*Mart and buy crap that was made in nations halfway around the world that don't care about pollution and pay their workers a pittance.
Agree. I get his CHD newsletter and this shirt also what I glean from it. He was an environmental lawyer. I admit to bias in his favor. I think someone in power needs to do Something about pollution in a Big Way. I don’t mean "climate change" either.
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
In his Twitter-Elon interview, he stated that he's a Constitution guy, and that includes the 2nd amendment...and that he's not going for anyone's guns.
I’d like some evidence of this alleged stance on climate and guns.
I heard him in an interview w Meghan Kelley stating that the only one of the Bill of Rights not abolished during the lockdowns/etc was the second. The context was that he was lamenting and pointing out the egregious violation of our rights during that time. So I am not convinced he wants to disarm.
And all I have heard him say about climate is the old fashioned sort of stuff, about the importance of clean water and clean air, not the global warming nonsense.
Maybe there’s hope for Bobby on other issues. I read his story about how he kept being encountered by some women at his climate change/global warming events where he’d speak. They repeatedly showed up trying to get his attention to talk to him about childhood vaccines (their children were/are vax injured). He dodged them until one time he listened. The rest is history.
I’ve never heard him describe those events as global warming events. He described that he was talking about the harms of environmental pollution. And the women showed up to say, hey, look, if you have concerns about environmental toxins like mercury, you should look at the mercury we inject into our kids.
I know he’s a DEM but just the fact that he’s anti vaxx is so important!!!
Through 13 presidential elections I have never voted for a democrat. I watched RFK Jr's candidacy announcement and various interviews and I believe he is truthful. Besides being totally anti-vax, he's anti war, he understands how we need to work with China and Russia rather than be belligerent, he cares deeply about children and he wants to reorganize the FDA, the intelligence agencies and others. I think he can beat Biden for the nomination .
WHY do people keep calling him "anti-vaxx"???
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Except vaccines are inherently unsafe and RFK Jr. says so on the podcast with Rogan. I don’t really know if there is a way to make a safe vaccine, and quite honestly, I’m not willing to be a lab rat in their quest. Its funny, but similar to how Jeff made this post about focusing on the positive vs the negative, everyone tries to discredit RFK Jr by calling him an anti-vaxxer, while we should be focusing on what he actually stands for, which is truth, health and safety of our children, population, or humanity as a whole.
I agree with you completely. And I am disappointed to see the author use this terminology to describe RFK, BECAUSE it is known and used primarily as a derogatory term, intended to discredit everyone who so much as dares question ANYTHING regarding "regular" vaccination.
CrazyMothers long ago suggested "vaccine risk aware". Would you accept that?
It's not about what *I* would accept. But "vaccine risk aware" is certainly more accurate than "anti vaxxer" in RFK's case... imo...
Thank you for pointing that out. People are applauding RFK as if he’s a white knight galloping in to save the world. He could also be a Trojan Horse. He’s a Democrat and a Kennedy.
He could be backed by something Trojan Horsey (y'all), but he didn't really want to run, goes to nine 12 step meetings a week, meditates every morning, and took up his cross as a sacrifice for the country and for us. He said he has so many skeletons in his closet that if they could vote he'd win in a landslide. Robert Jay Lifton calls these category labels "thought-terminating cliches". Let's not put him in what Iain McGilchrist calls "The Procrustean bed of the category" but evaluate him as an individual and in terms of how what he is saying is resonating with Americans. If he could stop the vaxes, and the liability shield, stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag, and stop endless war profiteering, and money printing, do you think he would care about the power and status of being president. I don't.
“If he could stop … the liability shield,” and “stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag.” Those two policies are contradictory, aren’t they? The liability shield is not what the American people want according to the comments I read in this report alone. Giving them immunity from prosecution is just why we are where we are with vaccine injuries. But I digress. I can’t possibly believe that anyone can know what RFK would think if he were to rise to POTUS. I believe Americans evaluated many of our POTUS’ on the basis of their individualism and in terms of what they were saying and how it was resonating with Americans, e.g. Obama and his “fundamentally change America” platform. More people need to do their own research on who or what they’re supporting and not be hypnotized by eloquent words and promises.
So well said!
I was a Kennedy Democrat when I was young, stopped being a Democrat when Carter was President. I'll never vote Democrat again. That being said, he sure couldn't be worse than Biden. It will be interesting to see how this plays out with the Dems.
So true. Biden being installed meant one thing - if not a gazillion more. He was to put the great reset on overdrive. So, everything being done now is way out in the open. Most of the Dems in the past hid their power-over-the-people plans (with the support of some Republicans and with the silence of the people). You remember, don’t talk about politics or religion was the mantra for decades. Religion may be okay to leave off the table, but not politics. It’s what our world is all about. It will be interesting to see what the Dems do. I’d love to be a fly on the wall listening in on the Dems strategy on Biden, et al. I don’t think all of the revelations about the FBI, DOJ, lying representatives is fazing them. They thrive on chaos and corruption. Keep watch but speak up.
Don’t be quick to jump on bandwagons. They are by definition attractive. Anyone can say anything and nobody gets true fact checking
Sorry -- I stand corrected!
💥💥💥🎯🎯🎯👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
... and he is fully aware of the “push back that is springing out the other side”.... what’s it gonna take to stop the CCP.... https://open.substack.com/pub/michaelyon/p/facts?r=697d8&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Try and convince me that the O'Biden Bolshevik regime is not a proxy government for the CCP. Sorry, but there is no good news here.
No… and it’s affected me and mine personally… after decades as work job transplants to Houston, later Austin… after decades of hearing the hollow political lies, especially about promised relief for property taxes, the unconscionable illegal unconstitutional open borders, the insane lockdowns and handling of the Covid response by Abbott… but when our personal finances are targeted, enough is enough. Our 1600 sf rental property tax surged from a piracy theft of $4300 in 2020 to $9300 in 2022!!! Of course we contested and of course we were literally smirked at by the “just doing my job” clericals. We’re the idiots foe saving, scrounging, planning for retirement, and buying an income producing property, only to be rewarded with double the tax burden overnight. Add that to the literal invasion across Texas borders, the WEF affiliation of Abbott to the WEF/CCP, his outright lies term after term about property tax relief, the suspicious targeting of AG Ken Paxton… our major cities gone woke, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Dallas… before this woke cancer spreads to the rest of Texas, we’re leaving… correction, fleeing…. done… just done.
Dems are mafia..always have been. The party roots are never learned. Climate change is such a hoax when they chem trail us and impose wind energy and solar panel scams upon us. Just another money grab.
Yes! AND Bobby, is a climate change guy...that’s a problem for me. Love all that he says about big pharma and anti-war but that climate crap 🤦🏻♀️
He said himself that climate change was being used to garner control just like Covid was. He made statements against that.
In addition to his take on climate change, his stance on gun control is frightening.
I know. I despise the whole climate change fraud. But he checks off so many other issues for me -- and I think he is sincere. I don't think any politician will ever satisfy all one's beliefs so you have to compromise and hope for the best.
His anti-war stance is notable. Contrast with the $$$/blood-lusting RINOs.
Yeah. Nasty rinos.
I apologize for having both Rubio and Rick Scott in Florida.
Yep. Even Gov Ron seems to be going with the big money interests. They just can't avoid it as they go up the ladder.
Gov Ron was recruited by the Bush branch of the Rinos in the Uniparty. Check who is backing him!
Fool me once, shame on you…fool me twice. Shame on me.
The deal seems to have been sealed in 2020, with the stipulation that should Trump come roaring, back—he would be taken down once for all and RDS would not have to run against him.
Plan hasn’t gone quite as smoothly as hoped.
Pray for President Trump’s safety if there is a heart in your chest.
I second that emotion.
The DNC will never let RFK be the nominee
Just like they struck off Bernie for Hillary
Yep
We need to do write in voting.
Not an easy task. I believe "how to" do write in voting is state-by-state. In MA, it's practically impossible for a write-in voting option.
But if RFK cannot get the MA votes, he's not going to get any...
Agree with this unfortunately. Would vote for a republican myself but he is about 10 million times better than Biden
He is someone to look at very very seriously
Agree with all that except the beating Biden part. No matter the circumstances, I can't imagine the DNC allowing RFK to get the nomination. Even if he got the most votes, which he wouldn't as there aren't enough sane Democrats.
I'm more concerned about the CIA and the FBI....
Yep. They know how to create computer algorithms to flip votes, so they can easily rig the machines at the convention.
They didn’t let Bernie either. Not that I’d vote for him but he was deliberately prevented from nomination. He was furious but still backed Hil when she “won” it.
I sure wouldn't have voted for him either but I always wondered what they gave him in return for stepping aside quietly and supporting her.
Plenty of Money in a Swiss bank account is my guess
Agree. But my guess is he’ll run as an independent once Biden secures the DNC nomination. And if he already has this much support in the polls, he shouldn’t have a problem meeting the threshold to hopefully be in the debates…
That would be an interesting scenario. If he runs as an independent, who would he siphon more votes from, Biden (assuming he's nominee) or Trump (assuming he's the nominee)?
My guess would be from Biden. I envision a scenario somewhat similar to how Trump won in 2016. 3rd party/independent candidates siphoned enough votes from Hilary to lead to a Trump win. But I do think he could attract some Republican voters as an Independent who can't get over the mental hurdle of voting "Democrat" (if he were the DNC nominee). I also think there would be a much larger percentage across the board voting for RFK as an independent than were voting 3rd party in 2016, especially if he's able to debate.
I would think the opposite. I would expect the majority of RFK support to come from the right; conservatives and libertarians. His main focus is on dismantling deep state, biomedical fascism, vaccines. All items many folks on the right are concerned with and are pretty much anathema to most on the left. Only his name would attract some older Dems, but they'd probably say "ick, so much disinformation!" as soon as they heard what he is about.
I think the spread will be a lot more evenly distributed between the left and right. But, as anecdotal evidence, I have heard from a few friends who aren't Republicans per say but voted for Trump at least once, and are "anti-vaxx" for lack of a better term, and are not planning to vote for RFK and will either vote for Trump or Desantis. That said, it's still very early on, so things could change.
Yes, it's such a unique situation and environment now, it's hard to to predict. I'm a double Trump voter who would have a hard time voting for Trump if RFK was on the ballot.
In a 3 way, I can't imagine RFK Jr getting more than 20%. Like, Ross Perot numbers. Which gave the victory to the Dem.
Yep, Perot gave us Bill & Hillary
He is certainly better than corn pop or camel toe. A choice between them and RFK Jr is a no brainer. Hands down RFK Jr.
Don’t get too carried away.... while I respect and like RFK Jr. he is an open borders guy and a climate change guy. He’s a liberal guy as is his wife. Though it may be just rumors, I’ve read that every person invited to the Kennedy Christmas party last year had to show proof of the jab. It was the wife’s who insisted but he went along. That was disappointing if true.
He is not open borders. He stated clearly in the Rogan interview and elsewhere that he wants the borders closed and immigration controlled. Had you heard otherwise?
Pillow talk in a political family can be a game changer!
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
He’s supportive of abortion as he is of human caused global warming.
I don’t support either.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
A little digging has revealed that more than a few progressives have the Margaret Sanger idea in mind.
Eugenicists all if them. They should set the example and go first.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
Many are the homeless on the streets
I know he’s anti vaxx which is so appealing but he is also pro climate change and pro gun grabs. The scary thing is there are still soooo many single issue voters.
I believe he is more anti environmental toxins and large corporations that get away with polluting than the carbon climate change hoax and I think he has addressed this topic in some of his speeches.
I'm generally in favor of clean air, water, etc. Problem: I've never heard a coherent solution to this problem: We pass laws here to restrict pollution, to avoid the exploitation of labor, etc. Then we wonder why the factories are closed, the jobs gone, the townsfolk unemployed. The few who still have money (government hand-outs, perhaps) then go to the local Wal*Mart and buy crap that was made in nations halfway around the world that don't care about pollution and pay their workers a pittance.
His climate change stance is about companies that will dump stuff in the environment to make profits. That's his main focus.
Agree. I get his CHD newsletter and this shirt also what I glean from it. He was an environmental lawyer. I admit to bias in his favor. I think someone in power needs to do Something about pollution in a Big Way. I don’t mean "climate change" either.
WHY do people keep calling g him "anti-vaxx"???
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Hard to know what's true.
In his Twitter-Elon interview, he stated that he's a Constitution guy, and that includes the 2nd amendment...and that he's not going for anyone's guns.
I’d like some evidence of this alleged stance on climate and guns.
I heard him in an interview w Meghan Kelley stating that the only one of the Bill of Rights not abolished during the lockdowns/etc was the second. The context was that he was lamenting and pointing out the egregious violation of our rights during that time. So I am not convinced he wants to disarm.
And all I have heard him say about climate is the old fashioned sort of stuff, about the importance of clean water and clean air, not the global warming nonsense.
He is all for climate lockdowns... 😩
Exactly
Maybe there’s hope for Bobby on other issues. I read his story about how he kept being encountered by some women at his climate change/global warming events where he’d speak. They repeatedly showed up trying to get his attention to talk to him about childhood vaccines (their children were/are vax injured). He dodged them until one time he listened. The rest is history.
I’ve never heard him describe those events as global warming events. He described that he was talking about the harms of environmental pollution. And the women showed up to say, hey, look, if you have concerns about environmental toxins like mercury, you should look at the mercury we inject into our kids.
I was thinking that his voice issue was a vaccine injury.
Reinstated to Instagram for less than a week and 841k followers.