I think the point Jeff is proposing is that now that the deed is done and Trump knows it was a scam, of which he was also played by his “trusted scientific advisors”, he is now taking the smart route of silence to help take the criminals down and not give them himself as a scapegoat to further distract from their misdeeds.
I think the point Jeff is proposing is that now that the deed is done and Trump knows it was a scam, of which he was also played by his “trusted scientific advisors”, he is now taking the smart route of silence to help take the criminals down and not give them himself as a scapegoat to further distract from their misdeeds.
Maybe. It's a good hypothesis that can't be disproven at this point. But I've been at this game for more than two decades. I'll reserve my enthusiastic support and continue to consider alternatives until I get some corroborating evidence. And I'll continue to consider alternatives and revise conclusions until I'm "pushing daisies" (thanks to the poster for that). The facts that reveal the truth don't often surface quickly, and some missing ones can completely overturn the apple cart.
If you do just the smallest amount of historical digging (see Whitney Webb's "One Nation Under Blackmail"), you will find enough evidence that Trump knew and went along with the pre-COVID planning (i.e. EOs and patents and pharma funding back to 2013 that continued during his four year term), launch and response. His silence now is only to avoid jail time if he can (continue to) manage it, IMO.
Not ad hominem at all. I am pointing out that allowing ones point of reference to be so solidly based on one other person can make you have tunnel vision. The ONLY time I would not argue that point is in reference to the Bible.
Thank you for this clarification. I am not basing my views on one other person's views but on 3 years of personal research and observation of Trump's words and deeds since he was fraudulently removed from office.
I would encourage you to read the books (or even just the first part of the first one). They are not easy to read because they are written like an encyclopedia. 🤦♀️ They are literally DENSE with historical, factual recitation. She doesn't take any liberties with innuendo or supposition. What I've gleaned so far (I'm not done yet) is exactly how and why I think politicians who are "successful" have so many skeletons by the time they ascend to power that they become heavily compromised (in the sense that they cannot, potentially under threat of death for their family members if not themselves) to the point that they cannot/will not fulfill their campaign promises. There is a "bigger" agenda pushing their success and they know their true masters will pull the plug on them the moment they step too far astray.
I voted for Trump, twice. I was pleased with the campaign promises he actually kept. I was disgusted with his personnel choices and his tendency to be a "nasty" man (despite rightfully calling out Hillary for the same nastiness)... that was beneath him and he lowered himself by going there.
That said, his actions are confounding to his supporters. Unless you know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't think it's 12D chess... it's the FBI/CIA/DOD/MIC power brokers pulling all the strings they can where he's concerned.
I think the point Jeff is proposing is that now that the deed is done and Trump knows it was a scam, of which he was also played by his “trusted scientific advisors”, he is now taking the smart route of silence to help take the criminals down and not give them himself as a scapegoat to further distract from their misdeeds.
Oh sure it *must* be some 5D chess, a genius do genius 🙃
If it is not "5D chess", it is indeed a good tactic. Go back and re-read Jeff's reasoning; it is spot-on.
Maybe. It's a good hypothesis that can't be disproven at this point. But I've been at this game for more than two decades. I'll reserve my enthusiastic support and continue to consider alternatives until I get some corroborating evidence. And I'll continue to consider alternatives and revise conclusions until I'm "pushing daisies" (thanks to the poster for that). The facts that reveal the truth don't often surface quickly, and some missing ones can completely overturn the apple cart.
*gospel 😝
ETA to clarify: Ever heard of circumstantial gain? 😇
Considering everything, it's not impossible that Trump is getting paid for that nonsense. Anyhow, it's not going to get him a lot of support.
If you do just the smallest amount of historical digging (see Whitney Webb's "One Nation Under Blackmail"), you will find enough evidence that Trump knew and went along with the pre-COVID planning (i.e. EOs and patents and pharma funding back to 2013 that continued during his four year term), launch and response. His silence now is only to avoid jail time if he can (continue to) manage it, IMO.
There’s no way he didn’t know. You’re not the most powerful person in the world and not know what’s going on, present commander in chief excluded🙄
I think you should probably widen your reading. Whitney Webb has you brainwashed.
Which of her thousands of footnotes of objectively observable history do you take issue with, exactly?
Ad hominem attacks aren't persuasive rebuttals.
Not ad hominem at all. I am pointing out that allowing ones point of reference to be so solidly based on one other person can make you have tunnel vision. The ONLY time I would not argue that point is in reference to the Bible.
Thank you for this clarification. I am not basing my views on one other person's views but on 3 years of personal research and observation of Trump's words and deeds since he was fraudulently removed from office.
I would encourage you to read the books (or even just the first part of the first one). They are not easy to read because they are written like an encyclopedia. 🤦♀️ They are literally DENSE with historical, factual recitation. She doesn't take any liberties with innuendo or supposition. What I've gleaned so far (I'm not done yet) is exactly how and why I think politicians who are "successful" have so many skeletons by the time they ascend to power that they become heavily compromised (in the sense that they cannot, potentially under threat of death for their family members if not themselves) to the point that they cannot/will not fulfill their campaign promises. There is a "bigger" agenda pushing their success and they know their true masters will pull the plug on them the moment they step too far astray.
I voted for Trump, twice. I was pleased with the campaign promises he actually kept. I was disgusted with his personnel choices and his tendency to be a "nasty" man (despite rightfully calling out Hillary for the same nastiness)... that was beneath him and he lowered himself by going there.
That said, his actions are confounding to his supporters. Unless you know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't think it's 12D chess... it's the FBI/CIA/DOD/MIC power brokers pulling all the strings they can where he's concerned.
I will take a look at the Whitney Webb writings.