He’s right over the target, I would love to see more of the RFK Jr clips from last week’s Joe Rogan Podcast in circulation. Now Rogan is challenging Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr on vaccine misinformation. I think he is offering him $100K. THAT would be a fun debate!
Joe Rogan is calling out Hotez - whom he previously interviewed on his podcast - personally and publicly. He's not taking his non-answers at face value.
I love Rogan more and more. He's still a liberal, but he's an honest one who calls out his own side, more and more.
Jimmy Dore is one of my favorite liberals, he's an honest liberal.Calls out All the BS and in fact is in 100% agreement with anything covid related with those of us on the right.
Agreed. Last month I watched a Jimmy Dore video where he and his guys were talking about how we need open border for unlimited immigration. I was like what?? But he's a lib.
Yes, whenever I have heard him discuss anything covid/shot-related, there is not a single bit of disagreement I have with anything he says. This is such a good sign when two people on complete opposite sides can be in 100% agreement.
That would be a fun debate! And the amount is over a million now after several other people added to the pot, including Steve Kirsch. Rogan offered to pay the money to Hotez’s favorite charity, so now Hotez looks even worse for not accepting the offer. And Elon Musk jumped into the debate as well, which instantly upped the spice level!
He's emotionally invested in the vaccines. His own *daughter* was injured by vaccines (autism) and he wrote a book about how it was anything but the vaxes.
I read somewhere that the USA is the only country that allows pharma public advertising of its products. It's unheard of in other countries. I love the idea of banning them here but personally, I find them humorous. They use the first 10-15 seconds of the commercial trying to sell how great their product is but then they spend the last 3/4 of the commercial, using an Evelyn Wood speed reading graduate, to disclose all of the possible side effects. 🤣
The problem is more the fact that if 70plus per cent of your income ( as does main stream media)then you will not say anything negative about their products and may promote them in articles,news stories etc. That is actually a great discussion point to have with people who haven't figured it out yet.How would your oncologist not know about drug XYZ/Right? It is absurd!There is another reason for all the prescription drug ads.
Another thing is most people have NO idea how many injections children are receiving under the guise of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule.All are LIABILITY FREE to the pharma and the injector.!!!!. And of course since they load multiple products into 1 syringe the kids are actually receiving way more vaccines than number of injections-which by the way no one has ever studied. I am one of those who believed that vaccines were in general safe and effective and had them given to my children what was on offer(mostly).The happenings around the C-19 led me to start questioning and researching. It hits hard when you realize your decisions injured your children but it is even worse when you realize that your children have been bullied by their providers during pregnancy and for their children into receiving un necessary and dangerous products.And I do absolutely mean bullying. The only way out is actually talking to people again.Having conversations. Planting seeds.
I was shocked the other day at the vet. Took my 11 year old dog in for an exam and said I’m not going to give her another rabies. She said ‘no problem’!! It’s really not even law. So I asked ‘what if my dog bites someone or a dog?’ She said then I’d have a problem.
Hmmm. Wonder about Jacksonville with our brand New Democrat Mayor, since ‘supposedly so popular’ DeSantis endorsed the Republican and he Lost! Anyone heard that reported anywhere?
I haven’t.
We get annual letters from the city reminding us we need to update our pets vaccine status. A couple of my pets ‘moved out of state’ —on paper that is.
My kittens have a vet in a nearby rural county. A quarter of what is charged in Duval, and no harassment. I feel so clever😊
You can always ask your vet to test for antibody titers as an alternative to vaccination. It provides alternative documentation of immunity, if the level is adequate.
Based on the rules I operated under as the equivalent of a county health director, but for a military post instead, if your unvaccinated dog bit a person, it would be held under observation for 10 days. If it were still healthy and symptom-free then, it's cleared for release. If it had rabies virus in its saliva at the time of the bite, it would have developed signs and symptoms within 10 days. Not doing so = no transmissible rabies at the time of the bite. And you'd likely pay a fine in addition to the kennel fees
for the observation period and be placed under extreme pressure to vaccinate before release, possibly even refusal to release your dog without it, or a threat to put the dog down if you refuse.
Probably, re the titers. My sister's small dog's seizure disorder disappeared when she stopped vaccinating her, and her rabies titer was way high the first time it was done. It can be worth it. I'd be most worried about a totalitarian public health dept deciding that your dog either dies or gets vaccinated in order to be released after a bite.
Just had my mare checked for breeding and the vet asked about shots. Then added that the shots should be given far enough from the pregnancy because they could cause loss of the foal. This is a very pro-vax vet.
I am suffering from a lot of guilt right now as I realize I poisoned my kids....#2 is autistic thanks to me (may have had very mild without anyhow, but the vaccines contributed based on timing of her changes)....I always thought there was a little something to the autism/vaxx connection but never did any real research until now....the fact it was on my radar at all puts me squarely at blame because I could have and should have researched before injecting my innocent babies
I saw this PBS show a long time ago about a train conductor who blamed himself for a terrible accident in which lives were lost, even though the train's steering was automatic and he was utterly powerless to change the outcome. The psychologists said that if he blamed himself, even to his life's detriment, he could feel some sense of control, because he could change himself, and it made the world make sense. It is the government Pharma complex's fault, totally, and they've done this to huge numbers of people over the decades since liability was waived for vaccines, AND they continue to try to promote this with Operation Catch Up and "equity' for Africa. Their fault, unequivocally.
I am reading Dr. Kory's ivermectin book, and the incredible brilliance of these dissident doctors is astonishing. I think that is true of all of them, unfathomably accomplished, innovators who love saving and changing lives. Dr. Marik was perhaps the most accomplished ICU doctor who ever lived, and they've destroyed his career, but he, and America's Frontline Doctors, and Dr. McCollough and the FLCCC are ON IT, so if you can, transfer that blame to where it belongs, and take control by researching the innovative treatments these brilliant doctors are finding for the suffering and vax damaged kids. Don't let them trick you into accepting blame.
I certainly agree with all you've just said! The FLCCC doctors, nurses and entire staff are my heroes, of course especially doctors Marik and Kory. I didn't realize that Dr. Kory's book was out yet and I subscribe to his newsletter. I've got to get that book. Thank you! 😘
Oh I am so sorry.Please, please forgive yourself. As you have witnessed from Covid ,the medical world has no qualms about manipulating you. The doctors know exactly what to say to get you to do what they want and have no qualms about lying. They are trained to specifically guilt you. Seriously scripts and all.If you had researched the CDC etc. you would have been misled.Going back to at least the polio vaccine the government has intentionally held back information to thwart hesitancy. I did not know that until a month ago. I am a nurse of over 40 years. When I was in college there was no liability shield and there were still quaint notions like if your child or close relative had a seizure history then you were not allowed certain vaccines(the recognition that every vaccine was not for everyone) and of course we learned that vaccines were lifesaving. Despite years of required continuing education and being a parent and grandparent did I ever realize the liability shield had been enacted in the 80's and that there is a vaccine injury reporting system that I am legally obligated to use. and the insane increase in the number of vaccines on the schedule.So until a year ago I was against early Hep B, HPV and rotovirus but I did not know the scope of the issue.I was not someone who goes along with all the recommendations of the health provider system-and yet I had a lot of blindness about vaccines. But you know what I know now and I am ethically duty bound as a nurse to educate. I am sure that if Jeff were to poll the readers how many had an epiphany about the childhood vaccine schedule because of C-19 it would be a huge per centage. And there are probably many who are not even sure what the issue is all about . All this long story to say that you cannot blame yourself. If you have any energy left from caring for your injured child then work to help the next confused parent.But no guilt if right now you don't have the energy. I think your saying the guilt part out loud is very,very powerful.And I am so sorry that our health care system has so utterly failed your family.
Thank you for such a thoughtful response - I knew some were bad but was too tired parenting to not trust my Dr...as some as said, there are detox protocols and I’ll be looking at those, trying to help my kid (who won’t want my help, but I’ll try anyhow)
Never give up! When I was still working with a team for ‘special needs’ kids, I said I believed Vaccines were causing autism. The leftist, activist child psychologist attacked me mightily and brought me a whole textbook trying to dispute that claim. I handed it right back to him.
God bless you! We most all bought their lies, not being able to believe the whole lot of them would lie to us! So many in medical fields just bought what they were taught without question. And they passed it on to us.
At University of Florida, 1972ish, I remember an older Professor having disdain for what he called ‘Cookbook’ techniques being taught that didn’t require us to use critical thinking and extensive research. He was so correct.
There’s a graphic about this very thing. As I recall it’s 70 shots total these days.
Books worthy of reading; RFK Jr. Fauci, Dissolving Illusions, & Turtles All the Way Down (make sure it’s the book Re: vaccines bc there’s another one - fiction I believe)
Through 13 presidential elections I have never voted for a democrat. I watched RFK Jr's candidacy announcement and various interviews and I believe he is truthful. Besides being totally anti-vax, he's anti war, he understands how we need to work with China and Russia rather than be belligerent, he cares deeply about children and he wants to reorganize the FDA, the intelligence agencies and others. I think he can beat Biden for the nomination .
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Except vaccines are inherently unsafe and RFK Jr. says so on the podcast with Rogan. I don’t really know if there is a way to make a safe vaccine, and quite honestly, I’m not willing to be a lab rat in their quest. Its funny, but similar to how Jeff made this post about focusing on the positive vs the negative, everyone tries to discredit RFK Jr by calling him an anti-vaxxer, while we should be focusing on what he actually stands for, which is truth, health and safety of our children, population, or humanity as a whole.
I agree with you completely. And I am disappointed to see the author use this terminology to describe RFK, BECAUSE it is known and used primarily as a derogatory term, intended to discredit everyone who so much as dares question ANYTHING regarding "regular" vaccination.
Thank you for pointing that out. People are applauding RFK as if he’s a white knight galloping in to save the world. He could also be a Trojan Horse. He’s a Democrat and a Kennedy.
He could be backed by something Trojan Horsey (y'all), but he didn't really want to run, goes to nine 12 step meetings a week, meditates every morning, and took up his cross as a sacrifice for the country and for us. He said he has so many skeletons in his closet that if they could vote he'd win in a landslide. Robert Jay Lifton calls these category labels "thought-terminating cliches". Let's not put him in what Iain McGilchrist calls "The Procrustean bed of the category" but evaluate him as an individual and in terms of how what he is saying is resonating with Americans. If he could stop the vaxes, and the liability shield, stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag, and stop endless war profiteering, and money printing, do you think he would care about the power and status of being president. I don't.
“If he could stop … the liability shield,” and “stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag.” Those two policies are contradictory, aren’t they? The liability shield is not what the American people want according to the comments I read in this report alone. Giving them immunity from prosecution is just why we are where we are with vaccine injuries. But I digress. I can’t possibly believe that anyone can know what RFK would think if he were to rise to POTUS. I believe Americans evaluated many of our POTUS’ on the basis of their individualism and in terms of what they were saying and how it was resonating with Americans, e.g. Obama and his “fundamentally change America” platform. More people need to do their own research on who or what they’re supporting and not be hypnotized by eloquent words and promises.
I was a Kennedy Democrat when I was young, stopped being a Democrat when Carter was President. I'll never vote Democrat again. That being said, he sure couldn't be worse than Biden. It will be interesting to see how this plays out with the Dems.
So true. Biden being installed meant one thing - if not a gazillion more. He was to put the great reset on overdrive. So, everything being done now is way out in the open. Most of the Dems in the past hid their power-over-the-people plans (with the support of some Republicans and with the silence of the people). You remember, don’t talk about politics or religion was the mantra for decades. Religion may be okay to leave off the table, but not politics. It’s what our world is all about. It will be interesting to see what the Dems do. I’d love to be a fly on the wall listening in on the Dems strategy on Biden, et al. I don’t think all of the revelations about the FBI, DOJ, lying representatives is fazing them. They thrive on chaos and corruption. Keep watch but speak up.
No… and it’s affected me and mine personally… after decades as work job transplants to Houston, later Austin… after decades of hearing the hollow political lies, especially about promised relief for property taxes, the unconscionable illegal unconstitutional open borders, the insane lockdowns and handling of the Covid response by Abbott… but when our personal finances are targeted, enough is enough. Our 1600 sf rental property tax surged from a piracy theft of $4300 in 2020 to $9300 in 2022!!! Of course we contested and of course we were literally smirked at by the “just doing my job” clericals. We’re the idiots foe saving, scrounging, planning for retirement, and buying an income producing property, only to be rewarded with double the tax burden overnight. Add that to the literal invasion across Texas borders, the WEF affiliation of Abbott to the WEF/CCP, his outright lies term after term about property tax relief, the suspicious targeting of AG Ken Paxton… our major cities gone woke, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Dallas… before this woke cancer spreads to the rest of Texas, we’re leaving… correction, fleeing…. done… just done.
Dems are mafia..always have been. The party roots are never learned. Climate change is such a hoax when they chem trail us and impose wind energy and solar panel scams upon us. Just another money grab.
I know. I despise the whole climate change fraud. But he checks off so many other issues for me -- and I think he is sincere. I don't think any politician will ever satisfy all one's beliefs so you have to compromise and hope for the best.
The deal seems to have been sealed in 2020, with the stipulation that should Trump come roaring, back—he would be taken down once for all and RDS would not have to run against him.
Plan hasn’t gone quite as smoothly as hoped.
Pray for President Trump’s safety if there is a heart in your chest.
Agree with all that except the beating Biden part. No matter the circumstances, I can't imagine the DNC allowing RFK to get the nomination. Even if he got the most votes, which he wouldn't as there aren't enough sane Democrats.
They didn’t let Bernie either. Not that I’d vote for him but he was deliberately prevented from nomination. He was furious but still backed Hil when she “won” it.
Agree. But my guess is he’ll run as an independent once Biden secures the DNC nomination. And if he already has this much support in the polls, he shouldn’t have a problem meeting the threshold to hopefully be in the debates…
That would be an interesting scenario. If he runs as an independent, who would he siphon more votes from, Biden (assuming he's nominee) or Trump (assuming he's the nominee)?
My guess would be from Biden. I envision a scenario somewhat similar to how Trump won in 2016. 3rd party/independent candidates siphoned enough votes from Hilary to lead to a Trump win. But I do think he could attract some Republican voters as an Independent who can't get over the mental hurdle of voting "Democrat" (if he were the DNC nominee). I also think there would be a much larger percentage across the board voting for RFK as an independent than were voting 3rd party in 2016, especially if he's able to debate.
I would think the opposite. I would expect the majority of RFK support to come from the right; conservatives and libertarians. His main focus is on dismantling deep state, biomedical fascism, vaccines. All items many folks on the right are concerned with and are pretty much anathema to most on the left. Only his name would attract some older Dems, but they'd probably say "ick, so much disinformation!" as soon as they heard what he is about.
I think the spread will be a lot more evenly distributed between the left and right. But, as anecdotal evidence, I have heard from a few friends who aren't Republicans per say but voted for Trump at least once, and are "anti-vaxx" for lack of a better term, and are not planning to vote for RFK and will either vote for Trump or Desantis. That said, it's still very early on, so things could change.
Yes, it's such a unique situation and environment now, it's hard to to predict. I'm a double Trump voter who would have a hard time voting for Trump if RFK was on the ballot.
Don’t get too carried away.... while I respect and like RFK Jr. he is an open borders guy and a climate change guy. He’s a liberal guy as is his wife. Though it may be just rumors, I’ve read that every person invited to the Kennedy Christmas party last year had to show proof of the jab. It was the wife’s who insisted but he went along. That was disappointing if true.
He is not open borders. He stated clearly in the Rogan interview and elsewhere that he wants the borders closed and immigration controlled. Had you heard otherwise?
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
I know he’s anti vaxx which is so appealing but he is also pro climate change and pro gun grabs. The scary thing is there are still soooo many single issue voters.
I believe he is more anti environmental toxins and large corporations that get away with polluting than the carbon climate change hoax and I think he has addressed this topic in some of his speeches.
I'm generally in favor of clean air, water, etc. Problem: I've never heard a coherent solution to this problem: We pass laws here to restrict pollution, to avoid the exploitation of labor, etc. Then we wonder why the factories are closed, the jobs gone, the townsfolk unemployed. The few who still have money (government hand-outs, perhaps) then go to the local Wal*Mart and buy crap that was made in nations halfway around the world that don't care about pollution and pay their workers a pittance.
Agree. I get his CHD newsletter and this shirt also what I glean from it. He was an environmental lawyer. I admit to bias in his favor. I think someone in power needs to do Something about pollution in a Big Way. I don’t mean "climate change" either.
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
In his Twitter-Elon interview, he stated that he's a Constitution guy, and that includes the 2nd amendment...and that he's not going for anyone's guns.
I’d like some evidence of this alleged stance on climate and guns.
I heard him in an interview w Meghan Kelley stating that the only one of the Bill of Rights not abolished during the lockdowns/etc was the second. The context was that he was lamenting and pointing out the egregious violation of our rights during that time. So I am not convinced he wants to disarm.
And all I have heard him say about climate is the old fashioned sort of stuff, about the importance of clean water and clean air, not the global warming nonsense.
Maybe there’s hope for Bobby on other issues. I read his story about how he kept being encountered by some women at his climate change/global warming events where he’d speak. They repeatedly showed up trying to get his attention to talk to him about childhood vaccines (their children were/are vax injured). He dodged them until one time he listened. The rest is history.
I’ve never heard him describe those events as global warming events. He described that he was talking about the harms of environmental pollution. And the women showed up to say, hey, look, if you have concerns about environmental toxins like mercury, you should look at the mercury we inject into our kids.
Pray for his life and safety. There are too many with too much money who will “accident” him.
The press will claim it’s the Kennedy curse.
Even if you would not vote for him, even if he doesn’t win the nomination fix, he is successfully bringing the conversation of the real pHarm to the campaign trail.
I agree, saw an interview where he was talking about gov involvement in the assassination of his uncle and I thought, dang, hope he has some good security detail. Stepping on a lot of toes these days.
On YouTube also…I’ll be watching a health blogger talking about curing diabetes, high blood pressure, thyroid, etc through diet…and constantly get interrupted by a string of pharma ads.
"First executive order, take big Pharma ads off television”. ABSOLUTELY; I’ve been saying Pharma ads are killing us; we outlawed tobacco ads. Seemed to replace with Pharma. Buying propaganda time, plus “owning” the networks & programs.
When the SEC schools (athletics) partnered w/ Pharma re: cv shots, I knew we were in deep trouble.
That's a disappointing response from one of the rare candidates from whose mouths words like 'Constitution,' 'freedom,' etc., come. The President has no such authority in the Constitution. Tyranny is fine, as long as it's our side in charge?
Another good clip of RFK Jr (2 mins). Check him out as he go nuts on Big Pharma.
"First executive order, take big Pharma ads off television"
https://twitter.com/FanaTeresafana/status/1670581658167246849
He’s right over the target, I would love to see more of the RFK Jr clips from last week’s Joe Rogan Podcast in circulation. Now Rogan is challenging Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr on vaccine misinformation. I think he is offering him $100K. THAT would be a fun debate!
I saw our very own Jeff Childers threw in 100k
Really? Wow!
More people up upping the ante. It’s now up to $1.5 million. 👍👍👍
I thought I read 2.6 mil this morning.
WOW! I am way off! This is fabulous! Soooo, Hotez is just quiet, totally ignoring like he’s above it all. Shows what a waste he is.
Someone tweeted that big Harma would probably pay him way more than Rogan et al to NOT debate. Sounds about right 😒
The threat of no more research grant money is worth way more than the debate kitty likely could ever be.
Joe Rogan is calling out Hotez - whom he previously interviewed on his podcast - personally and publicly. He's not taking his non-answers at face value.
I love Rogan more and more. He's still a liberal, but he's an honest one who calls out his own side, more and more.
Jimmy Dore is one of my favorite liberals, he's an honest liberal.Calls out All the BS and in fact is in 100% agreement with anything covid related with those of us on the right.
Agreed. Last month I watched a Jimmy Dore video where he and his guys were talking about how we need open border for unlimited immigration. I was like what?? But he's a lib.
But on covaids and other topics he rocks!
Yes, whenever I have heard him discuss anything covid/shot-related, there is not a single bit of disagreement I have with anything he says. This is such a good sign when two people on complete opposite sides can be in 100% agreement.
Yes! ChiefNerd posted that
That would be a fun debate! And the amount is over a million now after several other people added to the pot, including Steve Kirsch. Rogan offered to pay the money to Hotez’s favorite charity, so now Hotez looks even worse for not accepting the offer. And Elon Musk jumped into the debate as well, which instantly upped the spice level!
Well that is scary since his choice of charity would be questionable.
Hotez is a nutter.
Mentally and physically.
How is that guy a director of any kind of health anything.
Same way Walensky, Fauxci, his wife, Levine, etc. rise to the top. Making statements not substance. Inclusion before we even had official DEI
Certified
He's emotionally invested in the vaccines. His own *daughter* was injured by vaccines (autism) and he wrote a book about how it was anything but the vaxes.
Sad that he would deny the obvious.
He should probably throw in a years supply of fast food vouchers and 50 bowties.
I am not joking when I say this but they need to have to wear their sponsors on their lab coats.Like race drivers.
Politicians should as well...
From the Ricky Bobby movie "man, that guy sure likes Tide".
😆
Idiocracy- the movie!!! In 2006 it was far-fetched, now???
Brought to you by Carls Jr.....
"Brought to you by Carl's Jr."
We're living in Idiocracy now.
Oh my! Perfect!
I have said this exact thing before! 100% agree
I read somewhere that the USA is the only country that allows pharma public advertising of its products. It's unheard of in other countries. I love the idea of banning them here but personally, I find them humorous. They use the first 10-15 seconds of the commercial trying to sell how great their product is but then they spend the last 3/4 of the commercial, using an Evelyn Wood speed reading graduate, to disclose all of the possible side effects. 🤣
Yet the Fauci Ouchie had no such disclaimer.
And if you could even read the insert, it was 4 pages of blank.
Invisible ink
The problem is more the fact that if 70plus per cent of your income ( as does main stream media)then you will not say anything negative about their products and may promote them in articles,news stories etc. That is actually a great discussion point to have with people who haven't figured it out yet.How would your oncologist not know about drug XYZ/Right? It is absurd!There is another reason for all the prescription drug ads.
Another thing is most people have NO idea how many injections children are receiving under the guise of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule.All are LIABILITY FREE to the pharma and the injector.!!!!. And of course since they load multiple products into 1 syringe the kids are actually receiving way more vaccines than number of injections-which by the way no one has ever studied. I am one of those who believed that vaccines were in general safe and effective and had them given to my children what was on offer(mostly).The happenings around the C-19 led me to start questioning and researching. It hits hard when you realize your decisions injured your children but it is even worse when you realize that your children have been bullied by their providers during pregnancy and for their children into receiving un necessary and dangerous products.And I do absolutely mean bullying. The only way out is actually talking to people again.Having conversations. Planting seeds.
Just had my vet try and bully me into giving my dog useless treatments.
I was shocked the other day at the vet. Took my 11 year old dog in for an exam and said I’m not going to give her another rabies. She said ‘no problem’!! It’s really not even law. So I asked ‘what if my dog bites someone or a dog?’ She said then I’d have a problem.
I’ll go with the odds she won’t!
Hmmm. Wonder about Jacksonville with our brand New Democrat Mayor, since ‘supposedly so popular’ DeSantis endorsed the Republican and he Lost! Anyone heard that reported anywhere?
I haven’t.
We get annual letters from the city reminding us we need to update our pets vaccine status. A couple of my pets ‘moved out of state’ —on paper that is.
My kittens have a vet in a nearby rural county. A quarter of what is charged in Duval, and no harassment. I feel so clever😊
You can always ask your vet to test for antibody titers as an alternative to vaccination. It provides alternative documentation of immunity, if the level is adequate.
Based on the rules I operated under as the equivalent of a county health director, but for a military post instead, if your unvaccinated dog bit a person, it would be held under observation for 10 days. If it were still healthy and symptom-free then, it's cleared for release. If it had rabies virus in its saliva at the time of the bite, it would have developed signs and symptoms within 10 days. Not doing so = no transmissible rabies at the time of the bite. And you'd likely pay a fine in addition to the kennel fees
for the observation period and be placed under extreme pressure to vaccinate before release, possibly even refusal to release your dog without it, or a threat to put the dog down if you refuse.
Thanks, good explanation of what could happen. Question, don’t you have to do titers every year? They are so expensive, but, yep so is boarding.
Probably, re the titers. My sister's small dog's seizure disorder disappeared when she stopped vaccinating her, and her rabies titer was way high the first time it was done. It can be worth it. I'd be most worried about a totalitarian public health dept deciding that your dog either dies or gets vaccinated in order to be released after a bite.
Yes, it would not be a fun battle sadly.
Just had my mare checked for breeding and the vet asked about shots. Then added that the shots should be given far enough from the pregnancy because they could cause loss of the foal. This is a very pro-vax vet.
If you don't mind, what kind of treatments was your vet pushing? Just curious since I have 2 pooches.
I am suffering from a lot of guilt right now as I realize I poisoned my kids....#2 is autistic thanks to me (may have had very mild without anyhow, but the vaccines contributed based on timing of her changes)....I always thought there was a little something to the autism/vaxx connection but never did any real research until now....the fact it was on my radar at all puts me squarely at blame because I could have and should have researched before injecting my innocent babies
I saw this PBS show a long time ago about a train conductor who blamed himself for a terrible accident in which lives were lost, even though the train's steering was automatic and he was utterly powerless to change the outcome. The psychologists said that if he blamed himself, even to his life's detriment, he could feel some sense of control, because he could change himself, and it made the world make sense. It is the government Pharma complex's fault, totally, and they've done this to huge numbers of people over the decades since liability was waived for vaccines, AND they continue to try to promote this with Operation Catch Up and "equity' for Africa. Their fault, unequivocally.
I am reading Dr. Kory's ivermectin book, and the incredible brilliance of these dissident doctors is astonishing. I think that is true of all of them, unfathomably accomplished, innovators who love saving and changing lives. Dr. Marik was perhaps the most accomplished ICU doctor who ever lived, and they've destroyed his career, but he, and America's Frontline Doctors, and Dr. McCollough and the FLCCC are ON IT, so if you can, transfer that blame to where it belongs, and take control by researching the innovative treatments these brilliant doctors are finding for the suffering and vax damaged kids. Don't let them trick you into accepting blame.
So well said.
I certainly agree with all you've just said! The FLCCC doctors, nurses and entire staff are my heroes, of course especially doctors Marik and Kory. I didn't realize that Dr. Kory's book was out yet and I subscribe to his newsletter. I've got to get that book. Thank you! 😘
Oh I am so sorry.Please, please forgive yourself. As you have witnessed from Covid ,the medical world has no qualms about manipulating you. The doctors know exactly what to say to get you to do what they want and have no qualms about lying. They are trained to specifically guilt you. Seriously scripts and all.If you had researched the CDC etc. you would have been misled.Going back to at least the polio vaccine the government has intentionally held back information to thwart hesitancy. I did not know that until a month ago. I am a nurse of over 40 years. When I was in college there was no liability shield and there were still quaint notions like if your child or close relative had a seizure history then you were not allowed certain vaccines(the recognition that every vaccine was not for everyone) and of course we learned that vaccines were lifesaving. Despite years of required continuing education and being a parent and grandparent did I ever realize the liability shield had been enacted in the 80's and that there is a vaccine injury reporting system that I am legally obligated to use. and the insane increase in the number of vaccines on the schedule.So until a year ago I was against early Hep B, HPV and rotovirus but I did not know the scope of the issue.I was not someone who goes along with all the recommendations of the health provider system-and yet I had a lot of blindness about vaccines. But you know what I know now and I am ethically duty bound as a nurse to educate. I am sure that if Jeff were to poll the readers how many had an epiphany about the childhood vaccine schedule because of C-19 it would be a huge per centage. And there are probably many who are not even sure what the issue is all about . All this long story to say that you cannot blame yourself. If you have any energy left from caring for your injured child then work to help the next confused parent.But no guilt if right now you don't have the energy. I think your saying the guilt part out loud is very,very powerful.And I am so sorry that our health care system has so utterly failed your family.
Thank you for such a thoughtful response - I knew some were bad but was too tired parenting to not trust my Dr...as some as said, there are detox protocols and I’ll be looking at those, trying to help my kid (who won’t want my help, but I’ll try anyhow)
God bless and have mercy on you. All of us have at some point done way less than we should have.
Dang! There are some recovery protocols for vax-induced autism. Heard them discussed on a Steve Kirsch twitter cast.
Never give up! When I was still working with a team for ‘special needs’ kids, I said I believed Vaccines were causing autism. The leftist, activist child psychologist attacked me mightily and brought me a whole textbook trying to dispute that claim. I handed it right back to him.
I’ll be looking that up! She’s 18 now and stubborn so who knows where it will go, but I can try😀
God bless you! We most all bought their lies, not being able to believe the whole lot of them would lie to us! So many in medical fields just bought what they were taught without question. And they passed it on to us.
At University of Florida, 1972ish, I remember an older Professor having disdain for what he called ‘Cookbook’ techniques being taught that didn’t require us to use critical thinking and extensive research. He was so correct.
There’s a graphic about this very thing. As I recall it’s 70 shots total these days.
Books worthy of reading; RFK Jr. Fauci, Dissolving Illusions, & Turtles All the Way Down (make sure it’s the book Re: vaccines bc there’s another one - fiction I believe)
I believe New Zealand as well
The problem is the fact the censorship of all other information and the legal immunity. Remove that and it will quickly right itself.
'including death'.
And the one thing they don't do the end disclosure is with covid vax ads.
I know he’s a DEM but just the fact that he’s anti vaxx is so important!!!
Through 13 presidential elections I have never voted for a democrat. I watched RFK Jr's candidacy announcement and various interviews and I believe he is truthful. Besides being totally anti-vax, he's anti war, he understands how we need to work with China and Russia rather than be belligerent, he cares deeply about children and he wants to reorganize the FDA, the intelligence agencies and others. I think he can beat Biden for the nomination .
WHY do people keep calling him "anti-vaxx"???
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Except vaccines are inherently unsafe and RFK Jr. says so on the podcast with Rogan. I don’t really know if there is a way to make a safe vaccine, and quite honestly, I’m not willing to be a lab rat in their quest. Its funny, but similar to how Jeff made this post about focusing on the positive vs the negative, everyone tries to discredit RFK Jr by calling him an anti-vaxxer, while we should be focusing on what he actually stands for, which is truth, health and safety of our children, population, or humanity as a whole.
I agree with you completely. And I am disappointed to see the author use this terminology to describe RFK, BECAUSE it is known and used primarily as a derogatory term, intended to discredit everyone who so much as dares question ANYTHING regarding "regular" vaccination.
CrazyMothers long ago suggested "vaccine risk aware". Would you accept that?
It's not about what *I* would accept. But "vaccine risk aware" is certainly more accurate than "anti vaxxer" in RFK's case... imo...
Thank you for pointing that out. People are applauding RFK as if he’s a white knight galloping in to save the world. He could also be a Trojan Horse. He’s a Democrat and a Kennedy.
He could be backed by something Trojan Horsey (y'all), but he didn't really want to run, goes to nine 12 step meetings a week, meditates every morning, and took up his cross as a sacrifice for the country and for us. He said he has so many skeletons in his closet that if they could vote he'd win in a landslide. Robert Jay Lifton calls these category labels "thought-terminating cliches". Let's not put him in what Iain McGilchrist calls "The Procrustean bed of the category" but evaluate him as an individual and in terms of how what he is saying is resonating with Americans. If he could stop the vaxes, and the liability shield, stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag, and stop endless war profiteering, and money printing, do you think he would care about the power and status of being president. I don't.
“If he could stop … the liability shield,” and “stop the poisoning of kids by Big Food and Big Ag.” Those two policies are contradictory, aren’t they? The liability shield is not what the American people want according to the comments I read in this report alone. Giving them immunity from prosecution is just why we are where we are with vaccine injuries. But I digress. I can’t possibly believe that anyone can know what RFK would think if he were to rise to POTUS. I believe Americans evaluated many of our POTUS’ on the basis of their individualism and in terms of what they were saying and how it was resonating with Americans, e.g. Obama and his “fundamentally change America” platform. More people need to do their own research on who or what they’re supporting and not be hypnotized by eloquent words and promises.
So well said!
I was a Kennedy Democrat when I was young, stopped being a Democrat when Carter was President. I'll never vote Democrat again. That being said, he sure couldn't be worse than Biden. It will be interesting to see how this plays out with the Dems.
So true. Biden being installed meant one thing - if not a gazillion more. He was to put the great reset on overdrive. So, everything being done now is way out in the open. Most of the Dems in the past hid their power-over-the-people plans (with the support of some Republicans and with the silence of the people). You remember, don’t talk about politics or religion was the mantra for decades. Religion may be okay to leave off the table, but not politics. It’s what our world is all about. It will be interesting to see what the Dems do. I’d love to be a fly on the wall listening in on the Dems strategy on Biden, et al. I don’t think all of the revelations about the FBI, DOJ, lying representatives is fazing them. They thrive on chaos and corruption. Keep watch but speak up.
Don’t be quick to jump on bandwagons. They are by definition attractive. Anyone can say anything and nobody gets true fact checking
Sorry -- I stand corrected!
💥💥💥🎯🎯🎯👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
... and he is fully aware of the “push back that is springing out the other side”.... what’s it gonna take to stop the CCP.... https://open.substack.com/pub/michaelyon/p/facts?r=697d8&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Try and convince me that the O'Biden Bolshevik regime is not a proxy government for the CCP. Sorry, but there is no good news here.
No… and it’s affected me and mine personally… after decades as work job transplants to Houston, later Austin… after decades of hearing the hollow political lies, especially about promised relief for property taxes, the unconscionable illegal unconstitutional open borders, the insane lockdowns and handling of the Covid response by Abbott… but when our personal finances are targeted, enough is enough. Our 1600 sf rental property tax surged from a piracy theft of $4300 in 2020 to $9300 in 2022!!! Of course we contested and of course we were literally smirked at by the “just doing my job” clericals. We’re the idiots foe saving, scrounging, planning for retirement, and buying an income producing property, only to be rewarded with double the tax burden overnight. Add that to the literal invasion across Texas borders, the WEF affiliation of Abbott to the WEF/CCP, his outright lies term after term about property tax relief, the suspicious targeting of AG Ken Paxton… our major cities gone woke, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Dallas… before this woke cancer spreads to the rest of Texas, we’re leaving… correction, fleeing…. done… just done.
Dems are mafia..always have been. The party roots are never learned. Climate change is such a hoax when they chem trail us and impose wind energy and solar panel scams upon us. Just another money grab.
Yes! AND Bobby, is a climate change guy...that’s a problem for me. Love all that he says about big pharma and anti-war but that climate crap 🤦🏻♀️
He said himself that climate change was being used to garner control just like Covid was. He made statements against that.
In addition to his take on climate change, his stance on gun control is frightening.
I know. I despise the whole climate change fraud. But he checks off so many other issues for me -- and I think he is sincere. I don't think any politician will ever satisfy all one's beliefs so you have to compromise and hope for the best.
His anti-war stance is notable. Contrast with the $$$/blood-lusting RINOs.
Yeah. Nasty rinos.
I apologize for having both Rubio and Rick Scott in Florida.
Yep. Even Gov Ron seems to be going with the big money interests. They just can't avoid it as they go up the ladder.
Gov Ron was recruited by the Bush branch of the Rinos in the Uniparty. Check who is backing him!
Fool me once, shame on you…fool me twice. Shame on me.
The deal seems to have been sealed in 2020, with the stipulation that should Trump come roaring, back—he would be taken down once for all and RDS would not have to run against him.
Plan hasn’t gone quite as smoothly as hoped.
Pray for President Trump’s safety if there is a heart in your chest.
I second that emotion.
The DNC will never let RFK be the nominee
Just like they struck off Bernie for Hillary
Yep
We need to do write in voting.
Not an easy task. I believe "how to" do write in voting is state-by-state. In MA, it's practically impossible for a write-in voting option.
But if RFK cannot get the MA votes, he's not going to get any...
Agree with this unfortunately. Would vote for a republican myself but he is about 10 million times better than Biden
He is someone to look at very very seriously
Agree with all that except the beating Biden part. No matter the circumstances, I can't imagine the DNC allowing RFK to get the nomination. Even if he got the most votes, which he wouldn't as there aren't enough sane Democrats.
I'm more concerned about the CIA and the FBI....
Yep. They know how to create computer algorithms to flip votes, so they can easily rig the machines at the convention.
They didn’t let Bernie either. Not that I’d vote for him but he was deliberately prevented from nomination. He was furious but still backed Hil when she “won” it.
I sure wouldn't have voted for him either but I always wondered what they gave him in return for stepping aside quietly and supporting her.
Plenty of Money in a Swiss bank account is my guess
Agree. But my guess is he’ll run as an independent once Biden secures the DNC nomination. And if he already has this much support in the polls, he shouldn’t have a problem meeting the threshold to hopefully be in the debates…
That would be an interesting scenario. If he runs as an independent, who would he siphon more votes from, Biden (assuming he's nominee) or Trump (assuming he's the nominee)?
My guess would be from Biden. I envision a scenario somewhat similar to how Trump won in 2016. 3rd party/independent candidates siphoned enough votes from Hilary to lead to a Trump win. But I do think he could attract some Republican voters as an Independent who can't get over the mental hurdle of voting "Democrat" (if he were the DNC nominee). I also think there would be a much larger percentage across the board voting for RFK as an independent than were voting 3rd party in 2016, especially if he's able to debate.
I would think the opposite. I would expect the majority of RFK support to come from the right; conservatives and libertarians. His main focus is on dismantling deep state, biomedical fascism, vaccines. All items many folks on the right are concerned with and are pretty much anathema to most on the left. Only his name would attract some older Dems, but they'd probably say "ick, so much disinformation!" as soon as they heard what he is about.
I think the spread will be a lot more evenly distributed between the left and right. But, as anecdotal evidence, I have heard from a few friends who aren't Republicans per say but voted for Trump at least once, and are "anti-vaxx" for lack of a better term, and are not planning to vote for RFK and will either vote for Trump or Desantis. That said, it's still very early on, so things could change.
Yes, it's such a unique situation and environment now, it's hard to to predict. I'm a double Trump voter who would have a hard time voting for Trump if RFK was on the ballot.
In a 3 way, I can't imagine RFK Jr getting more than 20%. Like, Ross Perot numbers. Which gave the victory to the Dem.
He is certainly better than corn pop or camel toe. A choice between them and RFK Jr is a no brainer. Hands down RFK Jr.
Don’t get too carried away.... while I respect and like RFK Jr. he is an open borders guy and a climate change guy. He’s a liberal guy as is his wife. Though it may be just rumors, I’ve read that every person invited to the Kennedy Christmas party last year had to show proof of the jab. It was the wife’s who insisted but he went along. That was disappointing if true.
He is not open borders. He stated clearly in the Rogan interview and elsewhere that he wants the borders closed and immigration controlled. Had you heard otherwise?
Pillow talk in a political family can be a game changer!
He is too much of a threat to the establishment; the democrats and the neocons who want endless wars to keep the military and pharma industrial complexes stuck in high gear will not allow it. He will not be (s)elected, IMO. I do think he should run as independent if he doesn't get his party's nomination. Barring the cheating, I think he would have a good shot at winning the presidency. So far, I agree with about 80% of what he says he stands for. Three things that have me on the fence are that he is/was a staunch supporter of the Clintons, Obama, and the spawns of Satan in Congress, he's fully bought into the climate change hoax, and he recently said that he would not seek retribution for the covid wrongs over the past 3 years. He does come across as honest and sincere and the fact that he is not a career politician is a plus. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I am keeping an open mind; it's still a ways to the primaries.
He’s supportive of abortion as he is of human caused global warming.
I don’t support either.
His pro-choice stance is a bit puzzling given he has 7 children and he established childrenshealthdefense.org fighting for kids. But pro-choice is definitely a non-starter for me. I did watch his interview with geoengineeringwatch.org, and he actually listened and said the information was new and he would keep his mind open. Global warming and poisoning of the environment is human caused (government and Gates funded), just not the way he thinks it is.
A little digging has revealed that more than a few progressives have the Margaret Sanger idea in mind.
Eugenicists all if them. They should set the example and go first.
Good arguments. However, I can’t say he would win the Climate Change argument with conservative thinkers. And, not seeking retribution for the Covid wrongs? Wow. That is a non-starter. How many conservative-speaking democrats have won their elections? Plenty. He says the things logical-thinking people want to hear. We see how Dems back Dems and vote 100% in line no matter the subject matter. The Dems would rule him and he would have to bend. I see him as an honest appearing wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I also heard him say some things about gun control, also a problem for me. I WOULD LOVE for someone to talk about fixing mental health in the country. This was dismantled years ago, we have a facility by us that was full, took up a whole city block and was emptied! Where did those people go? It’s a huge problem but one that shouldn’t just be cured with drugs.
I am a retired Mental Health casemanager. Mental illness is a problem that is of course very complex and tragic. The "deinstitutionalization movement" had its pros and cons in relation to honoring basic human rights for individuals diagnosed with mental illness. Government funded mental hospitals are extremely expensive, but community programs that have attempted to replace these hospitals are very under funded. From my experience, I feel these community programs often inadequate in meeting the needs of people with serious mental illness. This leads me to think about the huge problem of the homeless. No easy answers.
I agree that mental health is a problem. I grew up with a facility in my back yard of the same size that is being used for other purposes today. We need more like it. But I think single issue voting is dangerous especially when voting for POTUS. Can’t we leave that issue at the state level? And, don’t get me started on gun control.
Many are the homeless on the streets
I know he’s anti vaxx which is so appealing but he is also pro climate change and pro gun grabs. The scary thing is there are still soooo many single issue voters.
I believe he is more anti environmental toxins and large corporations that get away with polluting than the carbon climate change hoax and I think he has addressed this topic in some of his speeches.
I'm generally in favor of clean air, water, etc. Problem: I've never heard a coherent solution to this problem: We pass laws here to restrict pollution, to avoid the exploitation of labor, etc. Then we wonder why the factories are closed, the jobs gone, the townsfolk unemployed. The few who still have money (government hand-outs, perhaps) then go to the local Wal*Mart and buy crap that was made in nations halfway around the world that don't care about pollution and pay their workers a pittance.
His climate change stance is about companies that will dump stuff in the environment to make profits. That's his main focus.
Agree. I get his CHD newsletter and this shirt also what I glean from it. He was an environmental lawyer. I admit to bias in his favor. I think someone in power needs to do Something about pollution in a Big Way. I don’t mean "climate change" either.
WHY do people keep calling g him "anti-vaxx"???
He is demanding SAFE vaccines. That does NOT make him "anti-vaxx".
You can call ME "anti-vaxx"... because I AM now, since I read up about the actual HISTORY of vaccinations... If I had children now, they'd be raised 100% injection FREE...
Hard to know what's true.
In his Twitter-Elon interview, he stated that he's a Constitution guy, and that includes the 2nd amendment...and that he's not going for anyone's guns.
I’d like some evidence of this alleged stance on climate and guns.
I heard him in an interview w Meghan Kelley stating that the only one of the Bill of Rights not abolished during the lockdowns/etc was the second. The context was that he was lamenting and pointing out the egregious violation of our rights during that time. So I am not convinced he wants to disarm.
And all I have heard him say about climate is the old fashioned sort of stuff, about the importance of clean water and clean air, not the global warming nonsense.
He is all for climate lockdowns... 😩
Exactly
Maybe there’s hope for Bobby on other issues. I read his story about how he kept being encountered by some women at his climate change/global warming events where he’d speak. They repeatedly showed up trying to get his attention to talk to him about childhood vaccines (their children were/are vax injured). He dodged them until one time he listened. The rest is history.
I’ve never heard him describe those events as global warming events. He described that he was talking about the harms of environmental pollution. And the women showed up to say, hey, look, if you have concerns about environmental toxins like mercury, you should look at the mercury we inject into our kids.
I was thinking that his voice issue was a vaccine injury.
Reinstated to Instagram for less than a week and 841k followers.
Pray for his life and safety. There are too many with too much money who will “accident” him.
The press will claim it’s the Kennedy curse.
Even if you would not vote for him, even if he doesn’t win the nomination fix, he is successfully bringing the conversation of the real pHarm to the campaign trail.
He needs protection from harm.
I agree, saw an interview where he was talking about gov involvement in the assassination of his uncle and I thought, dang, hope he has some good security detail. Stepping on a lot of toes these days.
Having the ads off tv would be an incredible blessing. If you aren't sick before watching the ads, you are after the list of side effects.
Interesting how there's never a list of side effects for the gene therapy shots??? I know safe and effective. lol
To the "stakeholders," they're not SIDE EFFECTS, they're RESULTS.
On YouTube also…I’ll be watching a health blogger talking about curing diabetes, high blood pressure, thyroid, etc through diet…and constantly get interrupted by a string of pharma ads.
I never see ads on YouTube. Using the Brave browser.
Or simply install an ad-block extension.
A broken clock is correct twice a day.
"First executive order, take big Pharma ads off television”. ABSOLUTELY; I’ve been saying Pharma ads are killing us; we outlawed tobacco ads. Seemed to replace with Pharma. Buying propaganda time, plus “owning” the networks & programs.
When the SEC schools (athletics) partnered w/ Pharma re: cv shots, I knew we were in deep trouble.
Keep at it Florida man. We need all this insight!
That's a disappointing response from one of the rare candidates from whose mouths words like 'Constitution,' 'freedom,' etc., come. The President has no such authority in the Constitution. Tyranny is fine, as long as it's our side in charge?
They're now marketing Gardisil to kids as young as nine
😡