912 Comments
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

"Justice Thomas was Judge Cannon’s law clerk."

Judge Cannon was Justice Thomas's law clerk. Regardless, outstanding round-up. I am particularly grateful for your rational breakdown of the Trump decision. I kept shouting, "That's not what it means" as local liberals were plunging to their death from nearby bridges and tall buildings.

Expand full comment
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

At first I thought Jeff made a mistake too. But then I realized he was saying Thomas was acting in the way a law clerk for Cannon would act, i.e., providing an outline and script to knock down Smith's position.

Expand full comment

Thank you. So much for my knee-jerk attempt at humor. I knew Judge Cannon was super-smart in law school and a law clerk, so I just assumed.

From Wikipedia: "From 2008 to 2009, Cannon served as a law clerk for Steven Colloton, a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Iowa."

Expand full comment

She may have put herself into the running for a SCOTUS seat...

Expand full comment

Maybe we can convince Barret to step down and replace her with Cannon

Expand full comment

ACB has been such a disappointment.

Expand full comment

True... but, of course... better by far than the Sotopig, Bulldyke Kagen or token Kunta-Ketangi...

And I am not thrilled with Roberts at all... or Kavanaugh, who seems to have a decided lack in the testicular dept...

Wouldn't it be great if a President who nominated a SCOTUS Justice could also, at will... remove them? I think Koward Kav and ACB would both be gone when TRUMP returns...

Expand full comment

''Humanity is about to be tested....... mayankjeptha.substack.com/p/qbpe

Expand full comment

YES!! Barrett has been a HUGE disappointment!!

Expand full comment

GREAT idea!

Expand full comment
RemovedJul 2
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Just use nicotine patches and take Ivermectin at least 2X/month.

Yes, seriously.

I also use Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) daily, but most have never heard of it... Big Pharma calls it "bleach".

Expand full comment

More info please. I also do Ivermectin 2x a month

Expand full comment

I read it 3 times and thought Jeff turned it around accidentally…I now get it 🤦🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment

I didn't get it until I read the comments. Vaccine injury, I presume.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I didn't get it either. I guess I'm too literal.

Expand full comment

Being "literal" with Jeff Childers is anathema--LOL!! His pungent wit always aces his commonality - :-)

Expand full comment
Jul 2·edited Jul 2

Well done, Justice Thomas. He has always been my favorite and most respected Supreme, but with this he has risen far and above my former high respect for him. Brilliant!

Expand full comment

It was actually Biden, in Senate confirmation hearings, that caused me to latch on to Justice Thomas. I was impressed with Thomas’ fortitude in putting up with it, and very pleased he’s one of the Supremes. My hope is that we don’t have to ever go through any of that again. Ever. FJB.

Expand full comment

Ahhhhhhh…the light dawns…excellent post! 🌅😱😎

Expand full comment

This is how I read it as well.

Expand full comment
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

I think what he meant was that Justice Thomas just wrote her decision for her, much as a law clerk would do. Here’s to hoping she grabs it with both hands and flings it in agent smiths face.

Expand full comment

Agent Smith. Oh! The irony! (The Matrix, for those that shun Sci-Fi.)

Expand full comment

Jeff said it first…and there IS that photo of Agent Smith in the article…I just agreed that we should (from now on) refer to the man as such since he’s certainly NOT a “special prosecutor “ in the legal sense of the term.

Expand full comment

the laser beams coming out of Justice Thomas's eyes like Godzilla

ok....here's the songs that are ringing in my head right now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muUZjovOFRg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ClwvRJMmZY

Expand full comment

Need a good video editor to put Biden's face on that first video, as he burns down our country.

Expand full comment

Unlike the noxious, flatulencia roaring from the backside of Sotopig Mayor!

Expand full comment

IKR?! I loved that pic. Justice Thomas seems like he would have laser beam eyes.

Expand full comment

that pic gave me a belly laugh!!

Expand full comment

Yea and he is the cockroach!

Expand full comment

I agree with your and T Kosse's interpretation. Given that everything you thrust into the universe of the internet is there in perpetuity (regardless of what most people think about 'delete my data' requests to Facebook), I usually research these things.

Expand full comment

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Expand full comment

Oh! If only they were plunging to their deaths. I am soooo tired of their self-righteousness. The everyone is stupid and always wrong, just never them. We deserve punishment for the least little thing, but they are above the law. All the while they are behind bringing down our country.

Expand full comment

They have voided their hearts and souls of God, and in its place, demonic, illogical hysteria has implanted itself into their hearts, minds and souls.

I see their hysteria (usually over abortion, alphabet, and sexual themes) as demonic possession.

Coretta Scott King once said: "When the heart is right, the mind and body follow".

(notice how the left has become so demonic that they don't even like Martin Luther King anymore because his words are too logical and spiritual).

Expand full comment

What makes you think MLK was a "good" guy? Check again, my friend...

Expand full comment

I found this article on ZeroHedge this morning. It shows how truly nuts these people are:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-hint-assassination-repsonse-supreme-court-immunity-decision

Expand full comment

I am not understanding how all those posts weren't taken down as hate speech. Can the one CA rep be charged with inciting an insurrection?

Expand full comment

Because hate speech is a totally made up concept that criminalizes people's thoughts. It's not real thus it's only applied in one direction.

There are already laws against threating to kill people.

Expand full comment

Nothing is hate speech when it comes from a dumbocrap.

Expand full comment

love that word "dumbocrap"

Expand full comment

Thank-you. I made it up many, many years ago. It describes them pretty well.

Expand full comment

Perhaps in a fair, rule of law universe where a 'uniparty' does not have exclusive control over the vast majority of social media and operates under two sets of rules.

Expand full comment

IF it was a conservative threatening assassination... the FBI would be visiting them the next day, if not within hours... with a CNN camera crew...

Expand full comment

If it was a conservative talking about the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in a lecture at Hillsdale College, the FBI would be paying a visit.

Expand full comment

They've been talking assassination for awhile now. Way before this decision. I think it's been their plan all along.

Expand full comment

All eyes on Judge Merchan.

I'll also be watching my neighbor with the 'yuge Trump and Gadsden flags who spends the weekend shooting AR-15s with his sons on his farm. Having come from Michigan, I remember the stories about the Nichols brothers blowing up things on their farm in Howell (the Michigan version of the deep-south) with their buddy Tim McVeigh. Very scary times we live in and I tend to agree with Tucker Carlson that supernatural things are afoot.

Expand full comment

very supernatural. Acts2: 1-3 ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, That I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, Your young men shall see visions, Your old men shall dream dreams. And on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days; And they shall prophesy.

Expand full comment

I read this as spiritual awakening.

What we are seeing is demonic possessions.

Expand full comment

AMEN!!! May it ever be thus!!!

Expand full comment

McVeigh was a patsy for the Deep State.

Expand full comment

My thinking about Tim McVeigh and Waco has changed radically over the years. I was horrified then and still am. Now, for different reasons.

Expand full comment

Actually "supernatural things" have been 'afoot' since prehistoric times...we just have more "media mites" jumping on juicy tidbits of 'news' now than ever before in human history.

Expand full comment

You sound a tad paranoid.

Expand full comment

I am a tad paranoid. Joe Biden is president. Taylor Swift is ubiquitous. How did that happen?

Expand full comment

When they actually ARE out to get you, you are not paranoid. Just a realist.

Expand full comment

Not just talking - I have read of several attempts, if the accounts are credible.

Expand full comment

dont they have some SERIOUS security, those guys? as a result of those threats?

Expand full comment

That does not surprise me at all.

Expand full comment

All these who believed "The Science" are now Constitutional scholars "doing their own research."

It's tiresome.

Expand full comment

The irony

Expand full comment

No, don’t go there. Never wish evil on anyone ‘cause…. it’s evil to do that. And to be sure, you’re not evil

Expand full comment

💯

Expand full comment

Because the legislative branch of our Federal government is filled with MORALLY COMPROMISED 'leeches' instead of true Constitutionally sound 'legislators'!! They're ALL IN ON IT!!! There are a few "beacons of light" (like the Freedom Caucus legislators)...but they are very few and far between.

Expand full comment

A 'vaccine' syringe does have a plunger, so there's that.

Expand full comment

But they should, because I also saw what this meant to previous demon presidents, like the Shrub, Obongo, and Slick Willie. They should be shaking in their boots. As should Biden, if I believed he was actually still alive.

Expand full comment

Great point.

I just ran to my local DEI-free Tractor Supply here in Middle Tennessee to buy a large placard and paint. I'm putting a sign next to the Tennessee River overpass that reads: "Free Money for Neocons" with an arrow pointing downward.

Expand full comment

LOLOL... love it!

Expand full comment

Post a photo of that sign here in the comments, plz.

Expand full comment

😂😂😂

Expand full comment

Tell me, someone please...when did the "military/industrial complex" morph into the term "neocons"???

Expand full comment

I like this explanation from a post by Thomas Gallagher on Quora:

"Conservatism is a political philosophy that values tradition and established practices over social progress and new ideas. This isn't saying it's purely reactionary; anyone who believes recent developments in a particular area were harmful and should be reversed could be considered conservative in that area, e.g "I hate how cellphones have destroyed face-to-face communication!" In the United States, conservatism has traditionally identified with keeping with the spirit of the Founding Fathers; limited government, non-intervention in foreign affairs, a free market, and strong personal liberties.

Conservatism typically switches between parties; depending on the time, the coalitions they build, and the ideas that are popular. Now, Republicans are considered more conservative, but that wasn't always the case.

Neoconservatism (and the older conservatism, now called Paleoconservatism) represent an offshoot of conservative thought that emerged during the Cold War. Since Communism, the antithesis of all conservative ideals, seemed to be rapidly growing in strength during the 50's, many Conservatives began to question the wisdom non-intervention in other countries, a school of thought already badly discredited by World War II. Their brand of "New" Conservatism placed great weight on the strength of the military, the interaction of industry and the government, and a powerful investment in industry and science. As a result, many tenets of Paleoconservatism (older conservatism) were dropped; Government spending vastly increased, personal liberties were tempered with security concerns, and many wars and coups were started in the aim of increasing American power, although a strong moral puritanism remained.

Neoconservatism reached its peak under the administration of George W. Bush, but became deeply unpopular as a result of the Iraq War and the financial meltdown.

So to wrap this up,

Conservatives: Back to Basics (Tea Party)

-limited government

-restrained spending

-moral values

-free market

-smaller military

-strong personal liberties

Paleo-Conservatives: Democracy with a Heavy Dose of Patriotism (Most Republicans now)

-limited government

-restrained spending in theory, often deficit spending

-moral values

-free market

-strong military

-certain liberties emphasized (Strong moralist streak)

Neo-Conservatives: America the Powerful

(Cheney, Bush, Reagan)

-big government

-deficit spending

-moral values

-military-industrial-financial complex (big business)

-strong and very active military

-heavy government surveillance, strong police

Basic overview, enjoy!

Expand full comment

Excellent. Thx for posting

Expand full comment

WHEW!!! A "thousand thanks", John Cougar - I'm C & P'ing this and saving it to my C drive!!

PRESS ON!!

Expand full comment

Omg yes

Please post a picture (not sure how on Substack)

Our Tractor supply seemed to be a DEI Free zone but it’s in Eastern CA….. they like to be known as part of the Jefferson State.

Expand full comment

The State of Jefferson gets more than it's share of getting sprayed from the overlords. I see it all the time on my trips back and forth to see my mom in NoCal. "They" are making me pray more, seek God and realize that God wins in the end. Pushing pushing pushing the people to realize our Godly prayers amount to everything against the huge evil that is everywhere we look.

Expand full comment

😂😂😂

Expand full comment
deletedJul 3·edited Jul 3
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Great comment. I particularly appreciate the additional perspective. You have offered much to think about and truly consider.

Expand full comment

The Clintons ushered into our culture and society, the demonic element, fully pushing Christian values and morality aside for good.

I think we can look at things as BC ( before Clinton) and AC (after Clinton).

Expand full comment

No, it was here well before that. Before 1871 and the Organic Act. Before Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. Those forces were hard at work. But - they Are a lot more obvious now, less lurking-in-the-shadows.

Expand full comment
Jul 2·edited Jul 2

Perhaps but what I meant is that our culture went through a fundamental and obvious morality change..I remember it clearly through television (everyone was having sex from the older ladies on Golden Girls to Frasier) and pop music took a sexual turn . Religious observation was being replaced by Sunday morning sports practice for children, brunch or jogs for adults. (I remember my Priest being upset about that.) Church going, Sunday school, was no longer the 'thing to do'. Clinton was talking about his wife's necromancy practice of communicating with Eleanor Roosevelt as if it was something everyone did. And his WH antics...

no one will forget, especially the children who were exposed to it and according to a middle school Principal I knew, emulating it behind the bleachers in groups.

Soros started buying up journalism schools and media outlets after Clinton in 2003 and the NWO agenda was in getting a foothold. The next year, the EU consciously removed all mention of its Christian foundation from its constitution.

All this on the surface. God only knows below the surface what was going on.

Expand full comment

We truly could not stomach what is "going on" all across the globe. Yahweh is merciful - but NOT FOREVER!

Expand full comment

Come on man, you know Biden isn’t shaking in his boots…he doesn’t even know he has boots on!

Expand full comment

As I said, I don't even think Biden is still of this earth

Expand full comment

You called him Shrub 😂😂😂😂😂

Expand full comment

Thank Ann Richards for that one…but anyway, funny how hindsight changes everything . All those times I defended W and Dick Cheney, blaming Dhimmicrat Derangement Syndrome for their histrionics…I have repented of all that now! 🤦🏽‍♀️

Expand full comment

Yes I did the same . You're not alone there .🤦🏻

Expand full comment

I second that emotion as well, Susan!! They're "all on the take" in one way or another - they are SO FAR from being "public servants" - it's ludicrous!!

Expand full comment

I can take no credit for that. It's what his own ( Bush , actually Scherff) family called him .

Expand full comment

Ah ok - well even more hilarious then !

Expand full comment

Were they given scores on the way down? :-)

Expand full comment

I gave them all "10". The outcome alone justified the effort.

Expand full comment

🙌

Expand full comment

I’m pretty sure he was making a wink remark about Thomas acting like a clerk on behalf of cannon…

Expand full comment

I was thinking that seemed like it should be the other way around, thanks for correcting!

Oops should have read the rest of the comments first 🤪 Now I get it but it wasn’t clear to me either when I read it 😜

Expand full comment

I didn’t sleep well. My first thought was How Old IS she?? 😆

Expand full comment

😆😂

Having seen pictures of her I knew she couldn’t be older than Thomas so was thinking it must’ve been the other way around 🤪

Expand full comment

ok I STILL dont get it. can someone explain the Cannon/Thomas remark like Im 5 yrs old? I thought she's older than she looks, takes good care of herself, etc.

Expand full comment

It was a backwards/sarcastic remark meant to imply that Thomas had done the grunt work that Cannon can use for her ruling.

Expand full comment

As I read it in the blog, I thought that was backwards so thanks for that clarification.

Expand full comment

Awesome analogy!

Expand full comment

The more local liberals that plunge to their deaths from nearby bridges and tall buildings, the fewer trials that will be required to purge them from the DoJ.

Expand full comment

Aw, let 'em plunge. If they don't do it now, they might when Trump wins in November. LOL.

Expand full comment

That sounds more like it.

Expand full comment

I took it literally too lol. Glad I checked the comments section.

Expand full comment

And He opened His mouth and began to teach them, saying,

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

Blessed are the lowly, for they shall inherit the earth.

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.

Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

— Matthew 5:2-12 LSB

Expand full comment

The Beatitudes. We don’t read or use them often enough. ❤️

Expand full comment

Maybe we can get those in schools

Expand full comment
deletedJul 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

excellent point. like Cafeteria Catholics, they take what they like of the Bible and dump the rest. like the ones in the 400s who dumped the Gospels of Thomas and Mary Magdalene to twist the church away from Gnosticism and towards male domination/misogyny. "but the BIBLE SAYS"... etc.

Expand full comment

🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣

Expand full comment

This passage is a lovely and moving way of expressing the truth that things in the Kingdom are done exactly opposite of the world.

Expand full comment

The Lord does indeed teach us patience. And those who trust in His power receive His reward. Yesterday's announcements from SOTUS being a clear example.

Expand full comment

Now to Him who is able to do far more abundantly beyond all that we ask or understand, according to the power that works within us, to Him be the glory in the church and in Christ Jesus to all generations forever and ever. Amen.

— Ephesians 3:20-21 LSB

Expand full comment

One of my top three favorite Bible verses. 😍

Expand full comment

Amen!

Expand full comment

Thank you for the deep breath and exhalation there, Janice…rather like striking a tuning fork to get us back into the right “vibration”…🙏🏼😇🙏🏼

Expand full comment

Lovely reminder! Thank you, Janice!

Expand full comment

♥️✝️ Blessed truths from Jesus that will endure throughout eternity, and give us comfort in the here and now.

Expand full comment

💜

Expand full comment

Ah yes....best to recite these Beatitudes as they will have special significance in the coming months!! Thank you, dear Janice!

Expand full comment

Thank you! The Beatitudes are printed on the inside of my kitchen door. I have them there as a reminder before I walk out the door!

Expand full comment

❤️🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻

Expand full comment

The rich, until recently, were right behind this, especially:

Blessed are the lowly, for they shall inherit the earth.

Expand full comment

the rich have never been behind that. unless it was as a fantasy to keep the working class in line.

Expand full comment
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

Definitely appreciate the summaries today on the various rulings. Still not crazy about the free speech and private orgs being influenced by the government ruling, but the rest are pretty good. I figured the "partial immunity where it makes sense in a sane world" ruling would be the way it came down. You couldn't rule "absolute immunity" nor could you rule "it's all fair game". You have to have the balance there and that _is_ a good thing.

The concern now is all of the nuts out there trying to claim the current admin could order drone strikes to take out Trump (or other political opponents) and do so with completely immunity. Those people are really concerning because they walk among us and genuinely think that's a good idea. These are all some great rulings, but just like we're seeing in France, we're ramping up for another "Summer of Love" type of insanity. :(

Now to see if courts start (or continue) ruling for people affected by the OSHA mandates and such. I saw the TN award for nearly $700k for one person, which I expect will be challenged and reduced, but that's the first case. We can only hope that this trend will start going far and wide. Companies should have taken a long look at what forcing their employees to take untested medical interventions would do to their bottom line.

Expand full comment
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

I know my company thought that far ahead. I was able to fairly easily obtain an exemption for myself and multiple co-workers. They really only required that you ask for one. And, while not a hospital or medical office, it is a pharmacy with direct patient care giving covid shots (which I also did not do). But there were pharmacists who DID give the shots who were exempted as well so…. While I know they only did so to prevent a shortage of pharmacists (which they certainly would have had if they had denied) I was eternally grateful to have been able to keep my job as there was no force on earth able to make me take that shot.

Expand full comment

Broke radius messily Fri. a.m. Saw surgeon yesterday. Wrote, in shaky handwriting, w. signature: no allografts, no xenografts, only autografts, no mRNA products, no blood transfusion from any but husband. Said to P.A. these words: I would rather die than take Covid-jab-tainted blood.

Expand full comment

May you heal well and quickly. God bless!

Expand full comment

We wanted to “bank blood” for our mom during the height of the vax insanity (because we did not want her to have tainted blood either). It was not going to be an easy process by any means! So for anyone concerned about transfusions, I would research well in advance of any planned surgery what you need to do! Thankfully, my mom chose not to have the surgery so it became a moot point.

Expand full comment

Autologous donation was the way to go before an elective procedure even pre-jabs. Seems to be more resistance to that approach now; well, except for the ortho docs.

Expand full comment

Ortho yestday said ~2 WK window on repairing fractures. Currently 500 mi from home base.

Expand full comment

My husband refused the shot and banked his blood before his colon cancer surgery in 2021.

Expand full comment

I second what Jeanne said re: researching this well in advance. We looked into banking my daughter's blood before an elective surgery, and it's a paperwork nightmare that has to be started months in advance.

Expand full comment

If you push hard enough, and have a cooperative doc, it can be done in as little as 3 weeks. Contact your local blood bank directly for assistance! (Just don’t mention unvaxxed blood.) Everyone knows it’s safer to use you own…

Expand full comment

Woman dies from blood clots after receiving blood transfusion.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/netherlands-woman-63-dies-from-blood

Expand full comment

This is alarming!

Expand full comment

Yes, we figured it would happen since the medical community is taking vaxxed blood.

Expand full comment

I would grieve for my beloved husband of 52 years, but I am confident of going to the Lord if (a minor) surgery should go awry.

Expand full comment

Yep; remember the baby who had extensive clotting after a transfusion?; parents were denied a directed transfusion. If anyone remembers the image, you could see the dilation of the superficial vessels on the chest and abdominal wall due to ‘rerouting’ of blood. 😢😡

Expand full comment

Correct.

Expand full comment

Did you save a link?

Expand full comment

In WW2, Australia used coconuts for plasma when there was a shortage of blood for their soldiers; it’s full of electrolytes and sterile. I’m inclined to start stocking them though I heard rumors of the Christian resistance about a hospital for the pure-blooded 🙏 (this is in The Netherlands but Jeff mentioned he joined a medical community that’s not gone mad). ❤️🥥

Expand full comment

Check out ProtocolKills.com website & substack of same name. From attorney Greta Crawford. Tons of info and tips to prepare yourself PRIOR to hospitalization.

Tragically, I believe the remdesivir protocols are still in place.

Also Dr Margaret Aranda has similar info on her substack.

Expand full comment

I'm sorry to hear you've been injured. Via, may your recovery be uneventful.

Expand full comment

Oh no! Prayers for you and your medical team. May you heal perfectly, quickly. 🙏🤗♥️

Expand full comment

I dislocated my shoulder just short of a year ago. I was scared to death, going to the ER and then to the Ortho afterwards. I did not want to do surgery and as it worked out, they agreed! Reasoning was, my shoulder was so bad from previous abuse, surgery wasn’t recommended.

I’m sure they would have done it if I had asked for it though, and that’s a problem.

Expand full comment

So sorry! ❤️🙏🏻❤️

Expand full comment

And did they respect your requirements?

Expand full comment

You are the exception, unfortunately for the rest of the country or the world.

But I’m so happy for you and I’m sure your company is looking really smart now.

Expand full comment

Aloha, Irunthis1! Can you share the name of your company? I’m an attorney representing employees fired for requesting a religious accommodation from the Covid vax. Generally the employer denied the accommodation on the basis of a purported undue hardship, that being the unvaxed were an alleged threat to others. But being able to tell the court that many companies- including those providing healthcare - granted accommodations can help to beat that dubious defense (indeed, even the CDC granted hundreds of accommodations and did not fire any of its employees who requested accommodations). If you’re comfortable doing so (I would not use your name, just the name of the company) feel free to email me at joegomesesq@gmail.com. Thank you in advance!

Expand full comment

My husband was granted a religious exemption from the City of Milwaukee. Very grateful to Jeff to this day for helping lay out the format for us on this blog.

Expand full comment

Consider using Conscientious Objector instead of Religious reasons. It indicates a thoughtful, rational decision to decline the vaccine. It would benefit those who don't have a religious belief.

Expand full comment

I went with religious because of the stronger laws on the books in my state with regards to exemptions. I wanted to do a medical but so many doctors were just playing along and screwing it up for everyone who had legitimate medical concerns--e.g. telling people who clearly had a severe adverse event to get another dose or telling people with anaphylactic reactions they had to get one anyway---completely insane advice. So religious made more sense.

Expand full comment

Curious which religion provides that exemption.

Expand full comment

Well I’m catholic but there is plenty of doctrine out there that one can be a conscientious objector of something the church says is okay. Here is an example from a catholic organization of such a statement:

https://www.ncbcenter.org/ncbc-news/vaccineletter

Expand full comment

That's great news! Someone won a law against a company forcing the shot on them? I didn't see that. This would be a great start towards ending this madness permanently. Companies need to be sued to kingdom come for forcing shots on employees.

Expand full comment
Jul 2Liked by Jeff Childers

Blue Cross Blue Shield of TN had to pay $700,000 to someone they fired for not taking the jab. The damn has been breached!

Expand full comment

I can only hope that her attorneys fees were not 50% of the judgement. Any judgement such as this where a monetary reward is for lost wages should include an award for attorneys fees so as not to further harm the person who won. Not that I wouldn’t want her attorney paid mind you, it just doesn’t seem fair that she should have to be out that money since she wouldn’t have needed an attorney but for the negligence of BCBS.

Expand full comment

Attorneys have bills to pay. Attorneys deserve huge fees in these kinds of cases, in my opinion.

They have to pay in front as a loan to the client for all of the expenses of the case, in order to win it. Filing fees, court, reporter fees, secretarial fees, jury fees, and on and on for thousands and thousands of dollars advanced on behalf of the client.

Expand full comment

I don't think 50% is excessive. . . . Sure the client needs money, but to get a lawyer to even TOUCH this case. . . Very brave and trusting of the lawyer to do that

Expand full comment

Especially since every lawsuit is a crapshoot. I've won cases that I thought were unwinnable, and lost cases I initially thought were unloseable.

Expand full comment

Typically, though it does vary, plaintiff attorneys reap about 30% of a settlement or jury award. See Lamed's excellent comment.

Expand full comment

But also without that attorney taking the case when nobody what’s wheeling it could never had happened.

Thanks to the lawyer for risking everything and got it to the other said.

Expand full comment

In other jurisdiction the losing side also has to pay the winning side's legal fees.

Expand full comment

Wow. That is good news. My husband had said wait until the companies are sued for requiring it.

I am so thankful his company never did and we did not need an exemption.

Expand full comment

It will be good to see college administrators being sued as well.

Expand full comment

Yes! It is really a travesty what many kids went thru feeling like they would never have college without it. I know few who abstained. 😩

Expand full comment

A good few of the kids who didn't have since abstained from life.

Expand full comment

Bingo! And they should. It's the same dynamic

Expand full comment

They will be

Expand full comment

Same!!

Expand full comment

❤️❤️❤️

Expand full comment

Wow!! In one way, xlnt!! In another... will this bankrupt our hospitals, which are already really hurting by being forced to provide free healthcare for Biden's 50 million illegal parasites?

Expand full comment

Not one drop of pity for these greedy hospitals!

They’ll charge you $500 for a Kleenex without blinking an eye. Make them pay.!💰

Expand full comment

And hospital administrators should be tossed out on their a#$es . . . and that is the nicest thing I can hope for them.

Expand full comment

Had brain surgery two years ago. My insurance sent me an Explanation of Benefits statement. The hospital charged over $50K, Insurance approved $20K, I was asked to pay $200! talk about greed! I wonder how much the actual surgeon got paid

Expand full comment

OK, close them down... but AFTER my upcoming minor surgery!! 😬

Seriously... we need them... and maybe TRUMP's HHS guy and a GOP House and Senate can regulate the hell out of them... once he deports ALL the illegals... the pressure will lessen...

Expand full comment

I’m with you

Expand full comment

So what? They will have to reorganize under a bankruptcy court, or get sold for pennies on the dollar to another, hopefully saner and more ethical management.

Expand full comment

More likely an investment entity purchases them creating another mega corporation & they don't give 2 whoots about anyone that requires their services. A very sad state of affairs.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, won’t happen in Michigan. Our governor’s daddy is a bigwig in Michigan BCBS.

Expand full comment

Juries are funny. You would be surprised. If I am BCBSM, I would be worried.

Expand full comment

Especially as more and more people have family members and friends potentially affected by all this. And the tide is turning so those people who go with the crowd will also go along with the anti jab crowd once this builds up more steam I think.

Expand full comment

I always thought that that official line about how many took the shot was b.s. Based upon personal anecdotal evidence I'd wager that the number is much less. Regardless, I know too many people who were stridently pro-shot but now feel the need to confess to me that I may have been right all along. These people will comprise the jury pool pretty much everywhere.

Expand full comment

what is BCBSM?

Expand full comment

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan that also is being sued by several hundred employees who were fired for refusing to take the shot.

Expand full comment

Lot of pressure to run Big Gretch to replace O'Biden.

Expand full comment

The "BitchWitch"?? She is hideous, inside and out.

Expand full comment

Wow!! I didn’t know that. I wonder if they both took the shot… or just pretended to??

Expand full comment

Biden's meteoric downward spiral since taking them, implies he actually did. Plus, just after he caught so-called covid multiple times.

Expand full comment

That’s fantastic!!!!

Expand full comment

Yes Second Smartest Guy SubStack did a story on it all.

Was wonderful to read others may pursue as well

Expand full comment

I sure did not know about that !

Expand full comment

The one comment to that article is rage inducing. The science does NOT show it prevented Covid or deaths. That commenter and his comment is a direct result of only getting your facts from a corrupt media and believing everything they tell you to believe, for that is the only way you could come to his opinion.

Expand full comment

Gates/Soros etc. have hired thousands of social media 'warriors'. Plus all the bots.

Expand full comment

Read the foolish comment on that article! I wanted to comment, but I’m not a subscriber to that paper: “Read the work of Denis Rancourt and others. There were no excess deaths in 2020. Excess deaths leapt after the vaccines started being administered.”

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link!

Expand full comment

Thank you !!!

Expand full comment

AND colleges!!

Expand full comment

Great add! May those nests of Marxist indoctrination be bankrupted and SOON!

Slimy Teachers Unions too?

Expand full comment

You and a while lot of others didn't see that. When folks would complain to me "well, you can't sue big pharma or the government, I'd have to point out that you CAN sue a company," and watch the little light bulbs go on.

Expand full comment